/
A 2020 overview Presented to Rotary Club of Warren County A 2020 overview Presented to Rotary Club of Warren County

A 2020 overview Presented to Rotary Club of Warren County - PowerPoint Presentation

Thrillseeker
Thrillseeker . @Thrillseeker
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2022-08-04

A 2020 overview Presented to Rotary Club of Warren County - PPT Presentation

Conflict of Interest Cee A Davis MD MPH FACOG FACPM Presenter reports no conflicts of interest Represents NACCHO on WPSIDISC Director Blue Ridge Community Health Member rotary club of Warren County ID: 935525

recommendations screening anxiety women screening recommendations women anxiety wpsi clinical services preventive org care amp health www woman chart

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "A 2020 overview Presented to Rotary Club..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

A 2020 overview

Presented to Rotary Club of Warren County

Slide2

Conflict of Interest

Cee A. Davis, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.O.G, F.A.C.P.M

Presenter reports no conflicts of interest.

Represents NACCHO on WPSI-DISCDirector, Blue Ridge Community HealthMember, rotary club of Warren County

Slide3

Women’s Preventive Services Initiative

Federal grant supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

Five-Year Cooperative agreement between ACOG and HRSA’s Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB), March 2016-February 2021

Purpose:

Develop and update recommendations for preventive health care for women across their lifespan

Disseminate these broadly-supported recommendations to a wide array of providers of women's health and to women

Slide4

Why WPSI?

Gaps in preventive care for

average risk

women across the lifespan

Inconsistency in guidelinesLack of development, updating & review of women’s preventive services across the lifespan

Slide5

WPSI Organizational Chart

Slide6

WPSI Methodology

Minimize impact of individual bias & conflicts of interest

Slide7

Recommendation Components

Clinical Recommendations:

O

verarching summary recommendation, based on the best available evidence & clinical expertise

Supported by HRSANon-grandfathered plans & coverage are required to provide coverage without cost sharing

consistent with these guidelines if recommendations are accepted by HRSA.

Slide8

Recommendation Components (cont.)

Implementation Considerations:

Addresses aspects of clinical and practical applications of the recommendation

Not included as part of the HRSA-supported guidelines

Provide additional clarity on implementation of the guidelines in clinical practiceConsidered informational and not part of the formal action by the HRSA Administrator

Research Recommendations:

research questions that would strengthen the current evidence base.

Slide9

Completed Recommendations Year 1: 2016

Year 1

Breast Cancer Screening for Average Risk Women

Breastfeeding Services and SuppliesContraception

Counseling for Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs)

Screening for Cervical Cancer

Screening for Gestational Diabetes MellitusScreening for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

Screening for Interpersonal and Domestic Violence

Well-Woman Preventive Visits

Slide10

Completed Recommendations Year 2: 2017

Screening for Diabetes Mellitus After Pregnancy

Screening for Urinary Incontinence

Completed Recommendations Year 4: 2019

Screening for Anxiety

(coverage begins January 1, 2021)

Slide11

Screening for Anxiety:

Clinical Recommendations

WPSI recommends screening for anxiety in

Adolescent and adult women

Includes pregnant & postpartum women

Optimal screening intervals are unknown, screening frequency based on clinical judgement

Consider screening women who have not been recently screened

High prevalence of anxiety disordersLack of recognition in clinical practice

multiple problems associated with untreated anxiety

https://www.womenspreventivehealth.org/recommendations/screening-for-anxiety/

Slide12

Screening for Anxiety:

Implementation Considerations

Consider screening for anxiety while screening for depression,

USPSTF

, recommends screening adults for depression

Co-occurrence of anxiety and depressive disorders is common

Validated instruments that screen simultaneously for both may be clinically efficient in practice, such as:

EPDS (specifically for pregnant and postpartum women)

PHQ-4, and HADS in adult women

Bright Futures Y-PSC in adolescents and young women

Option of additional anxiety disorder screening instruments of moderate to high accuracy in

Women(e.g., GAD, HADS, BAI)

Adolescents & young adult women (e.g., 5-item SCARED)

Although not evaluated in research studies of adolescents, the GAD-7 and Bright Futures youth self-report PSC (Y-PSC) are commonly used in clinical practice.

https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/RecommendationStatementFinal/depression-in-adults-screening

Slide13

Screening for Anxiety:

Implementation Considerations (Cont.)

While no studies have evaluated the benefits & harms of population screening for anxiety, trials among patients with clinically diagnosed anxiety support effectiveness of treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy, medications, or both

When screening suggests the presence of anxiety, evaluation necessary to:

Establish diagnosis

Determine appropriate treatment

Screening should be implemented in conjunction with collaborative and team-based approaches to ensure accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and appropriate follow-up.

https://www.womenspreventivehealth.org/recommendations/screening-for-anxiety/

Slide14

Recommendations for Well-Woman Care – A Well-Woman Chart

2020 Update

Slide15

A Well-Woman Chart

Comprehensive tool summarizing preventive services recommendations for women from the

WPSI

, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and Bright Futures

based on age, health status& risk factors.

Clinical practice considerations, risk assessment methods, and the age and frequency to deliver services are described in the Clinical Summary Tables that accompany the chart.

Slide16

Organization of the Well-Woman Chart

Slide17

Recommendations

for

Well-Woman

Care

Clinical SummaryTableshttps://www.womenspreventivehealth.org/wellwomanchart/

Slide18

Frequently Asked

Questions (FAQ)

https://www.womenspreventivehealth.org/wellwomanchart/faqs/

Slide19

Telehealth FAQ for

Preventive Care

 Health care professionals should consider telehealth modalities as an alternative to in-person preventive visits and services.

WPSI has worked alongside our partners to identify telehealth resources that can help clinicians to continue to provide health care to their patients.

Slide20

Coding Guide - 2020

 Introduction to Coding

Coding Guidance for all WPSI recommendations

Medicare and Medicaid information

https://www.womenspreventivehealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2020_WPSI_CodingGuide.pdf

Slide21

WPSI Patient Trifold – 2020 Update Now Available

Slide22

Care Women Deserve (CWD)

A coalition of organizations dedicated to educating people about the women’s preventive services available at no out-of-pocket costs, thanks to the Affordable Care Act.

www.carewomendeserve.org

@

CareWeDeserve

carewomendeserve

Slide23

Download the WPSI Recommendations, Well-Woman chart and clinical summary tables

Download additional resources

Visit out website and provide feedback

Participate in public comment opportunities

Join our listserv Nominate new topics

Slide24

Questions? Contact WPSI Staff

General WPSI E-mail –

wpsi@acog.org

Michelle Jones, MSc, Program Administrator – mjones@acog.org

Slide25

Thank You!

Questions?

“Trustworthy guidelines hold the promise of improving healthcare quality and outcomes.”

(IOM, 2011)