/
Algorithmic and Economic Aspects of Networks Algorithmic and Economic Aspects of Networks

Algorithmic and Economic Aspects of Networks - PowerPoint Presentation

giovanna-bartolotta
giovanna-bartolotta . @giovanna-bartolotta
Follow
375 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-24

Algorithmic and Economic Aspects of Networks - PPT Presentation

Nicole Immorlica Networked Markets Garmets Market Marseille Fish Market Labor Markets Why Network Trust predicability referrals incomplete contracts friction ID: 562859

jobs bargaining network strong bargaining jobs strong network ties networks nash people weak outcomes prob payoff outcome stable markets

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Algorithmic and Economic Aspects of Netw..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Algorithmic and Economic Aspects of Networks

Nicole ImmorlicaSlide2

Networked Markets

Garmets

Market

Marseille

Fish

Market

Labor

MarketsSlide3

Why Network

Trust, predicability, referrals,

incomplete contracts, friction,

moral hazard/adverse selection

price, reputationSlide4

Labor Markets

“You hear about jobs through your friends.”

– Granovetter

b

etterSlide5

Boorman’s Model

Network of

strong

and

weak

ties

Preferential flow

of information about job opennings through networkSlide6

Strong and Weak Ties

Weak +

λ∙

Strong = TimeSlide7

Information Flow

People need jobs with prob.

μ

.

People hear about jobs with prob.

δ

.

People tell (stronger) friends about jobs.Slide8

Boorman’s Results

Study trees, fix degree of strong/weak ties, consider equilibria via simulation

As cost of strong ties , # strong ties .

As unemployment prob. , # strong ties .Slide9

What’s Missing?

network architecture, e.g., weak ties more likely to be bridges

correlation in employment state over time and network structureSlide10

Carvo-Armengol & Jackson

Drop strong/weak distinction, but incorporate time.Slide11

Information Flow

People need jobs with prob.

μ

.

People hear about jobs with prob.

δ

.

People tell friends about jobs.Slide12

Tarred with the Same Brush

Time causes correlation in employment:

you are more likely to find a job if more of your friends have jobsSlide13

Persistance of (Lack of) Luck

The longer you are unemployed, the less likely you will find a job tomorrow:

because you are more likely to have more unemployed neighborsSlide14

Education

Agents can pay cost

c

i

to be educated.

educated

– apply previous model

uneducated – payoff zeroSlide15

Poverty Traps

Payoff: 0.5 –

c

i

Payoff: 0.6 –

c

i

Payoff: 0.69 –

c

i

Payoff: 0.65 –

c

iSlide16

Networked Exchange Theory

Network represents potential trades

what prices result?Slide17

Nash Bargaining

How to split a dollar?

Matt ($0.50)

Mykell ($0.50)

If negotiations fail, you get nothing.Slide18

Nash Bargaining

How to split a dollar?

Trevor ($0.70)

William ($0.30)

If negotiations fail, Trevor gets $0.60, William gets $0.20.Slide19

Nash Bargaining

Any

division in which each agent gets at least the outside option is an equilibrium.

Yet ….

a

gents usually agree to

split the surplus

.Slide20

Nash Bargaining

If when negotiation

fails

,

- A gets $a

- B gets $b

Then when

succeed, - A gets $(a + s/2) - B gets $(b + s/2)

s

= (1 – a – b

) is the surplusSlide21

Nash Bargaining

Nash

: “

Agents will agree to split the surplus

.

Motivated by axiomatic approach, optimization approach, and outcome of particular game-theoretic formulations.Slide22

Bargaining in Networks

Value of outside option arises as result of network structure.Slide23

Bargaining in Networks

William ($0.50)

Arun ($0.50)

Bach ($0)

Matt ($0)

Mykell ($0)

Transactions worth $1.

Only one

transaction per person!Slide24

Bargaining in Networks

Almost all the money.Slide25

Bargaining in Networks

v

v gets between 7/12 and 2/3 in negotiation to left.Slide26

Bargaining in Networks

v

v gets between 1/2 and 1 in negotiation to left.Slide27

Cook and Yamagishi

A solution for a network G is a

matching M

and a set of

values

ν

u

for each node u s.t., - For (u,v) in M, ν

u + νv = 1

- For unmatched nodes u,

ν

u

= 0Slide28

Stable Outcomes

Node u could negotiate with unmatched neighbor v and get (1 -

ν

v

).

Outside option of u is

α

u

= maximum over unmatched neighbors v of (1 - νv).Slide29

Stable Outcomes

Defn

. An outcome is

stable

if for all u,

ν

u

α

u.

Notice there are many stable outcomes, so which one should we expect to find?Slide30

Balanced Outcomes

Each individual bargaining outcome should agree with the Nash bargaining solution.

s

uv

= 1 -

α

u

-

α

vνu

= αu + s/2

And similarly for

ν

v

.Slide31

Computing Balanced Outcomes

A balanced outcome exists if and only if a stable outcome exists.

Balanced outcomes can be computed and characterized using Edmonds-Galai decompositions.

[Kleinberg-Tardos STOC’08]Slide32

Assignment:

Readings:

Social and Economic Networks, Chapter

10

The two Kearns papers or a paper on labor markets of your choosing (see refs in book)

Reaction to paper

Presentation volunteers?