/
1 New Collaboration between WHO and INSTAND 1 New Collaboration between WHO and INSTAND

1 New Collaboration between WHO and INSTAND - PowerPoint Presentation

SunnySeahorse
SunnySeahorse . @SunnySeahorse
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-08-03

1 New Collaboration between WHO and INSTAND - PPT Presentation

eV on Molecular EQA for Measles and Rubella Process and results of 1 st molecular PT exercise in EUR Oliver Donoso Mantke 1 and Heinz Zeichhardt 123 1 INSTAND ID: 934173

virus house sample pcr house virus pcr sample amp results cdc nat instand rna test samples 2015 viral countries

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1 New Collaboration between WHO and INST..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

1

New Collaboration between WHO and INSTAND e.V. on Molecular EQA for Measles and Rubella Process and results of 1st molecular PT exercise in EUR

Oliver Donoso Mantke

1

and

Heinz

Zeichhardt

1,2,3

1

INSTAND

e.V. - Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Qualitätssicherung in medizinischen Laboratorien e.V.,

Düsseldorf

2

Professor

of

Virology

(

retired

)

Charité

Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Institut für Virologie,

Berlin

3

Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der Virusdiagnostik - IQVD, Berlin

at GBD Gesellschaft für Biotechnologische Diagnostik mbH, Berlin

Vanessa

Lindig

3

and

Hans-Peter Grunert

4

3

Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der Virusdiagnostik - IQVD, Berlin

at GBD Gesellschaft für Biotechnologische Diagnostik mbH, Berlin

4

GBD Gesellschaft

für Biotechnologische Diagnostik

mbH

, Berlin

in

cooperation

with

Sabine Santibanez

and

Annette Mankertz

Nationales Referenzzentrum für Masern, Mumps und Röteln

am Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin

FG 12 Masern, Mumps, Röteln und Viren bei Abwehrschwäche

Slide2

International14 Organistions / Scientific SocietiesNational28 Organistions / Scientific Societies

Slide3

Slide4

INSTAND EQA Schemes

Slide5

O. Adams Universitätsklinikum DüsseldorfA. Baillot Niedersächsisches Landesgesundheitsamt, HannoverS. Becker / M. Eickmann Philipps Universität Marburg, Nat. Konsiliarlab. FilovirenC.-T. Bock / S. Niendorf / A. Mas-Marques Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin; Nat. Konsiliarlab. Noroviren

; Nat. Konsiliarlab. RotavirenS. Diedrich Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin; NRZ Poliomyelitis und Enteroviren Regionales Referenzlabor der WHO/EURO für PoliomyelitisU. Dittmer / S. Ross / M. Roggendorf Universitätsklinik Essen; NRZ HCV; Nat. Konsiliarlab. TollwutG. Dobler Institut für Mikrobiologie der Bundeswehr, München; Nat. Konsiliarlab. FSMECh. Drosten / A.-M. Eis-Hübinger Universität Bonn; Nat. Konsiliarlabor für

Coronaviren

J.

Eberle

/ L.

Gürtler

Ludwig-

Maximillians

-

Universität München, Max-von-Pettenkofer InstitutG. Enders / M. Enders Labor Enders, StuttgartJ. Fuhrmann MVZ Labor 28 GmbH, BerlinA. Gessner / B. Schmidt / J. Wenzel Universität Regensburg; Nat. Konsiliarlab. HAV und HEVS. Günther / J. Schmidt-Chanasit / P. Emmerich Bernhard-Nocht-Institut, Hamburg; NRZ trop. Infektionserreger, WHO CCG. Harms-Zwingenberger Institut für Tropenmedizin, BerlinH.H. Hirsch Universität Basel, Dept. BiomedizinD. Huzly / M. Panning Universitätsklinikum FreiburgG. Jahn / K. Hamprecht Universitätsklinikum Tübingen; Nat. Konsiliarlab. CMVA. Karl / K. Frank / K. Gubbe DRK-Blutspendedienst Ost, PlauenV. Kempf / H. Rabenau / A. Berger / M. Stürmer Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt; NRZ RetrovirenD. Krüger / J. Hofmann Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, CCM; Nat. Konsiliarlab.Hantaviren; Labor Berlin – Charité Vivantes GmbHC. Kücherer Robert Koch-Institut, BerlinU.G. Liebert Universität LeipzigA. Mankertz / S. Santibanez Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin; NRZ Masern, Mumps und RötelnT. Mertens / D. Michel Universitätsklinikum Ulm; Nat. Konsiliarlab.CMVS. Modrow Universität Regensburg; Nat. Konsiliarlab. ParvovirenS. Nick / H. Scheiblauer Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen; Prüflabor für IVDM. Nübling / M. Chudy / S.A. Baylis / J. Kreß Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, WHO CCH. Pfister / U. Wieland / S. Silling / R. Kaiser Uniklinik Köln; NRZ Papillom- und PolyomavirenB. Weißbrich Universität WürzburgA. Sauerbrei / P. Wutzler Universitätsklinikum Jena; Nat. Konsiliarlab. HSV und VZVT. Schulz / A. Heim Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; Nat. Konsiliarlab. AdenovirenT. Schulz / W. Puppe / C. Schmitt Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; Nat. Konsiliarlab. EBV, HHV 6, 7, 8B. Schweiger Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin; NRZ Influenza; Nat. Konsiliarlab. RSV, Parainfluenzaviren, HMPVS. Smola, N. Müller-Lantzsch, J. Rissland Universitätsklinikum des SaarlandesK. Überla / K. Korn Universitätsklinikum ErlangenJ. Ziebuhr, D. Glebe / C. Schüttler / W. Gerlich Universität Gießen; NRZ HBV und HDV

INSTAND Target Value Laboratories

(in total: 36;

6

for

MeV+RubV

)

Slide6

INSTAND EQA Schemes (68 Schemes)in Virus Immunology and Genome Detection 2016Serology and Antigen Detection

Virus Genome Detection and TypingHIV-1/2Herpes simplex Viruses

HIV-1 (RNA)

HIV-2 (RNA)

Measles Rubella

Mumps

Viruses

HIV-1 p24 Ag

Varicella Zoster VirusHIV-1 Resistance + TropismAdenovirusesHTLV-1/2Epstein Barr VirusHepatitis A VirusNorovirus RotavirusHepatitis A VirusResp. Sync. Virus AgHepatitis B Virus + Genotyping + ResistanceCoronavirusHepatitis B Virus, Prg. IInfluenza A and B Ag +A/H1N1 pdm 2009+A/H5N1+A/H7N9Hepatitis C Virus+ Genotyping + Resistance

Enteroviruses + Enterovirus (WHO/RKI)

Hepatitis B Virus, Prg. II

Rubella VirusMeasles VirusMumps VirusHepatitis D VirusHepatitis E VirusHuman RhinovirusesResp. Syncytial VirusHum. MetapneumovirusParainfluenza virusesHepatitis C VirusTBE VirusCytomegalovirus+ ResistanceInfluenza A and B Ag +A/H1N1 pdm 2009+A/H5N1+A/H7N9Hepatitis D VirusHantavirusEpstein-Barr VirusBK VirusJC VirusHepatitis E VirusDengue VirusNEW: Chikungunya VirusNEW: Zika VirusHerpes simplex VirusesDengue VirusWest Nile VirusChikungunya VirusNEW: Zika VirusParvovirus B19Rabies VirusVaricella Zoster VirusHum. Papilloma VirusesCytomegalovirusBSE (PrPsc) (2002-2007)Parvovirus B19Rabies Virus

Zeichhardt – SoGAT Graz – 28.05.2015

Slide7

Accreditation issues1- Rolling out 2015 molecular PT for the European regionInvite NRLs performing molecular testing in routine to enrol in Instand molecular PT (Nov 2015 round)NRLs to pay for the fees, WHO to support labs in needInstand to expand protocols to get full set of resultsContinue collaboration to harmonize Instand and CDC molec PT in coming rounds7

Slide8

Summary of organizational data:No. of laboratories invited for participation: 37 (call of participation beginning Sep 2015)No. of laboratories registered for participation: 34 (as of 7 Oct 2015)Bulk shipment of sample panels to RRLs: 18.11.2015No. of laboratories reporting results: 34

(from 33 countries)(as of 27 May 2016)Response rate: 100%PCR/NAT - Measles Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (991) Nov 2015

Slide9

Sample properties (as discussed in Aug 2015):PCR/NAT - Measles Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (991) Nov 2015 Sample No.

Sample sourceIdentical Named Strain and Distinct sequence ID in MeaNSDilution

991001

Lysate of cells infected with measles virus

(

wild-type measles

strain;

genotype

D8

)$MVs/Frankfurt Main.DEU/17.11, 2266undiluted991002Lysate of non-infected cells----991003Lysate of cells infected with measles virus (wild-type measles strain; genotype B3)$MVi/Harare.ZWE/38.09, 1310undiluted991004Lysate of cells infected with measles virus (wild-type measles strain;

genotype

D4

)$MVs/Manchester.GBR/10.09, 1306undiluted$ Infectious viruses are chemically inactivated on the sample FTA disk.

Slide10

PCR/NAT - Measles Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (991) Nov 2015 Summary of qualitative results and typing results:

& The success rates for all 4 samples in test categories 20 and 40, respectively, refer to the number of participating laboratories. Laboratories having reported results obtained by several methods are recorded only once.

§

One

participant (Participant No. 1191), who was registered for genotyping, did not report results in test category 40.

This

was evaluated as "false" result in test category 40.

# One

participant (Participant No. 49690), who was registered for genotyping, was not able to report results in test category 40 due to weak PCR signals. This was evaluated as "false" result in test category 40. Sample 991001Sample 991002Sample 991003Sample 991004Successratefor all samples&Sample propertiesMeasles virus positive(genotype D8) 104.0 PFU/ml on Vero/hSLAMMeasles virus negativeMeasles virus positive(genotype B3)

10

5.5

PFU/ml on Vero/hSLAMMeasles virus positive(genotype D4) 104.1 PFU/ml on Vero/hSLAMDilutionundiluted----undilutedundiluted"correct" results for qualitative genome detection (test category 20)(basis for receiving a certificate of successful participation)qual. detectionpositive100% (38/38)negative100% (38/38)positive100% (38/38)positive100% (38/38)

100%

&

(34/34)

&

"

correct

"

results

for

type

identification

(

test

category

40)

(basis for receiving a certificate of successful participation)

type

identification

D8

93.3%

(

28/30)

negative/

nd

93.3%

(

28/30)

B3

93.3%

(

28/30)

D4

93.3%

(

28/30)

93.3%

&,§,#

(28/30)

&,§,#

Slide11

PCR/NAT - Measles Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (991) Nov 2015 Link to results from regular INSTAND EQA scheme (386):&

& The success rates for all 4 samples in test categories 20 and 40, respectively, refer to the number of participating laboratories. Laboratories having reported results obtained by several methods are recorded only once.

Sample 991001

Sample 991002

Sample 991003

Sample 991004

Success

rate

for all samples

&

= 386015= 386014= 386016= 386013Sample propertiesMeasles virus positive(genotype D8)Measles virus negativeMeasles virus positive(genotype B3)Measles virus positive

(genotype

D4)

Dilutionundiluted----undilutedundiluted"correct" results for qualitative genome detection (test category 20)(basis for receiving a certificate of successful participation)qual. detectionpositive100% (38/38)negative100% (38/38)positive100% (38/38)positive100% (38/38)100%&(34/34)&qual. detection

positive

96.6%

(29/30)

negative

96.6%

(29/30)

positive

93.3%

(28/30)

positive

96.6%

(29/30)

93.1%

&

(27/29)

&

"

correct

"

results

for

type

identification

(

test

category

40)

(basis for receiving a certificate of successful participation)

type

identification

D8

93.3%

(

28/30)

negative/

nd

93.3%

(

28/30)

B3

93.3%

(

28/30)

D4

93.3%

(

28/30)

93.3%

&

(28/30)

&

type

identification

D8

100

%

(

2/2)

negative/

nd

100

%

(

2/2)

B3

100

%

(

2/2)

D4

100

%

(

2/2)

100%

&

(2/2)

&

Slide12

New test categoryfor sequence quality:Success rate for all samples refers

to the number of participating laboratories(in 1st round/Nov 2015 not evaluated w/o consequences for certificate)21/28 = 75.0%

Results

:

see

details by S. Santibanez (RKI)PCR/NAT - Measles Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (991) Nov 2015

Slide13

21.06.1613Evaluation of sequence quality – Measles

Sample 991001: D8-FM- 20 countries/ 21 labs7 countries

The N-450

correctly

sequenced

Deviation(s)

Sample 991004: D4-M

- 23 countries/ 24

labs

4 countriesSample 991003: B3-H- 24 countries/ 25 labs 3 countries- Panel contained three MV-positive samples- Sequence data provided by 27 countries/ 28 labs (for all samples) - All samples correctly sequenced by 20 countries/ 21 labs- Deviations from the reference sequence in:-

one

sample

 3 countries - two samples  1 country- three samples  3 countries Incomplete endsMismatch at one or more pos.Single „N“ at one or more pos.Single additional nt insideSingle nt missing inside

Slide14

PCR/NAT - Measles Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (991) Nov 2015 Summary of applied methods and reported ct-values:

ParticipantExtractionAmplification

Sample 991001

Sample 991003

Sample 991004

Sequencing

48512-

IRE

QG Qiamp Viral RNA mini

in house TaqMan

22.9728.7424.58in house48659- UKBiomerieux Easy Magin house Multiplex TM N29.8030.6031.20

no information

48659-

UKBiomerieux Easy Magin house Multiplex TM H30.9035.4032.70no information1296- AUTBiomerieux Easy Magin house real-time PCR26.9026.6025.60Santibanez, JGV 20025577- BULQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house PCR (CDC)---not registered f. typing49701- CZEStratecmanufacturer (LifeRiver)28.8428.3529.62not registered f. typing

49690-

DEN

RO MagnaPure 96

in house

TaqMan

39.48

39.41

37.96

in house (WHO)

30010-

DEU

Qiagen

in house

TaqMan

(CDC)

26.27

27.17

26.50

in house

30010-

DEU

Qiagen

in house nested PCR

-

-

-

in house

40790-

EST

no information

in house

TaqMan

(CDC)

21.21

23.15

26.86

in house (CDC)

32637-

FIN

Biomerieux Easy Mag

in house TaqMan

24.76

25.12

24.34

in house

49713-

HUN

Phenol-Chloroform

in house nested PCR

-

-

-

in house (ABI)

49636-

ITA

QG

RNeasy

in house real-time PCR

33.16

27.26

27.77

in house

1191-

LVA

Biomerieux Easy Mag

in house real-time PCR

23.31

22.06

22.78

reminded /no respond

49131-

LTUQG MiniElute Virus Spinmanufacturer (LifeRiver)26.7625.6624.82not registered f. typing40201- NORQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house nested PCR---no information49712- POLQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house nested PCR---Santibanez, JGV 200249638- ROMMacherey-Nagel Nucleospinin house TaqMan (CDC)24.9626.0225.47in house (ABI)48876- SVNQG MiniElute Virus Spinin house real-time PCR25.7020.8320.74in house (CDC)8850- SWEQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house PCR - - -in house (ABI)29411- BELQG Qiamp Viral RNA mini in house TaqMan21.8022.2922.55in house nested PCR49699- BiHQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house PCR (CDC)---in house (CDC)49698- CROQiagenin house TaqMan27.0027.0027.00in house49691- FRA CQG EZ1 DSP Virus in house real-time PCR25.9524.9926.63in house49693- GREMacherey-Nagel Nucleospinin house TaqMan26.8825.5824.85In house49709- ISRQiagenin house TaqMan (CDC)26.5022.9022.10in house (CDC)49694- LUXQG Qiamp Viral RNA mini in house real-time nested PCR28.4427.8325.55no information49664- NED BRO MagnaPure 96in house real-time PCR29.6229.8329.83in house49637- NED RRO MP LC total NA isolatioin house real-time PCR22.6022.4021.60in house (CDC)49700- PORBiomerieux Easy Magmanufacturer (FTD)21.5026.4423.63in house nested PCR49692- ESPQiagenin house nested PCR---in house49711- TURQG EZ1 DSP Virusmanufacturer (FTD)21.3030.7021.90in house (BE)49640- BLRQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house TaqMan (CDC)25.1324.9925.42in house (CDC)49710- KAZInvitrogen PureLinein house real-time PCR26,6626,2325,62in house (ABI)49710- KAZInvitrogen PureLinein house PCR---in house (ABI)49644- RUSQG Qiamp Viral RNA mini in house real-time PCR25.2023.8023.80in house (ABI)49644- RUSQG Qiamp Viral RNA mini in house PCR---in house (ABI)49697- TJKQG Qiamp Viral RNA mini in house TaqMan26.5026.9027.20not registered f. typing

Red

=

weak

PCR

signals

Blue=

problems

in seq.

quality

Slide15

Summary of organizational data:No. of laboratories invited for participation: 37 (call of participation beginning Sep 2015)No. of laboratories registered for participation: 30 (as of 7 Oct 2015)Bulk shipment of sample panels to RRLs: 18.11.2015No. of laboratories reporting results:

30 (from 28 countries)(as of 10 Mar 2016)Response rate: 100%PCR/NAT - Rubella Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (992) Nov 2015

Slide16

Sample properties (as discussed in Aug 2015):PCR/NAT - Rubella Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (992) Nov 2015 Sample No.

Sample sourceStrain name and sequence ID in RubeNSDilution

992001

Lysate of cells infected with rubella virus

(

wild-type rubella

strain;

genotype

1G

)$RVi/Prahova region.ROU/25.03, 268undiluted992002*= 992004Lysate of cells infected with rubella virus (wild-type rubella strain; genotype 2B)$RVs/Duesseldorf.DEU/35.13, 10074undiluted992003Lysate of non-infected cells----992004*= 992002Lysate of cells infected with rubella virus (wild-type rubella strain;

genotype

2B)$ RVs/Duesseldorf.DEU/35.13, 10074undiluted$ Infectious viruses are chemically inactivated on the sample FTA disk.* The positive samples 992002 and 992004 are identical.

Slide17

PCR/NAT - Rubella Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (992) Nov 2015 Summary of qualitative results and typing results:

& & The success rates for all 4 samples in test categories 20 and 40, respectively, refer to the number of participating laboratories. Laboratories having reported results obtained by several methods are recorded only once.

§ One

participant (Participant No. 1191), who was registered for genotyping, did not report results in test category 40.

This was evaluated as "false" result in test category 40.

# Four

participants (Participant No. 32637, 49638, 49690 and 49711), who were registered for genotyping, were not able to report results in test category 40 due to weak PCR signals. These were evaluated as "false" results in test category 40.

Sample 992001

Sample 992002= 992004Sample 992003Sample 992004= 992002Successratefor all samples&Sample propertiesRubella virus positive(genotype 1G) 104.69 PFU/ml on Vero/hSLAMRubella virus positive(genotype 2B)

10

6.0

PFU/ml on Vero/hSLAMRubella virus negativeRubella virus positive(genotype 2B)106.0 PFU/ml on Vero/hSLAMDilutionundilutedundiluted----undiluted"correct" results for qualitative genome detection (test category 20)(basis for receiving a certificate of successful participation)qual. detectionpositive100% (31/31)positive96.8% (30/31)negative96.8% (30/31)positive100% (31/31)

96.7%

&

(29/30)

&

"

correct

"

results

for

type

identification

(

test

category

40)

(basis for receiving a certificate of successful participation)

type

identification

1G

75.0%

(

18/24)

2B

70.8%

(

17/24)

negative/

nd

75.0%

(18/24)

2B

66.7%

(

16/24)

62.5%

&,§,#

(15/24)

&,§,#

Slide18

PCR/NAT - Rubella Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (992) Nov 2015 & & The success rates for all 4 samples in test

categories 20 and 40, respectively, refer to the number of participating laboratories. Laboratories having reported results obtained by several methods are recorded only once.Link to results from regular INSTAND EQA scheme (389):

Sample 992001

Sample

992002

=

992004

Sample 992003

Sample

992004

= 992002Successratefor all samples&= 389012= 389009= 389011= 389010Sample propertiesRubella virus positive(genotype 1G)Rubella virus positive(genotype 2B)

Rubella virus negative

Rubella virus positive

(genotype 2B)Dilutionundilutedundiluted----undiluted"correct" results for qualitative genome detection (test category 20)(basis for receiving a certificate of successful participation)qual. detectionpositive100% (31/31)positive96.8% (30/31)negative96.8% (30/31)positive100% (31/31)96.7%&(29/30)&qual. detectionpositive94.7%

(18/19)

positive

89.5%

(17/19)

negative

94.7%

(18/19)

positive

89.5%

(17/19)

89.5%

&

(17/19)

&

"

correct

"

results

for

type

identification

(

test

category

40)

(basis for receiving a certificate of successful participation)

type

identification

1G

75.0%

(

18/24)

2B

70.8%

(

17/24)

negative/

nd

75.0%

(18/24)

2B

66.7%

(

16/24)

62.5%

&

(15/24)

&

type

identification

1G

100

%

(1/1)

2B

100

%

(1/1)

negative/

nd

100

%

(1/1)

2B100% (1/1)100%&(1/1)&

Slide19

New test categoryfor sequence quality:Success rate for all samples refers

to the number of participating laboratories(in 1st round/Nov 2015 not evaluated w/o consequences for certificate)13/19 = 68.4%

Results

:

see

details by S. Santibanez (RKI)PCR/NAT - Rubella Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (992) Nov 2015

Slide20

21.06.1620Evaluation of sequence quality – Rubella

Sample 992001: 1G- 13 countries/ 14 labs5 countriesSample 992002: 2B- 13 countries/ 14 labs4 countries

1

country

without

result

Sample 992004: 2B

-

13 countries/ 14 labs- 2 countries- 3 countries without resultThe 739 nt window of E1 correctly sequencedDeviation(s)- Panel contained three RV-positive samples- Sequence data provided by 18 countries/ 19 labs: - 15 countries/ 16 labs for all samples - 2 countries for

two

samples - 1 country for one sample - All samples correctly sequenced by 12 countries/ 13 labs- Deviations from the reference sequence in:- one sample  3 countries - two samples  1 country - three samples  2 countriesIncomplete endsMismatch at one or more pos.Gap, stretch of „N“And others:single nt missingsingle add. nt inside- single „N“

Slide21

PCR/NAT – Rubella Virus Collaboration – WHO EURO and INSTAND (992) Nov 2015 Summary of applied methods and reported ct-values:

ParticipantExtractionAmplification

Sample

992001

Sample

992002

Sample

992004

Sequencing

48512-

IREQG Qiamp Viral RNA mini in house TaqMan27.4739.8738.40in house48659- UKBiomerieux Easy Magin house TaqMan27.5024.9024.90

no information

1296-

AUTBiomerieux Easy Magin house real-time PCR26.4027.3027.20Fene, SantibanezJMV 20115577- BULQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house PCR (CDC)---not registered f. typing49701- CZEStratecmanufacturer (LifeRiver)29.9930.7831.10not registered f. typing49690- DENRO MagnaPure 96in house TaqMan37.7537.7438.07

in house (WHO)

30010-

DEU

Qiagen

in house nested PCR

-

-

-

in house

32637-

FIN

Biomerieux Easy Mag

in house TaqMan

25.51

38.00

36.94

in house

49713-

HUN

Phenol-Chloroform

in house nested PCR

-

-

-

in house (ABI)

49636-

ITA

QG RNeasy

in house real-time PCR

27.76

26.33

27.12

in house

1191-

LVA

Biomerieux Easy Mag

in house real-time PCR

24.69

23.81

25.63

reminded/no respond

49131-

LTU

QG MiniElute Virus Spin

manufacturer (LifeRiver)

27.04

26.12

26.31

not registered f. typing

40201-

NOR

QG Qiamp Viral RNA mini

in house real-time PCR

24.57

23.35

22.51

no information

49712-

POL

QG Qiamp Viral RNA mini

in house nested PCR

-

-

-

Abernatly

,

JCM

2009

49638-

ROM

Macherey-Nagel Nucleospinin house TaqMan (CDC)28.5929.2027.80no info, lab states:PCR signals too weak48876- SVNQG MiniElute Virus Spinin house real-time PCR26.7624.3826.09in house (CDC)29411- BELQG Qiamp Viral RNA mini in house TaqMan25.0226.3226.83not registered f. typing49699- BiHQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house TaqMan (CDC)29.2623.9924.03in house (CDC)49696- FRA VBiomerieux Easy Magin house TaqMan26.4027.1026.40in house (ABI)49691- FRA CQG EZ1 DSP Virus in house real-time PCR26.8225.4825.63not registered f. typing49693- GREMacherey-Nagel Nucleospinin house TaqMan26.4225.3925.74In house49709- ISRQiagenin house TaqMan (CDC)26.4024.5024.70in house (CDC)49694- LUXQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house TaqMan (modified CDC)29.1025.9425.97no information49664- NED BRO MagnaPure 96in house real-time PCR30.3340.7941.07in house49637- NED RRO MP LC total NA isolationin house real-time PCR21.8032.2031.60in house (CDC)49700- PORBiomerieux Easy Magmanufacturer (Sacace)29.0940.7225.04results disregarded49692- ESPQiagenin house nested PCR---in house49711- TURQG EZ1 DSP Virusin house TaqMan (CDC)32.50neg.-F32.40no information49640- BLRQG Qiamp Viral RNA miniin house TaqMan (CDC)28.6026.4625.73in house (CDC)49644- RUSQG Qiamp Viral RNA mini in house real-time PCR23.3021.2021.87in house (ABI)49644- RUSQG Qiamp Viral RNA mini in house nested PCR---in house (ABI)Red= weak PCR signals Blue= problems in seq. quality

Slide22

ConclusionsLink of WHO and INSTAND measles & rubella molecular EQA schemes was successfulSample shipment via WHO EURO and RRLs was smooth (in most cases)Participants were successful in general (success rates 62.5 - 100%)Non-reporters contributed to high failure rateFor future EQA schemes *agreed at 11th Meeting of the Measles/Rubella RRLs WHO EUR – Berlin, 15.03.2016:Inclusion of sequence quality for assessmentEvaluation criteria: 100% correct results in all test categories for all panel members

for labs genotyping: correct genotype and zero nucleotide errorCoordination of sample selection between WHO, CDC and INSTANDHarmonization of next rounds between regional and global EQA schemes (instruction sheet, check-list of required information, evaluation criteria) Online-reporting of EQA results incl. sequence submission to MeaNS/RubeNS (cooperation of PHE with WHO, CDC and INSTAND)Classification of mEQA samples as non-infectious by INSTAND

Slide23

Thanks to INSTAND Target Value Laboratories 

Robert Koch-Institut, Abt. Infektionskrankheiten, FG 12 Masern, Mumps, Röteln und Viren bei Abwehrschwäche, Nationales Referenzzentrum für Masern, Mumps und Röteln: Prof. Dr. A. Mankertz, Dr. S. SantibanezUniversität Leipzig, Institut für Virologie: Prof. Dr. U. G. LiebertLabor Berlin - Charité Vivantes GmbH, Fachbereich Virologie: Prof. Dr. D. H. Krüger, Prof. Dr. J. HofmannUniversität Würzburg, Institut für Virologie und Immunologie: Dr. B. Weißbrich

Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Institut für Virologie:

Prof. Dr. C. Drosten, Prof. Dr. A.-M. Eis-

Hübinger

Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Institut für Medizinische Virologie, Frankfurt/Main, Nationales Referenzzentrum für Retroviren:

Prof. Dr. V.

Kempf

, Prof. Dr. H. F. Rabenau, PD Dr. A. Berger, PD Dr. M. Stürmer

WHO HQ

WHO EUROCDC GSLRRLBerlinPHE GSLLondonRRL LuxembourgRRL MoscowIQVD TeamGBD TeamINSTAND Team

Slide24