Teachingstudent support 330425 COE advising 15 min Center for Teaching and Learning 30 min Rubrics 10 min Course Development 425440 Assessment and Accreditation COE and OSU 440500 ID: 782315
Download The PPT/PDF document "January 9, 2014 COE Faculty 101" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
January 9, 2014
COE Faculty 101
Slide2Teaching/student support (3:30-4:25)
COE advising (15 min)
Center for Teaching and Learning (30 min)Rubrics (10 min)Course Development (4:25-4:40)Assessment and Accreditation COE and OSU (4:40-5:00)***Break (5:00 to 5:30)***Broader Impact Partners (5:30-5:50)***Socialize***
Outline
Slide3Summer 2015, all first-year COE students advised centrally
What is advising?
Professional verses Faculty advisingExploration, academic success, career, PIN, curricular, proceduralMyDegreesAdvisors are your friends
Slide4COE Central advisors
COE Head Advisor
Brett Jeter
COE Central Advising
Mary
Sarah
Kameron
Michelle Chuinard Kyllo Kadooka White
International and academic success advisingCaine Francis and Nova Schauss
Slide5School Advisors
MIME Advising
Tyler Carrie John NancyDeAdder
Randall Barber Holman
CBEE
Advising
Kristen Richard
Rorrer
Kerr
NERHP Advising
Joan
Stueve
BEE AdvisingRoger Ely
Slide6School Advisors
EECS Advising
Calvin Shannon Lizabeth Padma Nicholas
Hughes Reed Marquez Akkaraju
Malos
(
Ecampus
) (
Ecampus)
CCE AdvisingJanice Katie
Nave-Avebele Whitehead
Slide7CTL Website (
http
://oregonstate.edu/ctl/) Winter SymposiumTeaching Tools (Rubrics, etc.)Video Introduction to cognition (https://media.oregonstate.edu/media//0_rwgtq59h)Rubrics and more…. (https://media.oregonstate.edu/media//0_k6clrdif)
Center for Teaching and Learning
Slide8rubrics
Slide9Performance Indicators
1
(unsatisfactory)
2
(satisfactory)
3
(good)
4
(excellent)
Develop process flow diagrams PFDs are incomplete (missing unit operations), missing or incorrect standard elements (stream and equipment #s, correct symbols, flow information)
PFDs incorporate appropriate unit operations and conventions, but not all minor elements (utility streams, pumps, etc.)PFDs accurate, thorough, incorporate conventions appropriatelyPFDs incorporate additional processing not explicitly defined in the description based on appropriate process considerations (e.g. minimizing wastePerform economic analyses
Missing major aspects of costs (capital and manufacturing) or profitability analysesConsiders capital costs and depreciation, manufacturing costs and determines profitability. Substantially complete and somewhat accurate
Complete and relatively accurate cost and profitability analysesComprehensive and accurate assessment of costs, multiple measures of profitability with analysis of meaning, discussion of sensitivity
Optimize design given constraintsNo recognition of constraints and no alternatives consideredConsideration of constraint(s). Attempt to evaluate multiple alternatives
Comprehensive evaluation of multiple alternatives (accurate calculation of costs, profitability) Consideration of multiple constraints
Example Rubric to Assess Design
Slide10Performance Indicators
1
(unsatisfactory)
2
(satisfactory)
3
(good)
4
(excellent)
Develop process flow diagrams PFDs are incomplete (missing unit operations), missing or incorrect standard elements (stream and equipment #s, correct symbols, flow information)
PFDs incorporate appropriate unit operations and conventions, but not all minor elements (utility streams, pumps, etc.)PFDs accurate, thorough, incorporate conventions appropriatelyPFDs incorporate additional processing not explicitly defined in the description based on appropriate process considerations (e.g. minimizing wastePerform economic analyses
Missing major aspects of costs (capital and manufacturing) or profitability analysesConsiders capital costs and depreciation, manufacturing costs and determines profitability. Substantially complete and somewhat accurate
Complete and relatively accurate cost and profitability analysesComprehensive and accurate assessment of costs, multiple measures of profitability with analysis of meaning, discussion of sensitivity
Optimize design given constraintsNo recognition of constraints and no alternatives consideredConsideration of constraint(s). Attempt to evaluate multiple alternatives
Comprehensive evaluation of multiple alternatives (accurate calculation of costs, profitability) Consideration of multiple constraints
Example Rubric to Assess DesignSet of criteria that define and describe the important components of the work being evaluated
Slide11Performance Indicators
1
(unsatisfactory)
2
(satisfactory)
3
(good)
4
(excellent)
Develop process flow diagrams PFDs are incomplete (missing unit operations), missing or incorrect standard elements (stream and equipment #s, correct symbols, flow information)
PFDs incorporate appropriate unit operations and conventions, but not all minor elements (utility streams, pumps, etc.)PFDs accurate, thorough, incorporate conventions appropriatelyPFDs incorporate additional processing not explicitly defined in the description based on appropriate process considerations (e.g. minimizing wastePerform economic analyses
Missing major aspects of costs (capital and manufacturing) or profitability analysesConsiders capital costs and depreciation, manufacturing costs and determines profitability. Substantially complete and somewhat accurate
Complete and relatively accurate cost and profitability analysesComprehensive and accurate assessment of costs, multiple measures of profitability with analysis of meaning, discussion of sensitivity
Optimize design given constraintsNo recognition of constraints and no alternatives consideredConsideration of constraint(s). Attempt to evaluate multiple alternatives
Comprehensive evaluation of multiple alternatives (accurate calculation of costs, profitability) Consideration of multiple constraints
Example Rubric to Assess Design
Provides clear targets of proficiency to studentsEnables unambiguous assessment of qualitative tasksPromotes consistency between multiple
evaluators
Slide12Creative Thinking
Critical Thinking
Ethical ReasoningGlobal LearningInquiry and AnalysisIntercultural Knowledge and CompetenceFoundation and Skills for Lifelong LearningOral CommunicationProblem SolvingQuantitative LiteracyTeamworkWritten CommunicationValue Rubrics
Developed
by the Association of American Colleges and Universities
Slide13Problem Solving Rubric
Slide14So….you want to offer a new course.
Review plans with School’s curriculum committee
Develop a syllabus with the required contentOptionsOffer under a blanket course #New course #Online Curriculum Proposal System
Course Development
Slide15Visit “Course Proposals” from right menu of APAA
(
http://drupaldev.cws.oregonstate.edu/apaa/academic-programs/home)Checklist for proposalsCommon problemsSyllabus templateBlooms taxonomySelect “Curriculum Proposal System” from top menu of APAAOSU Course proposal
Slide16By Program (ABET)
6 year cycle
Single self-study report due at year 6by University (NWCCU)7 year cycleReports every 2 years with different contentAccreditation
Effect on you (typical faculty)?
Course outcomes (on your syllabus) must map to specific program outcomes
Must complete course reflection after each course
During year 5 and 6 collect graded student work
Slide17Help with proposal project description and budget
Work with PI to develop integration
Implement, administer and assess broader impact project Deliver material for final reportsBroader Impact Partners will…