/
Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in - PowerPoint Presentation

genesantander
genesantander . @genesantander
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-22

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in - PPT Presentation

Software Defined Networks 1 By Saleh Asadollahi amp Dr Bhargavi Goswami asadollahimcitpgmailcom bhargavihgowsamigmailcom Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in ID: 782646

controller floodlight networks defined floodlight controller defined networks software scalability sdn experimenting network http org sigcomm throughput host proceedings

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Experimenting with Scalability of Floodl..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in Software Defined Networks

1

By:

Saleh

Asadollahi

&Dr. Bhargavi Goswami

asadollahimcitp@gmail.com

bhargavihgowsami@gmail.com

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

Slide2

OutlineLimitations of Current NetworksWhat is SDN?Floodlight SDN Controller

SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT Conclusion

2

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

Slide3

Limitations of Current Networks

http://www.excitingip.net/27/a-basic-enterprise-lan-network-architecture-block-diagram-and-components/

3

Lack of programmability and innovation

Enterprise networks are difficult to manage

“New

control requirements have arisen”:How to easily configure huge networks? Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

Slide4

OpenFlow/SDN tutorial, Srini Seetharaman, Deutsche Telekom, Silicon Valley Innovation Center

What is SDN

Traditional

vs

SDN4

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

Slide5

Floodlight SDN Controller Floodlight open source java based

web GUI

5

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

Floodlight SDN Controller Architecture

Slide6

SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT

6

Connectivity between nodes in the scenario

GUI of Floodlight Controller Environment

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

Slide7

Result:throughput

7

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

Throughput for 50 host

Throughput for 300 host

Throughput for 150 host

Slide8

Result:Latency

8

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

Throughput for 50 host

Throughput for 300 host

Throughput for 150 host

Slide9

Conclusion

9

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

With this paper, authors have made attempt to address the scalability features of the Floodlight controller by implementing various diversified scenarios in simulation experimental environment. In this paper, authors have provided the clear idea how to create experimental test bed with analysis of obtained statistical results keeping the performance as the central focus. We would conclude this paper by providing positive sign to move forward to the researchers who are looking for implementation of their idea over Floodlight Controller in the domain of Software Defined Networks without any doubt. The controller not just provide the simulation experimental test bed support but, also provides clear explanation for analysis of obtained statistics after the experiments are simulated. The tools suggested, simulated, shown through figures and graphs will help the research community to further conduct such experiments in the future by implementing their desired parameters though these experiments. This paper will also address the programmers, developers and new bees in the area of SDN, who are looking forward to touch the practical aspects of the SDN by following step by step implementations provided in the paper. Further, the research team will come up with few more papers on implementation of other SDN controllers in the coming future. The team also has planned to compare the controllers of SDN, once all the stellar controllers are implemented and experimented by them.

Slide10

Conclusion

10

Experimenting with Scalability of Floodlight Controller in

Software Defined Networks

Asadollahi

, S.,

Gowsami

, B. (2017). Revolution in Existing Network under the Influence of Software Defined Network. Proceedings of the

INDIACom

11th, Delhi, March 1-3.2017 IEEE Conference ID: 40353

McCauley, M. (2012). POX, from http://www.noxrepo.org/

OpenDaylight

, Linux Foundation Collaborative Project, 2013, form http://www.opendaylight.org

Erickson, D. (2013). The Beacon

OpenFlow

controller. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Workshop Hot

Topocs

Software Defined Network II, 13-18 p, 2013.

Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, RYU network operating system, 2012, from http://osrg.github.com/ryu

Gude

al, N. (2008). NOX: Towards an operating system for networks. ACM SIGCOMM - Computer Communication

Revie

. vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 105–110

Asadollahi

, S.,

Gowsami

, B. (2017). Software Defined Network, Controller Comparison. Proceedings of

Tec'afe

2017,Vol.5, Special Issue 2, April 2017. ISSN: 2320-9798.

McKeown

et al, N. (2008).

OpenFlow

: Enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM - Computer Communication

Revie

, vol. 38, no. 2, p. 69–74.

Smith et al, M. (2014).

OpFlex

control protocol, Internet Engineering Task Force, from : http://

tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-opflex-00

Enns

, R.,

Bjorklund

, M.,

Schoenwaelder

, J.,

Bierman

, A. (2011). Network configuration protocol (NETCONF). Internet Engineering Task

Forc

, form http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6241.txt

Doria

et al, A. (2010). Forwarding and control element separation (

ForCES

) protocol specification. Internet Engineering Task

Forc

, from http://www.ietf.org/r/fc/rfc5810.txt.

Song, H. (2013). Protocol-oblivious forwarding: Unleash the power of SDN through a future-proof forwarding plane. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Workshop Hot Topics

Softw

Defined

Netw

II. p. 127–132.

Sundaresan

, S., de

donato

, W.,

Feamster

, N., Teixeira, R., Crawford, S. (2011). A. Broadband internet performance: a view from the gateway. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM ,Aug. 2011.

Casado

, M., Freedman, M. J., Pettit, J.,

Luo

, J.,

Mckeown

, N.,

Shenker

, S. Ethane. (2007). taking control of the enterprise. SIGCOMM CCR. p 1–12.

Project Floodlight, Floodlight. (2012). from http://floodlight.openflowhub.org/

Lantz, B. Heller, and N.

McKeown

. (2010). A network in a laptop: Rapid prototyping for software-defined network. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Workshop Hot Topics

Netw

, 19th. p. 19:1–19:6

B. Pfaff and B. Davie. (2013). The Open

vSwitch

database management protocol. Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 7047, from http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7047.txt

Slide11

Thanks!

11