/
Building a  Biosimilars  Pathway in the U.S. Building a  Biosimilars  Pathway in the U.S.

Building a Biosimilars Pathway in the U.S. - PowerPoint Presentation

attentionallianz
attentionallianz . @attentionallianz
Follow
345 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-23

Building a Biosimilars Pathway in the U.S. - PPT Presentation

Richard Dolinar MD Endocrinologist Chairman of the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines Presented at the Colorado Biosimilars Educational Forum   December 6 2012 2 The differences between Chemical Drugs and Biotech Medicines you ID: 785049

patient biosimilars product alfa biosimilars patient alfa product cancer biologic unique adverse epoetin medicines patients biologics products drugs differences

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Building a Biosimilars Pathway in the ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Building a

Biosimilars Pathway in the U.S.

Richard Dolinar, MDEndocrinologist, Chairman of the Alliance for Safe Biologic MedicinesPresented at the Colorado Biosimilars Educational Forum  December 6, 2012

Slide2

2

The differences between Chemical Drugs and Biotech Medicines you can

see

CHEMICAL DRUGS:

Made by chemical reactions

Defined structure, easy to characterize

Usually taken by mouth, prescribed by general practitioner

BIOTECH MEDICINES:

Made by living cells-unique cell lines, from bacteria, yeast, or mammals

Heterogenous

structure, difficult to characterize

Usually injected, prescribed by specialists

Slide3

3

Source: New England Journal of Medicines, “Developing the Nation’s Biosimilars Program,” August 4, 2011

Molecular Comparison: Aspirin vs. Biologic Monoclonal Antibody

Slide4

4

A Highly

Complex Manufacturing Process

IgG1 antibody

>1000 amino acids

~150,000

daltons

>20,000 atoms

Slide5

Role of Biotechnology in Medicine

HIV/AIDS

Some antiretroviral therapies like Infuvirtide (Fuzeon) stop the HIV virus from infecting cells while others treat HIV-related anemia and other complications.

Advancements in science have increased the number of biotechnology products, revolutionizing the diagnosis, prevention, cure and management of many serious diseases.

DIABETES

Synthetically made Human insulin was made available in the 1980’s. Before then, it was made from cows

and

pigs.

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

This disorder attacks healthy

parts

of the body, including its own joints, causing swelling, pain and even disfigurement. New biotech drugs target the affected area without suppressing the entire immune system.

CANCER

Several biologics including this image of

Trastuzumab

(

a monoclonal antibody) treat cancers.

5

Slide6

6

Examples of Biologic Medicines

By 2014, it is projected that six out of the 10 top-selling drugs in the U.S. will be biologics, some of which may face biosimilar entry.Analysis Group Health Care Consulting Bulletin (Fall/Winter 2010) Product

Manufacturer

Condition

HumulinR

(

Insulin Injection,

Human Recombinant)Eli LillyDiabetes

Betaseron (Interferon beta-1b)BayerMultiple SclerosisGenotropic (Somatropin)Pfizer

Children with growth hormone

deficiency;

Prader-Willi

syndrome, girls with Turner syndrome

Follistim

(

Follitropin

Beta)

Organon

Infertility

NovSeven

(

Coagulation

Factor

VIIa

)

Novo Nordisk

Hemophilia

Enbrel

(

Etanercept

)

Amgen

Rheumatoid Arthritis, PsoriasisEpogen (Epeotin alfa)AmgenAnemia caused by chronic kidney diseaseRituxan

(Rituximab)Genentech

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Rheumatoid ArthritisHumira (

Adalimumab

injection)

Abbot Labs

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Crone’s disease,

ankylosing

spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis

Erbitux

(

Cetuximab

injection)

Bristol-Meyers

Squibb

Head & Neck Cancer, Colorectal Cancer

Pegasys

(

Peginterferon

alfa-2a)

Roche

Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B

Herceptin

(

Trastuzumab

injection)

Genentech

Metastatic

Breast Cancer

Avastin

(

Bevacizumab

)

Genentech

Colorectal Cancer, Lung

Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer,

Gliobastoma

, Metastatic Kidney Cancer

Slide7

What are Biosimilars?

Biosimilars are often referred to as “follow

-on biologics” or “follow-on proteins”.Biosimilars are copies of existing trade-name biological products whose patents have expired.While “highly similar” biosimilars are not “identical” to the reference productThey

do not utilize the same living cell line, production process, or raw material as the innovator drug.

SIMILAR, BUT NOT IDENTICAL

INNOVATOR MEDICINE

EU-APPROVED BIOSIMILAR

Slide8

Guiding Principles

The safety of my patients is paramount.

Information is power: the more I know, the better for my patients.Manufacturers must be transparent for me to have confidence in the product.

Hippocratic Oath:

first, do no harm”

Slide9

Patient safety is paramount: Biologics are highly sensitive; slight differences can have unexpected results.

In 2001 an increase in life threatening adverse events associated with an innovative biologic in Europe was recognized.

At the time there were three products on the market with different scientific names. It took many months to determine the responsible product

epoetin

alfa

epoetin

beta

darbepoetin

alfaImagine if these products had the

same

scientific

name

Slide10

Confusion can result with identical naming…

IF ONE OF THESE GENERATES

AN ADVERSE EFFECT IN THE PATIENT, WILL THE DOCTOR KNOW WHICH ONE? Eprex® (epoetin alfa

)

Binocrit

™ (

epoetin

alfa

)

Abseamed (epoetin alfa)Epoetin

alfa

Hexal

(

epoetin

alfa

)

Slide11

Unique names help physicians quickly and accurately identify and report adverse events.

Reliably distinguish between medicines

Enable clearer communication with patient, medical staff and pharmacists Physicians overwhelmingly remember and refer to medicines by name

Slide12

What Physicians think Identical Naming means…

Identical names, even with extensive

patient and physician education, would result in inappropriate substitution.

Slide13

ORDERS are to be clear and precise and followed exactly

.Orders are not POETRY open to individual

interpretation.

Slide14

Transparency is Critical

Patient response must be traced to the correct manufacturer’s product.

Multiple means of product identification avoid a single point of information failure.Unique naming provides transparency and helps differentiate products for observing and reporting adverse events.Patients and their caregivers are the last line of defense - unique names ensure that they can accurately identify the product.

Slide15

Interchangeability of

Biosimilars

Slide16

16

Source: Bilao LLC, 2008

Small Differences

Slide17

17

Source: Bilao LLC, 2008

Small Differences = Large Impact TestosteroneProgesteroneEstradiol

Slide18

Importance of Notification of Medication Switch:

With and Without Known RisksQuestion: How important would it be for you to be notified by the pharmacist that your patient has received a biologic other than the one you prescribed

…if you were aware that the product could cause an unwanted immune response in some patients or that small differences between brands could have clinical implications for patients?

Slide19

Ground lost is

GROUND LOST.-ASBM Physician Notification Working Group Meeting, May 24, 2012

Slide20

Slide21

Creating a U.S. Biosimilars

PathwayBiologics are not covered under the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act for generic versions of conventional drugs.

On March 23, 2010 President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that included a pathway for the approval of biosimilars (also referred to as the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). 21In November 2010, the Food and Drug Administration began consulting with patient groups, physicians and industry on how to approve the first copies of biologics, known as follow-on biologics or

biosimilars

.

On February 9, 2012 the FDA issued a draft guidance seeking public input.

On May 11, the FDA held its first public hearing on the draft guidance.

Slide22

Learning from Biosimilars

Data from the EU Biosimilar pathway established 2003, First

biosimilar approved in 200614 approved so far20% Markdown15% takeup rateLack of saturationExpected savings in U.S. market could be low initially22

EU Experience

In 2004, the European Union (EU) became the first jurisdiction in the world to authorize a formal regulatory pathway for biosimilars. The statuary and regulatory provisions have been adopted over time through a public and scientific process and now the EU's rigorous guidelines, requirements, and experiences provide an instructive reference to the United States and other regions.

Slide23

ASBM Recommendations made at FDA May 11 Hearing

23CLINICAL TRIALS for each new follow-on biologic, demonstration of no new side effects compared with original biologic medicine.

A thorough EVALUATION and UNDERSTANDING of biosimilars will be needed before interchangeability is allowedTreatment decisions are the purview of the physician and patient,

there should be no AUTOMATIC

SUBSTITUTION of

non-interchangeable

biosimilars

by pharmacist, insurer, or other third party.

UNIQUE PROPRIETARY NAME for each biological product for clarity during prescription and monitoring. TRACKING/TRACING SYSTEM- label with unique names and lot numbers, to quickly identify source of any potential adverse effects.

Slide24

Conclusion

Biosimilars are very different from generics, new standards must be developed by the FDA regarding what analytical

, preclinical and clinical data will be needed for approval. Prior to biosimilars’ market entry, key policy questions must be addressed with a science-based, transparent approach that seeks the input of major stakeholders and puts patients first.Unique naming of biosimilars is

essential

for ensuring patient safety, informing physicians, and holding manufacturers accountable.

Interchangeability policy must account for:

Accurate tracking and tracing of adverse events

Rare adverse events not frequent enough to be detected in clinical trials

Biologic

medicines

drift over time