Non Religious Arguments Read the sheet carefully and answer the following Qs Explain why Singer says it is worse to kill a self conscious being than a merely conscious being Why should voluntary euthanasia not cause people to be fearful How can voluntary euthanasia ease peoples ID: 932676
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Personhood & the Euthanasia debate" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Personhood & the Euthanasia debate
Non Religious Arguments
Slide2Read the sheet carefully and answer the following Qs:
Explain why Singer says it is worse to kill a “self conscious being” than a “merely conscious being”.
Why should voluntary euthanasia not cause people to be fearful? How can voluntary euthanasia ease peoples’ fear?
According to preference utilitarianism, why is it wrong to murder? What would preference utilitarianism say about voluntary euthanasia?
What point is Singer making about “rights”?
Slide3Peter Singer’s argument
Voluntary Euthanasia = a person’s desire to die
People have no reason to fear something they do not have to consent to.
VE can have a positive impact on the community as they are re-assured that they don’t have to endure a long & painful death
To not kill someone who wants to die is to thwart their desire for death
A right to life implies a right to die
VE is necessary in order to respect my status as a rational & autonomous person
Slide4Qualities of personhood:
Ability to reason
Rational
Self conscious – includes having a preference about continued existence.
Communicate
Qualities of personhood make human life
instrumentally valuable.
It is having these qualities that makes life worth living (a good quality of life)
Slide5The Argument from Personhood
The wishes of a person opting for Voluntary Euthanasia should be respected because:
They are rational so they’ve thought it through carefully
They have the ability to communicate their wishes
They are aware of their situation
They have a preference about their continued (non) existence.
To deny a person the right to Voluntary Euthanasia is effectively to deny them their status as a person altogether.
Slide6However… PARADOX
Persons
who opt for Voluntary Euthanasia have a good quality of life (they still possess all the qualities of personhood) and so Voluntary Euthanasia
should not be need to be an option
for them.
Individuals whose quality of life is so poor that voluntary euthanasia would be an option are no longer considered to be persons and so their views don’t need to be trusted or respected.
Slide7Written task:
Imagine a conversation between a strict Catholic
Christian, a fundamentalist Christian,
a more liberal Christian like Joseph
Fletcher,
and Peter
Singer
debating whether voluntary active euthanasia should be legalised in the UK
How do you think their conversation might go?