/
Chemistry 125: Lecture 2 Chemistry 125: Lecture 2

Chemistry 125: Lecture 2 - PowerPoint Presentation

faustina-dinatale
faustina-dinatale . @faustina-dinatale
Follow
399 views
Uploaded On 2017-12-17

Chemistry 125: Lecture 2 - PPT Presentation

Sept 4 2009 Force Laws For copyright notice see final page of this file Silliman and Morse Lead Stiles Trails race to complete their directory on the Wiki Note the online audio recording for this lecture begins with ID: 616105

bodies force newton pepys force bodies pepys newton atoms attraction forces mol kcal particles energy query coulomb law problems

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Chemistry 125: Lecture 2" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Chemistry 125: Lecture 2Sept 4, 2009Force Laws

For copyright notice see final page of this file

Silliman and Morse Lead! Stiles Trails.

(race to complete

their directory on the Wiki)

(Note: the on-line audio recording for this lecture begins with Frame 12)Slide2

How to Succeed in Chem 125Samuel Pepysas a ModelScience StudentSlide3

Samuel Pepys (1633-1703) July 9, 1662Up by four o'clock, and at my multiplicacion-table hard, which is all the trouble I meet withal in my arithmetique. July 11, 1662Up by four o'clock, and hard at my multiplicacion-table, which I am now almost master of…

December

25, 1662…so to my office, practising arithmetique alone and making

an end of last night's book with great content till eleven at night, and so home to supper and to bed

Motivated,DiligentSlide4

Samuel Pepys (1633-1703) December 6, 1663 [Sunday]…I below by myself looking over my arithmetique books and timber rule. So my wife rose anon, and she and I all the afternoon at arithmetique, and she is come to do Addition, Subtraction, and Multiplicacion very well, and so I purpose not to trouble her yet with Division... Worked with study partnerSlide5

Isaac Newton (1643-1727)Slide6

Six years later Pepys encountered a “problem” with Dice.Slide7

Pepys’s Problem (11/22/1692)A - has 6 dice in a Box, wth wch he is to fling a 6. B - has in another Box 12 Dice, wth wch he is to fling 2 Sixes.C - has in another Box 18 Dice, wth wch he is to fling 3 Sixes.Q. whether B & C have not as easy a Taske as A, at even luck?If the Question be thus stated, it appears by an easy computation that the expectation of A is greater then that of B or C, that is, the task of A is the easiest.What is ye expectation or hope of A to throw every time one six at least

wth six dyes? [etc.]

Newton’s Reply

(11/26/1692)Slide8

But yet I must not pretend to soe much Conversation wth Numbers, as presently to comprehend as I ought to doe, all ye force of that wch you are pleas'd to assigne for ye Reason of it, relating to their having or not having ye Benefit of all their ChancesPepys’s Reply (12/6/1692)...You give it in favour of ye Expectations of A, & this (as you say) by an easy Computation. . ; and therefore were it not for ye trouble it must have cost you;

I could have wish'd

for a sight of ye very Computation.

Not ashamed to admit whenhe didn’t really understand

Insisted on proofSlide9

31031

46656

A

0.6651

=

1346704211

2176782336

B

0.6187

=

Slide10

Pepys “WHY?”"I cannot bear the Thought of being made Master of a Jewell I know not how to wear." “I never went to his office hours for help because I felt like he would make me feel stupid, because he is superior to me in chemistry.” (from an anonymous end-of-semester course evaluation - Jan 2007)Contrast with:

Willing to swallowhis pride in the search

for solid understandingSlide11

Read Pepys & Newton and get together to do Problems for Monday.Slide12

Problems For Monday: Isotope problems (from Pepys & Newton ) Two Coulomb Problems For Wednesday (Sept. 8): Compare Textbooks

1) Draw Lewis Structures for

Functional Groups2) Are Lewis/Resonance correct?

3) What do Lewis/Resonance Structures show?

Collaborative Group Submissions

form three groups of 3-5 students from each of the following sets of residential colleges:

(BK,CC,JE) (BR,SM,SY)

(DC,PC) (ES,TR) (MC,TD) Slide13

Isotope Ratio Mass SpectrometrySlide14

Are There Atoms & Molecules?What Force HoldsAtomsTogether?Slide15

What Holds Atoms Together?HooksHormones?

The Handsof the Deity?

Springs?

Bolts?

Friction?

Clips?Slide16

What Holds Atoms Together?GravityQuarksKinetic EnergyQuantum Forces

Strange Attractors

Magnetic Forces

Electrical Forces

The Strong Force

Shared Electron PairsExchange of Virtual Particles

Exchange of Photons

The Weak Force

Let’s Vote

0

59

(unanimous)

10

5

20

58

0

7

12

3

5

5

Last YearSlide17

What Holds Atoms Together?GravityQuarksKinetic EnergyQuantum Forces

Strange Attractors

Magnetic Forces

Electrical Forces

The Strong Force

Shared Electron PairsExchange of Virtual Particles

Exchange of Photons

The Weak Force

0

59

(unanimous)

10

5

20

58

0

7

12

3

5

5Slide18

Robert BoyleRobert Boyle

(1627-1691)

P

 V = constAir Pump built by his servant Robt. Hooke

1661Slide19

1678Slide20

Hooke’s Law

Hooke’s Force Law

F = -k

xSlide21

ScalePotential EnergyForce  x

Hooke’s Law

“Ut

tensio

sic vis”

x

2

extension

force

energySlide22

Isaac Newton (1643-1727)Slide23

Force

: GravityAttraction at a Distance

vs.

Cartesian blocked repulsion

Newton : Force  r-2

(How about mass?)Slide24

Isaac Newton (1643-1727)Slide25

Query 31 in Opticks (1717) Have not the small Particles of Bodies certain Powers, Virtues, or Forces by which they act at a distance, not only upon the Rays of Light for reflecting, refracting and inflecting them, but also upon one another for producing a great part of the Phaenomena of Nature? For it's well know that Bodies act one upon another by the Attractions of Gravity, Magnetism and Electricity; and these Instances shew the Tenor and Course of Nature, and make it not improbable but that there may be more attractive Powers than these. For Nature is very consonant and conformable to her self. Slide26

Query 31How these Attractions may be perform'd, I do not here con-sider. What I call Attraction may be perform'd by impulse, or by some other means unknown to me. I use that Word here to signify only in general any Force by which Bodies tend towards one another, whatsoever be the Cause. For we must learn from the Phaenomena of Nature what Bodies attract one another, and what are the Laws and Properties of the attraction, before we enquire the Cause by which the Attraction is perform'd, The Attractions of Gravity, Magne-tism and Electricity, react to very sensible distances, and so have been observed by vulgar Eyes, and there may be others which reach to so small distances as hitherto escape obser-vation; and perhaps electrical Attraction may react to such small distances, even without being excited by Friction. Slide27

Query 31 The Parts of all homogeneal hard Bodies which fully touch one another, stick together very strongly. And for explaining how this may be, some have invented hooked Atoms, which is begging the Question; and others tell us that Bodies are glued together by rest, that is, by an occult Quality, or rather by nothing; and others that they stick together by conspiring Motions, that is, by relative rest amongst themselves. I had rather infer from their Cohesion, that their Particles attract one another by some Force, which in immediate Contact is exceeding strong, at small distances performs the chymical Operations above mention'd, and reaches not far from the Particles with any sensible Effect.

Maybe

Fchymical

 1/r>2

?Slide28

Query 31…the Attraction [between glass plates separated by a thin film of Oil of Oranges] may be proportionally greater, and continue to increase until the thickness do not exceed that of a single Particle of the Oil. Slide29

Query 31There are therefore Agentsin Nature able to make the Particles of Bodies stick together by very strong Attractions. (This business will take us nearly five weeks)And it is the

business of experimental Philosophyto

find them out.Slide30

Felectrical =Fgravity =mass1  mass2

r

2

charge

1

 charge2

r

2

Astronomy

Kepler, Newton

(

?

)Slide31

Initially wanted to be a mathematicianin charge of building Ft. Bourbon, Martinique, 1764-1772

Meyzi

ères Engineering School

1760-1761

National Maritime Museum, Greenwich

~1751 “Charles Augustin continued to deny his mother’s desire that he study medicine and was therefore temporarily disowned. Without funds, he was forced to join his father in Montpellier.”

(Gillmour. 1971, p. 5)

(1732-1799)

Institut de France

1795-1806

Royal Corps of Engineers

1760-1790

Acad

émie Royale des Sciences

1781-1793

electrical

torsion balance

1785

M

émoires de l’Académie

Royale des Sciences,

pp. 569-577

Charles Augustin Coulomb

(1736-1806)

1793

silver wire

(~20

m thick

~1/4 of a hair)

gilded pith ball

gilded pith ball

needle

deflection

scale

torsion pointer

with deg. scale

(0°)

Pointer Twist (°)

Net Deflection (°)

0 36

18

567 8.5

charge pinhead by rubbingSlide32

Pointer Twist (°)Net Deflection (°)

0 36

18

567 8.5

(1)

Coulomb used these data to derive his law for repulsion of like charges:F

 1/r

2

How certain could he be that the exponent for r is exactly 2, and not 2 +

?

That is, how large a

could be consistent with his data?

(Modern experiments, relevant to the rest mass of the photon and to the dimensionality of space, show

< 10

-17

)

Hints:

One approach would be to make a plot based on numbers derived from these data. You might want to consider experimental error and geometry. Detail on experiment and calculation is available in the translation of Coulomb’s paper on the course website.

Two Problems

(2)

Two years later (1787) Coulomb extended this law for repulsion to include attraction between opposite charges.

Explain why Coulomb would need to develop a new apparatus for this experiment.

That is, why couldn’t he just use the same apparatus with different charges on the two gilded pith balls?

Hint:

Remember that the torsional force is approximately linear in the displacement. It might help to graph the Coulombic and torsional energies through a region that includes the point where they balance.

Slide33

Binding Energies from Various SourcesMagnetic  12/r3

0

3

6

-3

Log (Potential Energy)

kcal/mol

Gravitational

m

1

m

2

/r

Coulombic

q

1

q

2

/r

Chemical Bond

(similar to 1 e Coulombic)

(What of Kinetic Energy?)

(

216

kcal/mol)

: Proton-Electron at 1.54Å

(

0.0014

kcal/mol)

: Electron Spins at 1.54Å

(

5 x 10

7

kcal/mol)

: Proton-Neutron in Deuterium Nucleus

(

3 x 10

-32

kcal/mol)

: C atoms at 1.54Å

(

90

kcal/mol)

: C-C at 1.54Å

“Strong” BindingSlide34
Slide35

DemonstrationwithMagnets

Valuable prize for balancing suspended

magnet

between sets of attracting ma gnt!

magnetsSlide36

End of Lecture 2Sept 3, 2009Copyright © J. M. McBride 2009. Some rights reserved. Except for cited third-party materials, and those used by visiting speakers, all content is licensed under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0).

Use of this content constitutes your acceptance of the noted license and the terms and conditions of use.

Materials from Wikimedia Commons are denoted by the symbol .

Third party materials may be subject to additional intellectual property notices, information, or restrictions.

 The following attribution may be used when reusing material that is not identified as third-party content:

J. M. McBride, Chem 125. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0