/
Hr Leonard Downie Jr kk I violate doctors orders tilat I keep my heels Hr Leonard Downie Jr kk I violate doctors orders tilat I keep my heels

Hr Leonard Downie Jr kk I violate doctors orders tilat I keep my heels - PDF document

bethany
bethany . @bethany
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2021-10-05

Hr Leonard Downie Jr kk I violate doctors orders tilat I keep my heels - PPT Presentation

hearing only to have them ignore all that evidence tested as evidence is itsar to as well as in the court record on thellatter point is tat his plea 0 11421th 1n the former I decided that the only ID: 895396

records rifle evidence fbi rifle records fbi evidence billings foreman ray committee fired wrong held number bullet lies overt

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Hr Leonard Downie Jr kk I violate doctor..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 Hr. Leonard Downie, Jr. kk I violate doc
Hr. Leonard Downie, Jr. kk I violate doctor's orders tilat I keep my heels higher than my heart s e tAiar uses-s6o-ary partis with pasts to obseckre but it is not entitled to liublish overt lies as tact. a number of SSOIA. lawsuitsonfithe wing and at -'. be given a copy of the recording and any teanscript made. committee for which Billings worked. I had_ somedealing4Withi it. t began with the overt intention to support what This was so unhidden that on my first acceptance of Richard Sprlue's invitation to speak to him aftdr he going to happen to him ' he continued as I could see he was going. When it did wasiterlin remembering the future. Harold INoisberg 21702 hearing - only to have them ignore all that evidence tested as evidence is itsar to as well as in the court record on thellatter point is t)at his plea /0 11421,th 1n the former I decided that the only way to .prove that Foreman

2 did no1/ -e render "effective assistanc
did no1/ -e render "effective assistance of counsel" was in effect to try to vomeeal ged y)u have r...., that guilt or innocence were ix vaterial to what was before hid)!!! Literally cocpunse , the tublic defender, in the FBI's c Foreman did net The records I have reflect not the slightest Foreman in- Ray in pc) hOri UM' even glanced at the sworn testimony of that evi- is TEo evidence we put on, and this hzirdlindicates the extent of it, was c what he rofees to, A.Q.antq laundry recoupts, to hide the fact that I had a ute th) Vied ady placed theE# e could not have gone over those records and have that belief. The FBI wus L never close to any and i'.: even refused to do what cbuld have boon helpful did after the FBI refused to make that request. Russell Byers, part of Billings' fictions,. and Raymor Irtis, wh1 las a apology' for a work of norrfiction, were among the 50-75 crimine1, ei

3 ther facing /eosecution1 r already in Ai
ther facing /eosecution1 r already in Ail who made those andqof stories up in the hope of what Byers got,- a break from his lies, wit4 any 4estioh at alliliblAI khkko trAl wrong in stating that 41gbbed the Fulham bank in London and got '6240 from it. I ias oland divided it aay and money is fiction. Commod sense should tell you as it would have told the committee that if Ray had Gotten that supposed ;;504000 for the Liob held never have been caught. 'to Portugal (with mennhe got from robbing a Qanada whorehouse) with S100 less than treaty and held have been free. e Billings is wrong in saying that 'ohn Ray' : nwith jam es and Jerry ih alone then. john and 'npver did got along very well. They were not close. J-err? YVV V" P)t ""(P 4A" un such aupponod evidence as t%;that "a and" the smposed rifle used to hill him Billings again is not faithful to the record. The FBI never even testriflo1

4 71 test-fired one it om know could not
71 test-fired one it om know could not .-- have been f" ed and a number of others- and I have those records - but not that rifle. Inn ad it had its Robert fe.the Lab so much now complained about England (in open violcitiong of could draw no conclusion as it whether the submitted bullet was fired fron the snbritted rifle." I pubaithed this in facnimile in 1971. I got it in the records I had to sue to got n that were used by our gevernm4nt publicly in England- and found they were .) ..) I 4 rumnao of bullet removed from ' 's body. NC i .4... mod his microscope and took podlures and testified then and there that if 4istietion on that remnant of wee not Oidence,,Iguch as the mark the rifle supposedly made on that bathroom windoweilly -' A In fetiW of that the shooter and part of the rifle Woad have had to hay been inside the bathroom well the GL, foregoing indietes to a eligtit degree. e