Wednesday afternoon CIFE review CIFE Industry Advisory Board Meeting Agenda Wednesday October 12 th 330 PM Review of Recent CIFE Work 600 PM Informal nohost Dinner at a local restaurant ID: 807525
Download The PPT/PDF document "CIFE Industry Advisory Board 2011" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
CIFE Industry Advisory Board 2011Wednesday afternoon CIFE review
Slide2CIFE Industry Advisory Board Meeting
AgendaWednesday, October 12th3:30 PM
Review of Recent CIFE Work
6:00 PM Informal (no-host) Dinner at a local restaurantThursday, October 13th 8:00 AM Continental Breakfast8:30 AM Welcome – Martin Fischer9:00 AM Leadership in VDC (Virtual Design & Construction) Carl Bass (Autodesk), Eric Lamb (DPR), Charles Matta (US General Services Administration.)10:30 AM Discussions about Leadership – all members11:15 AM Break11:35 AM CIFE Initiatives: professional development to "cross the chasm"; sustainability – Martin Fischer & John Kunz12:05 PM Working Lunch: identify specific initiatives and skills to enable an "early majority" of VDC practitioners1:15 PM CIFE Overview and Status from past year - John Kunz1:45 PM Summary of current top initiatives at member organizations and opportunities for synergy – all members2:45 PM Break3:05 PM Breakout Sessions: Next Steps in collaborative initiatives - all members4:05 PM Discussion - all members5:00 PM Social Hour and Poster Session of CIFE work6:00 PM Meeting ends
2
Slide3Wednesday afternoon CIFE review
Overview of CIFE research and methodsCase examplesDesign Optimization (MDO) for Daylighting Simulation using Artificial Intelligence, Distributed Computing, and
Uncertainty: work of John Basbagill, Ben Welle and Forest Flager
Scheduling optimization: work of Tony Dong and Rene Morkos
A Metric-Based Framework to Guide Management: work of Wendy LiCertificate Program case examples: John Kunz Our method is informal; please comment and ask questions!3
Slide4Reports from CIFE Summer Program:Wake Up! The Revolution Has Arrived: A Report From CIFE (ENR)
Designers/engineers:
30% reduction in project
schedule (
GPLA)33% cost reduction (Sera)328x increase in number of design versions (Arup)99.99% reduction in design cycle time (Beck)Design-Builders:48% reduction in man hours (Beck)30% reduction in cost (NCC)>99% reduction in design batch size (GT)85% reduction in effort to track supply chains (Optima) Builders:95% reduction in field rework (DPR)20% improvement in field productivity (DPR)0% reduction in scope (DPR)4
Slide5Our challenge: Find new chasmYour challenge: “Crossing the chasm”
Early innovator adopters now embrace VDC in all CIFE member organizations and in wide practice
Challenge: cross the “chasm” and engage early majority
Internally in CIFE organizations – hundreds
Externally in their value chains – thousands Reference: Geoffrey Moore in Crossing the Chasm (1991, revised 1999) 5http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Chasm_%28book%29# new userstime
Slide6Design Optimization (MDO) for Daylighting Simulation using Artificial Intelligence, Distributed Computing, and Uncertainty:
John BasbagillBig idea:
The innovative Life
cycle assessment (LCA)
method applies LCA specifically during the early design stages, allowing designers to understand the relative environmental impact importance of various building design decisions. Optimization algorithms generalize the method across a range of building shapes. An impact allocation scheme shows the distribution of impacts among building elements, and an impact reduction scheme shows which material and size decisions consistently achieve the greatest impact reductions. The method assists building design by highlighting early stage decisions that frequently achieve the significant reductions in carbon footprint.6
Slide7Scheduling optimization:
work of Tony Dong and Rene MorkosBig idea:
7
Slide8Predicting Client Satisfaction based on Dynamic Performance Feedback:A Metric-Based Framework to Guide Management
Wendy Li
Big idea:
Quantitative metrics can provide highly visible feedback to the project team about its project performance that in turn can help the team to manage its work better to achieve high client objectives.
8
Slide9Metrics project Objectives – work of Wendy LiEvaluate project performance
objectively using metrics
subjectively
using in-depth interviews
Understand the value of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and VDC methodsEstablish a benchmark for future projects9
Slide10Performance Metrics Overview - Categories
Quality – issues resolution, reliable promising,
precon
planning
Cost – estimates, contract directives, incentive programSchedule – schedule conformance, constraints, JIT, reworkOrganization – meetings, IPD concepts, leadership, satisfactionInnovation – SPS, BIM, Big Room10
Slide11Predicting Client Satisfaction based on Dynamic Performance Feedback:A Metric-Based Framework to Guide Management
Wendy Li
Big idea:
Quantitative metrics can provide highly visible feedback to the project team about its project performance that in turn can help the team to manage its work better to achieve high client objectives.
11
Slide12VDC Certificate ProgramJohn Kunz and Martin FischerBig ideas:
The VDC certificate program is the single most effective CIFE initiative
in
helping member organizations to get high value from adoption of VDC
methods. It provides professional education to enable participants to:Understand basic theory and practice of VDC;Develop awareness of trends, potential results and issues in using VDC;Develop specific skills in collaborative use of VDC methods.12Photo courtesy DPR
Slide13VDC Certificate Program: 9/2011 – 9/2012
Multiple programs at multiple venues with multiple participants and companies … about our capacity
13
Slide14Total Sample Size = 34
Certificates Awarded
Project
Cost
$1 million - $4 billionProject Size30,000 - 560,000 sf Project TypesHotelsHospitalResidentialTunnelDock FacilityBridgeAmusement RideRetailViaductEducationMisc. (Business Development; Design)Demographics of CP graduates’ projects
Slide15All participants now set objectives and measure and assess process performance wrt objectives
15
Slide16Status of the VDC adoption chasm: Many tasks use BIM in multiple projects with varying success
16
Slide17Performance Metric Tracked Frequently (weekly, monthly)
# Projects n = 34)
RFIs
15
Cost Conformance12
Schedule Conformance (incl. milestone)
11
BIM/VDC Metrics (training, model quality, VDC competence, use rate, QTO, cost/project, model conformance)
10
Latency (response, design review, overrun)
8
Meetings/ICE (effectiveness, attendance, participation)
8
Clash Detection
7
Commitment Reliability/PPC/Task Conformance
6
Submittals
5
Design Change Requests
4
Misc (energy calc methods, daily production, disruption time from public,, design input completeness)
4
Rework (field, design, prefab)
4
User Satisfaction
3
Change Orders
2
Prefabrication
2
Safety Incidents
2
Participants tracked a wide variety of process performance metrics
Slide18CP participants’ use of metrics
They all use them!Many report that they have valueInsightful qualitative value from monthly report comments
Improvements over time:
2008 > 2009:
understanding ‘metrics’2009 > 2010: define objectives2010 > 2012: graphical reportingMany did not identify appropriate metrics (vs. deliverables, tasks ‘getting usable 3D model for glass roof construction planning’Frequency of tracking randomly identified and not followed throughFrequent comment: did not know how to establish measurable objectives (improved > 2010)
Slide19Most CP graduates use multiple VDC methodsExample methods used one participant:
19
Slide20Example summary of personal work to date:Participants have multiple roles and activities
20
Personal activities
Comment - certification requirements:
Principal responsibility
Contribute
to team
Reviewed
Specify functional intent
five explicit, quantitative and measurable output
objectives for your project,
including at least one each that relate to product,
organization and process
Product (3D) model
No
Yes
Yes
Organization
No
Yes
Some
Process
Yes
Yes
Yes
Explicitly model
Create or contribute to one
project model, which might be
a 3D
BIM, organization or
process
Product (3D)
No
Yes
Yes
Organization
No
Yes
Yes
Process
Yes
Yes
Yes
Analysis: predict, measure
status
Two
performance predictions and five measured process performance metrics
Product (3D)
No
Yes
Yes
Organization
No
Yes
Yes
Process
Yes
Yes
Yes
Use VDC methods in management
Explain management implications of measured performance metrics wrt explicit objectives
Slide21Example of methods by one CP graduate
21
Slide22Many lessons learned
22
Slide23Generally high level of satisfaction
23
Slide24CIFE Industry Advisory Board 2012
Slide25Meeting goals
Discuss:
Translation
:
Share (inspiring) experiences, implicationsPlans: Identify Individual goals for outcomes, process, actionsShared objectivesCommitment and focus: translational work to find “next chasms”Initiatives: Based on our individual work, identify candidate joint initiatives CIFE 2012 focusOld businessYour workCIFE statusDesired outcome: guidance for CIFE communityParticipants better understand translation practice and potential Identify CIFE foci for breakthrough research and sustaining VDC-related work
25
Slide26Focus for 2013 and beyond:
Check your
desired activities with the
CIFE community
in next 2 years26Single VF activityMulti-stakeholder consortiumManagementMetrics: process to collect and report; global benchmark dbBIM management and operationalized methods (e.g., specification, model server, cloud)Coordination management and latency improvement
Knowledge management
Sustainability
Smart buildings and communities
Sustainability analysis and optimization
Operations and
facility management (energy
, etc.)
Process
Pre-fabrication,
dramatic schedule compression
4D with analytics (DSS)
Extremely rapid parametric design
variation and multi-disciplinary analysis
Education
VDC education for
senior executives
VDC education for project executives
VDC education for thousands of professionals
VDC-enabled workforce
and field-knowledge-enabled VDC
Other
Slide27CIFE Industry Advisory Board Meeting
27
Slide28Thursday morningTranslating CIFE research into practice
28
9:00 – 11:15 am
Slide29Translation forum
Focus:
translation --
the (often iterative) process where
Members and CIFE work jointly to define problems; CIFE researchers develop innovative new methods to address the problems;Members move the new research results into practice.We move results to education 29
Slide30Translation forum
SpeakersEric Lamb, DPRStewart Carroll (Beck)
Zuhair Haddad
(CCC)
30
Slide31CIFE initiatives: prefabrication; many design options; professional development
31
11:35 – 12:00 pm
Slide3232
Plus-Delta of Civil Engineering
Provides fixed physical assets and wealth
High global demand for infrastructure and housing
Opportunity to impact global climate challenge significantly
Slide3333
Plus-Delta of Civil Engineering
Provides fixed physical assets and wealth
High global demand for infrastructure and housing
Opportunity to impact global climate challenge significantlyLow productivity compete with other ways to spend $High energy use and rising energy costsStructural reliability << societal need (Chile)1. US Department of Commerce, compiled by P. Teicholz2. Persson, Sustainable City of Tomorrow: B01—Experiences of a Swedish Housing exposition (Swedish Research Council, Distributed by Coronet Books Stockholm, 2005), pp. 108 – 109. Guilllermo Gomez, PUChile12
Slide34Fundamental issue: outcome reliability
Structures (Chile, post-earthquake) -- good:~500K/~5M homes damaged or destroyed:
<2σ
~4 joint failures /~100 in (collapsed) buildings:
2σ4/~10,000 post-1985 buildings collapsed in major damage area: >3σ Energy – not good:20/20 buildings used more energy than predicted – Malmo, Sweden, 2001 (range 70 – 340% greater) 121 LEED buildings use 30% more energy per square foot than average for U.S. buildingsNeither structure nor energy performance meets societal needs34
Slide3535
The CIFE mission
to be the world's premier academic research center for Virtual Design and Construction of Architecture - Engineering - Construction (AEC) industry projects.
Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) is the use of multi-disciplinary performance
models of design-construction projects, including the Product (i.e., facilities), Organization of the design - construction - operation team and Work Processes in order to support business objectives
Slide36to be the world's premier academic research center for Virtual Design and Construction of Architecture - Engineering - Construction (AEC) industry projects.
Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) is the use of multi-disciplinary performance
models
of design-construction projects, including the
Product (i.e., facilities), Organization of the design - construction - operation team and Work Processes in order to support business objectives … … to support exceptionally reliable engineering and management processes to plan, design, construct and operate sustainable facilities 36The CIFE mission
Slide37Is there any other option?
For our research
For you
… to support exceptionally reliable engineering and management processes to plan, design, construct and operate sustainable facilities 37
Slide3838
(Multiple) Predictable performance objectives: *Changed in 2010
Controllable
Process
[Conformance to plans]Outcome [Performance]
Product, organization, process designs
Latency:
mean <= 1; 95% within 2 working days
Safety:
0 lost hours
Coordination activity
:
planned, explicit, public, informed > 90%
Field-generated Requests for Information
:
0
Schedule
: 1 y Design
< .5 y Construct
95% on-time performance
Facility
managed
Scope
:
100% of items with > 2% of value, time, cost or energy
Rework volume
:
0 (for field construction work); objective = 10-20% (virtual work)
Cost
: >= 95% of budgeted items within 2% of budgeted cost
Prediction basis:
> 80% of predictions founded
*Function (quality) conformance (%):
>= 99%
Quality - Delivered Scope
: 100% satisfaction by POE
Design versions
:
2 or more >= 80%
Schedule conformance (%):
>= 80%
*Sustainability: >
75% better energy, water, materials, than 2002, profitably
Staff trained in VDC:
>= 4/project
Cost conformance (%):
>= 95%
Globalization
: >= 50% of supply and sales
Slide39Research questions at CIFE
What is a theory, based on fundamental principles, which can be used to describe and explain or predict elements of (sustainable)
design, construction and operations?
What is a way to operationalize a new theory using socially embedded computer methods
?Power and generality of the theory?39
Slide40Translational
research at
CIFE
Goal:
Measurably contribute to exceptionally reliable engineering and management processes to design, construct and operate sustainable facilitiesMethod – “translation” to integrate: 40
Slide41Summary of CIFE roleCIFE translational research gives practitioners the opportunity to identify, explore, develop and apply new methods that have great potential value … with low risk and (relatively) low cost
41
Slide42How we try to workCultural values
Open and transparent: to members, colleagues, studentsDirected toward big ideas: believable breakthrough vision for members and studentsEvidence-based:
seek and respect measured results to precise questions
Systematic:
drive from Mission strategy objectives plans actions reflection updatesFocused: serve our members, students, university; help the industry as we can42
Slide43CIFE VisionWe and our members develop, learn and apply VDC principles and methods to help projects deliver exceptional value and help member organizations achieve breakthrough objectives
43
Slide44VDC principles support the CIFE vision
Integrate: take an integrated (POP) view of projects: Relate Function, Scope, Behavior of the P, O and P
Model the project
(
P, O & P) and analyze early and oftenEngage stakeholders: early, often and meaningfullyMetrics-based: Set explicit objectives, report performance often and manage by objectives and performanceLOD: manage the level of detail. Focus models, analyses and management on what is within your locus of control 44
Slide45VDC methods we develop and use
Project models: POP, TEI, RiskProduct: BIM+3/4D (Parametric)
Many analyses
Organization:
ICEOrganization model and analysisTeam design and charter, commitments, coordination, meeting agreementsProcess: models and metricsControllable, process, outcome objectives and metricsTarget costing and scheduling, pull planning, master schedulingProcess and value stream maps45
Slide46Suggestions for membersFocus VDC implementation on deep
and broad impactDeep: apply VDC modeling, analysis (>= 5 analyses/BIM), collaboration (ICE) and metrics (at least weekly)Broad – (with corporate leadership and budget) provide:
Corporate suite of modeling, analysis tools
(Global + regional) VDC steering groups + Wiki to share methods and lessons
Modeling & analysis methods and tools: PBS, OBS, WBS, CBS, data exchange methods, metrics collection and reporting, VDC training x >100/yearSet objectives; measure process & outcome status; integrate VDC with strategic business processesEngage in specific collaborative translational activities46
Slide47Major trends in next decade ….Demographics:
Aging populations ↑ hospitals
Global economic growth ↑ middle class housing
Aging western infrastructure + ↑ wealth in emerging economies ↑ infrastructure
Shaken economies less building, call for measured performanceChanging world:Global warming ↑ sustainability (Structural, energy efficiency) ↑ cost of oil ↑ demand for energy efficiencyGlobalization Consolidation via acquisition, merger, partnershipChanging role of AEC: low-cost transactions long-term partnerships w/guaranteed high level of performanceTechnology and connectivity:Computing and automated sensing and control very inexpensiveVDC on the job site and work face; stick build manufacture, assemble IM, chat, 3D, ICE natural for young staff47
Slide48CIFE initiatives:Recent results that support a 2015 objective
Generate and analyze many design options quickly
48
Slide49CIFE initiatives:Recent results that support a 2015 objective
Schedule conformance (Certificate participant)
49
VDC projectNo-VDC
Slide50CIFE initiatives:Recent results that support a 2015 objective
VDC professional development: Certificate programParticipants: ~400Organizations: scoresProjects with >= 4 participants: ~10
Graduates: 36
Impacts:
Most participants now implement metrics and ICE“Best thing we have done.”50
Slide51CIFE initiatives:Recent results that support a 2015 objective
Managing facility modeled (BIM) scopeProblem: inconsistent BIM methods and results
Method: Create BIM management framework
51
Finding: ↑ BIM value ← ↑ usesImpacts: Consistent methods, more value
Slide52CIFE initiatives:Recent results that support a 2015 objective
Latency (Certificate participant)
52
Slide53CIFE overview and status from past year
1:30 – 1:55 pm
Slide54CIFE MEMBERSHIP
Visiting Fellows & Interns during 2010-11
Akshay
Adya (WDI)Austin Becker (WDI)Catherine Boubekeur (Glodon, MTR)Anne-Laure Cuvilliez (Microsoft)Ning “Tony” Dong (CCC) Forest Flager (Beck)Victor Gane (MTR)Julian Gonsalves (MTR, GSA, Glodon)Jinping Gou (MTR, GSA, Glodon)Calvin Kam, (GSA) Atul Khanzode (DPR)Jung In Kim (MTR, GSA, Glodon)Wendy Li (Skanska, WDI) Liang Ma (WDI)Rene Morkos (Slavenburg)David Newell (WDI)Adam Nizich (MTR)Reid Senescu (Arup) Min Song (MTR, GSA)Christopher Stiedemann (WDI)Richard Tsai (MTR, GSA, Glodon)Meng
Yu (MTR, GSA,
Glodon
)
Anthony
Zara (MTR, GSA,
Glodon
)
Sangwoo
Cho (DPR)
Plus multiple summer interns
Consulting Professor: Ben Schwegler (WDI)
54
Slide55CIFE MEMBERSHIP
Visiting Fellows & Scholars
Visiting Scholars
Merel Witteveen,
Utrecht University, March – June 2010Peng Yi “Nathan” Wang, Glodon Software, Oct 2010Ole Berard, Technical University of Denmark, Jan – June 2011Ragip Akbas, Autodesk, April – May 2011Liang Ma, Tongji University, Jan – Dec 2011Kishio Tamura, Konica Minolta, Sep – Dec 2011Sandy Ng, Fulbright Scholar, Jan – Mar 2012Visiting ProfessorLeonardo Rischmoller, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile,Jan – Dec 201155
Slide5656
Finances: Income, Carryover, & Expense Comparison
Slide57CIFE Membership57
Slide5858
CIFE MEMBERSHIP
Changes since last IAB (Oct. 2010)
CHANGE IN MEMBERSHIP LEVEL
Beck Contributor AssociateFORMER MEMBERSArup Design+Construction StrategiesLondon Infotech
Slide59Proposed CIFE Calendar 2012 - 13
59
E V E N T S
D A T E S
Call for Seed ProposalsFebruary 15, 2012
Proposals Due
April 11
Technical Advisory Committee
April 18
Award Announcements
April 23
Summer
Program, Stanford
June 20-21
Industry Advisory Board
2012
October
18
VDC Certificate Program
March
19-23, September 10-14
Slide6060
CIFE Seed 2012-13 ProjectsPower
to the Edge: A Work Tracking System for Construction
:
Fischer, Levitt, Garcia-LopezMultidisciplinary Design Optimization of Buildings for Life-Cycle Cost and Environmental Impact Performance: Lepech, Fischer, Flager, BasbagillIncorporating Human and Social Behavior in Computational Egress Analysis: Law, Latombe, Parigi, ChuSeeding Scalable Workflow Productivity Improvements: Fischer, Steinert, Senescu, HeadSpace Constraint Method: Fischer, Lepech, Morkos
Slide6161
CIFE Membership
Industry Type:
AEC = Arch/Eng/Constr
IP = Info. ProviderO/O = Owner/ OperatorOT = OtherR = Real EstateS/H = Software/ HardwareCOMPANY NAMECOUNTRYMEMBER CATEGORYINDUSTRY TYPEArup
Contributor
AEC
Autodesk, Inc.
Associate
S/H
Beck Group
Contributor
AEC, R
CCC (Consolidated Contractors Co.)
Greece
Associate
AEC
Design+ Construction Strategies
Member
S/H
DPR Construction, Inc.
Associate
AEC
FIATECH
Reciprocal
OT
Glodon Software Co., Ltd
China
Associate
S/H
GSA (U.S. General Services Administration)
Partner
O/O
London Infotech
USA & India
Contributor
S/H
Microsft Corporation
Contributor
S/H
MTR Corporation Ltd
China
Associate
O/O
NCC Construction
Sweden
Member
AEC
Obayashi Corporation (with Webcor Builders)
Japan
Member
AEC
Optima DCH Development, Inc.
Member
AEC
Oracle Primavera
Contributor
S/H
Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.
Associate
AEC
Scenario Virtual Project Delivery
Member
S/HSkanska USAUSA, EUAssociateAECSlavenburg BVNetherlandsAssociateAECSMART Technologies, Inc.CanadaMemberS/HStrategic Project SolutionsMemberAEC
Veidekke Sverige AB
Sweden
Member
AEC
Walt Disney Imagineering
Partner
O/O
Webcor Builders (with Obayashi Corp.)
Member
AEC
Slide62Members: summary of current initiatives of member organizations and opportunities for synergy
1:55 – 2:45 pm
Slide63Discussion and next steps - all members
3:50 – 5:00 pm
Slide64Our challenge: “Crossing the chasm”
Early innovator adopters now embrace VDC in all CIFE member organizations and in wide practiceChallenge: cross the “chasm” and engage early majorityInternally in CIFE organizations – hundreds
Externally in their value chains – thousands
Reference: Geoffrey Moore in
Crossing the Chasm (1991, revised 1999) 64http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Chasm_%28book%29# new userstime
Slide6565
Controllable
Process
[Conformance to plans]
Outcome [Performance]Product, organization, process designs
Latency:
[
mean <= 1; 95% <=2 working days]
Safety:
[
0 lost hours]
Coordination activity
:
[
planned, explicit, public, informed > 90%]
Field-generated Requests for Information
:
[
0]
Schedule
:
[
1 y Design;
< .5 y Construct;
95% on-time performance]
Facility
managed
Scope
:
[
100% of items with > 2% of value, time, cost or energy]
Rework volume
:
[
0 (for field construction work); objective = 10-20% (virtual work)
]
Cost
:
[>= 95% of budgeted items within 2% of budgeted cost]
Prediction basis:
[
> 80% of predictions founded]
*Function (quality) conformance (%):
[
>= 99%]
Delivered Scope
:
[100% POE satisfaction]
Design versions
:
[
2 or more >= 80%]
Schedule conformance (%):
[
>= 80%]
*Sustainability:
[>75% better energy, water, materials, than 2002, profitably]
Staff trained in VDC
:
[
>= 4/ project]
Cost conformance (%):
[
>= 95%]
Globalization
:
[>= 50% of supply and sales]
Other:
Other:
Your
views on leadership, objectives and methods:
[CIFE]
you
Slide66Survey results:Types of activity in which your organization participated in past two years
66
Slide67Survey results:Types of activity in which your organization would like to participate in the
next two years
67
Slide68Discussion
68
Slide69Focus for 2012 and beyond:your
desired activities with the CIFE community in next 2 years
69
Red
indicates relatively significant level of interest Committee or task force to exploreSingle VF activityMulti-stakeholder consortiumManagementMetrics: process to collect and report; global benchmark db147VDC/BIM scorecard assessment
BIM management and methods (e.g., model server,
cloud)
1
1
3
Coordination management and latency improvement
1
0
1
Sustainability
Smart buildings and communities
1
0
0
Sustainability analysis and optimization
0
2
3
Operations and
facility management (energy, etc.)
1
0
4
Process
Pre-fabrication,
dramatic schedule compression
1
3
5
4D with analytics (DSS)
1
4
5
Education
VDC education for
senior executives
0
0
2
VDC education for project executives
1
3
4
VDC education for thousands of professionals
0
0
0
VDC-enabled workforce
and field-knowledge-enabled VDC
0
1
4
Legal change
1
1
1
Tool evaluation and sharing014
Slide70Interest in specific activities Metrics
for management: GSA/scorecard CK, Bechtel (JK); DPR w/Nellie MF & IVL, Slavenburg (JK
: POE,
macdadi
in design and poe)Real results autumn, winter; TAC-time discussion of consortiumBIM management/model server: GSA, vico MF in mid-Nov.211/212? Operations including sustainability: Skanska JK; Yau Lee (prefer prefab) CK, DPR MF, MTR CKPrefab/ schedule compression: Skanska JK, DPR MF; Yau Lee CK, Slavenburg MF, [Tony Dong]4D Analytics: PB MFEducation for executives: Bechtel JKOthersNCC – JKBeck; CCC – MFGlodon - CK70
Slide71PlusMember presentations and sharingMorning speakers
Open forumWed. PM
71
Slide72DeltaMake sure everyone receives choices ahead of timePM too slow
Voting confusing (interest vs. $?)Include brief student/project presentationsPromote Wed. PM moreWork through case (??)
72
Slide73Meeting goals
Discuss:
Leadership
:
Share (inspiring) experiences, intent, risksPlans: Identify Individual objectives for outcomes, process, actionsShared objectivesSynergies: identify opportunities for collective work Initiatives: Based on our individual work, identify candidate joint initiatives CIFE 2012 focusOld businessYour workCIFE statusDesired outcome: guidance for CIFE communityParticipants better understand leadership and global work in Integrated Facility Engineering with VDCIdentify CIFE foci for future integration and VDC-related work
73
Slide7474
2011?,
… 2015?
2011?, … 2015?What do you have? … What do you want?ObjectiveObjective: 2015
Schedule
1 y Design; < .5 y Construct
Cost
Variance < 5%
Function/ Scope
0 variance, by POE
Safety
Better
Sustainability
75% better than 2002
Globalization
>= 50% of supply and sales
Slide75Informal social hour
5:00 – 6:00 pm