PPT-Other Distributed Frameworks

Shannon Quinn Distinction General Compute Engines Hadoop MapReduce Spark Userfacing APIs Cascading Scalding Alternative Frameworks Apache Mahout Apache Giraph GraphLab Apache Storm. Access to resources of various machines is done explicitly by Remote logging into the appropriate remote machine Transferring data from remote machines to local machines via the File Transfer Protocol FTP mechanism Tightly Coupled Distributed System David Ríos. CSCI 6175. Fall 2011. Why are we going to spend 25 minutes on Condor?. Agenda. What is Condor?. Who can benefit from Condor?. Distributed Computer Concepts. Condor Design Philosophy. How Condor Works. Lecture 1. 1. Chapter 18 Distributed software engineering. Topics covered. Distributed systems issues . Client–server computing. Architectural patterns for distributed systems. Software as a service. SINGA Team. September 4, 2015 @VLDB BOSS. Apache SINGA. Outline. Part one. Background. SINGA. Overview. Programming Model. System Architecture. Experimental Study. Research Challenges . Conclusion. Part two. Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0304. Jingzhi. Lu . and . Jian. Zhang*. Increasing acidity. Introduction. Porous materials . with high . surface . area have extensive applications in . Health professions educators are increasingly defining the outcomes expected of the educational process in the US and abroad. The Scottish Doctor Learning Outcomes, the ACGME Core Competencies and the Institute of Medicine Core Competencies are just a few examples of competency frameworks that are driving education. A technical standard for competency frameworks would facilitate the tracking of competencies within curricula and learner records. . Executional. Frameworks. Chapter 7. Chapter. Overview. Message strategies. Executional. frameworks. Spokespersons and endorsers. Principles of effective advertising. Conative. Affective. Cognitive. Overview – Spring 2010 . Dr. Paul N. Friga. 1. Dr. Paul N. Friga. Our plan for Day 1.... 2. Dr. Paul N. Friga. Your tour guide for the journey. Key Details about the . Professor. Experience. McKinsey & . How to use the nursing priority frameworks…….. There are many different nursing priority frameworks.. Nursing priority frameworks will help with your ability to make nursing judgements and clinical decisions. . THE FOLLOWING IS THE . SINGLE-SLIDE. . VERSION OF THE ANNOUNCEMENT. Single. . SKUs, One Price, Flexible Structure. Simple . Aggressive, Pre-approved, Competitive Pricing. Innovative. . . John E. Stone. Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~johns/. Petascale. The Desired Brand Effect Stand Out in a Saturated Market with a Timeless Brand kindly visit us at www.nexancourse.com. Prepare your certification exams with real time Certification Questions & Answers verified by experienced professionals! We make your certification journey easier as we provide you learning materials to help you to pass your exams from the first try. Today’s reusable robotics software is provided
by several self-contained open-source projects with virtually
no software reuse between them. Such partitioning leads to
problems with software quantity, quality, ease of evaluation
and, ultimately, to poor end user experience. By reviewing
several of the projects we observe that all of them contain
a mix of three types of software: 1) driver and algorithm
implementations, 2) communication middleware, and 3) robotic
software framework. We show that more than half of the
combined code base contains software which could be highly
reusable but only a small fraction of it actually is.
We argue that formal separation of the three groups in
the existing and future software projects would offer several
potential advantages. Availability of framework-independent
code would enable community-wide library-based software
reuse in addition to the existing framework-wide componentbased
reuse. Another important benefit is related to evaluation
procedures. The three software types are very different and
should be evaluated separately, using different criteria. The
first two types allow quantitative comparisons which are well
documented in the literature. The last one is largely qualitative
and, therefore, more subjective.
Practically, we recommend today’s projects to refactor and
eject the driver and algorithm implementation code and focus
on the task of software integration. Thin frameworks can
be numerous, increasing the diversity of options available to
robotics practitioners. Finally, we discuss distribution options
for the refactored framework-independent code including the
option of creating a Common Robotic Project.