Meenakshi Garg University of Delhi India Introduction India is just behind US and China in global hazard list of top 10 countries with highest number of obese people A country where 270 million people live below the poverty line obesity seems to be a distant issue mean ID: 912919
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Title: Nutritional status of North In..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Title: Nutritional status of North Indian obese young adults
Meenakshi
Garg
University
of Delhi,
India
Introduction
India is just behind US and China in global hazard list of top 10 countries with highest number of obese people. A country where 270 million people live below the 'poverty line', obesity seems to be a distant issue, meant for the rich kids of first world.
India is under siege: junk food, alcohol and sedentary lifestyle are leading us to silent self destruction, making one in every five Indian men and women either obese or overweight.
The US topped the list with 13 per cent of the obese people worldwide in 2013, while China and India together accounted for 15 per cent of the world's obese population, with 46 million and 30 million obese people, respectively.
According to the study, number of overweight and obese people globally increased from 857 million in 1980 to 2.1 billion in 2013. This is one-third of the world's population.
( http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/obesity-india-weighs-third-on-obesity-scale/1/365876.html)
Slide3There is a need for the assessment of the nutritional status to obtain a clear view of malnutrition in various regions of country. This will help in identifying the causes of problem and solutions to overcome the problem of malnutrition.
Keeping
this in view a study was planned to assess the
nutritional status of
North Indians.
Slide4Material and Methods
One
fifty respondents from west and north Delhi who had age between 18 to 45 years were chosen for detailed dietary
assessment.
Informed consent was taken,
nutritional survey was carried out by the 24 hour dietary recall method.
The
nutritional data collected were analyzed using Diet Soft software
. and biochemical parameter were also taken using standard methods. The
values obtained were compared with Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) values for Indians (
Gopalan
et, al. 2009,I.C.M.R,
2009).
Body composition analysis was done using Omron Body Composition Monitor model HBF-375.
Data
was analyzed using SPSS 20 Version
Slide5Table 1 Socioeconomic status of Obese respondents
Number of Respondents
150
Income Group
Middle and high
Age
<30
27%
>30
73%
Religion
Hindu
95%
Muslim
4%
Sikh
1%
Marital Status
Single
11%
Married
89%
Family type
Joint
40%
Nuclear
60%
Sex
Male
39%
Female
61%
Slide6MEAN NUTRIENT INTAKE OF OBESE MALES LESS THAN 30 YEARS
NUTRIENTS
RDA
INTAKE
Calcium (mg/d)
600
600.82±348.684
(100.13%)
Iron (mg/d)
17
13.41 ±
5.099* (78.88%)Zinc (mg/d)126.1 ± 2.104* (50.83%)Protein (g/d) 6050.77± 17.666 (84.61%)Fat (g/d)2576.77± 27.959* (307.08%)Folic acid(µg/d)20038.01± 14.611* (19%)Energy (kcal)23201823.86±497.683 (78.61%)
Values are mean ± S.D. Values with * are significantly different (P< 0.05) from other group
Slide7MEAN NUTRIENT INTAKE OF OBESE MALES MORE THAN 30 YEARS
NUTRIENTS
RDA
INTAKE
Calcium (mg/d)
600
967.58±412.779
*(
161.26%)
Iron (mg/d)
17
15.49 ± 5.508 (91.11%)Zinc(mg/d)126.85 ± 2.307 *(57.08%)Protein (g/d)6062.52± 21.508 (104.2%)Fat (g/d)2596.1± 39.355* (384.4%)Folic acid (µg/d)20048.12± 18.266* (24.06%)Energy (kcal/d)23202181.93±599.177 (94.04%)Values are mean ± S.D. Values with * are significantly different (P< 0.05) from other group
Slide8MEAN FOOD INTAKE OF OBESE MALES LESS THAN 30 YEARS
FOOD ITEMS
RDI
INTAKE
Milk (ml)
300
288.46±210.311 (96.15%)
Sugar (gm)
20
11.53 ±
5.547*
(57.65%)Fat (gm)2561.15±20.325* (244.6%)Cereals (gm) 375260± 74.498* (69.33%)Other vegetables (gm)20050.76± 60.89* (25.38%)Roots and tubers (gm)20089.23± 60.202* (44.61%)Fruits (gm)10032.30±19.644* (32.3%)
Pulses(gm)
75
30.76
±
33.282
*(41.01%)
Values are mean ± S.D. Values with * are significantly different (P< 0.05) from other group
Slide9MEAN FOOD INTAKE OF OBESE MALES MORE THAN 30 YEARS
FOOD ITEMS
RDI
INTAKE
Milk
300
382.88±226.772 (127.62%)
Sugar
20
19.22± 12.245 (96.1%)
Fat
2565 ± 34.245* (260%)Cereals 375266.44± 99.113 (71.05%)Other vegetables20088.44± 73.017* (44.22%)Roots and tubers200100.77± 70.161* (50.38%)Fruits100103±130.22 (103%)Pulses75
44±
41.418
*(
58.66%)
Slide10MEAN NUTRIENT INTAKE OF OBESE FEMALES LESS THAN 30 YEARS
NUTRIENTS
RDA
INTAKE
Calcium (mg/d)
600
813.4±318.51
*(
135.56%)
Iron (mg/d)
21
12.24± 4.441 *(58.28%)Zinc (mg/d)105.48 ± 1.737* (54.8%)Protein (g/d)5551.76± 18.378 (94.1%)Fat (g/d)2069.72± 19.555* (348.6%)Folic acid (µg/d)20041.36± 16.232 *(20.68%)Energy (kcal/d)19001684.55±338.982 (88.66%)Values are mean ± S.D. Values with * are significantly different (P< 0.05) from other group
Slide11MEAN NUTRIENT INTAKE OF OBESE FEMALES MORE THAN 30 YEARS
NUTRIENTS
RDA
INTAKE
Calcium (mg/d)
600
976.74±420.17*
(162.79%)
Iron (mg/d)
21
13.29± 7.6
*(63.28%)Zinc (mg/d)105.51± 1.904* (55.1%)Protein (g/d)5555.28± 19.148 (100.5%)Fat (g/d)2087.22± 33.36* (436.1%)Folic acid (µg/d)20046.09± 20.336* (23.04%)Energy (kcal/d)19001826.06±475.083 (96.1%)Values are mean ± S.D. Values with * are significantly different (P< 0.05) from other group
Slide12MEAN FOOD INTAKE OF OBESE FEMALES LESS THAN 30 YEARS
FOOD ITEMS
RDI
Before Intervention
Milk (ml)
300
331.48±147.51 (110.49%)
Sugar (g)
20
15.92± 7.97 (79.6%)
Fat (g)
2043.7 ± 15.968* (218.5%)Cereal (g) 270222.22± 54.935 (82.3%)Other vegetables (g)200107.77± 94.557 *(53.88%)Root and tubers (g)20074.07± 55.557* (37.03%)Fruit (g)10058.51±54.399 *(58.51%)Pulses(g)
60
39.62±
38.177
*(
66.03%)
Slide13MEAN FOOD INTAKE OF OBESE FEMALES MORE THAN 30 YEARS
FOOD ITEMS
RDI
Before Intervention
Milk (ml)
300
408.92±219.061
*(
136.3%)
Sugar (gm)
20
24.3± 10.964 (121.5%)Fat (gm)2053.69 ± 29.636 *(268.45%)Cereal (gm) 270207.69± 62.743 (76.92%)Other vegetables (gm)20090.3± 79.371* (45.15%)Roots and tubers (gm)20082.46± 52.974* (41.23%)Fruits (gm)10079.07±93.853 (79.07%)Pulses(gm)60
36±
34.36*
(60%)
Slide14MEAN ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF OBESE MALES
ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENT
STANDARD
Values
Body mass index (kg/m²)
<25
28.48 ± 2.626
Waist circumference (cm)
90
97.75
± 3.01
Waist : hip<0.900.94± .058Body fat( %)10-20%30.15± 3.235Visceral fat0.5-9.513.73± 3.652
Slide15MEAN BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF OBESE MALES
BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS
Standard
OBSERVED
Hemoglobin
gm%
13-18
14.38±1.31
Cholesterol (mg/dl)
125-200
192.48 ± 44.372
High density lipoproteins (mg/dl)35-8037.08± 7.413TC:HDL3-55.31± 1.305Low density lipoproteins (mg/dl)85-130129.12± 36.041LDL:HDL1.5-3.53.48± 1.067Very low density lipoproteins (mg/dl)5-4039.21± 21.521Triglycerides (mg/dl)25-200202.31
±
107.821
Systolic blood
pressure (mm Hg)
120
131.51
± 15.134
Diastolic blood
pressure (mmHg)
80
81.74
±10.367
Blood
glucose (mg/dl)
70-110
102.93
±23.684
Insulin
micro (IU/ml)
2-25
20.19
±24.218
Pulse
rate/ min
72-80
82.37
±9.451
Slide16MEAN ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF OBESE FEMALES
ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENT
Intervention
Body mass index (kg/m²)
<25 Normal
30.4± 4.661
Waist circumference (cm)
80
107.81
± 13.328
Waist : hip
<0.800.9± 0.056Body fat20 to 30%37.99± 3.828Visceral fat0.5-9.512.57± 5.593
Slide17MEAN BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF OBESE FEMALES
BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS
Standard
OBSERVED
Hemoglobin
13-18
11.57±1.107
Cholesterol (mg/dl)
125-200
172.03 ± 31.881
High density lipoproteins (mg/dl)
35-8043.32± 9.901TC:HDL3-54.09± 0.909Low density lipoproteins (mg/dl)85-130109.59± 30.418LDL:HDL1.5-3.52.6± 0.791Very low density lipoproteins (mg/dl)5-4029.86± 19.61Triglycerides (mg/dl)25-200141.88±73.542
Systolic blood pressure
120
123.52
±16.068
Diastolic blood pressure
80
81.01
±11.745
Blood glucose
70-110
98.88
±26.048
Insulin
2-25
14.47
±11.558
Pulse rate
72-80
88.09
±9.895
Slide18CONCLUSIONIntake of iron, zinc, folic acid was significantly lower than
reccomended
amount
Intake of fat was 2-3 folds higher than recommended amount
Body fat and visceral fat were higher than standard values
Most of the biochemical parameters are at border line in males.
Slide19Public health policies should be adoptedNutrition education, physical exercise and good quality life should be encouraged
high levels of physical activity (≈1 h/d), eating low-fat diet, eating breakfast regularly, self-monitoring weight, and maintaining a consistent eating pattern across weekdays and weekends
Slide20THANK YOU