PrEP Kenneth Mugwanya Renee Heffron Christina Wyatt Nelly Mugo Connie Celum Elly Katabira James Kiarie Alan Ronald and Jared M Baeten for the Partners PrEP Study and Partners Demonstration ID: 807258
Download The PPT/PDF document "Optimizing the frequency of kidney safe..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Optimizing the frequency of kidney safety monitoring in HIV-uninfected persons using daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate PrEP
Kenneth Mugwanya,
Renee Heffron
, Christina Wyatt, Nelly
Mugo
, Connie Celum, Elly
Katabira
, James Kiarie, Alan Ronald, and Jared M. Baeten
for
the Partners PrEP
Study
and
Partners Demonstration
Project Teams
Slide2Conflicts of InterestI have received research funding from the National Institutes of Health.I am the Principal Investigator of a study that received donated emtricitabine/tenofovir from Gilead.
Slide3Clinically relevant kidney toxicity is rare with TDF-based PrEP
In clinical trials, TDF-based PrEP has been associated with small non-progressive and clinically insignificant declines in creatinine clearance, a commonly used measure of overall kidney function.
Clinically relevant events are very rare and quickly resolve within weeks of PrEP discontinuation.
2.5% of people randomized to FTC/TDF in the Partners PrEP Study experienced a decline in
eGFR
>25% of their baseline
eGFR
value
(Mugwanya
et al
2015 JAMA
Intern
Med)
Slide4Optimal frequency of kidney
safety monitoring is a
key knowledge gap
As PrEP is bought to scale, defining the optimal frequency of kidney
safety monitoring
is
a key knowledge
gap
This is particularly important for regions with limited resources and/or less developed laboratory infrastructure
PrEP implementation guidance
recommend
periodic creatinine monitoring (when feasible
)
Clinical trials monitored creatinine clearance every 3 months
Demonstration projects have used a variety of monitoring schedules, from monthly to 6-monthly
US CDC recommends monitoring 6-monthly
Slide5Research objective
To investigate whether
6-monthly
kidney function monitoring could be as safe as 3-monthly monitoring
Slide6Data sources
Partners PrEP Study
Randomized clinical trial of PrEP efficacy and safety
Routine
3-monthly
creatinine monitoring; confirmatory testing of any abnormal results was conducted within ~1 week
Partners
Demonstration
Project
Open-label delivery study of integrated PrEP and ART
Routine
6-monthly
creatinine monitoring; confirmatory testing of any abnormal results was conducted within ~1 week
Both studies
HIV
uninfected
participants were members
of heterosexual HIV serodiscordant couples
Creatinine clearance >60 mL/min
was required
for study entry
PrEP
adherence was high
(>
80% by tenofovir blood measurements)
PrEP was not discontinued unless there was a confirmed creatinine
toxicity
Slide7MethodsAnalysis included people who initiated PrEP and had at least one post-enrollment serum creatinine measurement
Outcomes
Occurrence of
clinically relevant decline in creatinine
clearance, defined
as creatinine clearance <60
mL/minute
Occurrence
of
1.5-fold
creatinine increase from
baseline
Descriptive methods used to summarize creatinine eventsCox proportional hazards regression used to determine factors associated with the incidence of creatinine clearance falling below 60mL/minute
Slide8Participant baseline characteristics
Partners PrEP Study
(N=4404)
Mean
±
SD or %
Partners
D
emonstration
Project
(N=955)
Mean
±
SD or %
Age, years
35
±9
32 ±9Male63%67%Serum creatinine, mg/dL0.77 ±0.150.77 ±0.15Creatinine clearance, mL/min110 ±25116 ±25Creatinine clearance60-90 mL/min22%13%Weight ≤55kg22%9%Systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg5%5%
Slide9Cumulative proportion
of
persons with
CrCl
<60
mL/min
*
Decline confirmed on repeating testing
3-monthly monitoring
(Partners PrEP Study)
N=4404
6-monthly
monitoring (Partners Demo) N=955
Months after study enrollment
3
6
12612Unconfirmed measurement1.4%63/44042.5%90/44042.7%120/44040.7%7/955 1.1%10/955Confirmed measurement*
0.4%
16/4404
0.5%
21/
4404
0.7%29/44040.2%2/9550.2% 2/955
Slide10Cumulative proportion
of
persons with 1.5-fold increase in creatinine
*
Increase confirmed on repeating testing
3-monthly monitoring
(Partners PrEP)
N=4404
6-monthly
monitoring (Partners Demo) N=955
Months after study enrollment
3
6
12
6
12
Unconfirmed measurement
1.3%57/44041.9%85/44042.8%123/44041.4%13/955 1.8%17/955Confirmed measurement0.4%18/4404
0.5%
23/4404
0.8%
33/
4404
0.3%3/9550.4%4/955
Slide11Baseline covariates associated with CrCl
<60 mL/min within 12 months of starting PrEP
% with confirmed
CrCl
<60 mL/min in 12 months
Adjusted HR
(95% CI)
p-value
Age
≥45 years
3.4%
(23/676)
2.5
(1.3-4.9)
p=0.0008
Age <45 years
0.6% (30/4685)CrCl 60-90 mL/min4.3% (35/812)74.4 (9.8-567.2)p<0.001CrCl >90 mL/min0.1% (4/4256)Weight ≤55 kg2.3% (25/1105)2.7 (1.4-5.2)p=0.004Weight >55kg0.7% (32/4549)
*Model includes variables listed plus systolic blood pressure and PrEP treatment (TDF/FTC or TDF) and stratification by site and gender. Other demographic
and medical factors were not significantly associated with
CrCl
<60mL/min
.
Slide12Results summary
The frequency of clinically
relevant decline in
creatinine clearance was rare in these 2 large cohorts with high adherence to TDF-based PrEP
Overall,
<1% of people in
the 2 cohorts experienced
a confirmed
decline in
CrCl
to <60
mL/min within 12 months of starting PrEPThe occurrence and pattern was not qualitatively different whether creatinine clearance monitoring was based on 3-monthly or 6-monthly monitoring
More than 75% of creatinine elevations
or declines in creatinine clearance
were un
confirmed on repeat testing
Slide13Implications
These data support US CDC recommendations for 6-monthly creatinine monitoring for people using PrEP
These data also suggest that less frequent testing may be possible for
a majority of persons using
PrEP, requiring fewer
resources
Reduced creatinine clearance was extremely rare among persons with baseline levels >90 mL/min, younge
r than age 45, and weighing >55kg. Monitoring might be able to target those with defined risk factors.
Slide14Partners PrEP Study Team
Sites:
Eldoret, Kenya (
Moi
U, Indiana U): Edwin Were (PI), Ken Fife (PI), Cosmas Apaka
Jinja
, Uganda (
Makarere
U, UW); Patrick Ndase (PI), Elly Katabira (PI), Fridah Gabona
Kabwohe
, Uganda (KCRC): Elioda Tumwesigye (PI), Rogers Twesigye
Kampala, Uganda (
Makarere
U): Elly Katabira (PI), Allan Ronald (PI), Edith Nakku-Joloba
Kisumu, Kenya (KEMRI, UCSF): Elizabeth Bukusi (PI), Craig Cohen (PI), Josephine Odoyo
Mbale, Uganda (TASO, CDC): Jonathan Wangisi (PI), Akasiima Mucunguzi
Nairobi, Kenya (KNH/U Nairobi, UW): James Kiarie (PI), Carey Farquhar (PI), Grace John-Stewart (PI), Harrison
TamoohThika, Kenya (KNH/U Nairobi, UW): Nelly Mugo (PI), Kenneth NgureTororo, Uganda (CDC, TASO): Jim Campbell (PI), Jordan Tappero (PI), Aloysious KakiaUniversity of Washington Coordinating Center: Connie Celum (PI and Co-Chair), Jared Baeten (Co-Chair and Medical Director), Deborah Donnell (Statistician), Justin Brantley, Robert Coombs, Carlos Flores, Lisa Frenkel, Harald Haugen, Ting Hong, Jim Hughes, Erin Kahle, Becky Karschney, Lara Kidoguchi, Meighan Krows, Jai Lingappa, Toni Maddox, Angela McKay, Julie McElrath, Allison Mobley, Susan Morrison, Kelly Moutsos, Apollo Odika, Hilda O’Hara, Dana Panteleeff, Marothodi Semenya, John Sparkman, Katherine Thomas Adherence Ancillary Study: David Bangsberg, Jessica Haberer, Norma Ware, Monique Wyatt, Steve Safren, Christina Psaros, Craig Hendrix, Namandjé Bumpus DF/Net (data center): Lisa Ondrejcek, Darryl Pahl, Jae ChongCLS (laboratory oversight): Wendy Stevens, Charlotte Ingram, Ute Jentsch, Mukthar Kader, Nombulelo Gqomane, Feroza Bulbulia, Jan van den HeuvelClinPhone/Perceptive Informatics (randomization)Gilead (study drug donation): Jim Rooney
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (study funder):
Stephen Becker
HIV
serodiscordant
couples who tested, screened, & participated
Slide15Investigators
University of Washington Coordinating Center: Jared Baeten (protocol chair),
Connie Celum (protocol co-chair), Renee Heffron (project director),
Deborah Donnell (protocol statistician),
Ruanne
Barnabas, ICRC Operations, Data and Administration teams
Kabwohe, Uganda (KCRC): Stephen Asiimwe,
Edna Tindimwebwa
Kampala, Uganda (
Makerere
University): Elly Katabira, Nulu Bulya
Kisumu, Kenya (KEMRI): Elizabeth
Bukusi
, Josephine Odoyo
Thika, Kenya (KEMRI): Nelly Mugo, Kenneth Ngure
MGH/Harvard:
Jessica Haberer, Norma Ware Johns Hopkins: Craig Hendrix, Mark MarzinkeDF/Net Research (data management)FundersUS National Institutes of Health (grants R01 MH095507, R01 MH100940, R01 MH 101027, R21 AI104449, K99 HD076679, R00 HD076679)Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grants OPP47674, OPP1056051)US Agency for International Development (contract AID-OAA-A-12-00023) Research participantsPartners Demonstration Project Team