Are we Hitting Rock Bottom Markus J Aschwanden Solar amp Astrophysics Laboratory Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center 8th Coronal Loops Workshop Palermo Italy 2730 June 2017 ID: 634922
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Loop Width Distribution" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Loop Width Distribution – Are we Hitting Rock Bottom
Markus J. AschwandenSolar & Astrophysics Laboratory, Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center
8th Coronal Loops Workshop, Palermo Italy, 27-30 June 2017
Reference: Aschwanden M.J. and Hardi P. 2017, ApJ 840:4, 24pp “The Width Distribution of Loops and Strands in the Solar Corona – Are We Hitting Rock Bottom ?”
Monreale
Loops
Fabio
Reale Loops
Hardi Peter
Max Planck Institute for Solar System ResearchSlide2
.
.Slide3
.
.Slide4
.
.Slide5
.
.Slide6
Previous Loop width measurements
Loop widths measured in optical, Ha, Lya, EUV, SXR, radioFrom w=20 Mm (radio wavelengths)down to w=70 km (0.1 arcsec
pixel size, Hi-C)52+ publications (1963-2017) with the instruments:Dunn/Sac Peak, Pic-du-Midi, Skylab, NRAO, VLA, CSIRO,Rockets, SXT/
Yohkoh, EIT/SOHO, TRACE, EIT/STEREO,VAULT, AIA/SDO, EIS/Hinode, CRIPS, Hi-C, IRISMost finest loop width measurements are 2-4 pixel sizesMost loop width measurements in EUV (171, 195 A)Higher instrumental resolution revealed progressivelysmaller loop widths.QUESTIONS:
Do we find finer loop widths with higher resolution ?Is there a fundamental physical limit ?Slide7
.Slide8
.
textSlide9
.Slide10
Scale-Free Probability Conjecture
Nonlinear dissipative processes (avalanches) produce scale-free size distributions(i.e. no special size is preferred within a range).The scale-free range of a size distribution isnaturally be described by a power-law distribution, because the number of sizes N decreases by a constant factor with increasing sizes (w): w=1 N=1
w=1/2 N=4 w=1/4 N=16 w
=1/8 N=64 …. N(w) = w -2 For areas, the number of areas with length scale wdecreases by a power law index of a=-2Note that a power law distribution function iso
nly defined in a scale-free range [wmin < w < w
max]Slide11
Thresholded Power-Law Distribution,Pareto [type II] or Lomax Distribution
A lower threshold of the power-law distributionis produced by: - a physical threshold of an instability - incomplete sampling of smallest events - Contamination by an event-unrelated background
An upper cutoff is produced by - truncation effects at the largest events (due to finite system size)
N(w) = (w+wmin)-2 w < wmaxA threshold at
wmin produces a turn-over of the
power-law distribution to a const N
max at the lower end
Nmax = wmin
(-2) = const for w < wmin
Slide12
Loop Width Broadening Effects
A pixelized image has a spatial resolution of wmin ~ 2.5 pixel sizes
The observed loop width w is broadened bythe pixel size and loop background noise.The effective loop width can be added in quadrature:Slide13
Power-law with a Smooth Cutoff
Data noise, the instrumental point-spread function, and uncertainties in the background subtraction of loop profiles will smear out the theoretically predicted sharp peak of the size distribution at the lower end. A smooth power-law size distribution can be defined by a singularity at w/wmin=1
The size distribution has a smooth rollover from the
most likely value w
p to the absolute minimum wminand has 3 free parameters (
wp, wmin, a) and a
normalization constant (n0).Slide14
Power-Law Size Distribution with a Smooth CutoffFits the Observed
Distributions (AIA, Hi-C):
Simulation:
Hi-C:
AIA:
Hi-C rescaled to AIA:Slide15
Loop Width Measurements with OCCULT-2 Code:
AIA 171 A
OCCULT-2 code (Aschwanden, De
Pontieu, & Katrukha 2013, Entropy 15, 3007)”Oriented Coronal Curvature Loop Tracing”Slide16
.
Monte-Carlo simulations of circular loops
with power-law distributions,Automated Tracing with OCCULT-2 codeSlide17
.Automated Tracing with OCCULT-2 CodeSlide18
.Size Distributions for pixel sizes ofdx=0.1”, 0.2”,…,2.0”
Normalized:Unresolved loops
have a peak at wp=2.5 pixels,resolved loopsat w
p > 2.5 pixelsSlide19
.Size Distributions for pixel sizes ofdx=0.1”, 0.2”,…,2.0”
Normalized:Unresolved loops
have a peak at wp=2.5 pixels,resolved loopsat w
p > 2.5 pixelsSlide20
.Hi-C, 2012 July 11, 18:54:16 UTSlide21
.
fOriginal
dx=0.1”Filter:Nsm1=1Nsm2=3W=140 kmFilter:Nsm1=16Nsm2=18
W=1200 km
Filter:Nsm1=32Nsm2=342500 kmSlide22
.Hi-C data do not show
significant structures at the highest resolutionThe size distribution
shows a peak at wp/wmin=7.1,which indicates fully resolvedstructuresSlide23
.AIA data do showsignificant structures at the highest resolutionThe size distributions
hows a peak at wp/wmin
=3.1,which indicates marginally resolvedstructuresSlide24
.AIA shows a most frequentwidth at wp=1258 km,similar to Hi-C scaled to the
same resolutionThe most frequent loop
widths are seen at >2.5 pixelswhen unresolvedThe Hi-C data show a mostfrequent width at w=514 km,and similarly do the AIA datawhen scaled to the same
resolution of 0.1” The most frequent loop widths are seen at 500 km
when fully resolvedSlide25
.Hi-C shows a most frequentwidth at wp ~ 500 km,w
hich is fully resolvedsince wp >> 2.5 pixels (170 km)
The AIA data show a mostfrequent width at w ~ 500 km,which is marginally resolved,since wp ~ 3.0 pixels Slide26
Theoretical Interpretation :What sets the preferred (most frequently observed) value of w~500 km ? (granulation pattern of magneto-convection cells?)
Detection of small-scale granular structures in Quiet Sun with NST/Big Bear
(
Abramenko et al. 2012, ApJL 756: L27)Diffraction limit of 0.0375”=77 kmTwo population of granules: regular granules and mini-granules
Mini-granular structure dominant at scales 100 km < L < 600 kmPower-law distribution with Kolmogorov spectrum -5/3 (obs
: -1.8)Regular granulation has Gaussian distribution with mean 1050 kmMini-granular structures are fragments of regular granules,
Subject to highly turbulent plasma flows in the intergranular lanes,Where the intensity of turbulence is enhanced (Nordlund
et al. 2009)Slide27
Conclusions :1) Largest statistics of loop width measurements (N~10
5) in Hi-C images with automated loop tracing code (OCCULT-2).2) Principal-Component Analysis produces differential occurrence rate size distribution of loop widths power-law distribution3) Loop width distribution N(w) can be characterized by a thresholded power-law distribution (Pareto type II, Lomax distribution) with peak width
wp at
wp/wpixel ~ 2.54) Monte-Carlo simulations provide diagnostic on resolvability of finest loop/strand structures: Unresolved strands have wp/wpixel~2.5, while resolved strands have
wp/w
pixel >> 2.5.5) Hi-C (with a pixel size of 70 km) fully resolves loops, finds a most frequent value at ~500 km6) AIA/SDO (with a pixel size of 435 km) marginally resolves finest loops at ~500 km
7) Loop width ranges in agreement with Brooks et al. (2013), with 91 loops with a low cutoff at wmin
~ 200 km and a peak at wp ~ 640 km.8) Theoretical prediction: Instruments with higher spatial resolution will not show finer strands no unresolved
nanoflare strands !!!9) Theoretical consequence: What sets the preferred (most frequently) value of w~500 km ? (magneto-convection or field line braiding at the granulation scale)