Joyce Reinecke JD Executive Director Alliance for Fertility Preservation October 25 2021 Alliance for Fertility Preservation About Us A 501c3 Professionals in oncology reproductive endocrinology research bioethics research reproductive law We believe that having cancer should n ID: 917912
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Fertility Preservation Coverage: 2022 Ou..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Fertility Preservation Coverage: 2022 Outlook
Joyce Reinecke, JD
Executive Director,
Alliance for Fertility Preservation
October 25, 2021
Slide2Alliance for Fertility PreservationAbout Us A 501(c)(3). Professionals in oncology, reproductive endocrinology, research, bioethics, research, reproductive law. We believe that having cancer should not preclude parenthood.Our Mission To increase information, resources, and access to fertility preservation for cancer patients and the healthcare professionals who treat them.
Our VisionFertility preservation as a standard facet of cancer care so all patients receive the information, support, referrals and services they need to protect their individual reproductive and parenthood goals.Our Programs and ServicesFertility Scout®– Free, secure, online referral tool for patients and providersAdvocacy – Develop content and policy to support increased access to FPAwareness & Education – Provide online information and resources for patients and professionals
Patient Support – Patient stories, IA Mentor program, assistance with appeals
Slide3Successful FP Legislation (2017-19)
STATE
YEAR
BILL
STRUCTURE
GROUPS COVERED
LIVES
LIMITATIONS
COVERAGE SPECIFICS
CT2017HB7124Changed definition of InfertilityIndividual and group plans651,134Cycle limits; religious exemptionChanged statutory definition of “infertility” to “medically necessary”RI2017S 0821A & H 6170AAmended IVF mandate. Added FP coverageIndividual and group plans241,582Age limits (25-40); unclear whether applies to FPStandard FP services if necessary medical treatment may cause iatrogenic infertilityMD2018SB271 & HB908Amended IVF Mandate. Added FP coverageLarge groups only926,446No embryos; religious exemptionStandard FP services if necessary medical treatment may cause iatrogenic infertilityDE2018SB139New mandate for Infertility including IVF+FP No state employees or Medicaid 120,4386 cycles; religious exemption; retrieve by 45Coverage for specific treatments, inc. IVF & sperm, egg/embryo cryo. No exper. treatments IL2018HB2617New FP coverage not linked to infertility mandateBroad coverage inclu. state employees and Medicaid 5,303,325ACA mandate clause re: exceeding EHBStandard FP services if necessary medical treatment may cause iatrogenic infertilityNY2019S719/A2817*budgetAmend Infertility mandate to include IVF. Add FP coverageIVF: Large groups onlyFP: Ind., all group plans4,700,0003 cycles of IVF; FP TBDCoverage added through State Budget process. IVF + FP coverage.NH2019SB 279New mandate for Infertility including IVF+FP All “health carriers” (insurers, HMOs, etc.)208,515Limits can’t be “arbitrary”Standard FP services for eggs, embryos, sperm, and “material.” Storage through policy term.CA2019SB 600Clarifies existing coverage for FP All managed care plans; HMOs, some PPOs16,900,000TBD – Regs pendingCodifies regulator’s view that medically-necessary FP is a “basic healthcare service"NJ2020S2133FP coverageAll group plans 50+; state & school employees1,179,000No storageStandard FP services if necessary medical treatment may cause iatrogenic infertilityCO2020HB20-1158Infertility diagnosis and treatment, incl. IVF + FP All individual and group health plans1,196,0003 cycles of IVF; ACA clause; religious exemptionIF dx & treatment; FP for “condition” or medical treatment creating a risk of infertilityUT2021HB 192Directed Medicaid to create waiver for FP coverageMedicaid405,590Cancer onlyStandard FP services when needed cancer treatment causes substantial risk of infertility
Successful Legislation Fertility Preservation 2017-2021
31+ M
Lives Covered
!
Slide4Legislative Summary2017-to DATE
11 States Have Enacted FP Coverage:
California New Hampshire*
Connecticut New Jersey
Colorado* New York*
Delaware* Rhode Island
Illinois Utah**
Maryland
*Also includes IVF coverage**Medicaid only31+ MLives Covered!
Slide5Federal CoverageFederal Coverages:1. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) -announced coverage 2/17/21
-coverage starts Jan 20222. Veterans Administration-Directive 13323. TRICARE-Limited, supplemental coverage
Slide6Role of InsuranceExpand AccessAlleviate financial burden on patientsProtect fundamental life activity – reproductionFacilitate robust discussions between providers and patients about optionsLegitimize fertility preservation services as appropriate
Expedite & systematize processes for information and referralAddress current socioeconomic and gender access disparitiesMeet the Standard of Care
Slide7Principles of CoverageAll patients have the right to be fully informed about the possible effects of their medical treatment on their reproductive system and their ability to have children in the future.
They also deserve to be told of their options for preserving and protecting their ability to have genetic offspring and/or become a parent in the future, and to be referred to a fertility specialist for a thorough consultation. Fertility preservation options are only true options if patients can access them. Without insurance coverage for medically necessary fertility preservation treatments, many patients simply cannot afford sperm, egg, embryo, or tissue banking, especially in the midst of urgent, distressing, and often, costly, life-saving medical treatment.
Slide8“Model” coverageGoal: Coverage of standard fertility preservation procedures for patients who are at risk of iatrogenic infertility or sterility due to medically necessary treatments for serious or life-threatening illness.
Policy:Distinguish from “infertility” treatment coverageEstablish as part of comprehensive cancer careParallel to other side effects, WCHRA
Scope:Standard procedures as per ASCO, ASRMNot limited to cancerConsultations, evaluations, procedures, laboratory tests, medications, and storageNo arbitrary or discriminatory limits (age, prognosis, etc.)Medical necessity of procedures determined by physician All insurers
Slide9Looking AheadCoalition Building
Strategic Planning2021 wrap-up (states still pending)Annual review & goal settingFinalize 2022 target states
Explore federal coverage:Possible Federal legislationCon’t FEHBP implementationMedicaid Task ForceOutreach to AdministrationIncrease media, patient stories
Slide102022 Priorities
State
TierDescription
Notes
Massachusetts
1
FP
2021 – positive report from CHIA – pending
Utah
1FPNew bill w/ expanded coverage; Planning call 10/27Washington1IVF+FPWaiting on final report from Sunrise cmteOregon1IVF+FPNew bill from health cmte going forwardVirginia1IVF+FPWaiting on HIRC; pending electionCalifornia2IVF onlyDecember briefing/hearingHawaii2FPGoal: trigger new auditor’s reportPennsylvania2IVF+FP (or FP)Dem caucus Wisconsin2IVF+FPBill being filed/announced Nov. 1Maine2IVF+FPWaiting on fiscal reportPossible: NC, TN (IVF+FP); MI, MO (FP only)
Slide11Thank you!
joyce@allianceforfertilitypreservation.org