2 nd Meeting 15 09 2015 Venue Vienna Boris Le Hir Pierre Le Mouël amp Paul Zagamé Seureco Methodological debriefing Hierarchy of commitments regarding their relevance to be implemented in ID: 650107
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "I3U “Methodological debriefing“" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
I3U “Methodological debriefing“2nd Meeting –15 09 2015
Venue: ViennaBoris Le Hir, Pierre Le Mouël & Paul Zagamé, SeurecoSlide2
Methodological debriefing
Hierarchy of commitments regarding their relevance to be implemented in NEMESIS.All commitments
will not necessarily be implement in NEMESIS either because for instance no significant quantitative effect are expected in terms of economic performance (ranking of universities or innovation scoreboard for instance) or because it would be too
tricky.Slide3
Methodological debriefing
Hierarchy of commitments regarding their relevance to be implemented in NEMESIS.Several commitments are strongly overlapping and they should maybe grouped together for NEMESIS simulations, for instance:
All commitments aiming at increasing the mobility of human capital could be taken together;
All commitments aiming at making a unified European IPR, etc.Slide4
Methodological debriefing
The implementation in NEMESIS should be considered at three different levels:Commitment → variation of
exogenous
variables (supply of high skill; public R&D investments, etc.)
Commitment
→
variation
of parameters (does increasing SME’s
involvement
increase the R&D productivity of the sector?)
Commitment
→
behavioral modification of the model, i.e. change of equations (should we create a financial module to implement the WP3?)Slide5
Methodological debriefing
The determination of these points must be based on:The commitments action map;
The NEMESIS innovation process described in the paper:Slide6
Methodological debriefing
After this meeting, on the basis on the presentation of the WPs:First iterations must be done between Seureco and the teams of WP 1 to 8 in order to identify the way of implementation of the commitments
On that basis one should probably organize bilateral workshops in particular for commitments that need strong modification of NEMESIS (for instance to deal with finance and innovation or with the question of the heterogeneity of firms size)
Is there travel budget possible for that?Slide7
Thank youBoris Le Hir, Pierre Le Mouël &
Paul Zagaméboris.le-hir@erasme-team.eupierre.le-mouel@erasme-team.eu
paul.zagame@erasme-team.eu