EuroCirCol WP5 Cea Activities - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

EuroCirCol

WP5

Cea

Activities

FCC

Addendum Kick Off Meeting

07/12/2017

Maria Durante

on behalf of the ECC team

CONTENT

Initial Program

Design optionsCEA block coil option: statusCEA block coil option: next stepsCDR contentCDR Road MapFCC Magnet System Cost ModelProject Team

| PAGE 2

CERN-CEA meeting 07/12/2017 – FCC Addendum kick off meeting

3

/ 153

Dipole 16 T – Nb3Sn

High Field Magnet

WP5

Design study for FCC-HH June 2015 – Mai 2019

Focus on the key design questions



feasibility of a 100

TeV

FCC-HH

CDR by end 2018 in time for the next European Strategy Update

WP5 - Task

denominations and distribution of task leadership

Task

Denomination

Leader

Alternate

5.1CoordinationCERN (D. Tommasini)CIEMAT (F. Toral)5.2Design Options (16 T – Nb3Sn – 2D analysis) CIEMAT (F. Toral)CEA (C. Lorin)5.3Cost ModelCERN (D. Schoerling)CEA (M. Durante)5.4Magnet Conceptual  DesignINFN (S. Farinon)CEA (M. Durante)5.5Conductor StudiesCERN (B. Bordini)UT (M. Dhallé)5.6Quench ProtectionTUT (A. Stenvall)INFN (M. Sorbi)5.7Magnet Engineering DesignCEA (M. Durante)CERN (D. Schoerling)

EuroCirCol

WP5 - Initial Program

CERN-CEA meeting 07/12/2017 – FCC Addendum kick off meeting

EuroCirCol

WP5 - design options

The three identified design options have been developed by the three institutes INFN, CEA and CIEMAT. INFN took charge of the cosine theta designCEA took inncharge the block coil designCIEMAT took in charge the common coil designLast summer, the cosine theta option has been officially chosen as the baseline option for the FCC (“design configuration in use in all superconducting colliders made so far”).However, the interest of the alternative options has been pointed out leading to the decision to continue to go on in parallel.The initial foreseen magnet engineering design deliverable (by CEA) is replaced for Europe by the detailed conceptual designs of the three options

and the signature of three contracts to build dipole models.

CEA block

coil

optionAfter a first 2D magnetic and mechanical design based on the first set of parameters (250 mm interbeam distance, 18% LL margin, 800 mm outer diameter)

[

v101]

Al

Iron

Ti

CuAl

Steel

Bp

ss

-Bpends = 0.4 TCEA block coil optionCEA produced a more compact design based on the new set of parameters defined following recommendations of the 1st WP5 EuroCirCol Review Reduction of the margin on the load line from 18% to 14%Reduction interbeam distance from 250 to 204 mm

[

v1ari204, FCC week 2017]

Yoke/pads

Coils

Ansys

+

Cast3m

//

study

CEA block

coil

optionCEA produced a more compact design based on the new set of parameters defined following recommendations of the 1st WP5 EuroCirCol Review and discussions of the 2017 FCC week Reduction of the margin on the load line from 18% to 14%Release of the constrain on stray field at the cryostat surface (1 m) from 0.1 T to 0.2 T  Reduction of the cold mass size : cryostat max outer Ø = 1200-1250 mm  colds mass max outer Ø = 750-800 mm including SS shellAt the same time reduction of the interbeam distance from 204 to 194 mm (LHC interbeam distance)

CEA block

coil

option2D magnetic and mechanical design finalized BUT for an interbeam distance of 194 mm

3D

m

agnetic

Design

3D

Mechanical

Design to

be

done

[

MT25]

CEA block

coil

option – next stepsReview of the 2D design with an interbeam distance of 204 mmIntegration of a SS shell outer the Al shellMagnetization losses studies

3D magnetic Design

3D

Mechanical

Design



As far as possible

until

June 2018

CDR content

(

courtesy of Davide tommasini)A "summary" volume including 5-6 pages on 16T dipolesan introduction (1 page) the baseline option (2-3 pages), the other options (1-2 pages). 1 page on quadrupoles.A "detailed" volume on the technological part,

describing all the options in as much details as produced by the deadline for the reduction.

CDR Road

Map

(courtesy of Davide tommasini)Dec 2017: First draft of summary FCC CDR book chapter on 16T.2 D designs of all design optionsApril 2018: FCC Week 2D EM and mech design finalized (with SS shell, 204 interbeam)conceptual 3D EM study (EM model + artistical picture)integration in the cryostat (by CERN)

Status of the 3D Mechanical study

report

for Task 5.3

Cost

model

report for Task

5.5 Conductor studies

r

eport for Task 5.6 Quench protectionJune 2018: first draft of detailed FCC CDR book chapter on 16T dipole Dec 2018: compilation of FCC CDR April 2019: final report for EU

FCC COST MODEL – WP5

Objective : FCC Magnet System Cost Model

Focused on the Dipole Magnets which dominate over other magnet costA study has been started to analytically estimate the costs of production of a 16 T FCC-hh magnet (cosine-theta baseline), separated into:Cost of parts (CIEMAT)Cost of the assembly process (CEA) for a required production rate of 20 magnets/week to complete the production in 5 years.

FCC COST MODEL –

Assembly

costAssembly process first analysis: technical manpower+ production engineers, foremen, controls and quality assurance engineers, administrative

Process

step

Shifts

Time needed (WEEKS)

Nb of

Operators

Work

Hours

Qualification

Operations/magnet

Tot hours/magnet

Coil

Winding122160

Mechanical/Winding

8

1280

Coil Heat treatment

3

2

0.1

24

Non skilled worker

8

192

Internal Splices (HF, if any) 2/coil

0

1

2

Mechanical

8

Transfert, Coil instrumentation, end splices

1

2

2

160

Mechanical/Electrical

8

1280

Coil Impregnation

1

1

2

80

Mechanical/chemist

8

640

Coil tests

1

1

1

40

Electrical/Mechanical

8

320

Coil pack Assembly

1

1

3

120

Mechanical

2

240

Structure

assembly

1

1

3

120

Mechanical

1

120

Cold mass assembly and finishing

2

4

2

640

Mechanical

1

640

14

weeks

1344

4712

3.5 months

FCC COST MODEL – NEXT STEPS

Establish a

production flow chart to be able to estimate the:tooling cost Edit a first furnace specification to evaluate feasability and cost of a large furnace (maximum number of coils)New Impregnation moulding techniques fitting with high rate productionlabour cost (manpower table to be consolidate)indirect cost (25% to direct costs according to the guideline for EU H2020 projects)

EuroCirCol

- Project Team –

until October 2017

EuroCirCol

- Project Team

| PAGE

17

CERN-CEA meeting 07/12/2017 – FCC Addendum kick off meeting