/
Copyright  2009 by IGCS and ESGO Unauthorized reproduction of this a Copyright  2009 by IGCS and ESGO Unauthorized reproduction of this a

Copyright 2009 by IGCS and ESGO Unauthorized reproduction of this a - PDF document

gelbero
gelbero . @gelbero
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-08-20

Copyright 2009 by IGCS and ESGO Unauthorized reproduction of this a - PPT Presentation

beenmademagneticresonanceimagingcanprovideusefulinfor mationfortreatmentplanningforthosecasesnotamenabletosur geryMagneticresonanceimagingcanprovideinformationon tumorbulkdepthofmyometrialinvasio ID: 938868

etal gog copyright ncri gog etal ncri copyright 2006 2009 pten january2009 number1 internationaljournalofgynecologicalcancer 2007 volume19 gynecoloncol prohibited igcs

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Copyright 2009 by IGCS and ESGO Unautho..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Copyright @ 2009 by IGCS and ESGO. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. beenmade,magneticresonanceimagingcanprovideusefulinfor- mationfortreatmentplanningforthosecasesnotamenabletosur- gery.Magneticresonanceimagingcanprovideinformationon tumorbulk,depthofmyometrialinvasion,andcervicalinvolve- mentandextrauterinespread. 11 StagingprotocolsarebasedonT2- weightedsequences,butcontrast-enhancedT1-weightedsequences maybecomplementaryandoptimizetheaccuracyofinterpreta- tion.Magneticresonanceimaginghasitslimitations,including microscopicinvasionandintranodallymphnodemetastases;itis possiblethatsensitivityfordetectionofthelatterwillbeimproved bytheuseofultrasmallparticlesofironoxide(USP10)contrast agents.Evaluationofpositronemissiontomography,particularly forlymphnodestagingandearlydetectionofrecurrence,warrants evaluation. 12 TreatmentofEC RoleofSurgery Theroleofprimaryhysterectomyforthetreatmentofen- dometrialcarcinomaiswellaccepted.Morecontroversialisthe roleoflymphadenectomy.AssignmentofFIGOstageisbasedon presenceorabsenceofmetastaticdiseaseintheretroperitoneal lymphnodes.Asnotedbelow,somegynecologicsurgeonsperform staginglymphadenectomiesonallpatients,someonnopatients, andsometailorstagingtoincludelymphadenectomyforpatients thoughttobeatsuf“cientlyhighriskoflymphnodeinvolvement. Inaddition,theextentoflymphadenectomyremainsasubjectof debate. Furthermore,understandingpatternsoffailureiscriticalin understandinghowbesttomanageECinpostsurgicalcare.Of 612womenmanagedwithhysterectomyandadjuvantradiother- apy(RT)attheMayoClinic,141(23%)relapsedandsitesof recurrencewereknownfor132cases;60hematogenous,44lym- phatic,and37intraperitoneal. 13 Amongwomenwithmyometrial invasionoflessthan50%,5%developedhematogenousspread comparedwith23%inthosewithmorethan50%invasion. Lymphaticembolizationwasfoundonlyinhigh-riskcases.Pelvic sidewallrecurrenceoccurredatarateoflessthan1%inwomen withoutlymphovascularinvasion(LVI)orpositivenodesatpre- sentation,andpara-aorticrecurrencewasalsoasrareinwomenwho werenode-negativeandhadnoLVI.Inthepresenceofthese, however,sidewallandpara-aorticrecurrenceswere26%and33%, respectively.Intraperitonealspreadwaslargelyassociatedwithad- vanceddiseaseatpresentation.Vaginalfailurewasassociatedwith grade3histologicsubtypeandLVI. GOG-99isarandomizedtrialevaluatingpelvicradiationto nofurthertherapyamongwomenconsideredatintermediaterisk forrecurrenceafterhysterectomyandlymphadenectomy. 14 Among thosewomenwithnoevidenceofdiseaseintheretroperitoneal lymphnodes,age,grade,depthofmyometrialinvasion,andlym- phovascularspaceinvasionwereindependentpredictorsofrecur- rence.ThesesamefactorsalsopredictedrecurrenceinthePORTEC 1studythatinvolvedwomenwhounderwenthysterectomybut notlymphadenectomyasprimarytherapyforEC. 15 Therefore,bothhysterectomyandlymphadenectomy,ifper- formed,canhelpdetermineboththeriskofrecurrentdiseaseand thedominantpatternsoffailure,whetherperitonealornodal.Wedo notknowyethowtointegrateadjuvantradiationtherapyandche- motherapytominimizetheriskofrecurrence. RadicalHysterectomy Unlikeasimplehysterectomy,aradicalhysterectomywill removeparametrialtissue,uppermostvagina,andpelvic T para- aorticlymphnodes.Asnotedbelow,theoptimalextentoflym- phadenectomyisnotwellde“ned.Thiscombinedsurgical procedurecouldhavetheeffectofreducingcentralpelvicandvag- inalfailures,aswellasde“newomenatlowriskoflymphaticsite relapse.Thereis,however,noevidencetosupportradicalhyster- ectomyforstageIdisease.Radicalhysterectomyshouldbecon- “nedtowomenwithknownbulkyinvolvementofthecervix,that is,IIB. 16 RoleofLymphadenectomy Theroleoflymphadenectomyistostagediseaseandinso doingtode“neprognosisanddeterminetheneedforadjuvant therapy.Theextentoflymphadenectomyalsoremainscontrover- sial,includingtheoptimalnumberoflymphnodestoremove,the sitesforlymphadenectomy,andhowhighuptheaortathelym- phadenectomyshouldextend.Somegroupshaveadvocatedto abovetheaorticbifurcation,otherstotheleveloftheIMA,and otherstotherenalvessels.Whetherlymphadenectomyisthera- peuticinitselfbyremovinginvolvednodesisahighlycontro- versialissue.Nonrandomized,retrospectivecaseserieshavebeen analyzedtodeterminewhetherremovalofagreaterorlessernum- berofnodesorindeedanynodesisassociatedwithimproved survival.AnumberofsuchstudiesfromtheUnitedStateshave suggestedasurvivalbene“tinwomenundergoingsurgicalstaging, butmostofthesestudieshavenotcontrolledforstandardofcare, comorbidity,andstagemigration,thatis,node-positivewomenare movedoutofstageIdisease,leavingnode-negativewomenbeing comparedwithwomenofunknownnodestatus.Arecentlypub- lishedstudybyChanetalreportedthatamongwomenwhohad beenstagedandfoundtohavepositivenodes,thoseinwhom11 to20nodeswereremovedandmorethan20nodeswereremoved hadarelativehazardrateof0.77and0.60,respectively,compared withthosewhohadupto10nodesremoved. 17 Thebene“tof lymphadenectomyamongwomenwhosehysterectomyspecimens putsthematlowriskforextrauterinediseaseseemstobesmall.As notedabove,thereisnoconsistentapproachtolymphadenectomy eveninNorthAmerica. Decisiveproofofwhetherlymphadenectomyistherapeutic requiresdatafromarandomizedtrialinwhichadjuvanttherapy doesnotconfoundthe“ndings.Therecentlyreported,butasyet unpublishedASTECtrial,performedintheUnitedKingdom,was designedtoaddresstheeffectoflymphadenectomyonsurvivaland theeffectofadjuvantRTonsurvivalofat-riskwomen.Thepub- lishedresultsofASTECareeagerlyawaited,althoughaprelimi- naryanalysispresentedattheAnnualMeetingoftheSocietyof GynecologicOncologists(PalmSprings,Calif,March2006)sug- gestednosurvivalbene“tassociatedwithlymphadenectomy. SentinelNodeBiopsy Therationaleofsentinelnodesurgeryrequireshighnegative predictivevalueasameansofavoidingtheneedforsystematic lymphadenectomyinallandusingapositivesentinelnodetode- terminetheneedforfulllymphadenectomyoradjuvanttherapy. Sentinelnodescanbeidenti“edlaparoscopically,whichcouldpre- cedede“nitivesurgery.Sentinelnodescanbeidenti“edusing eithertoluidineblueorradiolabeledtechnetium. 18 Usingbothhysteroscopicallypresentedmarkerandcervical orsubserosalcorpusinjectionhasachievednegativepredictivevalue approaching100%. 19 Sentinelnodedetectionratesaremorethan 90%,mostlypelvicwithpara-aorticnodesbeingthesentinelsiteon much

rareroccasions.Althoughsentinelnodesurgeryseemstobe feasibleinEC,itsusehasnotbecomewidespread.Inaddition,the utilityofsentinelnodesurgeryinECmanagementneedstobe establishedinclinicaltrials. KitchenerandTrimble InternationalJournalofGynecologicalCancer & Volume19,Number1,January2009 136 * 2009IGCSandESGO Copyright @ 2009 by IGCS and ESGO. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. bydatathatdemonstratedahazardratioforECof89,when comparedwithbenignendometrialbiopsyduringaperiodof10 years. 2 Mutationof PTEN ,atumorsuppressorgene,isimplicated becausethemutationratesfornormalendometrium,endometrioid intraepithelialneoplasia(EIN),andendometrialcarcinomaare0%, 55%,and83%,respectively. PTEN knockoutmicedemonstratevery highratesofEIN,and20%developEC.Progestinscanachieve regressionofprecancerouslesions,whichcurrentlyofferthebest prospectforsecondarypreventioninpredisposedwomen. MolecularGeneticsofEndometrioidEC Type1andtype2tumors(non Y estrogen-related)havediffer- entgeneticpro“les. 3 Inadditionto PTEN ,type1featuresmutations inmismatchrepairgenesaswellasK- ras and A -catenin .Type2 featuresaneuploidyandp53mutations.Microarraytechnologyhas beenusedtodemonstrateupregulatedanddownregulatedgenes inECcomparedwithnormalendometrium.Avarietyofdifferen- tiallyexpressedgenescanalsobeidenti“edbetweenearlyandlate stagediseases.Someofthemostsigni“cantoverexpressedgenes areinvolvedinkeypathways:cellproliferation(eg, CCNE1 ),an- giogenesis(eg, MMPG ),andchromosomalinstability( BIRC5 ). Thesehavebeencon“rmedaspredictedtargetgenesbymeans ofmicroRNAs,mostdifferentiallyexpressedinECcomparedwith normalendometrium.Greaterunderstandingofkeygenesinvolved inendometrialcarcinogenesiswillhelpindevelopingbiomarkers ofprognosisandtherapeutictargets.Fundamentalstudiesofthese candidategeneswillbeimportantinelucidatingmechanismsof causation,progression,andmetastasis. SerousandClearCellCarcinoma Type2EC,whichcomprisesaround5%to10%ofECs, includesbothserouscarcinomaandclearcellcarcinoma. 4,5 The termserouscarcinomaispreferredtothecommonlyusedaspa- pillaryserouscarcinomabecauseaglandularvariantexistswithout papillaryformation.Unliketype1tumors,type2neoplasmsare associatedneitherwithestrogenexcessnorwithendometrialhy- perplasia,althoughaproportionmayevolvefromatype1tumor viaprogressionandmutation.Serouscarcinomasarethoughtto ariseinatrophicendometriafromaprecursorlesionknownas serousendometrialintraepithelialcarcinoma(serousEIC).They are,byde“nition,highgradeandhaveamuchpoorerprognosis thantype1tumors.TheprecursorlesionserousEIChasapropen- sitytoariseinendometrialpolypsandmaygiverisetoextrauterine disease,evenintheabsenceofendometrialstromalormyometrial invasion.Immunohistochemicalstudieshaveshownthatp53is diffuselypositiveinapproximately90%ofserouscarcinomas.Other markerssuchasHER-2 neu andER/PRareinconsistentlyexpressed (manycasesarehormonereceptor Y negative).Mostserouscarcino- masareassociatedwithmutationsinthe p53 tumorsuppressorgene. Thesemutationsoccurearlyintheevolutionofuterineserous carcinomaandaredemonstrableintheprecursorlesionserousEIC. Inclearcellcarcinomas,whicharealsoaggressiveneoplasmsand whicharerarerthanserouscarcinomas,moleculareventshavebeen lesswellstudied. p53 andER/PRarebothinconsistentlyexpressed. Mixedtype1andtype2carcinomasarenotuncommonandmay evolvefromatype1neoplasmsecondaryto p53 mutation. LynchSyndrome ThetermLynchsyndromeisnowusedtoencompassHNPCC andLynchsyndromeI/II.Endometrialcancerasaresultofthe Lynchsyndromeaccountsfor2%to3%ofallcases. 6 Inwomenwith ECbelowtheageof50years,9%haveLynchmutations.Individ- ualswhoexhibittheLynchsyndromehavearounda50-foldlifetime riskofdevelopingECcomparedwithunaffectedwomen,with studiessuggestingarangeof40%to60%lifetimeriskforthosewith amutation.Thesyndromecanbede“nedclinicallyusingthe Amsterdamcriteriaorgeneticallybygermlinemutationin MLH1 , MSH-2 ,or MSH-6 defectiveDNArepair. Thesemutationscanbetestedforonatumorspecimento demonstrateamutationcarrierusingimmunohistochemistryand,if bothnormalandtumortissueareavailable,microsatelliteinstability canbetestedfor,which,inhereditarycancer,isassociatedwitha germlinemutationinthemismatchrepairgene.Insporadictumors, itisassociatedwithhypermethylationofthe MLH1 promoter. ThirtypercentofindividualswithLynchsyndromewillde- velopasecondcancerwithin10yearsofthe“rstcancer(compared witharound3% Y 4%ofunaffected),andforwomendiagnosedwith EC,themediantimeforasecondcanceris11years.Theonly provenmeansofpreventionofECishysterectomy;however,en- docrinechemoprophylaxisiscurrentlybeingexploredintrialsboth intheUnitedStatesandintheUnitedKingdom. ER/PRExpressions TwoisoformsofbothER(ER � andER A )andPR(PRAand PRB)havebeendescribed. 7 Progesteronetreatmentiscapableof inhibitinginvasionofendometrialcellsbydown-regulatinganum- berofgenes,forexample, integrins and K-cadherin .PRAisnu- clear,whereasPRBshuttlesbetweenthenucleusandcytoplasm. WhereasERandPRtendtobeabundantinwell-differentiated EC,theyaresparseinpoorlydifferentiateddisease. G-proteincoupledwithreceptorforestrogen(GRP30),whose functionisunknown,ishighlyexpressedinsomehigh-gradeECs, anditsunderexpressionissigni“cantlycorrelatedwithimproved survival. InGOG-119,tamoxifenincombinationwithmedroxypro- gesteroneacetatewasusedinwomenwithmetastaticcancer;tu- morswithabundantERhadimprovedsurvivalupto5years. 8 This hormonalregimenshouldbeconsideredtobecombinedwithtem- sirolimus,anM-TORinhibitor,inarandomizedstudyinwomen withadvanced/metastaticdisease. SelectiveEstrogenReceptorModulatorsand theEndometrium Tamoxifenwasthe“rstselectiveestrogenreceptormodu- lator. 9 Ithasastimulatingeffectonuterinestromaandonepithelial cells,whichmayrangefromcysticchangetoproliferative,hyper- plasic,toinvasivecancer.Thesetissue-speci“cdifferentialchanges aredependentondifferentialERconformationuponligandbind- ing,differentialexpression,andbindingofcoregulatoryproteinsto theER. Tamoxifenmayalsoexertacarcinogeniceffectviaageno- toxicpathwaythroughtamoxifenDNAadducts.Comparedwith non Y tamoxifen-relatedtumors,ahigherproportionoftamoxifen- relatedtumorsexhibit p53 mutations.Itisnotknownwhethersome womenaremoresusceptibletocarcinogenesisbytamoxifenthan otherwomen,andifso,w

hatmaybethebiomarkersforthis. CurrentStateofImaging ThemostcommoneventbeforethediagnosisofECispost- menopausalbleeding,forwhichultrasoundexaminationoftheuter- ushasconsiderableutility. 10 Thenegativepredictivevalueofan endometrialecholessthan5mmis99%,whichprovidesavery reliablemeansofexcludingcancer.Anultrasoundimagethat showsanabnormallythickenedendometriumisnotspeci“cfor benignormalignantlesions,whichrequirefurtherinvestigations, includinghysteroscopyandbiopsy.WhenadiagnosisofEChas InternationalJournalofGynecologicalCancer & Volume19,Number1,January2009 ECStateoftheScienceMeeting * 2009IGCSandESGO 135 Copyright @ 2009 by IGCS and ESGO. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. EndometrialCancerStateoftheScienceMeeting HenryC.Kitchener,*EdwardL.Trimble, Þ andfortheEndometrialCancerWorkingGroupoftheGynecologicCancerIntergroup Abstract: Thereisapressingneedtoimproveourunderstandingofendometrialcancer(EC)anduterine carcinosarcomaandtodevelopnewtreatmentstrategiestoimproveoutcomes.Inrecognitionofthis,aStateofthe SciencemeetingonECwasheldlastNovember28and29,2006,inManchester,UnitedKingdom.Themeeting wascosponsoredbytheNationalCancerResearchInstitute(UK),theNationalCancerInstitute(US),andthe GynecologicalCancerIntergroup. Theobjectivesofthemeetingwereasfollows: 1.ToreviewcurrentknowledgeandunderstandingofECanditstreatments. 2.Toidentifykeyissuesfortranslationalresearchandclinicaltrials. 3.Toidentifythemostimportanttrialsforwomenwithendometrialcarcinomaanduterinecarcinosarcoma,both thosealreadyunderwayortobedone,forwhichtheGynecologicalCancerIntergroupmightfacilitate internationalcooperation. KeyWords: Endometrialcancer,Clinicaltrials,Translationalresearch ( IntJGynecolCancer 2009;19:134 Y 140) E ndometrialcancer(EC),thesecondmostcommongynecologic cancerworldwide,hasnowbecomethemostcommongynecol- ogiccancerindevelopedcountries.Itsrisingincidenceisrelated toincreasinglifeexpectancy,tamoxifenuse,andtheepidemicof obesity.Thelastisalsoresponsibleforcomorbidity,notablyadult- onsetdiabetesandhypertension.Together,comorbidityandobesity presentchallengesindeliveringoptimaltherapyformanywomen withEC.TherisingincidenceofEChasbeenassociatedwitha risingdeathrate.Althoughtheprognosisofearlydiseaseisgood withasurvivalrateof80%,thosewithveryhigh-riskdiseaseand advanceddiseaseatpresentationhaveasurvivalratebelow50% withverylittlegainintherapeuticef“cacyduringthepast30years. Thislackofprogressintreatmentis,inpart,relatedtoourlimited understandingofthemolecularpathologyofEC.Thereisapressing needtoimproveourunderstandingofECandtodevelopnewtreat- mentstrategiestoimproveoutcomes.Inaddition,comparedwith ovarianandcervicalcancer,ECanduterinecarcinosarcoma(CS) havebeenstudiedmuchlessextensively.Fewertrialshavebeen openedforwomenwiththesecancers,andaccrualtothosetrialshas beenslow. Inrecognitionofthis,aStateoftheSciencemeetingon ECwasheldlastNovember28and29,2006inManchester,United Kingdom.ThemeetingwascosponsoredbytheNationalCan- cerResearchInstitute(NCRI,UK),theNationalCancerInstitute (US),andtheGynecologicalCancerIntergroup(GCIG).Amulti- disciplinarygroupof75,drawingonsurgeons,gynecologiconcol- ogists,radiation(clinical)oncologists,medicaloncologists, pathologists,translationalscientists,andpatientadvocatesfrom 18countriesandrepresenting14trialgroupsattended. Theobjectivesofthemeetingwereasfollows: 1.ToreviewcurrentknowledgeandunderstandingofECandits treatments. 2.Toidentifykeyissuesfortranslationalresearchandclinical trials. 3.Toidentifythemostimportanttrialsforwomenwithendo- metrialcarcinomaanduterineCS,boththosealreadyunderway ortobedone,forwhichtheGCIGmightfacilitateinternational cooperation. The“rsthalfoftheproceedingswasdedicatedtoaseriesof presentations,whichoutlinedourcurrentknowledge.Thesecond halfofthemeetingbeganwithparallelsessionsofearlydiseaseand advanced/recurrentdiseasetode“nestaging,treatment,andtrans- lationalresearchissuestoleadtocandidateclinicaltrialsquestions. Thiswasfollowedbyplenarydiscussionofthequestionstobe addressedinthesecandidatetrialsandanattempttodevelopan internationalconsensusofthemostfavoredconceptsforfuture developmentandinternationalcollaboration. Thispaperreportsthecontentandconclusionsarisingfrom thismeeting. CURRENTKNOWLEDGE MolecularPathologyofEC EndometrialHyperplasia Thereisbroadagreementthattype1(estrogen-related)EC progressesviaaprecursorlesion,atypicalhyperplasiaorendome- trialintraepithelialneoplasia. 1 Thishasbeenclearlydemonstrated *UKNationalCancerResearchInstituteandUniversityofManchester, Manchester,UnitedKingdom;and  NationalCancerInstitute,Bethesda,MD. AddresscorrespondenceandreprintrequeststoEdwardL.Trimble, CIB,CTEP,DCTD,NationalCancerInstitute,NationalInstitutesof Health610ExecutiveBlvd,Suite7025,Bethesda,MD20892.E-mail: tt6m@nih.gov. Copyright * 2009byIGCSandESGO ISSN:1048-891X DOI:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181995f90 O RIGINAL A RTICLE 134 InternationalJournalofGynecologicalCancer & Volume19,Number1,January2009 Copyright @ 2009 by IGCS and ESGO. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. CancerCenter(GOG);WilliamSmall,NorthwesternUniversity (RTOG);GavinStuart,UniversityofVancouver(NCICCTG);Ann- MarieSwart,UKMedicalResearchCouncil(NCRI),PaulSymonds, UniversityofLeicester(NCRI);SunKuieTay,SingaporeGeneral Hospital;J.TateThigpen,UniversityofMississippi(GOG);Gillian Thomas,UniversityofToronto(GOG,ACRIN);IanTominson,Barts andtheLondonNHSTrust(NCRI);HemantTongaonkar,Tata MemorialHospital,Mumbai,India(GOG);EdwardTrimble,NCI; JoanWalker,UniversityofOklahoma(GOG);Y.F.Wong,Chinese UniversityofHongKong. REFERENCES 1.HechtJL,MutterGL.Molecularandpathologicaspectsof endometrialcarcinogenesis. JClinOncol .2006;24:4783 Y 4791. 2.BaakJP,MutterGL,RobboyW,etal.Themoleculargeneticsand morphometry-basedendometrialneoplasiaclassificationsystem predictsdiseaseprogressioninendometrialhyperplasiamore accuratelythanthe1994WorldHealthOrganizationclassification system. Cancer .2005;103:2304 Y 2312. 3.YongWF,CheungTH,LoKW,etal.Identificationofmolecular markersandsignallingpathwayinendometrialcancerinHongKong Chinesewomenbygenome-widegeneexpressionprofiling. Oncogene . 2007;26:1971 Y 1978. 4.GehrigPA.Uterinepapillaryserouscarcinoma:arev

iew. ExpertOpin Pharmacother .2007;8:809 Y 816. 5.LaxSF.Moleculargeneticchangesinepithelial,stromal,andmixed neoplasmsoftheendometrium. Pathology .2007;39:46 Y 54. 6.LuKH.Hereditarygynecologiccancers:differentialdiagnosis, surveillance,managementandsurgicalprophylaxis. FamCancer . (inpress). 7.LeslieKK,SteinMP,KumarNS,etal.Progesteronereceptorisoform identificationandsubcellularlocalizationinendometrialcancer. GynecolOncol .2005;96:32 Y 41. 8.WhitneyCW,BrunettoVL,ZainoRJ,etal.PhaseIIstudyof medroxyprogesteroneacetateplustamoxifeninadvancedendometrial carcinoma:aGynecologicOncologyGroupstudy. GynecolOncol . 2004;92:4 Y 9. 9.MoralesL,TimmermanD,NevenP,etal.Endometrialsafetyofthird generationaromataseinhibitorsversustamoxifeninbreastcancer patients. IntJGynecolCancer .2006;16:Suppl2:515 Y 517. 10.AkinO,MironovS,Pandi-TaskarN,etal.Imagingofuterinecancer. RadiolClinNorthAm .2007;45:167 Y 182. 11.OrtashiO,JainS,EmannuelO,etal.Evaluationofthesensitivity, specificity,positiveandnegativepredictivevaluesofpreoperative magneticresonanceimagingforstagingendometrialcancer: aprospectivestudyof100casesattheDorsetCancerCentre. EurU ObstetGynecolReprodBiol .(inpress). 12.ChaoA,ChangTC,NgKK,etal. 18 F-FDGPETinthemanagement ofendometrialcancer. EurJNuclMedMolImaging .2006;33:36 Y 44. 13.MarianiA,DowdySC,KeeneyGL,etal.High-riskendometrial cancersubgroups:candidatesfortarget-basedadjuvanttherapy. GynecolOncol .2004;95:120 Y 126. 14.KeysHM,RobertsJA,BrunettoVL,etal.AphaseIIItrialofsurgery withorwithoutadjunctiveexternalpelvicradiationtherapyin intermediateriskendometrialadenocarcinoma:aGynecologic OncologyGroupstudy. GynecolOncol .2004;92:744 Y 751. 15.CreutzbergCL,vanPuttenWL,KoperPC,etal.Surgeryand postoperativeradiotherapyversussurgeryaloneforpatientswith stage-1endometrialcarcinoma:multicentrerandomisedtrial. PORTECstudygroup. Lancet .2000;355:1404 Y 1411. 16.MarianiA,WebbM,KeeneyG,etal.Roleofwide/radicalhysterectomy andpelvicnodedissectioninendometrialcancerwithcervical involvement. GynaecolOncol .2001;83:72 Y 80. 17.ChanJK,UrbanR,CheungMK,etal.Lymphadenectomyin endometrioiduterinecancerstaging:howmanylymphnodesare enough?Astudyof11,443patients. Cancer .2007;109:2454 Y 2460. 18.Holub,JaborA,KlimentL.Comparisonoftwoproceduresof sentinellymphnodedetectioninpatientswithendometrialcancer: apilotstudy. EJGyneOncol .2002;23(1):L53 Y L57. 19.AltgassenC,PagenstecherJ,HornungD,etal.Anewapproachto labelsentinelnodesinendometrialcancer. GynaecolOncol . 2007;105:457 Y 461. 20.AaldersJ,AbelerV,KolstadP,etal.Postoperativeexternalirradiation andprognosticparametersinstageIendometrialcarcinoma:clinical andhistopathologicstudyof540patients. ObstetGynecol .1980; 56:419 Y 427. 21.MaggiR,LissoniA,SpinaF,etal.Adjuvantchemotherapyvs. radiotherapyinhigh-riskendometrialcarcinoma:resultsofa randomisedtrial. BrJCancer .2006;95:266 Y 271. 22.GrevenK,WinterK,UnderhillK,etal.FinalanalysisofRTOG 9708:adjuvantpostoperativeirradiationcombinedwithcisplatin/ paclitaxelchemotherapyfollowingsurgeryforpatientswithhigh-risk endometrialcancer. GynecolOncol .2006;103:155 Y 159. 23.MartinezAA,WeinerS,PodratzK,etal.Improvedoutcomeat tenyearsforserous-papillary/clearcellorhigh-riskendometrialcancer patientstreatedbyadjuvanthigh-dosewholeabdomino-pelvic irradiation. GynOncol .2003;90:537 Y 546. 24.RandallME,FiliaciVL,MussH,etal.RandomizedphaseIIItrial ofwhole-abdominalirradiationversusdoxorubicinandcisplatin chemotherapyinadvancedendometrialcarcinoma:aGynecologic OncologyGroupstudy. JClinOncol .2006;24:36 Y 44. 25.SmallW,EricksonB,KwakwaF.AmericanBrachytherapySociety surveyregardingpracticepatternsofpostoperativeirradiationfor endometrialcancer:currentstatusofvaginalbrachytherapy. IntJ RadiatOncolBiolPhys .2005:63:1502 Y 1507. 26.FlemingGF.Systematicchemotherapyforuterinecarcinoma: metastaticandadjuvant. JClinOncol .2007;25:2983 Y 2990. 27.ThigpenJT,BradyMF,AlvarezRD,etal.Oralmedroxyprogesterone acetateinthetreatmentofadvancedorrecurrentendometrialcarcinoma: adose-responsestudybytheGynecologicOncologyGroup. JClin Oncol .1999;17:1736 Y 1744. 28.FioricaJV,BrunettoVL,HanjaniP,etal.PhaseIItrialofalternating coursesofmegestrolacetateandtamoxifeninadvancedendometrial carcinoma:aGynecologicOncologyGroupstudy. GynecolOncol . 2004;92:10 Y 14. 29.RosePG,BrunettoVL,VanLeL,etal.AphaseIItrialofanastrozole inadvancedrecurrentorpersistentendometrialcarcinoma:a GynecologicOncologyGroupstudy. GynecolOncol .2000; 78:212 Y 216. 30.MaBB,OzaA,EisenhauerE,etal.Theactivityofletrozoleinpatients withadvancedorrecurrentendometrialcancerandcorrelationwith biologicalmarkers V astudyoftheNationalCancerInstituteofCanada ClinicalTrialsGroup. IntJGynecolCancer .2004;14:650 Y 658. 31.Martin-HirschPL,JarvisG,KitchenerH,etal.Progestagensfor endometrialcancer. CochraneDatabaseSystRev .2000;(2):CD001040. 32.ChenML,XuPZ,PengXD,etal.ThedeficiencyofAkt1is sufficienttosuppresstumordevelopmentin Pten T mice. GenesDev . 2006;20(12):1569 Y 1574. 33.PodsypaninaK,LeeRT,PolitisC,etal.AninhibitorofmTOR reducesneoplasiaandnormalizesp70/S6kinaseactivityin Pten T mice. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA .2001;98(18): 10320 Y 10325. KitchenerandTrimble InternationalJournalofGynecologicalCancer & Volume19,Number1,January2009 140 * 2009IGCSandESGO Copyright @ 2009 by IGCS and ESGO. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. surgicalexcision,pelvicradiation,and,morerecently,chemothe- rapy.Theproposedtrial(GOG-0238)wouldrandomizewomen experiencingpelvicrecurrenceoftheirECstoradiationalonever- susplatinum-basedchemoradiation.Surgicalexcision/debulking, butnotexenteration,potentiallycurativesurgerywouldbeper- mittedbeforeentryintothetrial. TreatmentofStageIVorRecurrentEC Theproposedtrialsseektooptimizechemotherapyregi- mensordecreasethetoxicityofstandardchemotherapy.Inthe UnitedStates,onthebasisofGOG-177,paclitaxelseemstohave beenacceptedaspartofthestandardtreatmentregimenforad- vancedEC.OutsidetheUnitedStates,paclitaxelisnotwidely used.Inmanycountries,paclitaxelhasnotbeenapprovedforrou- tineuseamongwomenwithEC.IntheUnitedStates,therefore, theGOGplanstocompleteaccrualtoGOG-0209,whichcompares a3-drugcombinationofpaclitaxel,doxorubicin,andplatinumtoa 2-drugregimenofcarboplatinand

paclitaxel.OneproposedEuro- peantrialwouldcomparedoxorubicinpluscisplatinwithcarbop- latinplusliposomaldoxorubicin.Anovelagent,temsirolimus,an M-TORinhibitorasdescribedabove,seemstohaveactivityinEC. Twoproposedstudieswouldevaluatetheadditionoftemsirolimus tochemotherapyorhormonaltherapyinthetreatmentofwomen withstageIVorrecurrentEC. TreatmentofUterineCS UterineCSisarelativelyrarehistologicsubtypecompared withendometrialadenocarcinoma.Onlyintergroupandinterna- tionalcollaborationswillmakepossibletimelycompletionofde- “nitivetrialsforwomenwiththisdisease. WomenwithuterineCSareathighriskforbothlocaland distantrecurrencesafterprimaryhysterectomy.Theproposedstud- iesseektode“nethebene“tofpelvicRT,aswellastheoptimal chemotherapyregimen. AdjuvantTreatmentofFIGOStageItoII UterineCS OneproposedstudywouldrandomizewomenwithCSafter primaryhysterectomytopelvicRTorobservation.Asecondpro- posedtrialwoulduseabifactorialdesigntoaddressbothchemo- therapyandradiationtherapyquestions.WomenwithCSafter primaryhysterectomywouldberandomizedtopelvicRTornot RT,aswellastopaclitaxelpluscisplatinorpaclitaxelpluscis- platinplusdoxorubicinorepirubicin. ConsolidationTreatmentforFIGOStageIItoIV UterineCS Theproposedstudywouldalsouseabifactorialdesignto comparechemotherapywithorwithoutatargetedagentandto comparepelvicradiationtonoradiation. CONCLUSIONS TheEndometrialCancerConsensusprocessallowedasuc- cessfulpresentationofthecurrentstateofknowledgeandresulted inaneffectiveconsensustoemergeregardingtheprogressthat needstobeachievedtoimpactpatientcare. Asnotedabove,comparedwithovarianandcervicalcancer, ECanduterineCShavebeenstudiedmuchlessextensively.Rel- ativelyfewtrialshavebeenopenedforwomenwiththesecancers, andaccrualtothosetrialshasbeenslow.Throughintergroupand internationalcollaborations,wehopetoensurethatthebestscience informstrialsforwomenwithECanduterineCSandthatthese trialsarecompletedasrapidlyaspossible.Weplantoworkthrough theGCIGtopromoteaccrualtothosetrialsalreadyopenaswellas thetimelydevelopmentofthosetrialsproposedabove.Wewillalso needtoeducateoursponsorsandpartnersinresearch,including nationalgovernments,charities,andthepharmaceuticalindustry abouttheimportanceofidentifyingmoreeffectivetreatmentof womenwithECanduterineCS. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Theauthorsthankthehelpofthefollowingindividualsin preparingthispaper:ChrisAltgassen,CarienCreutzberg,Gini Fleming,HaniGabra,GeoffHall,JaneHawnaur,AnujaJhingran, KimLeslie,KarenLu,WGlenMcCluggage,ScottMcMeekin,Karl Podratz,WilliamSmall,andGillianThomas. EndometrialCancerWorkingGroupparticipants:Chris Altgassen,UniversityofSchleswig-Holstein(AGO);Carol Aghajanian,MemorialSloan-KetteringCancerCenter(GOG), USA;FrederickAmant,CatholicUniversityofLeuven(EORTC); MichaelBirrer,USNationalCancerInstitute(GOG);PeterBlake, RoyalMarsdenHospital(NCRI);JeffBoyd,CurtisandElizabeth AndersonCancerInstitute(GOG);MarkBrady,RoswellPark CancerInstitute(GOG);DavidCantu,MexicanNationalCancer Institute;MichaelCibull,UniversityofKentucky(GOG);Larry Copeland,OhioStateUniversity(GOG);WilliamCreasman, MedicalUniversityofSouthCarolina(GOG);CarienCreutzberg, DanieldenHoedCancerCenter,ErasmusMedicalCenter(EORTC, PORTEC);KathleenDarcy,RoswellParkCancerInstitute(GOG); SusanDavidson(NCRI);PhilipDiSaia,UniversityofCalifornia- Irvine(GOG);GinnyFiliaci,RoswellParkCancerInstitute(GOG); GiniFleming,UniversityofChicago(GOG);HaniGabra,Imperial CollegeLondon(SGCTG);DavidGaffney,UniversityofUtah (RTOG);PatricaGoldman(patientadvocate);PaulGoodfellow, WashingtonUniversity(GOG);JohnGreen,LiverpoolUniversity (EORTC,NCRI);GeoffHall,UniversityofLeeds(NCRI);Jane Hawnaur,UniversityofManchester;ThomasHogberg,University ofLinkoping(NSGO);CathHolland,UniversityofManchester (NCRI);WilliamHoskins,CurtisandElizabethAndersonCancer Institute(GOG);JamesLinsey;AnjuaJhingran,TheUniversityof TexasMDAndersonCancerCenter(RTOG);SokbomKang,Seoul NationalUniversity(KGOG);SeanKehoe,BirminghamWomens Hospital(NCRI);JaeWeonKim,SeoulNationalUniversity (KGOG);HenryKitchener,UniversityofManchester(NCRI); IkuoKonishi,ShinshuUniversity(JGOG);GunnarKristensen, NorwegianRadiumHospital(NSGO);JonathanLedermann,Kings CollegeHospital(NCRI);KimLeslie,UniversityofNewMexico (GOG);TraceyLively,NCI;JacLivsey;KarenLu,TheUniversityof TexasMDAndersonCancerCenter(GOG);ChristianMarth, InnsbruckMedicalUniversity(AGO-Austria);LuizMathias, BrazilianNationalCancerInstitute;GlennMcCluggage,Royal GroupofHospitalsTrust,Belfast(NCRI);DynesMcConnell, WellingtonHospital,NZ(ANZGOG);ScottMcMeekin,Universityof Oklahoma(GOG);LarryMaxwell,WalterReedArmyMedical Center(GOG);DavidMiller,UniversityofTexas-Dallas(GOG); ArnoMundt,UniversityofChicago(RTOG);GeorgeMutter, BrighamandWomensHospital(GOG);JaneOrton,Leeds TeachingHospitalNHSTrust(NCRI);AmitOza,PrincessMargaret Hospital(NCICCTG);TimPerren,StJamessUniversityHospital, Leeds(NCRI);RayPetryshun,NCI;SandroPignata,National CancerInstitute,Naples,Italy(MITO);KarlPodratz,MayoClinic (GOG);MelaniePowell(NCRI);MarcusRandall,Universityof Kentucky(GOG);NickReed,UniversityofGlasgow(EORTC); SatoruSagae,SapporoMedicalUniversity,Japan(JGOG);Helga Salvesen,HaukelandUniversityHospital,Bergen,Sweden(NSGO); JalidSehouli,ChariteCampus,VirchowKlinikum,Berlin,Germany (AGO);EamonnSheridan,StJamessUniversityHospital,Leeds (NCRI);BrianSlomovitz,TheUniversityofTexasMDAnderson InternationalJournalofGynecologicalCancer & Volume19,Number1,January2009 ECStateoftheScienceMeeting * 2009IGCSandESGO 139 Copyright @ 2009 by IGCS and ESGO. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. and2.7months,andoverallsurvivalof13and14months,res- pectively. 8,28 Thearomataseinhibitors,anastrozoleandletrozole, havebeenassessedbutdemonstratedlimitedclinicalactivity. 29,30 Progestogenhasbeenshowntoberelativelyineffectiveasanad- juvantinprimarytherapy. 31 Furthertrialsarerequiredtoidentifytheoptimalroleofhor- monetherapy,beforeorafterchemotherapy,andwhatbiomarkers maybeinformativeinpredictingresponse. Biotherapies Thehallmarksofendometrioid(type1)uterinecancerare beginningtobeunderstood,with PTEN inactivation,activating mutationswithinthePI3Kpathway,K- ras Y activatingmutations, MLH1/6 epigeneticinactivation,and A -catenin activationbeing

welldescribed.Incontrast,type2(nonendometrioid)uterinecar- cinomasarecharacterizedbyaneuploidy, p53 mutation,anddefects in p53 pathwaygenes(suchas p21/waf1 and MDM2 ).Targetsfor type1tumorsincludecomponentsofthePI3Kpathway,the A - catenin pathway,theepidermalgrowthfactorreceptorfamily,en- docrinetherapy(PgRandER),andantiangiogenictargets.Recently describedmousemodelsthatareheterozygouslydeletedfor PTEN developendometrialhyperplasiaandendometrioidendometrial carcinomaatahighrate.Theincidenceoftheseendometrialcarci- nomasisdrasticallyreducedbycrossingwithanAKT1-de“cient mouse. 32 Thissuggestsacaseforexploringendocrineorbiothera- pymanipulationofendometrioiduterinecancer. PhosphoM-TORandphosphoS6kinaseareexpressedin type1endometrialcarcinoma.Rapamycinanalogswereshownto inhibitendometrialcarcinomacelllinesgrowthinvitroandinhibit thedevelopmentofendometrialcarcinomain PTEN heterozygote knockoutmice. 33 Trialsoftemsirolimus(CCI-779)andRAD001 havebeenundertaken,whichhaveshownactivityinuterinecancer, althoughsurrogatemolecularmarkersofresponsehaveremained elusive.Forexample,temsirolimushasshowna26%responserate withasubstantialadditionalstablediseasefraction.Responseswere notcorrelatedwithexpressionofreceptors.Currently,thereisa drivetointegrateM-TORinhibitorsintochemotherapyschedules forEC. EpidermalgrowthfactorreceptorandHer-2areover- expressedin50%and60%ofECs,respectively.TKIsprevent multipleintracellularsignalingpathwaysfrombeingactivated.In- cludingmitogen-activatedproteinkinasepathway,proteinkinase B(Akt),trastuzumab,cetuximab,andlapatinibhavebeguntobe evaluatedinphase2studies. DEVELOPINGAPORTFOLIOOFKEYTRIALS Thisbodyofcurrentknowledgeprovidesaplatformforde- terminingthekeyquestions,whichneedtobeansweredinanat- tempttoimprovethestandardofcareandimprovesurvival.This requiresasetofclinicaltrialscombinedwithtranslationalresearch todemonstratetheoptimalroleofsurgery,RT,andchemotherapy andtobegintoevaluatebiologicaltargeteddrugsanddiscover biomarkersforlikelyresponse/nonresponsetotherapy. TheConsensusGroupdiscussedthekeyquestionswhere therewasadearthofinformationfromtrialsandwherenewand additionaldatawereneeded.Throughconsensus,thegroupfocused onquestionsofbroadinterest,whichcouldadvanceknowledgeand weremostlikelytoattractintergroupandinternationalcollabora- tions.Theseareoutlinedbelow: PreventionofEndometrioidEndometrial Carcinoma Asdiscussedabove,EINseemstobeaprecursorlesionto endometrioidendometrialcarcinoma.Arelativeexcessofestrogen, whetherendogenousorexogenous,toprogesteronecanresultin thedevelopmentofEIN.Severaltrialstoevaluatethetherapeutic bene“tofprogestinsinthetreatmentofEINwerediscussed.The “rst,GOG-0224,randomizeswomenwithEINtocontinuous(me- gestrol,40mgtwiceadayfor12weeks)orcyclic(megestrol,80mg twiceadayfor12weeks,2weekson/2weeksoff)progestinsfor 3monthsbeforehysterectomy.Theprimaryendpointofinterest isthepresenceorabsenceofEINinthehysterectomyspecimen. Afollow-upstudywouldcompareacommerciallyavailable progesterone-releasingintrauterinedevice,Mirena,tothebest- performingarmofGOG-0224. ForwomenwithLynchsyndrome,whofaceahighlifetime riskofEC,TheUKNCRIisundertakingthePOETtrial,which randomizeseligiblewomeneithertotheMirenaortoobservation. Theprimaryoutcomeisdevelopmentofatypicalhyperplasiaor EC,whicheverisdetected“rst.Womeninbotharmswillbeob- servedfor12monthswithtransvaginalscanning T uterinebiopsy, upto36months. TreatmentofEndometrialCarcinoma Adjuvanttherapyafterprimaryhysterectomy. Asdiscussedabove,thereseemtobe3broadapproaches toprimarysurgeryandstagingworldwide,namely,hysterectomy aloneformostpatients,hysterectomyandstaginglymphadenec- tomyformostpatients,andhysterectomywithstaginglymphade- nectomyforpatientsthoughtatsuf“cientlyhighriskfornodal metastasis.Thegroupendeavoredtodesigntrialsthatmighten- rollpatientswithandwithoutsurgicalstagingforvariousrisk groups. Forwomenwithdiseaseapparentlycon“nedtotheuterusat timeofhysterectomy(FIGOstageI Y II),s everaltrialswere discussed.Overall,thegoalsofthesestudieswastodelineatethe appropriaterolesforadjuvantpelvicRT,vaginalbrachytherapy, systemicchemotherapy,andlymphnodedissectioninthispatient population.CurrentlyopentoaccrualisthePORTEC3trial,which randomizeswomentopelvicRTversuschemoradiationandconsol- idationchemotherapy.EligibilityincludesFIGOIBandIC/grade 3,II(occult)grade3,IIIAorIIC,endometrioid,andstagesIBto IIICclearcellorseroushistologicsubtype.Chemoradiationin- cludesconcurrentcisplatin50mg/m 2 ondays1and22;aftercom- pletionofchemoradiation,womenwillreceive4additionalcycles ofcarboplatin(AUC5)andpaclitaxel175mg/m 2 thriceweekly. Theplannedaccrualof800willdetecta10%differencein5-year overallsurvivalwith80%power. Oneproposedtrialwouldrandomizewomenwithnode- negativeECde“nedasathighriskofrecurrencetopelvicRTor chemotherapyplusvaginalbrachytherapy.Theywouldbestrati- “edonthebasisoflymphnodeevaluation,whetherimagingor surgicaldissection.Asecondproposalwouldrandomizewomen whohadundergonehysterectomybutnotlymphnodedissection tosurgicalstagingandchemotherapyforpositivenodesorpelvic RTandchemotherapywithoutsurgicalstaging. ConsolidationTherapyAfterHysterectomyfor FIGOStageIIIDisease Therecentstudiesdocumentingaroleforsystemicchemo- therapyinwomenwithadvancedECthrowintoquestionthebene“ts oflocalradiationtreatment.Theproposedtrialwouldrandomize womentosystemicchemotherapywithorwithoutradiationtherapy targetedtotheknownorsuspectsitesofdiseaseinthepelvisand/ orpara-aorticregion. TreatmentofIsolatedPelvicRecurrence AbouthalfofwomenwithrecurrentEChavetheirrecur- renceslimitedtothepelvis.Treatmentapproacheshaveincluded KitchenerandTrimble InternationalJournalofGynecologicalCancer & Volume19,Number1,January2009 138 * 2009IGCSandESGO Copyright @ 2009 by IGCS and ESGO. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. PelvicRadiotherapyandChemoradiation Bothradiationtherapyandchemotherapyhaveshownacti- vityinpreventingrecurrenceofEC,althoughtheirutilityvariesas tositesoffailure.Trialsevaluatingdifferentmodalitiesoftreat- mentintheadjuvantsettinghavebeencomplicatedbyheteroge- neitybothofriskofrecurrenceandmostlikelysitesforrecurrence. Weneedtodeterminehowbesttointegrateradiationandchemo- therapyafterprimarysurg

erytotakeadvantageofbothmodalities. PelvicRT,bothexternalbeamandbrachytherapyaloneor incombination,hasbeenwidelyusedformanyyearsasadjuvant therapyinunstagedwomen,witheitherintermediate(stageIC/IIA, grades1 Y 2)orhighrisk(stageIC,grade3),aswellasinstaged womenwithpositivenodesandstagedwomenwithnegativenodes butotherhigh-riskfactors.Ithasalsobeenusedforunresecta- ble,advanceddiseaseinthepelvis.ThreerandomizedtrialsofRT forintermediate-riskdiseasehavebeencompleted:theNorwegian trial,PORTEC1,andGOG-99. 14,15,20 Thesealldemonstrateda reductioninpelvicrecurrencebutnoeffectonoverallsurvival.Risk factorsforrecurrenceweregrade3disease,depthofinvasion,lym- phovascularspaceinvasion,stageIC,andaged60yearsorolder. ThePORTEC2trialiscurrentlyevaluatingwhetherpelvicexternal beamtherapycanbesafelyreplacedbybrachytherapywithresults expectedlate2008.Inlightofthesetrials,therehasbeenareduc- tionintheuseofadjuvantRTforintermediate-riskdisease.The principalchallengenowisachievinghighersurvivalratesinwomen withhigh-riskdiseasebyvirtueofageandprimarytumorfeatures whetherunstagedorwithnegativenodesorthosefoundtohave nodalmetastases. InarecentlypublishedItaliantrial,345womenwithstages IC/II(grade3)andstageIIIwererandomizedtoCAPorpelvicRT. 21 Nodifferenceinoverallsurvivalwasfound,butRTdelayedpelvic relapseandchemotherapydelayeddistalrelapse.Arecentphase 2trialfromtheUnitedStatestestedconcurrentchemoradiation (cisplatin,50mg/m 2 )withadjuvantcisplatin/paclitaxel(4cyclesof cisplatin50mg/m 2 andpaclitaxel175mg/m 2 ). 22 Thiswasfeasible, andat4years,disease-freesurvivalwas81%,indicatingcandida- tureforaphase3trial.Onthisbasis,thePORTEC3trialopenedas acollaboratingPORTEC/NCRIintergroupstudy.Itisplanned torandomize800womenwithhigh-riskdiseasetoeitherexternal beamRTorRT+concurrentcisplatin(weeks1and3)followed by4cyclesofcarboplatinandpaclitaxel(175mg/m 2 ).Theprimary endpointwillbeoverallsurvival. WholeAbdominalRadiotherapy TherationaleforwholeabdominalRT(WART)isthatthe abdominalcavityisthecommonestsiteoftreatmentfailureina numberofstudiesinvolvingwithadvanceddisease,whichincluded womenwithserousandclearcelltumors.Upto30grayiswell tolerated,withshieldingofthekidneys.Inoneofthelargestre- portedstudies,132womenweretreatedwithWARTincluding 68%withstageIIIand45%withserousorclearcelltumors. 23 Disease-freesurvivalat5and10yearswas55%and45%,respec- tively;siteofrelapsewastheabdominalcavityin59%.Toxicity included14%withgastrointestinalgrades3to4and2%renal. InGOG-122,WARTwascomparedwithadriamycin/cisplatin inaphase3trialinvolving396womenwithstageIIIandIVendo- metrialcarcinomaandlessthan2-cmresidualdisease. 24 Theresults showedsuperiorityforchemotherapy(hazardratio,0.71;95% con“denceinterval,0.54 Y 0.94),althoughtherewasanexcessof neurologicG 1 Y 2 andcardiactoxicity,with8treatment-related deathscomparedwith4intheWARTarm.Eighty-fourpercent completedWARTcomparedwith62%forchemotherapy.Almost twiceasmanywomenwhohadRTrecurredoutsidetheabdomen (18.3%)comparedwithAP(9.8%).Weshouldnote,however,that thesurvivalcurvesforthe2armshavegrowntogetherwithtime. AlthoughWARTisgenerallywelltolerated,itsroleintheman- agementofECisnotclear. VaginalBrachytherapy Therationaleofvaginalbrachytherapyisthatvaginalcuff recurrenceisanimportantsiteofpelvicrecurrence,andthistype oftreatmentisverywelltolerated.Instudiesreportingvaginalbra- chytherapyforadjuvanttreatmentofstageIdisease,vaginalcontrol approaches100%.InPORTEC1,73%ofrecurrencesamongnon- irradiatedpatientsinvolvedthevaginalcuff.Vaginalbrachythe- rapycouldsubstituteforexternalbeamradiationifpelviccontrol rateswerenotcompromisedand,forhigher-riskdisease,couldbe combinedwithchemotherapy.AnAmericansurveyofASTROand AmericanBrachytherapySocietymembersproduced551comple- tedresponses. 25 Mostreportedincreasedreferralforvaginal brachytherapywithalmostalltreatingtheuppervaginaonly. Almost70%ofpatientsweretreatedwithhigh Y doseratebra- chytherapy.ThePORTEC2trialwilldeterminewhetherbrachy- therapycansafelyreplaceexternalbeamRTforintermediate-risk disease.Futuretrialscouldcombinevaginalbrachytherapywith chemotherapyandbetterde“nitionofthetechnicalaspectsof therapy. Chemotherapy Treatmentofadvanced/recurrentECneedstotakeaccount oftheproportionofwomenwhomaybeobese,previouslyirra- diated,andelderly.Amongwomenwhohavenotyetreceivedche- motherapy,responseratesinexcessof20%havebeenseenwith thefollowingdrugs:doxorubicin/epirubin,paclitaxel/docetaxel, andcisplatin/carboplatin. 26 Tworandomizedtrialshavecompared doxorubicinwithdoxorubicin/cisplatin.Responserateswere higherforthecombination(27%vs45%;17%vs43%)witha medianoverallsurvivalof9monthsforthecombinationarmsin bothtrials. GOG-177comparedthecombinationofdoxorubicinand cisplatinwithdoxorubicin/cisplatinandpaclitaxelwithF-CSFsup- port.Therewasanoverallsurvivalbene“t.Theresponseratewas 57%forthetripletcomparedwith34%forthedoublet.Theme- dianoverallsurvivalrateswere15.3and12.3months,respective- ly,buttherewasexcessneurotoxicitywiththe3-drugcombination. Theless-toxiccombinationofcarboplatinandpaclitaxelhasbeen evaluatedinseveralphase2trialswithresponseratesinexcessof 60%.Thiscombination,whichisnowwidelyusedinthecommu- nity,isnowbeingcomparedwithdoxorubicin/cisplatin/paclitaxel forwomenwithstageIIIandIVdiseases(GOG-209). RoleofEndocrineTherapy Thesexsteroidhormonesprogesteroneandestrogenbind tospeci“creceptorswiththeresultingcomplexenteringthenucleus andleadingtospeci“cpatternsofgeneexpression,whichleadto speci“cphenotypiceffects,forexample,progesteroneleadstoen- dometrialcelldifferentiation. Endocrinetherapyhasbeenshowntohavesomeactivity inadvanced/recurrentECformorethan40years.Inclinicaltrials ofsingle-agentprogestogens(GOG-48andGOG-81),response ratesofapproximately20%wereachievedwithhigherresponse ratesinPR-positiveandlower-gradetumors. 27 Combinationsof progestogensandtamoxifen(whichincreasesprogesteronerecep- torexpressionandmaythereforecounteractresistancetopro- gestogens)havebeenassessed.Phase2trialsofsuchcombination strategies(GOG-119andGOG-153)havedemonstratedoverall responseratesof33%and27%,progression-freesurvivalof3 InternationalJournalofGynecologicalCancer & Volume19,Number1,January2009 ECStateoftheScienceMeeting * 2009IGCSandESGO