/
test measurements were done in relation to Reference standard assessme test measurements were done in relation to Reference standard assessme

test measurements were done in relation to Reference standard assessme - PDF document

blanko
blanko . @blanko
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2021-09-25

test measurements were done in relation to Reference standard assessme - PPT Presentation

Pretest Probability PreTP proportion of population who have the condition prevalence EGEG CG Note the validity of the Post ID: 885352

participants test positive measurements test participants measurements positive condition negative study measurement standard assessment allocated reference proportion pre groups

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "test measurements were done in relation ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 test measurements were done in relation
test measurements were done in relation to Reference standard assessment. STUDY VALIDITY (bias or non random error): use RAMBO to identify possible bias Recruitment: was the setting / EP appropriate given the study aims &/or the reviewerÕs interests? Were participants representative of the EP? Could the results be generalis

2 ed to relevant populations Was there a w
ed to relevant populations Was there a wide enough range (spectrum) of participants with and without the condition/disease)? Allocation: how accurately were participants allocated to Reference Standard (RS) positive and negative groups? Was RS a valid measure of condition? Were measurements of RS: done blind to knowledge of

3 the Test result, or done objectively (e
the Test result, or done objectively (e.g. automated lab tests, radiography)? Were measurement methods well described Was RS measurement replicable based on data provided or referenced? Maintenance: How much time was there between the RS and Test measurements? Co-intervention: did participants remain untreated in their ini

4 tially allocated groups (RS positive or
tially allocated groups (RS positive or negative OR Test positive or negative)? Completeness of follow-up: what proportion of eligible Participants had both Test assessment of Tests Pre-test Probability (Pre-TP): proportion of population who have the condition = prevalence = EG/(EG & CG) (Note: the validity of the Post-