/
 How do transplants fit in the current therapeutic schema?  How do transplants fit in the current therapeutic schema?

How do transplants fit in the current therapeutic schema? - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-04-10

How do transplants fit in the current therapeutic schema? - PPT Presentation

Guenther Koehne MD PhD Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service Division of Hematologic Oncology Department of Medicine Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center New York New York Autologous SCT ID: 776662

auto wt1 sct dex auto wt1 sct dex del igg unrelated thal rvd kappa tcd related hsct 1x10e6 cell

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document " How do transplants fit in the current t..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

How do transplants fit in the current therapeutic schema?

Guenther Koehne, MD, PhD

Adult

Bone Marrow Transplant Service

Division of Hematologic Oncology

Department of Medicine

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York

Slide2

Autologous SCT

Who?When?How?Maintenance?

Allogeneic SCT

Who?

When?

How?

Maintenance?

Slide3

Multiple Myeloma Treatment Lines in Transplant-Eligible Patients

Induction

Consolidation

Conditioning?

Frontline treatment

Maintenance

Maintenance

Rescue

Relapsed

Bz/Dex

Bz/Dex/Dox

Bz/Thal/Dex

Len/DexRev/Len/DexCRd

SCT

ObservationThalThal/PredRev

Slide4

Curr

Opin

Oncol

,

Sept 2012

Slide5

Allogeneic Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Treatment with curative potential Lack of myeloma cell contamination in graftGraft vs. myeloma effectReserved for fit patientsConventional/Myeloablative studies: TRM >50%Non-myeloablative transplants – BMT CTN #0201No clear survival benefit High rate of acute and chronic GVHD

GVHD, graft versus host disease; TRM, transplant-related mortality.

Slide6

Allogeneic Vs. Autologous

US intergroup trial (S9321

)

N =

813

Induction

Therapy

VAD

RANDOMI

ZE

n=261

HD-CTX

collection

N=255

HD-CTX

collection

n=213

HDTMel/TBIautotransplant

n=211SDTVBMCPautotransplant

n=39<55 yearsHLA matched sibling

n= 36Mel/TBIallotransplant

GVHD prophylaxis

x

TRM:53%

HD-CTX, high-dose cyclophosphamide; HDT, high dose therapy; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; MEL,

melphalan

; SDT, standard dose therapy; TBI, total body irradiation; VAD, continuous infusion of vincristine and doxorubicin plus high-dose dexamethasone; VBMCP, vincristine,

carmustine

,

melphalan

, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone.

Barlogie

B,

et al.

J

Clin

Oncol

.

2006; 24:929-936.

Slide7

Summary of Recent Studies With Non-Myeloablative Conditioning for Multiple Myeloma

StudyConditioningTransplant (No. Pts) PFS / OS TRM Acute GvHDChronic GVHDBruno, et alN Engl J of Med 2007 TBI 200 cGy8036%@ 3 y80%@ 3 y10%43%Grade II ‒IV63%Extensive – 32%Rosiñol, et alBlood2008Mel 140/FLU25Median not reachedMedian not reached16%32%Grade II‒IV66%Vesole, et alBiol Blood Marrow Transplant2009FC3158%@ 3 y78%@ 3 y8%17%Grade III‒IV57%Extensive – 26%Krishnan, et alLancet Oncol 2011TBI 200 cGySR: 189HR: 3743%40%@ 3 y77%59%@ 3 y11%26%Grade II‒IV54%Björkstrand, et alJ Clin Oncol2011TBI 200 cGy /FLU10835%@ 5 y65%@ 5 y12%20%Grade II‒IV54%Extensive –23%

FC,

fludarabine

plus cyclophosphamide; FLU,

fludarabine

; HR, high risk; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; SR, standard risk.

Koehne

G,

Giralt

S.

Curr

Opin

Oncol

.

2012;24:720-726.

Slide8

Allogeneic SCT

Who?

Risk stratification based on high-risk factors

When?

Sooner than later

How & Where?

TCD HSCT & MSKCC

Maintenance?

Immunotherapeutic Approaches

Slide9

Approaches to Allogeneic SCT for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

Induction

Consolidation/Conditioning

Maintenance

Relapse# lines of treatmentVDT-PACE2nd salvage auto SCTUpfrontInductionAuto SCT

TCD HSCT

ImmunotherapyDLIAntigen-specific CTLs

1.

2.

Slide10

Cytogenetics and Disease

High-risk cytogenetics: 25% of patientsDeletion 17p: del(17p)10% of newly diagnosed patientsAssociated with aggressive disease and shorter overall survival No conclusive evidence that any currently available treatments are effective for patients with del17pTranslocation of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus on chromosome 14t(4;14); t(14;16)Deletion 13q: del13qRelated to association with t(4;14) and del17pHypodiploidy

High risk disease affects outcome and

should therefore affect treatment

Slide11

Current Study at MSKCC: TCD HSCT for Multiple Myeloma – IRB #10-051

Phase II study of TCD Allogeneic Transplantation for High-Risk Multiple MyelomaPrinciple Investigator: Guenther Koehne MD, PhDEligibility Criteria:Relapsed multiple myeloma following ASCT High risk cytogenetics or relapse ≤ 15 months postASCT At least PR to salvage therapyConditioning: Bu/Mel/Flu (+ ATG)TCD: CliniMacs device: CD34+ cells positively selected

ASCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ATC,

antithymocyte

globulin; Bu:

busulfan

; FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridization; IRB, internal review board; MSKCC, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; TCD, T-cell depleted, VGPR, very good partial response.

Slide12

Design of Study: TCD (CD34+ selection) HSCT for Multiple Myeloma

DLI (5x10

5 CD3+/Kg) at earliest 5-6 months post SCTDLI (5x105 CD3+/Kg) at earliest 8-9 months post SCTDLI (1x106 CD3+/Kg) at earliest 12-13months post SCT

DLI (1x10

5 CD3+/Kg) at earliest 5-6 months post SCTDLI (5x105 CD3+/Kg) at earliest 1-3months post SCT, following the first infusionDLI (1x106 CD3+/Kg) at earliest 3-4months post SCT, following the second infusion

Prophylactically in recipients of HLA-matched allografts

Preemptively in recipients of HLA-mismatched allografts

DLI, donor lymphocyte infusion.

Courtesy of Koehne G, et al. MSKCC.

Busulfan

:

0.8

mg/kg x 10 doses

Melphalan

:

70

mg/m

2

x 2 doses

Fludarabine

:

25mg/m

2

x 5

d

ATG:

2.5

mg/kg x 2

d

Slide13

UPN

MM

Cytogenetics

Prior Lines of TX

(Detail)

Prior Lines of TX

Age

of BMT

BMT

Match

Donor

1

IgG

Kappa

Normal

Thal/

D

ex

, tandem auto, RVD

3

42

11/28/2007

9/10

Unrelated

2

IgA Lambda

t(4;14), del 13q

Vel/Dex x 6, auto SCT, Len/Dex, Vel/Dex

4

38

6/18/2008

10/10

Related

3

IgG Kappa

del13q

Thal/Dex, auto SCT, Vel/Thal/Dex

3

32

8/20/2008

10/10

Related

4

IgG Lambda

del 17p, del 13q

Thal/Dex, Vel/VP-16/Cy, auto SCT, VAD, VP-16/Cy

5

57

3/4/2009

10/10

Unrelated

5

IgG Kappa

t(4;14)

RVD, auto SCT, RVD

3

69

4/30/2009

10/10

Related

6

IgG Kappa

t(4;14)

RVD, tandem auto SCT, DCEP

3

54

9/3/2009

10/10

Unrelated

7

IgA Kappa

t(4;14), del 13q

Thal/Dex, Vel/Dex, auto

SCT #1,

RVD, DCEP,

auto

SCT #2

6

54

10/23/2009

10/10

Related

8

IgG Lambda

t(4;14), del 13q

Rev/Dex

, tandem auto SCT, BD, DCEP, RVD

5

49

11/20/2009

10/10

Unrelated

9

IgG Lambda

del 17p, t(4;14)

VDD, tandem auto SCT, RVD

3

48

12/17/2009

10/10

Related

10

IgG Kappa

MLL, del 13q

BDD, auto SCT,

Vel/Dex/Cy

, RVD

4

57

12/24/2009

9/10

Unrelated

11

IgA Kappa

del 13q, del 14q32

Thal/Dex, auto

SCT #1,

Vel/Thal/Dex,

auto

SCT #2

4

46

1/15/2010

10/10

Related

12

IgA Kappa

del 13q, 1q23

Thal/Dex, auto

SCT #1,

DT-PACE, auto

SCT #2

4

68

1/21/2010

10/10

Related

13

IgG Kappa

t(4;14), del 13q

VDD, auto SCT, RVD

3

56

3/5/2010

10/10

Related

14

IgG Kappa

Normal

XRT; VDx5;

Auto SCT

,

RVDx3

,

DVT-PACE x2

4

65

8/13/2010

10/10

Related

15

IgG Kappa

Normal

BDDx3 /TDx2;

auto

SCT; XRT; RDx5;

BVDx2

;

auto SCT #2;

XRT

7

63

8/19/2010

9/10

Unrelated

16

IgG Kappa

Normal

VDD x 5: VDD/Rev; Tandem auto; Thal maintenance; RVD x6; DT-PACE x2

5

58

8/25/2010

9/10

Unrelated

17

IgA Lambda

extra1q, del(13q), t(4:14)

Thal; BDD x3;

auto#1

; Thal; RDx4;

VDD x2;

DVT-Pace x4;

auto

#2

8

59

9/8/2010

9/10

Unrelated

Slide14

UPN

MM

Cytogenetics

Prior Lines of TX

(Detail)

Prior Lines of TX

Age

of BMT

BMT

Match

Donor

18

IgG

Kappa

del(13q), der(1)

Thal/Dex

x5, tandem auto, Thal/Dex, XRT, Vel/Dox; RVD; RD;

DCEP x5

8

61

11/10/2010

9/10

Unrelated

19

IgG Lambda

Normal

Cy/Dex x2; VD x2; Auto #1; VD; RD/Mel;

Auto #2

6

57

12/2/2010

10/10

Related

20

IgG Kappa

Normal

Thal/Dex x4;

RVD x5,

Auto

#1; RVD

4

54

12/10/2010

10/10

Unrelated

21

IgG Kappa

p53, tri 17, 5p, 11, 15,

BiRD

x5

; Auto SCT #1; RVD; maintenance

Rev

; VD-

Cy

x5; VDT-PACE

x2;

Auto #2

6

37

3/2/2011

10/10

Unrelated

22

IgG Kappa

Normal

BDDx3 /TDx2, Auto #1; maintenance

Rev

; Auto #2; maintenance

Rev

;

VDT-PACE x2

; RVD-Cyx3

5

49

4/14/2011

10/10

Unrelated

23

Nonsecretory

del(20q), del(13q), del(17p), p53

BDDx4; BDx5 Auto#1; VD; RD;

Auto #2;

BiRD

7

63

4/20/2011

10/10

Related

24

IgG Kappa

MLL, del(13q),

IgH

, p53

BBD x2; Thal/Dex x2; tandem auto SCT; maintenance thal; XRT;RVD x 10

5

45

5/26/2011

10/10

Unrelated

25

IgG Lambda

extra 1q23 and 19p13, IgH, MLL, del p53, extra of 1q, 1p, del(13) and del(17p), extra 4,11, and 14

Thal/Dex x 3 ; VD x3;

RD,

VD-PACEx1; VD-PACE x3;Auto #1;

Bortez

maintenance

6

60

6/3/2011

10/10

Unrelated

26

IgG Lambda

extra 1q25, mono 13, Der3, I5p, I5q, trans IgH locus, del(17p)

Thal/Dex x1;

RD x4

; Auto #1 XRT/Dex followed by

RD x6

; Auto #2; maintenance Rev; VD-Cy x5

7

62

8/31/2011

10/10

Unrelated

27

IgG Lambda

Dup(1q), del(4p), 1q25, tri(9), mono (13), tri 15, mono 16, loss p53 gene, MLL

RVD x 4, Auto #1 ; RVD; DCEPx3 with RVD between cycles; VD-Bendamustine;

VDT-PACE x1

;

Auto #2

8

56

9/21/2011

9/10

Unrelated

28

IgG Kappa

del(1)(p13p22), +3,+5+9,+11,del(13), (q12q14), del(14)(q24), der(16), t(11;16), (p13.1;q24

RVD x9; XRT; Auto #1; VD x 4; VDT-PACE

x3

;

Auto #2

6

61

10/21/2011

9/10

Unrelated

29

Lambda LC

Normal

Thal/Dex,auto SCT, Len main., RevDex, RVDx1 -->BDx6

4

56

12/29/2011

10/10

Unrelated

30

IgG Lambda

Normal

RVDx6, Cytoxan --> Mel + auto

SCT #1,

PomCLARx5, Carfilzomib x3, VDT-PACE, salvage MEL +

auto SCT

#2

7

50

2/1/2012

10/10

Related

31

IgG Kappa

extra 1q25, trisomy 5,9,15; del12p1q

RXT, BDx2, BDDx2, CTX; MEL + auto SCT, main. Len, CyBorDx4,

VDT-PACE x3

5

59

4/20/2012

9/10

Unrelated

32

Nonsecretory

mono 13, t(11;14)

Thal/Dex x3

,

Bortez

+ Thal/Dex x2,, tandem auto SCT,

RevDex,lorvotuzumab

/mertansine x 9,

BD x4

4

52

8/1/2012

10/10

Unrelated

33

Kappa LC

Normal

RVD x 4, auto SCT, Bortez/Rev main., Cytoxan/Velcade x2

3

48

9/5/2012

10/10

Unrelated

34

IgG

Lambda

del13q, del20q, extra 1q25, del 4,12,16

RVD x4,

auto

SCT

#1,

CyBorD

x4

,

Bortez

/Mel

,

Auto SCT #2

5

44

12/28/2012

10/10

Unrelated

Slide15

Acute GVHD (grade II – IV) at 12 months (N = 34)

Transplant-related Mortality (at 12 months) (N = 34)

Courtesy of Koehne G, et al. MSKCC.

0.09 (0.02-0.23)

0.06 (0.01-0.17)

Slide16

Chronic GVHD

Graft failure or rejection

Courtesy of Koehne G, et al. MSKCC.

None observed

Slide17

OS + PFS of pts with multiply relapsed MM following allo TCD HSCT(N=34)

Courtesy of

Koehne G, et al. MSKCC.

Among survivors, median f/u is 44 mos (range: 18-79)

07/2014

1-y OS

66%

95% CI, 0.51-0.85

1-y PFS

49%

95% CI,

0.34-0.69

2-y OS

52%

95% CI,

0.36-0.73

2-y PFS

27%

95% CI,

0.14-0.49

Slide18

OS (a) + PFS (b) of pts with multiply relapsed MM by previous lines of therapy prior to allo TCD HSCT

a.

b.

p = 0.02

p = 0.05

Courtesy of Koehne G, et al. MSKCC.

Slide19

OS (a) and PFS (b) of pts with multiply relapsed MM with < 6 previous lines of therapy prior to allo TCD HSCT based on donor selection(related vs. unrelated)

Courtesy of Koehne G, et al. MSKCC.

b.

At 2yrs

Related:

0.30 (0.12-0.77)

Unrelated:

0.36 (0.17-0.76)

At 2yrs

Related:

0.60 (0.36-0.99)

Unrelated:

0.72 (0.51-0.99

)

a.

Slide20

OS (a) + PFS (b) of pts with multiply relapsed MM by previous lines of therapy prior to allo TCD HSCT

G. Koehne et al. MSKCC.

Slide21

Clinical responses induced by Bu/Mel/Flu conditioning chemotherapy

Slide22

Clinical responses induced by Bu/Mel/Flu conditioning chemotherapy

Slide23

Clinical responses after initial DLIs (when receiving at least 2 doses) given for relapsed or residual MM

Slide24

Single Patient Response

DLI 5x10e5/kg 06/09

July -1, 2014

65 months

in

CR

72 months post allo BMT

39-year-old

male dx stage III IgA lambda,

multiple myeloma (MM) high-risk

cytogenetics

(del 13; t(4;14).

Bortezomib /Dexamethasone (Dex) x 6, autoSCT 9/07 with relapse disease 12/07, Lenalidomide/Dex x1, Bort/Dex x2, alloHSCT from matched related donor (10/10) in 06/08, in complete remission (CR) since 5/09.

Slide25

DLI and Disease Course

55-year-old male dx stage III IgG lambda, MM high-risk cytogenetics (del 17p by FISH, del 13q by karyo). Thalidomide/Dex x 4 months with PD + ARF, Bort–MI–CAGB with EF 35%, VP-16 + cyclophosphamide (CY) with PR, auto SCT 08/07 with relapse disease 08/08, VAD with PD, VP-16 + CY x 3, allo HSCT from matched unrelated donor (10/10) in 03/09.

Allo BMT

DLI 5x10e5/kg

DLI 5x10e5/kg

DLI 1x10e6/kg

Slide26

WT1-Specific T-Cell Responses in Patients

with Multiple Myeloma

A2-RMG, HLA-A2 restricted peptide; CMB, cytomegalovirus; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; WT1,

Wilms tumor gene product 1. Tyler EM, et al. Blood. 2013;121:308-317.

WT1-specific T cells by MHC tetramer

A24-CMV

A2-RMF

4/2/09

04/09 Blood 01/11 Bone Marrow 01/11

3.5%

1.0 %

2.9 %

A2-RMF

CD8+

CD8+

Slide27

WT1—A Potential Target for Multiple Myeloma?

WT1: zinc finger transcription factorRoles in cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and organ developmentPreferentially expressed during embryogenesis, but also at low levels in kidney, ovary, endometrium, testis and spleen of adultsFrequently overexpressed in a number of solid and hematologic malignanciesExpression correlates with disease progression in MDS, ALL, & CMLMolecular marker for risk assessmentEmergence of WT1-specific T cells correlates with better relapse-free survival post allogeneic transplant in leukemia1MM cells are efficiently lysed by WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes2 WT1 expression in the BM of myeloma patients correlates with disease stage3

ALL, acute lymphocytic leukemia; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; MDS,

myelodysplastic

syndrome.

1.

Rezvani

K, et al.

Blood.

2007;110:1924-1932; 2. Azuma T, et al.

Clin

Cancer Res.

2004;10:7402-7412; 3.

Hatta

Y, et al.

J

Exp

Clin

Cancer Res.

2005;24:595-599.

Slide28

WT1-Specific T Cells and Disease Course

Slide29

WT1-Specific T Cells and Disease Course

55-year-old male dx stage III IgG lambda, MM high risk cytogenetics (del 17p by FISH, del 13q by karyo). Thal/Dex x 4 months with PD + ARF, Bort – MI – CAGB with EF 35%, VP-16 + CY with PR, auto SCT 08/07 with relapse disease 08/08, VAD with PD, VP-16 + CY x 3, allo HSCT from MUD (10/10) in 03/09.

Allo BMT

DLI 5x10e5/kg

DLI 5x10e5/kg

DLI 1x10e6/kg

Slide30

WT1-Specific T Cell Frequencies Increase in All Patients Following DLI

Max response to DLI: 47 WT1-specific T cells/

μL

blood 6.6-fold increase over pre-DLI frequenciesResults from the selective expansion of WT1-specific T cells rather than general immune reconstitution

Figure 1. WT1-specific T-cell numbers and function increase following transplant and DLI.

Tyler EM, et al.

Blood.

2013;121:308-317.

Slide31

IHC With WT1 mAb 6F-H2

CD138 (brown)/ WT1 (red) co-staining of BM biopsy

WT1 (red) co-staining

of kidney

biopsy

CD138 (brown) staining of BM biopsy

BM, bone marrow; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

Tyler EM, et al.

Blood.

2013;121:308-317.

Slide32

IHC Analyses of WT1 Expression in the BM of MM pts

++++

+++

CD138 (MI15; DAB) = brown; WT1 (6F-H2,

nFu

) = red

++

Focal

Negative

Grading

Neg

0

Focal < 5%+ < 25%++ 25 – 50%+++ 50 – 75%++++ > 75%

90% PC’s by biopsy

50 -60 % PC’s by biopsy

45% PC’s by biopsy

5% PC’s by biopsy

No PC’s by biopsy

DAB 3,3-diaminobenzidine;

nFU

, nFu1 antibody; PC, plasma cell.

Tyler

EM, et al.

Blood.

2013;121:308-317.

Slide33

Phase I Trial #IRB 12-175:TCD (CD34+ selection) Allo SCT Followed by WT1-Specific T-Cell Infusions for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Plasma Cell Leukemia

Busulfan

:0.8 mg/kg x 10 dosesMelphalan:70 mg/m2 x 2 dosesFludarabine:25mg/m2 x 5 dATG: 2.5 mg/kg x 2 d

WTW

WT1-specific CTLs

WT1 CTLs - Dose levels 1, 3 and 5 x10e6/ kg; -3 doses/recipient of HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched allografts. First dose at 6-10 weeks post transplant. The second dose will be given 4-8 weeks following the first infusion and a third dose will be administered 4-8 weeks following the second infusion. The second and third dose will only be administered in the absence of grade III-IV toxicity and grade II-IV acute GvHD following the preceding T-cell dose.

CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Courtesy

of

Koehne

G,

et al. MSKCC.

Slide34

Plasma Cell Leukemia

Overall Survival

(OS) in pPCL and sPCL, showing superior survival of pPCL vs sPCL from the time of leukemia diagnosis.

pPCL

, primary plasma cell

leukemia;

sPCL

, secondary plasma cell leukemia

.

Albarracin

F, Fonseca R. Blood Rev. 2011;25:107-112.

Slide35

Case―61-Year-Old AA Female With Secondary Plasma Cell LeukemiaUndergoing TCD HSCT Followed by WT1 CTLs Residual Disease Post VDT-PACE, but HLA-Matched Brother

TCD HSCT

02/13/12

WT1 #1 1x10e6/kg

04/18/12

WT1 #2 1x10e6/kg

05/16/12

WT1 #3 1x10e6/kg

06/13/12

Slide36

Immune Reconstitution Post-WT1-CTL Infusions

TCD HSCT

02/13/12

WT1 #1

1x10e6/kg

04/18/12

WT1 #2

1x10e6/kg

05/16/12

WT1 #3

1x10e6/kg

06/13/12

IFN-γ

CD8

CD4

IFN-γ

TCD HSCT

02/13/12

WT1 #1

1x10e6/kg

04/18/12

WT1 #2

1x10e6/kg

05/16/12

WT1 #3

1x10e6/kg

06/13/12

WT1 all pools

6/13/12

Slide37

WT1 CTLs + Disease Course

WT1 #3

1x10e6/kg

06/13/12

WT1 #2

1x10e6/kg

05/16/12

WT1 #1

1x10e6/kg

04/18/12

WT1

#4

5

x10e6/kg

09/26/12

WT1

#5 5x10e6/kg11/02/12

WT1 #6 5x10e6/kg12/05/12

TCD HSCT

02/13/12

WT1 #1

1x10e6/kg

04/18/12

WT1 #2

1x10e6/kg

05/16/12

WT1 #3

1x10e6/kg06/13/12

WT1

#4

5

x10e6/kg

09/26/12

WT1 #5 5x10e6/kg11/02/12

WT1 #6 5x10e6/kg12/05/12

M-Spike Gamma

Kappa: Lambda Ratio

Feb 2014

Feb 2014

#

#

Slide38

Slide39

IHC With CD138 + WT1 mAb 6F-H2

Relapse

11/11

Post

allo

BMT + WT1 CTL #1

05/16/12

Slide40

WT1 CTLs + Disease Course

Slide41

Future Approaches to Treatment for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

Induction

Conditioning

Maintenance

RelapseUpfront

TCD HSCT

Suicide-gene modified DLIWT1-specific CTLs

1.

2.

Do we need an auto SCT? CRD x 6 cycles TCD HSCT WT1 CTLs ?

3.

Do we need an allo SCT? Induction auto SCT MM-specific CARS?

Slide42

Acknowledgement

Research Team Eleanor Tyler, PhD, Cornell Weill College Achim Jungbluth, MD, Pathology, MSKCC Denise Frosina, Senior Research Technician Sean Devlin, PhD, Biostatistics, MSKCC Evelyn Orlando, RSA Eric Smith, MD, PhD Satya Kosuri, MD

Adoptive Immune Cell Therapy Facility (AICT lab)Ekaterina Doubrovina MD PhDRichard O’Reilly, MD

Myeloma ServiceHeather Landau MD Hani Hassoun MD Alex Lesokhin MD Nikoletta Lendvai MD PhDDavid Chung MD, PhD Sergio Giralt MDOla Landgren, MD

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd – for generous research support