In a rapidly changing world 1 2016 Spring Conference 2 Joe Thompson 8433840828 JoeIBG1987com Bobby Jarrell 7704870277 2591 US Hwy 17 S Suite 302 Richmond Hill GA 31324 BobbyIBG1987com ID: 933746
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Growing & Protecting Value" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Growing & Protecting ValueIn a rapidly changing world
1
2016 Spring Conference
Slide22
Joe Thompson
843-384-0828
Joe@IBG1987.com
Bobby Jarrell
770-487-0277
2591 US Hwy 17 S, Suite 302, Richmond Hill, GA 31324
Bobby@IBG1987.com
Tera Fisher
770-487-0277
2591 US Hwy 17 S, Suite 302, Richmond Hill, GA 31324Tera@IBG1987.com
Independent Beverage Group
Slide33Past
Change
Slide4Present
4
Change happens
Slide5FUTURE
5
Change happens – Like it or Not!
Slide66Todays Discussion:
History
Consolidation
Industry Numbers
Distributor NumbersSummary
Conclusion
Slide7Beer Marketers InsightsBrewers
Association - Bart Watson
Bump Williams Consulting
Greg Owsley - The Storied Brand
Marc E. Sorini
- MWE LLP
Michael Homeyer - Wells FargoMike
MazzoniNBWA - Lester
JonesNeilsenPints LLC - Kimberly ClementsSeveral BreweriesSeveral DistributorsUS Bureau of Labor StatisticsWe’d Like to Thank the Following:7
Slide88Introduction:
IBG is passionate about the 3 tier
system:The best method of getting
a beverage product to the total
marketBest system to grow brand
equity
Today’s environment offers a great opportunity for the 3 tier system to prosper
Slide9History 9
Slide10Beer Industry in the 1970’sSingle Brewer distributors meant
they needed Franchise protection.
Television Advertising began to impact sales of beer in 1976
Price increase started being originated by the brewers at a 2/3 to 1/3 split. Previously 50/50 originated by distributors.
Distributor margins were 23%. Distributors had
basic push/pull responsibility
Distributors in fear of Brewery
Termination Stop every week at every account, service on premise and community involvement were key
Very loyal
consumersA few National and several Regional Brewers (50-100 Brewers)10
Slide11Beer industry in the 1980’sA
/B beginning to dominate, several brewers
fail, Coors Expands (non-exclusive)Many Distributors had cash flow issues. Several distributors went
bankrupt
In 1988 IBG managed our first consolidation project with
Origlio
BevTelevision influencing beer drinkers at
Brewers expenseRetail chains coming into their own
Suppliers assume National Account responsibility at their expenseDistributor Value begins to increaseLoyal Consumers creating Equity Value11
Slide12Beer Industry in the 1990’sLoyal
consumers but beginning of “acceptable set of brands
”AB Still dominates, but Bud began declining1992 Federal tax
increase hurts volumeService model beginning to change – replaced driver-sell and installed presell, tell sell
AB and Miller push exclusivity but consolidation grows
1 + 1 = 3 starting to be
understood by non-AB distributors
Boston Beer emerging, and AB notices
“Pleasure /Pain Concept introduced”Distributor Value Increases but slowly
AB and “all other” distributor attitude completely different12
Slide13Pleasure and Pain;
With Beer Distributors, it takes both.
Emotions are as important as Economics.
Pleasure
Frustration/Pleasure
Pain
13
IBG Change Meter
No Profit, No Pressure, No Problem!
10-14%
4-7%(-1) – 1%
Slide14Millenial generation less brand loyal
Price
war erupted in 2005, driving A/B Distributors to $0.55 profit per case equivalent
“Triangle of Terror” – consolidation process was terrible for
buyers and brewers
IBG (at Insights Conference): “distributors must reduce costs to
15% of sales from current 22% in order to compete with
Costco/WalMart at 12
– 15%. AB Management agreedNorm Adami
told large audience not to “do business with IBG” because Miller didn’t want Coors in its distributorsIn 2006, Interest rates dropped and stayed down2008 ABI and MC emergeBeer industry in the 2000’s14
Slide15Maris litigation removes fear of termination from DistributorsA
fter 2006 the craft category, brands and SKU’s exploded
Distributors margins improving. Developing change in attitude and focus. Taking on new product entries, e.g.- craft, non-alcs,
W/S
Distributors view Brewery role as providing all pull while Distributors provide logistic - Push/Pull debate heated up
Brewer and distributor values increase
dramatically from 2005-2015
Consolidation accelerates for everyone except AB distributorsAB Distribution system loses its execution advantage
2000’s continued……
15
Slide16Consolidation 16
Slide17States IBG Has Completed transactions in 44 of 50 states:
Open States:
Delaware
Vermont
Maine
Indiana
Kansas
North Dakota
17
Slide18Retail Performance improved with ConsolidationIBG’s Retail Audit 1987-2003 “
Retailization”
In-Outlet Marketing of a consumer product1988 average retail performance was 61%. High share
wholesaler = 70%2002 average retail performance was 77%. High share wholesaler = 88%
2003 MBC’s Extensive Outside Survey Same Basic Results: A-B #1, MBC #2, CBC #3
Around 2002-2003, the retail performance gap begins to close
Currently, the Gold, ABI
and MC distribution systems have the resources necessary to compete effectively
18
Slide19Example of Profit Per Case 2003
19
Slide20Competitive Shifts 1996 - 2006
1996
Location
AB
Miller
Coors
Others
AZ57.9
17.113.111.9
GA54.022.66.117.2FL54.721.75.018.6NM52.113.217.716.82006
LocationABMillerCoorsOthersAZ56.537.56.0GA53.042.05.0FL55.941.92.2NM
56.7
43.3
0.0
20
Slide21Competitive Shifts 2006-2016
2006
Location
AB
MillerCoors
Others
AZ
56.5
37.56.0
GA53.042.05.0FL55.941.92.2NM56.743.30.02016
LocationABMillerCoorsOthersAZ50.048.02.0GA50.048.02.0FL53.046.01.0NM
45.0
55.0
0.0
21
Slide22Relative Values in Consolidation
22
Slide23Gross Profit Multiples, All Transactions
23
These represent all types of transactions. EVERY transaction is unique
.
Slide24IBG Buy/Sell Transactions 2003 v current
Suppliers
2003 GP Multiple
2015/16 GP Multiple
A-B
2.41
3.6
Miller
1.64
3.4
CBC
1.88
PBC
0.96
1.9
Crown
4.87
6.3
Heineken
3.29
5.0
NAB
2.13
2.5
Other Beer
1.56
4.8
N/A’s
0.82
1.0
Wines
1.13
1.2
Totals
2.14
3.85
1993 – 1.73
All
figures are after-the-fact calculations and include all types of transactions
24
Slide25EBITDA’s remain highInterest rates stay low
Buyers are willing to share savings with Sellers
Franchise laws don’t change dramaticallyBrewers/Distributors work together to build more long-term equity value for brands
15 year depreciation of Distributor rights remains
Buyers continue strategy of utilizing excess EBITA to buy
Values will Remain at Current Levels as Long as:
25
Slide26Industry Numbers26
Slide27Brewers/Distributors leveraging equity
Overall
volume peaked in 2008ABI/MC lost 24M BBLs
Craft exploded
Lagers making a come back?
Beer
industry pricing above
CPI
Excess
capacity Brands and SKU’s explodingConsumption per caps decliningDemographics shift to fewer young adultsHousehold income decliningLosing consumer brand loyalty
Interest rate historyIndustry Information:27
Slide283-Tier Growth Strategies
Brewer
DistributorRetailer
1. Quality
1. Pick
Up New Brands
1. Improve Margins
2. Local Roots2. Expand Footprint/Territory2. Market Basket $
3. Strong Flagship3. Restructure Compensation
3. Shopper Loyalty4. Flanker Brands4. Identify Profitable Brands4. Differentiation5. Innovation5. Add New Categories5. Innovation6. Strong On Premise6. Focus on High Volume Accts6. Foot Traffic7. Pick Great Partners7. Reduce Service Levels7. Customer Service8. Share of Mind8. Invest in People8. Variety
9. Execution9. Invest in Training9. Local10. Deeper Distribution10. Invest in Specialty Team10. Eliminate OOS’s
Slide29Brewers
and
Distributors
Reduce
costs, Raise
prices, trade consumer up
.
less effective marketing, less brand loyalty
Volume ---
Profits +++
Industry Harvesting Equity Value?
29
Profits
Volume
Slide30Total Industry Volume Trends (in
Bbls
.)30
Slide31AB and MC Lost 24 Mil Bbls in 7
yrs
}
}
11
bbls
lost
13 bbls lost
31
2008 2015 2008 2015
Slide32Evolving Influence?
IBG estimates:
2010 – 950 = 90% of volume.
2020 – 650 = 85% of industry volume.
Self distribution, soft drink, specialty = 1,000 – 2,500
Legislative
influence is changing fast.
32
2020 Forecast:
MEGA: 50%Traditional: 35%Other: 15%
Slide33Three tier principle of “Separation of Tiers” no longer existCarve out
laws
Growler sales
Self DistributionBrew Pubs
Debates in virtually every
state
Impact of Evolving Influence
33
Slide34Beer Price
I
ncrease vs. CPI Increase
Beer consistently above CPI since 2007
34
Slide35U.S Beer, Wine & Spirits Price at Home
BLS Consumer Price Index: 2007-2015
35
Slide36% of Absolute Alcohol
Beer
SpiritsWine
W/S improving at
– Availability
Price
Marketing
36On an absolute alcohol basis, total per capita consumption has not varied
Slide37Craft Production Vs. Capacity
13.2
22.2
15.6
23.9
34.6
20.7
IBG estimates non-craft brewing excess capacity is 10-15 million barrels (after MC closes
Eden,
NC)37
Slide38Under Utilization of CapacityExcess capacity leads to:
Less Aggressive
price increasesMore Discounting
More Brands and SKU’s
New Packages (discounted differently)
Blaming others (finger-pointing
)
Redundant information requestsExcessive Innovation
38
Slide39Per Capita Beer, Wine & Spirits Consumption: Change in Share of Absolute Alcohol
39
Slide40Millennials will represent 37% of the drinking population
(
Millennials were born 1980-2000)Millennials are not brand loyal or even category loyalThe
population is aging and per
capita consumption tends to decline with age
Hispanic population growth exploding at four times the rate of total population
growth
The next generation has less people than the Baby Boomers or Millennials
Demographic trends :40
Slide41Nielsen studied a number of trends in household consumer spending. From
2020 through 2050
they predict spending will decrease due to retiring boomers; the decline of the middle class and the rapid growth rate of low income
households. Beer price growth historically rarely exceeded CPI and has averaged about 75 % of CPI since 1980. Not lately.
If we assume history as our guide, and a long-term CPI averaging 3.22% since 1913 and 2.3% since 1990, we could expect beer price growth to remain around 2% over the long term. Industry
will adjust
back to historical levels.
Household Income:
41
Slide4242
Slide43Distributor Numbers43
Slide4444No Supplier gets enough Time and Attention
Mega Distributors
SKU proliferationPresales DilemmaMargins Grow
Gross Profit per CE growth
Operating Expenses DeclineOperating profit per CE grows
Slide4545No Supplier,
ever gets enough time and attention!
Whether exclusive or non-exclusive
Slide46ABI Mega Distributors
MT
WY
ID
WA
OR
NV
UT
AZ
ND
SD
NE
CO
NM
TX
OK
KS
AR
LA
MO
IA
MN
WI
IL
IN
KY
TN
MS
AL
GA
FL
SC
NC
VA
WV
OH
MI
NY
PA
MD
DE
NJ
CT
RI
MA
ME
VT
NH
ABI
Hensley
ABI
ABI
Hand
ABI
Ben E. Keith
Nau
Lamantia
ABI
Dobbs
Jefferies
Stokes
Don K
X
X
X
Sheehan
HDL
By 2020, 125 distributors will do
80-85% of ABI volume
Hand
Hand
ABI
Sheehan
Dobbs
ABI
ABI
Clay Adams
ABI
ABI
ABI
46
Slide47MC Mega Distributors
By 2020, 75 distributors will do
80-85% of MC volume
Manhattan Beverage
MT
WY
ID
WA
OR
NV
UT
CA
AZ
ND
SD
NE
CO
NM
TX
OK
KS
AR
LA
MO
IA
MN
WI
IL
IN
KY
TN
MS
AL
GA
FL
SC
NC
VA
WV
OH
MI
NY
PA
MD
DE
NJ
CT
RI
MA
ME
VT
NH
DBI
Reyes
Goldring
Moffat
MC
Reyes
Capitol Wright
Andrews
Goldring
Moffat
HoBo
Taylor
HoBo
Andrews
Reyes
Glazer
Reyes
Reyes
Glazer
Taylor
Clay
Clay
X
X
X
X
X
X
Clay
Reyes
Columbia
Monarch
Columbia
47
Slide48X – W/S with significant beer.
Craft Mega Distributors
X
MT
WY
ID
WA
OR
NV
UT
CA
AZ
ND
SD
NE
CO
NM
TX
OK
KS
AR
LA
MO
IA
MN
WI
IL
IN
KY
TN
MS
AL
GA
FL
SC
NC
VA
WV
OH
MI
NY
PA
MD
DE
NJ
CT
RI
MA
ME
VT
NH
Sheehan
Sheehan
Brown
Sheehan
Sheehan
Sheehan
Sheehan
X
Click
Saccani
Brown
Ben E. Keith
Nackard
X
X
X
X
SW&S
SW&S
Young
Self
Wirtx
Major Brands
Maletis
Stone
Wirtz
Major Brands
Maletis
Lamantia
48
Johnson Brothers
Slide49SKU’s per Distributor49
Slide50Despite SKU Proliferation, Presales Representatives Manage the Same Number of Accounts
Average Number of Presale Accounts per Presale Representative, 2008-2013
Average of Top 50 Owner Groups
Average of all Distributors
5 Year CAGR: -0.1%
5 Year CAGR: -0.3%
50
Slide51Distributor Margin Trend
51
Slide52Distributor Gross Profit Per Case
52
Slide53Gross Profit / Operating Expense Trends
53
Slide54Distributor Operating Profit Per Case
54
Difference: NBWA report has large representation of lower value distributors
Slide55Summary55
Slide56Single Source Distributor
(+) Multiple
Source Distributor
Multiple Distributors
in most markets(+) Mega Distributors
dominate large Markets
Volume Growing
(-) Volume declining
Significant Distributor Legislative influence
(-) Less Distributor Legislative influenceLess than 100 Brewers many with declining value(+) 4000+ Brewers with escalating value56Past (70’s) Future (2015+)(+) Good for Industry (-) Bad for Industry
Slide57Below
CPI pricing
(+) Above CPI Pricing
Gaining on Wine & Spirits
(-) Losing to Wine & Spirits
Limited Useful
Capacity(-) Excess Capacity
Limited SKU’s and Brands
(-) Too Many SKU’s and BrandsPer Caps growing(-) Per Caps declining57Past (70’s) Future (2015+)(+) Good for Industry (-) Bad for Industry
Slide5821-34 Demographics growing
(-) 21-34
Demographics will be less
Low to Middle
Household income growing(-) Low and Middle Household
income declining
Ample time to sell at
store level
(-) Very Limited time to sell at store level
Margins at distributor level 23% (+) Margins at distributor level 28% 58Past (70’s) Future (2015+)(+) Good for Industry (-) Bad for Industry
Slide59Operating costs at
21%
on average(+) Operating cost at 19% on average
Operating
Profit growing slowly for the winners
(+) Operating
Profit
growing fast for the winnersExclusive Beer Distributors
(+) Non-Exclusive Mega Beer Distributors
Loyal Consumers(-) Promiscuous consumerFear of Termination(-) No Fear of Termination59Past (70’s) Future (2015+)(+) Good for Industry (-) Bad for Industry
Slide60Macro
Marketing is key to brand
equity growth(+) Micro Marketing is key to brand equity growth
Small Retail Chain presence
(+) Huge Retail
Chain presence
Solid Franchise
protection(-) Leaking
Franchise protectionLimited Wine & Spirit availability
(-) Universal Wine & Spirit availabilityLimited Communication(+) Internet connects everyone60Past (70’s) Future (2015+)SCORE : (+) Good for Industry = 11 (-) Bad for Industry = 13
Slide61Conclusion61
Slide62Strive to always “Add Value” by constantly working to improve the equity value of the brands you represent
More sales people (Push)
Accept more marketing responsibility (Pull)Should understand that brewers now have other options.
You must be the most effective commercially viable access to market for brewers
Competitive systems exist if distributors don’t become logistics experts.
Learn to say no to bad ideas
One pallet of “Strawberry, lemon, apple flavored Bock Beer with a touch of Garlic” affects 5-15 people in your organization.
Distributors
62
Slide63Start interacting instead of interfering with distributorsDon’t do their job for them.
Work within the Three Tier System to develop a more effective brand building model.
Brewers
63
Slide6464Its time to feed the Goose that’s been laying the Golden Eggs
Distributors:
Assume more sales and marketing responsibilityR
ealize and adjust as Brands developBe willing to align incentives with performance
Brewers:
Develop Brand equity – if you have a pull problem, expanding territory or rushed innovation only makes the problem worse
I
nteract, don’t interfere with DistributorsDon’t do the Distributors job for them.
Slide6565