/
The  S omerset,  W iltshire, The  S omerset,  W iltshire,

The S omerset, W iltshire, - PowerPoint Presentation

ButterflyPrincess
ButterflyPrincess . @ButterflyPrincess
Follow
349 views
Uploaded On 2022-07-28

The S omerset, W iltshire, - PPT Presentation

A von and G loucestershire Y oung O nset C olorectal C ancer SWAGYOCC Study David Messenger Consultant Colorectal Surgeon University Hospitals Bristol A retrospective multicentre observational cohort study of the diagnostic pathways management and outcomes of adults aged u ID: 930769

colorectal data cases cancer data colorectal cancer cases young incidence years group 100 yrs 2041 onset phase 700 trends

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The S omerset, W iltshire," is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

The Somerset, Wiltshire, Avon and Gloucestershire Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer (SWAG-YOCC) Study

David MessengerConsultant Colorectal SurgeonUniversity Hospitals Bristol

Slide2

‘A retrospective multicentre observational cohort study of the diagnostic pathways, management and outcomes of adults aged under 50 years with colorectal cancer in the Somerset, Wiltshire, Avon and Gloucestershire Clinical Alliance’

Slide3

Aim‘To determine the feasibility of capturing data on all adults <50 years diagnosed

with colorectal cancer in the SWAG Clinical Alliance from September 2009 to September 2019

in order to describe their epidemiology, diagnostic pathways, management and outcomes’

Slide4

BackgroundWorldwide, US, UK (English) and European incidence trendsDemographic trends in young onset colorectal cancer in EnglandProjected impact on the South WestWhat is known about young onset colorectal cancer

Slide5

Worldwide IncidenceFerlay et al., GLOBOCAN 2012

, IARC20121.4 million

20302.2 million

Slide6

US Incidence Trends

Siegel et al., JNCI 2017

Zauber, Dig Dis Sci 2017

Slide7

English Incidence Trends

Colon

Rectum

Chambers et al.,

Br J

Surg

2020

Slide8

European Incidence Trends: Young adultsDriven by rise in proximal > distal tumours

Vuik et al., Gut 2019

Slide9

Demographic trends in England: Site

Chambers et al.

Br J

Surg

2020

Slide10

Demographic trends in England: Region

Proximal

Distal

Chambers et al.

Br J

Surg

2020

Slide11

2016 Incidence estimates: South West

Age group (yrs)

2016 population

2015 Incidence rate

(per 100,000)

Estimated number of cases in 2016

%

20-29

410,100

1.5

6.2

4.0%

30-39

367,700

6

22.1

40-49

407,700

16

65.2

50-59

437,900

55

241

96.0%

60-64

192,700

120

231

65-69

213,100

139

296

70-74

172,500

214

369

75-79

124,400

295

367

80-89

154,900

394

610

90+

37,300

350

131

Total

2,518,300

92.9

2338.5

Slide12

2041 Incidence estimates: South West

Age group (

yrs)

2041 population

2041 Projected Incidence rate (per 100,000): current APC

Estimated number of cases in 2041: current APC

%

2041 Projected Incidence rate (per 100,000): SW-specific APC

Estimated number of cases in 2041: SW-specific APC

%

20-29

443,700

5.0

22.2

7.2%

16.3

72.3

30.0%

30-39

408,000

19.8

80.8

65.0

265

40-49

413,200

21.6

89.3

173

716

50-59

433,100

72.3

313

92.8%

72.3

313

70.0%

60-64

207,100

105

217

105

217

65-69

211,700

31.2

66.1

31.2

66.1

70-74

230,700

57.5

133

57.5

133

75-79

216,400

198

429

198

429

80-89

277,800

358

995

358

995

90+

92,500

333

308

333

308

Total

2,934,200

90.4

2653.4

120

3514.4

Slide13

Young onset rectal cancer: Norway

<40 years

≥40 years

P-value

At presentation

Poorly differentiated

27%

14%

0.014

N2 disease at presentation

37%

16%

0.001

Metastatic disease at presentation

38%

22%

0.019

Treated with curative

intent

Develop metastatic

disease

56%

23%

0.003

5-year

Overall Survival

54%

80%

0.029

Endreseth

et al. (Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group),

Dis Col Rectum

2006

Slide14

Young onset colorectal cancer (sporadic): US

Tumour location

n

%

Proximal

25

17%

Left

34

23%

Rectum

91

61%

Group

3-year OS

5-year OS

10-year OS

Overall

76.2%

66.8%

58.6%

Genetic/IBD

94.6%

91.4%

87.9%

Sporadic

70.6%

61.5%

53.3%

Molecular feature

<50

yrs

50-59

yrs

60-69

yrs

70-79

yrs

80+

yrs

CIMP-H

0%

5%

18%

28%

42%

BRAF mutation

0%

2%

8%

15%

20%

MSI-high

0%

14%

23%

28%28%

Chouhan et al., Dis Colon Rectum 2019

Kozak et al., Colorectal Dis 2017

Liang et al.,

Int J Colorectal Dis

2015

Slide15

RationaleYoung onset colorectal cancer is increasingDriven by increase in distal tumours in EnglandSouth West experiencing >10% per annum increase in distal tumour incidenceBy 2041, young adults may account for up to 30% of all casesLack of detailed understanding of characteristics of the young onset colorectal cancer populationLikely more advanced at presentationNo UK data

Slide16

Study DesignTwo-phase retrospective observational cohort studyPhase 1: University Hospitals Bristol, North Bristol, Royal United Hospital

Phase 2: Taunton & Somerset, Yeovil District Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals, Weston General Hospital, SalisburyCompletion of Phase 1 will demonstrate deliverability

of Phase 2All adults aged <50 years with new

diagnosis

of colorectal cancer are

eligible

Slide17

Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaInclusion criteriaAged from 18 to 49 years at the time of diagnosis between September

2009 and September 2019Biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the colorectum Exclusion

criteriaAged under 18 years or over 49 years at the time of

diagnosis

Non-

adenocarcinomas

of the

colorectum

Appendiceal

neoplasms

Neoplasms

of the anal canal or

perianal

region

Previous

diagnosis

of a colorectal

adenocarcinoma

before

September

2009

Slide18

Outcome measuresPrimary outcome measureComplete data collection on ≥90% of cases presenting via the multidisciplinary team (MDT) at each

hospital trust Key secondary outcome measuresProportion of cases presenting as an emergency

Proportion of cases with stage IV disease at presentationProportion of cases undergoing

resection

with

curative

intent

Response

to

neoadjuvant

therapy

Local

recurrence

,

Disease

free

survival

,

Overall

survival

Proportion of cases

with

stoma

at 18

months

following

surgery

Proportion of cases in

each

data

field

submitted

to the NBOCA

where

data entry

is

correct

(

highlighted

as important

outcome

by ACPGBI PPI group)

Slide19

Sample Size EstimatesNo formal power calculation is required as primary endpoint is to demonstrate completeness of data collectionAverage of ≈120 eligible cases over last 10 years per TrustAssuming ≥90% complete data collectionPhase 1 (UHB,NBT,RUH): 0.9 x 120 x 3 = 324Phase 2 (YDH,TST,WHAT,GH,SAL): 0.9 x 120 x 5 = 540

Total = 864

Slide20

Data CollectionSurgical trainees will collect data and be supported by nominated consultant PI at each Trust (Research collaborative model)Identification of cases from Somerset Cancer Registry and data submissions to NBOCADirect date entry onto electronic case report form on REDCap databasePseudoanonymised data with unique study ID

Logic checksStudy period chosen to coincide with widespread use of electronic medical records3-month data collection period anticipated for each phase

Slide21

Dissemination of ResultsInvestigators can present Trust level data at departmental meetingsData from phase 1 and 2 to be presented to key stakeholdersSWAG Clinical AlliancePatient Support GroupsPrimary Care GroupsPresentation at national/international conferencesSubmission to peer reviewed journalsAll publications will be attributed to the ‘SWAG-YOCC’ group

Slide22

Future DirectionsProvide platform for prospective multicentre observational studyDemonstration of feasibilityAllow collection of additional data fields: quality of life, tissue samplesInform design of studies addressing key questionsEffectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy in young adultsTiming of surgery within treatment pathwayExpansion of FIT usage as screening tool in young adults

Allow linkage to future biomolecular and epidemiological studies

Slide23

Steering Group MembershipUniversity Hospitals BristolDavid Messenger, Adam ChambersNorth Bristol TrustAnn LyonsRoyal United HospitalsIsi Tonga, Ed CourtneyUniversity of BristolProfessor Richard Martin, Professor Caroline Relton (Epidemiology)

ACPGBIProfessor Bob Arnott (Patient Liaison Group & NBOCA Patient Panel Chair)

Nominated lead Consultant & Surgical Trainee contact at each Trust

Slide24

Current StatusSponsorship obtained from University Hospitals BristolProtocol currently undergoing peer reviewEthical approval to be sought through Proportionate Review Service REDCap database built and undergoing testing

Related Contents


Next Show more