/
Notesandrecords Notesandrecords

Notesandrecords - PDF document

caitlin
caitlin . @caitlin
Follow
345 views
Uploaded On 2021-01-11

Notesandrecords - PPT Presentation

EvidenceforlocaldeclinesinTanzania ID: 829592

ecol 2002 tanzania afr 2002 ecol afr tanzania corti jenkins 2003 maliti 1998 etal bonnington 2007 atmadabadaba 2009 xed

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Notesandrecords" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 Notesandrecords Evidenceforlocaldeclines
Notesandrecords EvidenceforlocaldeclinesinTanzania’spuku antelope( Kobusvardoni Livingstone,1857) populationbetween1999and2003 ColinBonnington 1 *,MarkD.Steer 2 ,JulienLamontagne- Godwin 2 ,NishaOwen 2 andMatthewGrainger 1 1 Frontier-TanzaniaSavannaResearchProgramme,POBOX 9743,DaresSalaam,Tanzania, 2 SocietyforEnvironmental Exploration ‡ Frontier,50-52RivingtonStreet,EC2A3QP, U.K. Introduction TheKilomberoValleyinTanzaniaholds c. 75%ofthe world’spukuantelope( Kobusvardoni ),whichisanesti- mated50,000–60,000individuals(East,1998;Jenkins, Maliti&Corti,2003).Globally,survivalofthisspeciesis closelyrelatedtothispopulation(Rodgers,1984;Tanzania WildlifeConservationMonitoring,1999),andtherefore studiesinvestigatingchangesinpukunumberinthevalley areimportantfordevelopingconservationmanagement strategiesforthisspecies. Pukuisa‘NearThreatened’species(IUCNSSCAntelope SpecialistGroup,2008),whichishabitatspecic,occu- pyinggrasslandsnearpermanentwaterwithinsavannah ingseasonalinundationoftheoodplainduringthelong rainyseason(March–May),pukumoveintohabitatonthe oodplainperiphery,suchasmiombowoodland(Jenkins etal .,2002). Anumberofhumanactivities,includinglivestockhus- bandry(Corti etal .,2002;Bonnington,Weaver&Fan- ning,2007)andsettlement(Haule,1997),are encroachingonthesefavouredoodplaingrasslandsinthe KilomberoValley,andotheractivitiessuchaspoaching (Jenkins etal. ,2002),negativelyimpactthepukupopu- lationofthevalleydirectly. Starkey etal .(2002)statedthatthereisanurgentneed forsurveystobeconductedintheKilomberoValleyin openareasofsuitableforaginghabitatandalsoinsuitable peripheralhabitatnearhumansettlementtoassessuc- tuationsinpukunumberinareasexperiencingdifferent levelsofhumanimpacts.Inthispaper,wedescribetherst ground-basedstudyofpukuintheKilomberoValley assessingannualchangesintheabundanceofthisspecies attwosuchlocalities.Wereportasignicantdeclineinthe relativeabundanceofpukuatbothlocationsovera5-year periodanddiscussthepossibleimplicationsforthecon- servationofthisspeciesinthisstronghold. Materialsandmethods 2 , issituatedinsouthernTanzania(Fig.1)approximately 320kmfromthecountry’slargestcity,DaresSalaam. TheinnerpartofthevalleyistheKilomberoGameCon- trolledArea(KGCA),anditconsistsofaseasonalood- plainfringedbymiombowoodlandandfarmland,with fragmentsofEasternArcevergreenforestathigherele- vations(InternationalInstituteForEnvironmentand Development,1992).WithinTanzanianGCAs(e.g. KGCA),unauthorizedhuntingisprohibited,butlanduse changes(e.g.livestockhusbandryandagriculture)arenot regulated(Haule,Johnsen&Maganga,2002). OurstudieswereconductedintheKGCAbetween1999 and2003,neartheareasofMofuandMadabadaba.Mofu andMadabadabaareapproximately55kmfromthetownof Ifakara(8  08 ¢ 20.48 ¢¢ S.36  40 ¢ 54.58 ¢¢ E.)andaresituated approximately4kmapart(Fig.1).BothMofu(8  32 ¢ 43.69 ¢¢ S. 36  23 00.60 ¢¢ E.)andMadabadaba(8  32 ¢ 45.28 ¢¢ S.36  25 ¢ 27.90 ¢¢ E.)arelocatedinthesouthernregionoftheood- plain,withMadabadabaclosetoavillageandMofusituated furtherintotheoodplain(awayfromvillages). Thestudysitesweresurveyedusingdirectobservation xed-pointtransects(markedusingaGPS).Twentyxed pointswerepositionedat0.5-kmintervalsalongtwo 10-kmtransectsinMofu(closetoatouristhuntinglodge), andtenxedpointswerepositionedat0.5-kmintervals alongtwo5-kmtransectsatMadabadaba.Ateachxed pointalongthetransects,withina0.25-kmradiusofeach point,thenumberofpukuobservedwasrecordedfora periodof10minusingbinocularsandarangender. Pukuwererecordedassoonastheobserversarrivedat * Correspondence: E-mail:c.bonnington@shefeld.ac.uk  2010SocietyforEnvironmentalExploration ‡ Frontier.Journalcompilation  2010BlackwellPublishingLtd, Afr.J.Ecol.

2 1 eachpointtoaccountforpukumovementsawa
1 eachpointtoaccountforpukumovementsawayinresponsetoobservers(thusminimizingtheimpactsofpotentialchangesinpukuresponsebetweenseasonsandyears).Alltransectswerewalkedbyasurveyteamcon-sistingofveobservers.Itwasassumedthatindividualswerenotcountedattwodifferentpointsalongthesametransectaspukumovementsduringtheshorttimeateachpointcountareminimal,andevenwhenstartled,ightdistancesareshort(.25m;Estes,1991).AtMadabadaba,transectswerelimitedto5kmbyawatercoursebarrier.Thetwotransectsateachsitewerespaced3kmapart,andallwereorientatedonaNorth–Southcompassbear-ing.Transectswereconductedatsunriseorassoonaspossiblethereafter(07:00h)andwereterminatedat10:30h.Asvegetationinthesurveyareaishomogeneousinthedryseason(June–November)andasaconsequenceofshortdetectiondistancesnegatingtheinuenceofvegetationstructureonvisibility,detectionprobabilitiesremainedconstantbetweensurveyseasonsandyears.AtMofu,datawerecollectedalongtwotransectsinAugustandSeptemberin1999,2000and2001;andalongthesametransectsinOctoberandNovember1999,2001and2003.AtMadabadaba,datawerecollectedalongtwotransectsinOctoberandNovemberin1999,2001and2003;andalongonetransectinAugustandSeptemberin1999and2000.ThedatacollectedbetweenAugustandSeptemberandOctoberandNovemberateachsite,ineachyear,werepooledtogethertoproduceanoverallpukurelativeabundanceindex(N).Nisthemeannumberofpukuobservedper10minwithinthesurveyareaof0.196km(0.25km*0.25km*)foreachsurveyyear.SurveyswerenotconductedateitherlocationinDifferencesinrelativeabundancewereanalysedusingagenerallinearmixedmodelthatincorporated‘Season’asaxedfactor,‘Location’asarandomfactorand‘Year’asacovariate.‘Transect’and‘SurveyPoint’werealsoincluded,respectivelynestedwithinLocationandTran-sect.ThemodeltestedforaninteractionbetweenLocationandSeason.Abundancedatawere1(x+1)transformedtoensureresidualvalueswerenormallydistributed.AllanalyseswerecarriedoutusingthestatisticalpackageMINITABver.15(MinitabInc.,StateCollege,PA,USA).PukurelativeabundancewassignicantlyhigherinMofucomparedtoMadabadabaacrossallsurveyyears=20.01,=0.006).Pukunumbersalsoshowedasignicantdeclineoverthe5-yeartimeperiodwhencombiningthevaluesforbothlocationsacrossallsurveyyears(=10.84,=0.001),withtherelativeabundancevaluesforthisspeciesparticularlylowin2003(Fig.2).Themodelreturnedanvalueof0.3775,indicatingthatareasonableamountofvariationwithinthedataisexplainedbythesevariables.NeitherSeason=2.01,=0.389)northeinteractionbetween Fig2Relativeabundanceofpuku(N)atMadabadaba(presentedonFigureas‘Mad’)andMofuovera5-yearperiod.Dataarebacktransformed.Errorbarsshow95%condenceintervals.Datapointsareoffsetalongthe-axisforclarity. MofuIfakara00101020 km20 miDar es SalaamIringa00100100200 km200 mi Fig1LocationoftheKilomberoValleyinTanzania.Insetillus-trateslocationofstudyareasinrelationtothetownofIfakara;KilomberoRiverisshownasadarkline,roadsaslighterlines.AdaptedfromanimagekindlysuppliedbyKVTC.ColinBonningtonetal.2010SocietyforEnvironmentalExplorationFrontier.Journalcompilation2010BlackwellPublishingLtd,Afr.J.Ecol. SeasonandLocation(=0.7,=0.404)signi-cantlyinuencedpukuabundance.Wereportasignicantdeclineinrelativelocalpukuabundanceoverthe5-yearsurveyperiodatMofu,whileMadabadabahasasmallerpukupopulationbutonewhichalsoexhibitsasimilardecline.Itismostlikelythatthesedeclinesareattributedtoanthropogenicfactors.Rodgers(1982)statedthatrisinglakelevelsintheRukwaValleyinsouth-westernTanzaniaresultedinareductionoflargemammalpopulations(includingpuku)asmuchofthesuitableforaginghabitatwasooded.Unassessed,stochasticenvironmentalfactors(suchaschangesinoodingregimesandprecipitation)arelikelytohavealowerinuenceonpukunumberthangrowinganthro-pogenicpopulationpressures,asourresultsshowacon-sistentdeclineinthisspeciesoverthelengthofthestudy.Pukuadoptaexiblesocialstructure,wh

3 ichresultsina‘freepassageofanimalswithin
ichresultsina‘freepassageofanimalswithinandbetweenpatches’etal.,1998).Assuch,pukuwouldbeexpectedtomovearoundsuitablehabitatwithintheKilomberooodplainduringthesurveyperiod,withdispersalbetweenthetwosurveyareasapossibility.Furthermore,acaveatthatshouldbeconsideredisthepossibilitythatourresultsareindicativeofatemporarydeclinebecauseofindividuals(particularlyfemalesasmaleswilloftenremaininanareadefendingaterritory;Goldspinketal.,1998)movingintosuitableadjacentun-surveyedhabitat.How-ever,counteringthis,our5-yearstudysupportsrecentndings(Bonnington,Weaver&Fanning,2007)whichdocumentedthatthehabitataroundthehuntinglodgeatMofuistraditionallyheavilyusedbypuku.Thisindicatesthatdirectpopulationpressuresfromanthropogenicsourcesaremostlikelytobethemajorfactordrivingdeclinesratherthananynaturaldispersal.Therefore,anydeclineinnumberatthisoptimallocationraisesconser-vationconcerns.ThecontinuallylowpukuabundanceatMadabadabaislikelycausedbythehighhumanpopulationinthearea,whichincreasesby.2.5%peryear(Meshack,2001).Humanandlivestockencroachmentclosertotheood-plainhasbeenreportedthroughouttheKilomberoValley(Haule,1997)andthispressureislikelytobelimitingthepukunumberinMadabadaba.AsimilarsituationhasbeenreportedbyWaltert,Chuwa&Kiffner(2009)atLakeRukwa,Tanzaniawherethesmallpukupopulation(ofglobalpopulation;Jenkins,Maliti&Corti,2003)avoidlandontheperipheryoftheRukwaGameReservepossiblyasaresultofhighpastoralistactivity.Ifourresultsrepresentalong-termdecline,thedecliningpukuabundanceatMofuisofprimaryconcern.PukunumbersatMofuhavebeenmaintainedinthepastbytheinuenceoftheMofuhuntinglodge(Bonnington,Weaver&Fanning,2007),whichhashadapositivebutlocalizedeffect,evidentfromtheinitiallyhighernumbersofpukupresentinthisstudy.However,thesubsequentdeclineswereportheresuggestthateventhelocalizedprotectionofthelodgeisinsufcientinthefaceofhumanencroachmentinthearea.IfthisisasourcepopulationindeclineatMofu,similardeclinesinotheroptimalareasintheoodplaincouldhaveseriousconsequencesforpersistenceofpukuintheKilomberoValley.Unregulatedhumanencroachmentandsubsequentactivities(e.g.habitatconversion,illegaloff-takesandlivestockhusbandry)arethoughttoadverselyimpactpukuintheKilomberoValley(Jenkins,Maliti&Corti,2003),yetthestabilityofthespeciesintheKGCAisinferredfromaerialsurveydata(Jenkinsetal.,2002;Jenkins,Maliti&Corti,2003).Ourstudyisthersttohavespecicallyhighlighteddecliningpukuabundanceintwolocationswithinthevalley,andwesurmisethatanthropogenicactivitiesaresignicantdriversforthistrend.AdecliningpukupopulationhasalsorecentlybeenreportedbyWaltert,Chuwa&Kiner(2009)atLakeRukwa,TanzaniawheresimilaranthropogenicpressurestothosewitnessedintheKilomberoValley(i.e.livestockhusbandryandsubsequenthabitatdegradation)havebeenblamedforthistrend.However,Dipotso&Skarpe(2006)foundnosuchdeclineinthepukupopulationonadjacentlandtotheChobeRiverinnorthernBotswanabutdidreportashiftintheconcentrationofthepopulationeastwards,whichtheyattributedtodisturbancefromhumanactivitiesinthewestoftheriver.Humanimpacts(particularlyillegaloff-takes)havehis-toricallybeenblamedforthereductionofAfricanKobantelopespecies(e.g.lechwespp.andpuku),withearlyrecordsofKobpopulations(Hughes,1933citedfromCotterill,2005)beingdecimatedbyhumanhuntingbythemid-20thcentury(Vesey-Fitzgerald,1961citedfromCotterill,2005).Weurgentlyrecommendimplementationofalarge-scaleconservationprogrammetoquantifyhowpukuusehabitatspace,tohighlightstrongholdswithintheKilomberoValleyforthespecies.AcombinationofPukupopulationinKilomberoValley2010SocietyforEnvironmentalExplorationFrontier.Journalcompilation2010BlackwellPublishingLtd,Afr.J.Ecol. recurrentaerialsurveys(describedbyJenkins,Maliti&Corti,2003)andradio-trackingprojectswouldrevealpopulationuctuationsanddeterminethemostheavilyusedhabitat.Protection,

4 particularlyofthemostimpor-tantpukuhabit
particularlyofthemostimpor-tantpukuhabitat,alongsidecurbingexcessivepukuoff-takesarecrucialelementsinthefutureconservationandsustainabilityofthisspecieswithintheKilomberoValley.ThisstudywasproducedaspartoftheFrontier-TanzaniaSavannaResearchProgramme,whichisacollaborationbetweentheUniversityofDaresSalaam(UDSM)andtheSocietyforEnvironmentalExploration(SEE).WethankthepersonnelatUlangaDistrictDepartmentofNaturalResourcesandWildFootprintsLtdforalltheirhelpandassistance,andforpermittingeldworkonlandnearthehuntinglodge.LouisvanZylfromKilomberoValleyTeakCompany(KVTC)kindlyprovideduswithamapwhichwasusedtoproduceFig.1.ThanksalsotoPeterMsan-gameno,AbdulMwangalileandChristopherNchimbi(gamescouts)andEibleisFanning(SEE).Finally,aspecialthankstoallstaff,gamescoutsandResearchAssistantsofFrontier-Tanzaniawhocarriedouttheeldsurveysbetween1999and2003,andespeciallytoGrahamCortiwhocoordinatedthesurveys.RichardK.B.Jenkinsandthreeanonymousreviewersprovidedvaluablecommentwhichimprovedthemanuscript.,C.,,D.&,E.(2007)LivestockandlargewildmammalsintheKilomberoValley,insouthernTanzania.Afr.J.Ecol.,G.,,E.,,G.&,R.K.B.(2002)Obser-vationsonthepukuantelopeintheKilomberoValley,Tanza-Afr.J.Ecol.,F.P.D.(2005)TheUpembalechwe,Kobusanselli:anantelopenewtoscienceemphasizestheconservationimpor-tanceofKatanga,DemocraticRepublicofCongo.J.Zool.Lond.,F.M.&,C.(2006)Populationstatusanddistri-butionofpukuinachangingriverfronthabitatinnorthernBotswana.SouthAfr.J.Wildl.Res.,R.(1998)AfricanAntelopeDatabase1998.IUCNSSCAnte-lopeSpecialistGroupReport,Gland,Switzerland.,R.D.(1991)TheBehaviorGuidetoAfricanmammals:IncludingHoofedMammals,Carnivores,Primates.TheUniversityofCali-forniaPress,Berkeley,U.S.A..,C.R.,,R.K.,,G.&Stjernstedt,R.(1998)AnoteonthedistributionandabundanceofpukuKobusvardoniLivingstone,inKasankaNationalPark,Zambia.Afr.J.Ecol.,K.S.(1997)WildlifeProspectsintheKilomberoValleyGameControlledArea,Tanzania.TraditionalvsStatemanagement.CentreforInternationalEnvironmentalandDevelopmentStudiesNoragric,AgriculturalUniversityofNorway,Norway.,K.S.,,F.H.&,S.L.S.(2002)Strivingforsustainablewildlifemanagement:thecaseofKilomberoGameControlledArea,Tanzania.J.Environ.Manage.nvironmentalandTheEnvironmentalImpactoftheProposedKilomberoValleyHardwoodProject.Tanzania.AnAssessmentofaProjectProposedbytheCommonwealthDevelopmentCorporation.TheInternationalInstituteforEnvironmentandDevelopment(IIED).London,andtheInstituteofResourceAssessment(IRA).UniversityofDaresSalaam,Tanzania.IucnsscKobusvardoniiIn:IUCN2009.IUCNRedListofThreatenedSpecies.Version2009.2http://www.iucnredlist.org.Downloadedon22September,R.K.B.,,H.T.&,G.R.(2003)ConservationofthepukuantelopeintheKilomberoValleyTanzania.,R.K.B.,,G.,,E.&Roettcher,K.(2002)ManagementimplicationsofantelopehabitatuseintheKi-lomberoValley,Tanzania.,M.V.(2001)ResourceAssessmentandVillageLandUsePlan–Itete–Minazini,2002–2012.UniversityCollegeofLandsandArchitecturalStudies,UniversityofDaresSalaam,Tanza-,W.A.(1982)ThedeclineoflargemammalpopulationsontheLakeRukwagrassland,Tanzania.Afr.J.Ecol.,W.A.(1984)Statusofthepuku(Kobusvardonistone)inTanzania.Afr.J.Ecol.117–125.,M.,,N.,,A.,,R.A.,,L.,,L.,,L.,,J.,,E.,,J.,H.&,W.(2002)TheKilomberoValleyWildlifeProject:AnEcologicalandSocialSurveyintheKilomberoValley,TanzaniaKilomberoValleyWildlifeProject,Edinburgh,UK.onservationonitoringAerialcensus:SelousGameReserve,MikumiNationalParkandSurroundingArea.Dryseason,October1998.TWCMFZSWildlifeSocietySurveyReport,FrankfurtZoologicalSociety,Arusha,Tanzania.,M.,,M.&,C.(2009)Anassessmentofthepuku(KobusvardoniiLivingstone1857)populationatLakeRukwa,Tanzania.Afr.J.Ecol.Manuscriptaccepted7May2010doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2010.01224.xColinBonningtonetal.2010SocietyforEnvironmentalExplorationFrontier.Journalcompilation2010BlackwellPublishingLtd,Afr.J.Ec

Related Contents


Next Show more