/
Week5Lecture1:Ordereects,CounterbalancingandLatinSquaresInstructor:Ea Week5Lecture1:Ordereects,CounterbalancingandLatinSquaresInstructor:Ea

Week5Lecture1:Ordere ects,CounterbalancingandLatinSquaresInstructor:Ea - PDF document

calandra-battersby
calandra-battersby . @calandra-battersby
Follow
416 views
Uploaded On 2016-03-09

Week5Lecture1:Ordere ects,CounterbalancingandLatinSquaresInstructor:Ea - PPT Presentation

Thewithinsubjectsdesignhasseveraladvantagesitrequiresfewerparticipantsvarianceduetoparticipantspredispositionswillbeapproximatelythesameacrosstestconditionsitisnotnecessarytobalancegroupsofpartici ID: 248781

Thewithin-subjectsdesignhasseveraladvantages:itrequiresfewerparticipants;varianceduetoparticipantspredispositionswillbeapproximatelythesameacrosstestconditions;itisnotnecessarytobalancegroupsofpartici

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Week5Lecture1:Ordere ects,Counterbalanci..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Week5Lecture1:Ordere ects,CounterbalancingandLatinSquaresInstructor:EaktaJainCIS6930,ResearchMethodsforHuman-centeredComputingScribe:Chris(Yunhao)Wan,1677-3116UniversityofFlorida,Spring2015 Thewithin-subjectsdesignhasseveraladvantages:itrequiresfewerparticipants;varianceduetoparticipantspredispositionswillbeapproximatelythesameacrosstestconditions;itisnotnecessarytobalancegroupsofparticipants.Becauseoftheseadvantages,experimentsinHCItendtofavorwithin-subjectsdesignsoverbetween-subjectsdesigns[Mac12].1OrderE ectsWhenthetestconditionsareassignedwithin-subjects,participantsaretestedwithonecondition,thenanothercondition,andsoon.Insuchadesign,participants'performancewillchangeduetoseveralreasons:Practice.Inmostwithin-subjectsdesigns,itispossiblethatparticipants'performancewillimproveastheyprogressfromonetestconditiontothenext.Throughpracticefromoneconditiontoanothercondition,theybecomefamiliarwiththeapparatusandprocedure,andtheyarelearningtodothetaskmoree ectively.Fatigue.Insomecases,itisalsopossiblethattheparticipants'performancewillbecomeworseonconditionsthatfollowotherconditions.Thismaybecauseofmentalorphysicalfatigue.OrderE ect.Theparticipants'performancemayeitherimprovedorworsenduetotheorderofthetestconditions.Thegoaloftheexperimentistoevaluatetheperformancethroughthetestconditions.Theseconfoundingin uencewillgreatlya ecttheaccuracyoftheexperimentsresults.Whenthere'sproblems,therealwaysbeasolution.Themostcommonsolutionfortheordere ectistodivideallparticipantsintogroupsandarrangethetestconditionsinadi erentorderforeachgroup.Thisiscalledcounterbalancing,whichisalsothetopicfornextsection.2CounterbalancingandLatinSquareLet'sstartwithanexample:Inadesigntherearetwolevels(testconditions)AandB.ThetotalnumberofparticipantsisN.Ifwedivideallparticipantsintotwogroups,eachgrouphasN 2participants,andthedesignwilllookslikethefollowingtable:1 Group TestLevelSequence 1 AB2 BAFurthermore,ifweincreasebothtestlevelandgroupnumber,e.g.howtodealwiththedesignof3groups?2.1LatinSquareLet'scontinuewiththeexamplefor3testlevels.Ifweequallydividethetheparticipantsintothreegroups,theneachgroupwillhaveN 3participants.Andwewilldistributethetestconditionsequenceasfollowingtable:Group TestLevelSequence 1 ABC2 BCA3 CABThroughfurtherinspectionfromtheprevioustwocases,wecan ndoutthateachtestconditionappearedonceineverypossiblepositioninthesequence.e.g.intheexampleofthreetestconditions,conditionAisinthe rstplaceingroupone;inthirdplaceofgroup2andinsecondplaceofgroup3.Furthermore,matrixlikethistypecanbeexpandandgenaralizedtoannmatrix,andinexperimentaldesign,ithasaformalname:LatinSquares,whichwasinspiredbymathematicalpapersbyLeonhardEuler,whousedLatincharactersassymbols.[WG11]nn 12...n-1n23...n1...............n-1n...n-3n-2n1...n-2n-1AsimplealgorithmtogeneratetheLatinSquaretalkedpreviouslyistousecircular.ThedetailsonhowtoconstructsuchanLatinSquareandtheproofwastalkedin[Bra58].2.2BalancedLatinSquareTheLatinSquareprovidesanequallyappearanceforeachconditionineachpossibleposition.however,thereisstillanordere ectexists.Recalltheexampleofthe33matrix:BfollowsAtwice,butAfollowsBonlyonce.That'snotacoincidence.Actuallyade ciencyinLatinsquaresoforder3andhigheristhatconditionsprecedeandfollowotherconditionsanunequalnumberoftimes.SoanA-Bsequencee ectisnotfullycompensatedfor.Weintroduceonesolutiontosuchde ciency,whichiscalled:BalancedLatinSquares.Ifwereconstructthe44squareasthefollowingmatrix:2 Group TestConditionSequence 1 ABDC2 BCAD3 CDBA4 DACBIntheabovebalancedLatinSquare,theA-Bsequencee ectasbeensolved.IfwewanttoconstructannbalancedLatinSquare,wecanfollowthematrixbelow12n3n-14...2314n5...342516........................n-1nn-21n-32...n1n-12n-23...Beforeusetheabovesquaretoconstructthebalancedlatinsquares,onethingmustbenoticed:balancedlatinsquarescanonlybegeneratedforevennumberconditions.Andforanconditiondesign,thenumberofparticipantsneededisakn,whichkisapositiveinteger.3ExampleAttheend,let'sgothroughadetailexampleforwhatwe'vetalkedaboutpreviously.Inanexperiment,thereare3algorithmstobetested:A.Videoframecodedwithaverageoptical ow;B.Videoframecodedwithaveragesoundlevel;C.don'tcodethevideo.Andtherearealso3tasks:1.BirthdayParty;2.GroupSkiing;3.BasketballGame.Theexperimentwasdesignedandaveragedataforeachcondition(averagevaluefor3tasks/condition)isshownasfollowing: Participant TestCondition Group Mean A B C 1 12.5 16.9 12.2 1 1A 2 14.4 16.3 14.1 3 ... ... ... 2 2A 4 5 ... ... ... 3 3A 6 mean A B C Ifwepresenttheresultsinachart:Inthisexample,ifthevaluesof1A,2Aand3Aareallcloseenough.Thuswecaninferthereisnoordere ectinthisdesignonconditionA.ThisconclusioncanalsoapplytoconditionBandC.3 References[Bra58]JamesVBradley.Completecounterbalancingofimmediatesequentiale ectsinalatinsquaredesign.JournaloftheAmericanStatisticalAssociation,53(282):525{528,1958.[Mac12]IScottMacKenzie.Human-computerinteraction:Anempiricalresearchperspective.Newnes,2012.[WG11]WalterDWallisandJohnGeorge.Introductiontocombinatorics.CRCPress,2011.4