/
SLAC test beam: particle flux/beam spot size SLAC test beam: particle flux/beam spot size

SLAC test beam: particle flux/beam spot size - PowerPoint Presentation

haroublo
haroublo . @haroublo
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-24

SLAC test beam: particle flux/beam spot size - PPT Presentation

Tuning the beam from Andys slides SLAC can provide and you can control between single electrons 200 electrons per bunch as its output 5 bunches a second 5Hz Beam size between 30 microns and 1cm ID: 786324

balls chip beam hits chip balls hits beam bunch bin probability events spot size strips fcf consecutive 10e bonded

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "SLAC test beam: particle flux/beam spot ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

SLAC test beam: particle flux/beam spot size

Slide2

Tuning the beam (from Andy’s slides)

SLAC can provide (and you can control)

between single electrons – 200 electrons per bunch as its output

5 bunches a second (5Hz)

Beam size between 30 microns and 1cm

2

How many events to we want/need?

In pixels with improvement to analysis code we can get results with ~200k events

Slide3

FCF requirements

FCF block can read out up to 4 hits (clusters) per ASIC, the rest is discarded

First ones that arrive are read out?

The same particles must be read out on both sides of the doublet

Does not like hits on consecutive strips coming from 2 different particles (confuses them as a cluster created by a single particle)

Requires some separation between hits (low occupancy) in order to perform correlation

Only the axial strips of the sensors are bonded to ASICs

Slide4

Proposed flux/beam spot size

If we use

10e/bunch

and

1 cm

2

beam spot

Low probability of double hits (~0.45%, check table at the end)

Will get enough data in reasonable time scale

Is this OK for the ABCN (covering all the sensor, around 10% occupancy per bunch)?

For the FCF:

1cm

2

~ 128 strips on 1 row, up to 256 on 2 rows

~ 0.1 hits per strip and per bunch

Low probability of consecutive strip hits per bunch

Still 10 hits/bunch, but can be distributed between consecutive ASICs and

unbonded

strip rows to lower the rate of hits/chip

Slide5

FCF examples

Bonded

Bonded

Unbonded

Chip 1

Chip 2

Chip 1

Chip 2

Chip 1

Chip 2

Chip 1

Chip 2

Chip 1

Chip 2

~10e/chip

~

5e/chip

~2.5e/chip

~5e/chip

~5e/chip

10e/bunch

and

1 cm

2

beam spot

Beam spot size, chip size and strips length approx. to scale

In most cases we should be OK

Alignment may be a bit more tricky

For relative displacement between sensors, use

(b)

or

(c)

(a)

(b)

(d)

(c)

(e)

Slide6

Total number of events

For the ABCN

10 events * 5 bunches per second = 3000 per minute

200,000/3000= 67 minutes per run

Reasonable time scale for 200k events

For the FCF we will get 50% or 25% of that (I think it is still ok)

Slide7

Double hit probability

What is the probability that 1 of the 100 strips will be hit by 2 electrons from 10 e/bunch

Translate into bins and balls..

What is the probability that any bin will contain more an 1 ball after 10 balls are thrown?

Slide8

Maths

How many bins have r balls?

Probability that a given bin has r balls is

=

For

m,n

>> r,

 

m = no of balls

n = no of bins

R = no of balls in 1 bin (

eg

1, 2

etc

Slide9

Results

Number of Balls

Prob

of a bin having

1 ball

Prob of a bin having 2 balls

Prob of a bin having 3 balls

1

0.99%

0.00%

0.00%

5

4.76%

0.12%

0.00%

10

9.05%

0.45%

0.02%

15

12.91%

0.97%

0.05%

20

16.37%

1.64%

0.11%

25

19.47%

2.43%

0.20%

30

22.22%

3.33%

0.33%

35

24.66%

4.32%

0.50%

40

26.81%

5.36%

0.72%

45

28.69%

6.46%

0.97%

50

30.33%

7.58%

1.26%

55

31.73%

8.73%

1.60%

60

32.93%

9.88%

1.98%

65

33.93%

11.03%

2.39%

70

34.76%

12.17%

2.84%

75

35.43%

13.29%

3.32%

80

35.95%

14.38%

3.83%

85

36.33%

15.44%

4.37%

90

36.59%

16.47%

4.94%

95

36.74%

17.45%

5.53%

100

36.79%

18.39%

6.13%