functions Indian Institute of Science April 27 2017 Dmitry Beliaev Oxford Igor Wigman KCL 1 Motivation amp Background Chladni plates video General Setup Compact smooth nmanifold ID: 801570
Download The PPT/PDF document "Volume distribution of nodal domains o..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Volume distribution of nodal domains of random band-limited functions
Indian Institute of ScienceApril 27, 2017
Dmitry Beliaev, OxfordIgor Wigman, KCL
Slide21. Motivation & Background
Slide3Chladni plates video
Slide4General Setup
– Compact smooth n-manifold
(most interesting n=2)
Laplace-Beltrami on M Eigenfunctions
:
Orthonormal basis of L
2(M,dVol), (Weyl law)
Nodal components & domains
Nodal set:
Nodal components:
Connected components of
.
Smooth (n-1)-manifold.
Nodal domains:
Connected components of
smooth n-manifold
Slide6Questions – local vs. nonlocal I. Local (“easier” via Kac
-Rice): a. Total volume, nodal intersections, curvature… b. Critical points (values) c. Euler characteristic (Gauss-Bonnet).II. Nonlocal (semilocal
): a. Nodal count (Nazarov-Sodin `09,`12, `15) b. Topology: genus, area…; Nesting (Sarnak-W)
c. Geometry: Lengths/areas/volumes d*. Total Betti Number (Gayet-Welschinger
)
*
semilocality
not established
Slide7“Semilocality” (Nazarov-Sodin)
Locality: (example) If then
+
Semilocality
:
“Most” of the nodal domains lie in
, R>>0.
Few “big” nodal domains.May approximate the total number of domains locally.
Slide8Nodal count (deterministic)
Nodal Count. Courant:
Pleijel:
Constant improved
by
(
Bourgain
)
No lower bound
Nodal picture for the square, arbitrarily high energy. A. Stern’s thesis, Gottingen, 1925.Courtesy of P. Sarnak.
Slide9Berry’s Random Wave Model
Principle (2d): as
“behave randomly” as wavenumber- monochromatic wave on
(chaotic M)
Random directions
, phases
.
Scale invariant, assume
Centered Gaussian, covariance
2. Random Band Limited Functions
Slide11Random Band-Limited FunctionsFix M – smooth n-manifold,
1
,
- N(0,1)
i.i.d
.
(
summation over
)
Covariance function
i.e. the spectral projector
.
Limiting ensemblesNatural scaling around any point of M.
Scaling for covariance (values & derivatives)
Fix x, chart around x,
r
escale
Define
on
, “clean” covariance
Spectral measure characteristic on annulus
Limiting ensembles (cont.)Defined Gaussian random field
on
(“scale invariant”).
is scaling limit of
around each point
depends on
,
not
on M, x (universality)Relevant question: nodal structures of restricted on ball , E.g. nodal count of domains lying in .
Slide141. Random Spherical harmonics
2-dimensional unit sphere.
Eigenfunctions – spherical harmonics degree
. More precisely
,
Take
be orthonormal basis
,
are N(0,1)
i.i.d
.
Legendre
E.g.
Berry’s RWM
Spherical harmonics vs. Planar waves
Random spherical
harmonicsAlex BarnettBerry’s RWM
Slide162. “Real Fubini Study”
n-dimensional projective space, round metric
– degree t homogeneous polynomial degree
,
is “random projective
hypesurface
”
Some pictures (Alex Barnett)
=0
Real
Fubini-Study
Random spherical harmonics
Berry’s Random Waves
Slide18Nodal count (Nazarov-Sodin)
Expected nodal count: (2007, 2012)
Concentration
(2012)
Exponential concentration
(2007)
,
degree
spherical harmonic
Valid for
toral
eigenfunctions
(
Rozenshein
`16).
Open
in general.
3. Universal law for nodal volume distribution(Dmitry
Beliaev-IW `16)
Slide20Scale-invariant (Euclidean) case Field e.g.
RWM on
For
,
let
number nodal domains
of
: a.
b. - number domains in
Nazarov-Sodin
: exists
s.t.
. Convergence in mean
, also
a.s
. (“N-S constant”)
Gaussian fields
(axioms), include
Scale-invariant (Euclidean) case
Faber-Krahn:
Theorem (
Beliaev
-W): For every
there exists
s.t.
(a.s.) Denote
deterministic
increasing on
(optimal)
distribution function.
Caveat: continuous (differentiable) outside
countable
atoms.
Variety of Gaussian fields on
(
axiomatize
)
Random spherical harmonics
Inherit
,
countable
Need to rescale area compared to
:
:
Theorem (
Beliaev
-W):
We have
for
The mass around atoms might be spreading
Discussion In practice: for “every” instance of
the proportion of nodal domains with area
is about
deterministic. Support of area distribution (optimal):
Proof for
inspired
Canzani-Sarnak `16 Conjecture: 1. No “distinguished areas” 2. is everywhere differentiable on 3. on
Coupling area + boundary length Can count the number of domains
of
Deterministic limit distribution
(
) in support must satisfy
isoperimetric inequality (“Dido’s Problem”). Eigenfunctions,
strictly increasing
,
(“optimal”). Proof inspired
Canzani-Sarnak
.
“Both oval-line and sausage-like domains exist”.
Dido Building Cartphage / J. M. W. TurnerThe National Gallery
Slide26The Embarkation of the Queen of Sheba / Claude LorrainThe National Gallery
Slide27General CaseBand-limited
Euclidean
.
domains
;
,
limit law,
atoms
For
:
,
then
increasing on
General case (cont.)
,
increasing on
1
st
zero of
Proof inspired by
Canzani-Sarnak
1. No “distinguished
volumes”
2
.
is
differentiable where increasing
3
.
domain of increase