Presenters Rebecca Jones Munger amp Terese Voge A common perception is that a pregnant woman would quit using if she really wanted the best for her baby Agree Disagree Todays Discussion ID: 933779
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Preventing Substance-Exposed Pregnancies..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Preventing Substance-Exposed Pregnancies:
Presenters:
Rebecca Jones Munger &
Terese Voge
Slide2Slide3A common perception is that a pregnant woman would quit using if she really wanted the best for her baby.
Agree
Disagree
Slide4Today’s Discussion
Prevalence and impact of alcohol, tobacco & other drug use by women of reproductive age
Using a Collective Impact approach to move upstream and prevent substance-exposed pregnancies
Unique considerations when addressing substance use among women of childbearing age
Slide5Where do you work?
Health Department
Treatment programs
Clinic/Health center
Education
Child welfare
Criminal justiceOther community-based organization (CBO)
Slide6What is your role?
AOD prevention
Treatment
Case management
Educator
Policy
Other
Slide7Rank your primary interest in attending this session:
Policy/system change
Organizational practices
Program implementation
Patient/client support
Other
Slide8Slide92011: Moving Upstream to Address Preconception
56% of all pregnancies in California are unintended.
Most women realize they are pregnant 4-6 weeks after conception.
Screen all women of reproductive age for risky behaviors
Source: Guttmacher Policy Review 2011; http://www.guttmacher.org/sections/pregnancy.php
Prevention of Substance-Exposed Pregnancies Practice Collaborative
Technical assistance October 2011- April 2013 to support local systems change
Funded by CDC – National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
Increase awareness of risks among health care providersIncrease capacity to deliver screening & brief intervention services to women of reproductive age
Six teams: Baltimore, Dayton, Tampa, Denver, Portland, Sonoma
Slide11Source: CDC
Vital Signs January
2013
Alcohol Risk for Women and Girls
Slide12Estimated Alcohol & Drug Use During Pregnancy
Substance Used
(Past Month)
1st Trimester
2nd Trimester
3rd Trimester
Any Illicit Drug
7.2
%
5.0%
2.8%
Alcohol Use
20.7%
7.8%
3.5
%
Binge Alcohol Use
10.3%
1.9%
1.3%
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use & Health, 2007-08
Slide13Past Month Illicit Drug Use
U.S. by Age, 2009 & 2010
Source: SAMHSA, (2011)
Results from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings
, NSDUH Series H-41, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 11-4658.
Slide14Illicit Drug Use by Age Group
Slide15Is
this SAMHSA
prevalence data similar to what you see in your community?
Yes
No
Slide16Estimated Alcohol & Drug Use During Pregnancy
Estimated pregnancies impacted based on Sonoma birth data for 2012
(N= 5,132) and SAMHSA National Survey data 2007-08
Substance Used
(Past Month)
1st Trimester
2nd Trimester
3rd Trimester
Any Illicit Drug
7.2
%
370
women
5.0%
257
w
omen
2.8%
144
w
omen
Alcohol Use
20.7%
1,062
women
7.8%
400 women
3.5
%
180 women
Binge Alcohol Use
10.3%
529
women
1.9%
98
women
1.3%
67
women
Source: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use & Health, 2007-08
Slide17Source: CDPH, MIHA Survey, 2010 & 2011
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/surveys/MIHA/Pages/MaternalandInfantHealthAssessment(MIHA)survey.aspx
Any Binge Drinking, 3 Months Before
Pregnancy 2011 Sonoma 15.6% vs. California 13.1% Sonoma Combined 2010 & 2011 = Sonoma: 17.6%
Private Insurance 19.4% vs. Medi-Cal 15.7%
White, non-Hispanic 23% vs. Hispanic 11.1%Any Alcohol Use During 1st or 3rd Trimester2011: Sonoma 26.7% (CI 20.7- 32.8) California 19.6% (CI 17.9 -21.2)
Slide18California
15.0% vs.
Sonoma
19.1
%
Slide19Source: California Healthy Kids Survey 2011-12;
https://chks.wested.org
California Healthy Kids Survey: Sonoma
Slide20Percentage of Students who Used Marijuana in Past 30 days
Slide21Marijuana is Not Safer than Tobacco for Pregnant Women
50-70% more cancer causing agents than tobacco
Smoking marijuana increases carbon monoxide and decreases oxygen in the mother’s blood
5x greater effect than cigarettes
Linked with poor fetal growth & premature birthThird trimester use can lead to withdrawal-like symptoms in newborns (increased crying & tremors)
Source: Gray et al, 2010; Dekker et al, 2012,
Slide22Source:
Hayatbakhsh
et al, (2012) Pediatric Research.
“Birth Outcomes Associated with Cannabis Use Before and During Pregnancy”
Australian study enrolled 28,874 women over 7 years:“Use of cannabis during pregnancy strongly and significantly predicted negative birth outcomes, including low birth weight, preterm birth, SGA, and admission to the NICU. After controlling for mothers’ sociodemographic characteristics, smoking, alcohol consumption, and use of other illicit drugs, these increased levels of poor outcomes remained statistically significant.”
Slide23Percentage of Women Who Smoked Tobacco during 1
st
or 3
rd
Trimester
Source: CDPH, MIHA Survey, 2011
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/surveys/MIHA/Pages/MaternalandInfantHealthAssessment(MIHA)survey.aspx
Slide24Source: http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/pdf/2013-07-vitalsigns.pdf
Slide25Overall Female Treatment Admissions for Other Opiates* as Primary Substance of Abuse, Nationally
Retrieved 09/05/13
from
http
://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/webt/newmapv1.htm
*Other opiates includes non-prescription use of methadone, codeine, morphine, oxycodone, hydromorphone, meperidine, opium, and other drugs with morphine-like effects.
Slide26Female Treatment Admissions for Other Opiates*
as Primary Substance of Abuse
States with Highest Percentage, 2012
Retrieved 09/05/13
from http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/webt/newmapv1.htm
*
Other opiates includes non-prescription use of methadone, codeine, morphine, oxycodone, hydromorphone, meperidine, opium, and other drugs with morphine-like effects.
Slide27Incidence of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (Nationally)
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome and Associated Health Care Expenditures. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 2012; 307(18):1934-1940.
doi
: 10.1001/jama.2012.3951.
Slide28Neonatal
A
bstinence Syndrome (NAS)
Source: CA Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, Patient Discharge Data, 2000-2011
NAS Rate (diagnoses/1000 newborn discharges) 2004-2006 2008-2010 California 1.1 1.2
Sonoma 1.4 2.4
Slide29Neonatal withdrawal symptoms:
tremors
irritabilityhigh-pitched crying
tight muscle toneseizuresyawning, stuffy nose, sneezingpoor feeding suck
diarrhea/ dehydration40%-60% of infants born to women using opioids develop NASSymptoms can appear 1-10 days after birthNAS requires prolonged hospitalization
29Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS)
Slide30Different Populations of Women Can Give Birth
to an Infant with NAS Symptoms
Women with chronic pain or other medical condition maintained on medicines
Women
actively abusing or dependent on opioids (e.g. untreated substance use disorder)Includes heroin usersMisuse own prescribed narcotics for acute or chronic pain
Misuse of non-prescribed opioids diverted from legitimate sources from friend of family member
Misuse of opioids obtained through illicit means (purchased, theft)Women in recovery from opioid addiction maintained on methadone through OPT or buprenorphine through office based prescribing*Groups may overlap, adapted from Dr. Cece Spitznas, White House Office of National Drug Control Policy
Slide31Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Costs
Hospital charges for newborns diagnosed with NAS was $53,400 per infant in 2009
Hospital charges for all other births was $9,500 per infant in 2009
The average length of stay for NAS babies is 16 days, compared to 3 days for all other hospital births Medicaid has paid for the majority of cases (77.6% in 2009)
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome and Associated Health Care Expenditures. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 2012; 307(18):1934-1940. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3951.
Slide32The number of infants affected by NAS & FASD accurately reflects the impact of perinatal substance use.
True
False
Slide33Estimated Number of Infants Affected by Prenatal Exposure,
by Type of Substance and Infant Disorder
*Includes nine categories of illicit drug use: use of marijuana, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, and inhalants, as well as the nonmedical use of prescription-type pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives.
Estimates based on: National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010; Hamilton, Martin, & Ventura. Births: Preliminary Data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Report, Volume 60, Number 2; Patrick, Schumacher, Benneyworth, et al. NAS and Associated Health Care Expenditures. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 2012; 307(18):1934-1940. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3951.
Slide34Cost Benefits for Medical System
Pregnancy Complication
+ Substance
Use
Screen positive only
n = 156
Treatment GroupScreen positive, assessed & treated
n= 2073
Controls
Screen negative
Preterm
delivery <37 weeks
17.4%
8.1%
6.8%
Placental abruption
6.5%
0.9%
0.9%
Low Birth
Weight
<2500 grams
12.4%
6.5%
4.7%
Neonatal-assisted Ventilation
6.9%
3.2%
2.2%
Intrauterine fetal demise
7.1%
0.5%
0.6%
Kaiser’s
Early Start
Program at Ten Bay Area Facilities
N = 49,985 pregnant members
Source:
Goler
, Armstrong,
Taillac
&
Osejo
,
Journal of
Perinatology, 2008
Slide35Relationship between Substance Abuse, Mental Health Problems and Trauma
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study
Slide36Prevalence Major
Depression in U.S. Women
Pregnancy: 9
-13 % U.S. Postpartum: 7
% first 3 months; 22 % first 12 months Women experiencing depressive disorders are at increased risk of substance use
Detection of prenatal depression without formal screening 6
% compared to 34% with Edinburgh screening tool Sources: Gaynes et al. 2005
Depressive Disorders in Pregnancy
Slide37Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)
Lifetime prevalence of having been raped and/or physically assaulted by a current or former partner
1 in 4 U.S. women
(Futures Without Violence)Abused women are at increased risk for substance abuseSpousal abuse scores are the strongest predictor of alcoholism in womenIPV during the first year of marriage is highly predictive of heavy, episodic drinking one year later
Source:
Kaysen et al, 2007; Miller et al, 1989; Plichta, 1992
Slide38Are coordinated services addressing perinatal substance abuse, co-occurring disorders and intimate partner violence available in your community?
Well coordinated
Somewhat coordinated
Little to no coordinated
Slide39Goal: Improve
the health of women and children by reducing risky substance use, intimate partner violence and untreated mental health disorders
among women of reproductive age.
39
Slide40CityMatCH PSEP Timeline
http://www.citymatch.org
Collective Impact
http://www.ssireview.org/images/articles/2011_WI_Feature_Kania.pdf
On a scale from 1 to 5, to what degree does your community work together to address substance exposed pregnancies?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Slide43Who serves as the backbone organization in your community?
Local public health
Alcohol and other drug programs
CBO
Hospital/health plan
Other
None
Slide44Strategy 1: Screening
& Brief Intervention
Strategy 2: Prevention
of Unintended Pregnancy
Strategy 3: Prescription Drug Abuse/Misuse
Sonoma County Team
Workgroups
6 Teams
Baltimore
Dayton
Denver
Portland
Tampa
Technical Assistance
Organizing Our Collaborative Work
Slide45Strategy 1: Reduce Risky Alcohol Use
Screen
all women of reproductive age for risky alcohol use, tobacco, marijuana, and drugs in primary care settings.
45
Brief intervention
Give feedback with clear, unambiguous recommendation Refer women to the most appropriate resource Help women align their birth control method with behavior Integrate with screening for intimate partner violence and depressive disorders
Slide46Source: NIAAA
46
Identify & Address Risky Alcohol Use
Slide47What is “risky drinking” for women?
1 drink a day
2 drinks a day
3 drinks a day
4 drinks a day
5 drinks a day
6 drinks a day
Slide4848
http://rethinkingdrinking.niaaa.nih.gov/isyourdrinkingpatternrisky/whatsatriskorheavydrinking.asp
49
Slide50600 Women Screened
70% for 1 or more areas
20% risky ETOH - one third were < 21 yrs
14% depressive disorder9.5%
intimate partner violence23% marijuana &/or tobacco42% of non-pregnant women reported using either tobacco or marijuana Less than a quarter of providers assessed birth control50
Plan-Do-Study-Act Pilot Results
Slide51Screening, Brief Intervention & Referral to Treatment
51
4% of women dependent
Referral to Treatment
Intended Outcomes:
Decreased or cessation of alcohol & other substance useLink women experiencing IPV &/or mood disorders with servicesPrevention of unintended pregnancy those with risky useWomen enter pregnancy healthier Improved maternal & infant outcomes
Screening
&
Assessment
Brief Intervention for Other + Findings
Verbal recommendations
Reinforce in writing
Facilitated Referrals
Warm hand-off to behavioral health staff
Contraception assessment
Slide52Brief Intervention for Risky Alcohol Use
Brief intervention can help some (
not all
) to reduce hazardous & harmful drinking
Based on Stages of ChangeAmbivalence is normalGive women feedback on their useCompare to CDC guidelinesProvide clear adviceStructured conversationLow intensity & short durationMotivational!52
Slide53ACA and Substance Use Disorder Prevention
Prevention Priorities in Health Care Reform: Requires insurers to cover certain services that were rated highly by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
53
Slide54ACA Included Preventive Services
54
No co-pay for:
Yearly physical
Well women checksRoutine prenatal care visitsEarly detection screenings,Immunizations,Breast-feeding counseling and supportContraceptive methods
Screenings for domestic violence ….Etc.
Slide55ACA & SBIRT
Under the Affordable Care Act,
Medi
-Cal managed care programs mandated to provide SBIRT in primary care clinics.SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral and Treatment): evidence-based public health approach to provide prevention and early intervention
Slide56Strategy 2: Prevent Unintended Pregnancies
Focus Group Findings
Women commonly try multiple methods of birth control
Consistent use of birth control can be difficult to maintain because it requires significant amounts of time, money and partner cooperation
Partners often refuse to use condoms &/or sabotage BCWomen want more ready access to services & information about side effects from their providers.Women need support to make the connection between planned pregnancies and emotional wellbeing
Slide57Tier 1 Contraceptives: Access & Acceptance
57
Develop & pilot My Life Plan curriculum into perinatal treatment Increase awareness of LARCs by home visitors and perinatal staff Provider training on IUDs & implants
Slide58Strategy 3: Promote Responsible Opioid Use
58
Partnered with Managed Medi-Cal program to host p
rofessional conferences on best practices for prescribing
Published article in local medical journal on the local trend
Slide59Community Education
Support safe medication storage & disposal
Educate parents on risks of poisoning & diversion
Classroom education in middle & high schools
Slide60Opportunities & Next Steps
Expansion of SBIRT in primary care settings
Embed screening tools into EMR systems
Increase provider confidence in using motivational interviewing techniques
Help women match their birth control method with their pregnancy intention (LARCs)Expand access to mental health services for womenUnderstand the health impacts of marijuana use and strengthen prevention efforts
Slide6161
Resources
Links
http://fasdeducation.org
http://www.choiceproject.wustl.eduhttp://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/fasd/freematerials.html http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/unintendedpregnancy/usmec.htm http://www.citymatch.org/projects/prevention-substance-exposed-pregnancies-collaborative-psep http://www.sonoma-county.org/health/topics/reproductiveproviders_citymatch.asp
http://www.uvm.edu/medicine/vchip/documents/ICONFULLTREATMENTGUIDELINESFINAL.pdf
Slide6262
Slide63Contact
Rebecca Jones Munger, RN, CNM, MPH
Rebecca.Munger@sonoma-county.org
707-565-4553Terese Voge, MPATerese.Voge@sonoma-county.org
707-565-6682