Joint Meeting NEPOOL Markets - PowerPoint Presentation

1. Joint Meeting NEPOOL Markets and Reliability Committees January 10-12, 2023 | Westborough, MAFeng ZhaoTechnical Managerfzhao@iso-ne.comWinter Gas Modeling and AccreditationResource Capacity Accreditation in the Forward Capacity MarketFei ZengTechnical Managerfzeng@iso-ne.com

2. 2WMPP ID:157Proposed Effective Date: FCA 19The Resource Capacity Accreditation (RCA) project proposes improvements to ISO-NE’s accreditation processes in the Forward Capacity Market (FCM) to further support a reliable, clean-energy transition by implementing methodologies that will more appropriately accredit resource contributions to resource adequacy as the resource mix transformsThe ISO has made a commitment to file proposed improvements to be implemented in time for FCA 19The goal of this presentation is to provide more details of the proposed winter natural gas modeling and accreditationHereafter “natural gas” will be simply referred to as “gas”Small numerical examples in this presentation are for illustration purposes only and do not reflect or imply actual market impact of RCAResource Capacity Accreditation in the Forward Capacity Market

3. 3WMPP ID:157Proposed Effective Date: FCA 19Outline of today’s discussion:Review of winter gas modeling and accreditation (slides 5-6)De-rating method framework for gas accreditation (slides 8-28):Gas resource qualification (slides 8-11)Resource Adequacy Assessment (RAA) with winter gas constraints (slides 13-17)Accreditation of gas resources (slides 19-26)Summary on De-rating method framework (slide 28)RAA modeling of winter gas constraints (slides 30-45)Stakeholder Schedule (slides 47-51)Resource Capacity Accreditation in the Forward Capacity Market

4. Winter gas modeling And AccreditationReview of Proposed De-rating Method4

5. 5Review: De-rating Method Proposed for Winter Gas Modeling and AccreditationGas resources (gas-only and dual-fuel) are subject to regional gas supply constraints (pipeline and LNG) in the 3-month gas-constrained winter period (December through February), potentially reducing their reliability contributions or accreditation valuesTo reflect the impact of gas constraints on gas resource accreditation, a de-rating method was introduced at the December MC meeting The proposed method will de-rate a gas resource’s winter QC for the gas-constrained winter period in calculating its accredited capacity (i.e., QMRIC) to reflect its reduced reliability contribution

6. 6Review: Framework for Proposed De-rating MethodGas Resource QualificationGas Resource De-rating Factor DeterminationGas Resource MRI/QMRIC CalculationGas Forecast DevelopmentAdequacy Risk AssessmentResource Adequacy Assessment (RAA) With Winter Modeling EnhancementsGas Resource AccreditationIntroducedDecember MC/RC MeetingThe proposed de-rating method has 3 components:Gas Resource Qualification: Determine firm (no de-rating) and non-firm (subject to de-rating) portions of a gas resource’s winter QC in the qualification process RAA with Winter Modeling Enhancement: Develop regional gas forecasts for the winter period, and model them as aggregated models in RAA to reflect adequacy risk in winterGas Resource Accreditation: Calculate de-rating factor for non-firm gas capacity, and calculate QMRIC values using individual gas resource models with de-rated QC (Dec.-Feb.) and EFORd

7. Winter gas modeling And AccreditationGas Resource Qualification7

8. 8Overview of Gas Resource QualificationUnder the proposed framework, the qualification process will determine a gas resource’s firm and non-firm capacities for the gas-constrained winter period (Dec. – Feb.)Gas resources include gas-only and dual-fuel resourcesFirm capacity represents the portion of winter QC backed by firm fuel arrangement at the time of qualification, and is not subject to de-rating in the accreditation processNon-firm capacity represents the portion of winter QC not backed by firm fuel, and is subject to de-rating in the accreditation processIn addition, gas resources that are operationally limited (e.g., expected physical constraints on gas delivery) will be flagged* Details of gas resource qualification are provided in a separate presentation by Levitan & Associates, Inc. (LAI)

9. 9Qualification Rules for Gas ResourcesFirm fuel requirements, expressed in hours of operation at a resource’s full winter rating, will be established to represent the fuel requirements for the full winter rating to be considered “firm,” e.g.,Firm Daily Operations Requirement (hours of full operation in a day)Firm Seasonal Operations Requirement (hours of full operation during the winter period)Firm Oil Storage Requirement (hours of full operation for consecutive cold snap days)A gas resource’s firm fuel arrangement will be compared to corresponding firm fuel requirements to determine its firm capacity MWIf a resource’s firm fuel arrangement satisfies a portion of firm requirements, the same portion of the resource’s winter rating will be qualified as “firm” Different firm arrangement types may need to apply different requirement typesOperationally limited resources will be assigned zero winter QC for the winter period (Dec. – Feb.)

10. 10Illustration of Gas Resource Qualification ProcessGas Resource QualificationGas resource firm fuel requirements Gas resource firm fuel arrangementGas resource winter QCFirm and non-firm capacities of winter QC for winter period, e.g.,“firm”“non-firm”Winter QCFlagged operationally limited gas resources; and Qualification determines firm and non-firm portions of gas resource’s winter QC by comparing demonstrated firm fuel arrangement with firm fuel requirements

11. 11Key Takeaways on Gas Resource QualificationNew qualification rules will be established to determine the firm and non-firm capacities of a gas-only or dual-fuel resource in the gas-constrained winter period A gas resource’s firm fuel arrangement demonstrated at the qualification process will be compared with firm fuel requirements to determine its “firm” capacityNon-firm capacities will be subject to de-rating in calculating gas resource’s accreditation value or QMRIC

12. Winter gas modeling and AccreditationRAA With Winter Modeling Enhancements12

13. 13Overview of RAA Winter Modeling EnhancementsGas supply for generation could be limited during the heating season of December through February (i.e., gas-constrained winter period), resulting in adequacy risk in winterProbabilistic regional gas supply during the winter period will be forecastedTo assess the winter adequacy risk caused by regional gas supply limitations, RAA will be enhanced with gas constraints for the winter period Gas constraints will be represented by energy limits of aggregated models in RAA

14. 14Illustration of RAA Process with Winter Modeling EnhancementsGas Forecast Development produces the probabilistic total available gas (pipeline gas and LNG) in the winter period (Dec. – Feb.)Adequacy Risk Assessment calculates the winter adequacy risk with aggregated gas models (subject to forecasted gas limits) and individual models representing firm oilGas Forecast DevelopmentAdequacy Risk AssessmentRAA with Winter Modeling EnhancementsFirm and non-firm gas capacities, firm oil capacity, flagged gas resourcesWinter adequacy riskForecasted gas supplyFirm gas arrangement

15. 15Gas ForecastsGas supply limitations (probabilistic) for gas resources during the winter period (Dec. – Feb.) are represented byForecasted daily pipeline gas, andForecasted seasonal LNGThe available pipeline gas will be forecasted based on pipeline capacity, weather-dependent LDC demand, LNG sendout, etc.The available LNG will be forecasted based on historical LNG shipments, economics, geopolitical situations, LNG sendout, etc. * Details of LNG forecast will be provided in a separate presentation by LAI

16. 16Assessing Adequacy Risk with Winter Gas ConstraintsDue to current software limitations, GE-MARS cannot model individual gas resources with shared seasonal or daily gas energy limitsThe total gas capacity from gas resources will be modeled as one aggregated storage resource and one aggregated intermittent resource behind an artificial gas interfaceEnergy limit of the aggregated storage resource represents forecasted seasonal LNGEnergy profile of the aggregated intermittent resource reflects forecasted daily available pipeline gasThe gas interface limit represents the total gas capacity from gas resourcesFirm oil capacities of dual-fuel resources are modeled as individual thermal resourcesThe objective is to capture the winter adequacy risk (e.g., winter LOLE) caused by gas limitationsMore RAA modeling details are discussed in the later section of this presentation

17. 17Key Takeaways on RAA With Winter Modeling EnhancementsRegional gas limitations will be represented by seasonal LNG forecast and daily pipeline gas forecast for the winter periodGas limitations will be modeled through one aggregated storage resource and one aggregated intermittent resource to capture winter adequacy risk caused by gas limitations

18. Winter gas modeling and accreditationGas Resource Accreditation18

19. 19Overview of Gas Resource AccreditationGas Resource De-rating Factor DeterminationGas Resource MRI/QMRIC CalculationGas Resource AccreditationWinter adequacy riskFirm and non-firm capacities, flagged gas resourcesDe-rating factor for non-firm gas capacities is calculated by an equivalencing methodGas resource QMRICs are calculated using individual gas resource models with de-rated QC (for Dec.-Feb.) and EFORd* Details of de-rating factor calculation will be presented in coming RC meetings

20. 20RAA With Individual Gas Resource ModelsThe RAA case with aggregated gas models reflects adequacy risk caused by regional winter gas limitations, but will not be used to accredit individual gas resources Individual gas resource QC needed for calculating MRI is not modeled in the aggregated caseIndividual gas resource EFORd affecting QMRIC is not modeled in the aggregated caseIndividual gas resource models with QC and EFORd will be needed in RAA for gas resource accreditationThese individual models need to also reflect the adequacy risk in winter period (Dec. – Feb.) caused by gas supply limitations

21. 21Equivalencing Adequacy Risk in Winter PeriodEquivalencing is used to obtain the RAA case with individual gas resource models Individual gas resources will be modeled as thermal resources with winter De-rated QC (DQC) for the gas-constrained winter period (Dec.- Feb.) and EFORdRAA cases with aggregated gas models and individual gas models have “equivalent” representation of adequacy risk in winter periodMethod of equivalencing is not uncommon in power system analysis

22. 22De-rated QC of Gas Resources Modeled in RAARAA with individual gas models considers their EFORd and monthly QCs for a gas resource:Winter de-rated QC (DQC) is a result of de-rating its non-firm capacity:JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecWinter De-rated QCWinter QCSummer QCWinter QCWinter De-rated QC“firm”“non-firm”Winter QCDe-rating“firm”Winter DQC“De-rated from non-firm”Winter QC

23. 23Calculating Non-firm Gas Capacity De-rating FactorNon-firm gas capacities are subject to de-rating:Uniform De-rating Factor (DF) for non-firm QC of non-flagged gas resources is currently considered A gas resource’s non-firm capacity will be reduced to: The gas resource’s winter DQC for the winter period is: The DF is obtained where the winter adequacy risk representation (e.g., winter LOLE) with individual de-rated gas resource models is equivalent to the winter risk representation with aggregated models  

24. 24Gas Resource AccreditationWith equivalencing, the RAA case with individual gas resource models, i.e., thermal resources with winter DQCs in Dec. – Feb., can be obtainedThe RAA case with individual thermal gas resource models will be used to construct the base case for calculating ICR, demand curves and resource MRIsA gas resource’s MRI is calculated as (∆EUE/∆QC), with QC being FCA QCThe gas resource’s FCA QC is defined as minimum of Summer and Winter QCs Note: Winter DQC is introduced only for gas resource accreditation, and will not affect its FCA QC or seasonal QCs defined under the current qualificationIn calculating MRI, a small change () to FCA QC translates to proportional changes to Summer QC (i.e., SummerQC/FCAQC), Winter QC (i.e., WinterQC/FCAQC) and Winter DQC (WinterDQC/FCAQC) for corresponding months in RAA base case

25. 25Gas Resource Accreditation, cont’dQMRIC of a gas resource is calculated as The QMRIC of a gas resource is calculated the same way as other thermal resourcesThe QMRIC of a gas resource reflects its aggregated reliability contributions from all seasons/periods including the gas-constrained winter period (Dec. – Feb.) 

26. 26Key Takeaways on Gas Resource Accreditation Using equivalencing method, gas resources can be modeled as individual thermal resources with de-rated winter QC (for Dec.-Feb.) and EFORd in the RAA base caseThe accreditation value or QMRIC of a gas resource can be calculated in the same way as other thermal resources

27. Summary on De-rating Method Framework 27

28. 28Summary on De-rating Method FrameworkQualification rules that identify firm and non-firm winter QCs of gas resources will allow the de-rating of non-firm gas capacitiesEquivalencing provides a way to model individual gas resources in RAA base case with winter DQCs of gas resources for the gas-constrained winter period (Dec.-Feb.)With the proposed de-rating method, reduced reliability contributions of gas resources will be captured in their accreditation valuesPotential further improvements such as non-uniform de-rating are under evaluation

29. RAA Modeling of Winter gas constraintsOverview of how gas constraints are modeled in RAA to quantify their impacts on system reliability29

30. 30Introduction of Modeling Enhancements for Gas ResourcesRCA project will enhance RAA modeling by:Modeling system conditions with greater accuracy and granularity Better capturing resources’ performance and interactions among different resourcesBetter reflecting the correlation between resources’ performance and system loading conditionImproving modeling consistency among different types of resourcesProposed changes have been discussed over the past several months related to the intermittent resources, pumped-storage hydro, demand resources and loadFocus of this section is on introducing modeling enhancements for gas resources in the RAA

31. 31Introduction of Modeling Enhancements for Gas Resources, cont.Modeling changes focus on how gas constraints are modeled in the resource adequacy assessment to evaluate their aggregate impacts on system reliabilityDiscussion at future committee meetings will explain how this model is used to accredit the gas resources that are subject to gas constraints (without specific forward arrangements) and forms the base case for accrediting other resources

32. 32Overview of Gas Resource RAA Modeling during the Winter PeriodNon-firm gas capacity portion of both gas-only resources and dual-fuel gas resources is subject to the gas constraints during the winter period (Dec. – Feb.)Gas-only ResourcesDual-fuel ResourcesNon-firm Gas CapacityFirm Gas CapacityNon-firm Gas CapacityFirm Gas CapacityFirm Oil CapacityIntermittent Resource subject toTotal Available Pipeline GasStorage Resource subject toTotal Available LNGIndividual Thermal ResourcesEFORdAggregated Gas Model with Gas ConstraintsRevision 1: Revised diagram

33. 33Overview of Gas Constraints Model during Winter Period

34. 34Probabilistic Modeling of Gas Availability and ImpactsLNG and pipeline gas available for generation are modeled on the system levelAll modeling is done in aggregate (not resource-specific) and does not reflect any specific pipeline or unit-specific limitationsAssumption is that if there is gas available some resources would be able to use it during times when the system is short of capacityGas availability and resulting impacts are modeled probabilistically Hourly electric energy profile is created to reflect hourly pipeline gas available for generation depending upon the probabilistic load level/weather, similar to an intermittent resourceSeasonal LNG available to the region is randomly drew following an underlying distribution

35. LNG Constraint ModelOverview of approach used to model limitations of LNG in the RAA process35

36. Distribution of the seasonal LNG available to gas resources is established using historical LNG deliveries to the regions adjusted down by weather-based sendout to load distribution companies (LDCs)Reference LAI material on LNG forecastDistribution of LNG Available to Generation36

37. 37Conversion of Available LNG for Generation to Electric EnergyDistribution of available LNG to generation represents the amount that can be used for electric generation absent any specific actions taken by gas resources to acquire firm LNG arrangementsThe seasonal distribution of available LNG to gas resources is converted to a seasonal LNG electric energy distribution using average heat rate of the gas resources (8,000 Btu/kWh)

38. 38Utilization of Available Electric Energy from LNGThe seasonal LNG electric energy distribution will be modeled in the RAA model using a single energy-limited storage resourceAt the beginning of the year for each replication, this storage resource is assigned an amount of energy that is randomly sampled based on the seasonal LNG electric energy distribution This amount of energy is available to serve system demand during the winter period and dispatched on “as-needed” basis to mitigate loss of load from December through FebruaryAligns with the treatment of other storage resources, e.g. batteries and pumped-storage hydro

39. Pipeline Gas Constraint ModelOverview of approach used to model limitations of gas pipeline system in the RAA process39

40. Correlation between Available Pipeline Gas and LoadAmount of electric energy gas resources can produce using the available pipeline gas is closely correlated the load levels used in the RAA as both are dependent on weather conditionDifferent load levels used in the RAA represent the system demand under different weather conditionsThe amount of available pipeline gas to generation is a function of the heating degree day (HDD) To establish this correlation, for each of the load levels modeled in the RAA an implied HDD is determined for each day, and used for deriving the amount of available pipeline gas to generation under this weather condition40

41. Determination of Daily Available Pipeline Gas for GenerationFor each load level, using the implied HDD and a gas pipeline forecast model, the daily LDC gas demand can be established and then adjusted down for the expected the daily satellite LNG peaking sendoutAdditional discussion on the ICF International gas pipeline forecast model will be in FebruaryComparing the daily adjusted LDC gas demand with the pipeline capacity determines the daily pipeline gas available to gas resources41

42. 42Development of Hourly Electric Energy from Daily Available Pipeline GasFor each load level, daily pipeline gas available to gas resources will be converted to daily electric energy using average heat rate of the gas resources (8,000 Btu/kWh)Daily available pipeline gas is based upon electric day, not gas dayAn hourly electric energy output profile is developed based on the total daily electrical energy supported by daily pipeline gas available to gas resources and the typical historical hourly generation pattern across the day

43. Illustration of relationship of LDC pipeline gas consumption, LDC satellite sendout and available pipeline gas for gas-fired generatorsExample of Pipeline Gas Available for Generation by HDD43

44. Key Takeaways Of RAA Modeling of Winter gas constraints44

45. Key Takeaways of RAA Modeling of Winter Gas ContraintsISO is establishing available gas to the region using probabilistic models reflecting historical LNG deliveries and pipeline gas availability correlated with weather in the winter (Dec. to Feb.)Aggregated reliability impacts account for assumed availability of pipeline gas and LNGIt is expected that this modeling will identify loss of load risk associated with the gas system limitation during winter periodAdditional discussion on how these models are used to accredit gas resources and impacts to other resources is scheduled for February45

46. Road Map and Stakeholder Schedule46

47. RCA Road Map – Integrating Gas Limitations into Resource Adequacy and Capacity AccreditationThe below road map provides a projection of when committee discussions will begin on topics related to integrating gas limitations into resource adequacy and capacity accreditation:47RCA TopicProjected Start of Committee DiscussionsFramework IntroductionDecember 2022Gas Resource Accreditation MethodJanuary 2023Modeling Winter Gas LimitationsJanuary 2023Supporting Process ChangesJanuary 2023

48. 48RCA Stakeholder Process – Additional ExtensionAdditional time is needed to finalize the detailed design for gas modeling and accreditation. The current stakeholder schedule has been extended by two months:Background, Conceptual Design, & Education: June 2022 – January 2023 (from 9 months to 8)Detailed Design: November 2022 – April 2023 (from 5 months to 6)Finalize Design, Review Tariff Language, and Stakeholder Amendments: May 2023 – August 2023 (from 3 months to 4)Voting: September 2023 (Technical Committees) and October 2023 (Participants Committee) (remains @ 2 months)The key dates for the impact assessment remain unchanged: September 2022: Introduce proposed impact assessment approachFebruary 2023: Finalize scenarios March 2023: Review initial results for all resource typesJune 2023: Final reportIntroduceIA ApproachFinalize IAScenariosReviewInitial IAResultsFinal IAReportFERCOrder202220232024Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1JJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMCurrent ScheduleConceptual Design Final Design,Review Tariff, and AmendmentsMC/RCVotePC VoteFile    Eff. Date      Detail DesignProposed ScheduleConceptual Design Final Design,Review Tariff,and AmendmentsMC/RCVotePC VoteFile  Eff. Date      Detail DesignNote: In November 2022, the RCA stakeholder process was extended by several months to allow additional time to finalize the conceptual design for gas modeling and accreditation. The key dates for the impact assessment in the stakeholder process were also shifted by two months

49. hStakeholder Schedule – Conceptual Design PhaseAUGUST 2022Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesMC Meeting Dates: August 9-10, 2022 (with joint RC during RCA components) (link to materials)Posting Materials Beginning: August 3, 2022Topics: Continue discussion of ISO's conceptual design. Stakeholders should submit additional clarifying questions on average and marginal approaches or the conceptual design to the MC Secretary by July 22, 2022SMTWTFS 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031   JUNE 2022Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesMC Meeting Dates: June 7-8, 2022 (with joint RC during RCA components)(link to materials)Posting Materials Beginning: June 1, 2022Topics: Review background and discuss opportunities for adjusting the way resources are accredited in the FCM to support a reliable, clean-energy transitionSMTWTFS   123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930  JULY 2022Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesMC Meeting Dates: July 12-14, 2022 (with joint RC during RCA components) (link to materials)Posting Materials Beginning: July 6, 2022Topics: Discussion of ISO's design objectives and conceptual design. Stakeholders should submit additional clarifying questions on average and marginal approaches to the MC Secretary by June 24, 2022SMTWTFS     12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031      SEPTEMBER 2022Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesMC Meeting Dates: September 13-14, 2022 (with joint RC during RCA components) (link to materials)Posting Materials Beginning: September 7, 2022Topics: Continue discussion of conceptual design and review proposed impact assessment approach. Stakeholders should submit remaining clarifying questions on average and marginal approaches or additional questions on the conceptual design to the MC Secretary by August 22, 2022SMTWTFS    123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930 49

50. hStakeholder Schedule – Conceptual/Detailed Design PhaseOCTOBER 2022Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesMC Meeting Dates: October 12-13, 2022 (with joint RC during RCA components) (link to materials)Posting Materials Beginning: October 5, 2022Topics: Continue discussion of conceptual design. Stakeholders should submit remaining clarifying questions on average and marginal approaches, additional questions on the conceptual design, and any feedback on the Impact Assessment to the MC Secretary by September 26, 2022 Additional Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesRC Meeting Date: October 18, 2022 (with joint MC during RCA components) (link to materials)Posting Materials Beginning: October 12, 2022Topics: Continue discussion on ISO's conceptual design and review proposed impact assessment scope and scenariosSMTWTFS      12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031     NOVEMBER 2022Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesMC Meeting Dates: November 8-10, 2022 (with joint RC during RCA components) (link to materials)Posting Materials Beginning: November 2, 2022Topic: Review design elements associated with MRI framework revisionsSMTWTFS  123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930   DECEMBER 2022Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesMC Meeting Dates: December 6-8, 2022 (with joint RC during RCA components; TC invited to participate in RCA discussions) (link to materials)Posting Materials Beginning: November 30, 2022Topic: Review detailed design elements associated with MRI framework revisions. Introduce framework for integrating gas limitations into resource adequacyReliability CommitteeRC Meeting Date: December 14, 2022 (MC invited to participate in RCA discussions) (link to materials)Posting Materials Beginning: December 8, 2022Topic: Review detailed design elements associated with resource modeling enhancementsSMTWTFS    1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303150

51. hStakeholder Schedule – Conceptual/Detailed Design PhaseJANUARY 2023Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesMC Meeting Dates: January 10-12, 2023 (with joint RC during RCA components)Posting Materials Beginning: January 4, 2023Topic: Continue review of detailed design elements associated with MRI framework revisions, and review conceptual design for gas resource modeling and accreditationSMTWTFS12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031FEBRUARY 2023Joint Markets and Reliability CommitteesMC Meeting Dates: February 7-9, 2023 (with joint RC during RCA components)Posting Materials Beginning: February 1, 2023Topic: Continue review of detailed design elements associated with MRI framework revisions, continue review of the design for gas resource modeling and accreditation, and finalize impact assessment scenariosReliability CommitteeRC Meeting Date: February 14, 2023 (MC invited to participate in RCA discussions)Posting Materials Beginning: February 8, 2023Topic: Continue review of detailed design elements associated with resource modeling enhancementsSMTWTFS12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728MARCH 2023Markets CommitteeMC Meeting Dates: March 7-9, 2023 (RC invited to participate in RCA discussions)Posting Materials Beginning: March 1, 2023Topic: Continue review of detailed design elements associated with MRI framework revisions, review detailed design elements for gas resource accreditation, and review initial Impact Assessment results Reliability CommitteeRC Meeting Date: March 14, 2023 (MC invited to participate in RCA discussions)Posting Materials Beginning: March 8, 2023Topic: Continue review of detailed design elements associated with resource modeling enhancements, and review detailed design elements for modeling winter gas limitationsSMTWTFS1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303151Note: Detailed information for the 2023 Q2 NEPOOL stakeholder meetings will be provided starting in February 2023

52. 52