䨠䭯牥慮慤楯氠卯挠〱㬀㐵㨀㔀ㄳⴀ㔱㠀 To describe the MRI and CT findings of temporal bone Langerhans cell histiocytosis The MRI n8 and CT n7 findings of nine lesions of ID: 941868
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "MR and CT Findings of Temporal BoneLange..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
ä¨ ä¯ç¥æ ®âæ ¤æ¥¯æ° å¯æ ã°ã±ã¬ãµã¨ãã³â´ã±ã MR and CT Findings of Temporal BoneLangerhans Cell HistiocytosisJae Ig Bae, M.D., Hee Jung Lee, M.D., Heung Sik Kim, M.D. To describe the MRI and CT findings of temporal bone Langerhans cell histi-ocytosis. The MRI (n=8) and CT (n=7) findings of nine lesions of tem-poral bone Langerhans cell histiocytosis in six children were retrospectively reviewed.Eight lesions were pathologically confirmed and one was clinically diagnosed. Thefindings were analyzed for bilaterality, location, lesion extent, signal intensity, the at-tenuation of soft tissue lesions seen at MRI or precontrast CT, enhancement pattern atMRI or CT, and the pattern of bony destruction at CT.Bilateral involvement was present in three of six patients (50%). Lesions weremost frequently located in the mastoid (n=8, 89%), followed by the petrous ridge(n=6, 67%), and the squamous portion (n=3, 33%). Seven (78%) lesions extended tothe ipsilateral cavernous sinus (n=3), sphenoid bone (n=3), orbit (n=2), or epiduralspace (n=2). The signals of the soft tissue lesions were isointense in five cases (63%)on T1-weighted images and hyperintense in six (75%) on T2-weighted images. Five le-sions (71%) were isodense on precontrast CT scans. The enhancement patterns wereinhomogeneous in six cases (75%) at MRI, and homogeneous in five (71%) at CT. Alllesions demonstrated bony destruction without periosteal reaction and five (71%)showed ill-defined destruction, with crossing sutures.Familiarity w
ith findings of predominant mastoid involvement, isoin-tense or isodense soft tissue lesions seen on T1-weighted images or at precontrast CT,with relatively homogeneous enhancement at CT, and irregular bony destruction withcrossing sutures may be helpful in narrowing the diagnosis of temporal boneLangerhans cell histiocytosis. Neoplasms, in infants and childrenTemporal bone, CT Tel. 82-53-250-7766, 7198 Fax. 82-53-250-7766 of disorders in which the idiopathic proliferation of histi-bone involvement of LCH is uncommon, with a report-ed frequency of between 18% and 61% (2). Clinical mis-important in the differentiation of disease from inflam-study was to determine the MR and CT findings of tem-poral bone LCH, and thus narrow the differential diag-We retrospectively investigated the MR and CT find-were pathologically confirmed by excision (n=5) or nee-dle aspiration biopsy (n=3). and the other lesion was di- C presented with a left postauricularlarge isodense soft tissue mass involv-and iso-to hyperintense on T2-weight-) demonstrates homogeneous en- A (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and the following imag-ing sequences: axial T1- and T2-weighted; contrast-en-hanced axial and coronal T1-weighted. The imaging pa-msec) for T2-weighted and 600/15 for pre- and postcon-(Omniscan, 0.2 mmol/kg; Nycomed, Norway) was ad-(seven lesions) using a Somatom Plus-S (Siemens,5.0 mm, with contrast-enhancement after the intra-on T1- and T2-weighted MR images, attenuation at pre-contrast CT and defined as hypodense, isodense
, or hy-Soft tissue lesions were iso- (n=5, 63%) (Fig. 1) or hy-weighted images and either hyper- (n=6, 75%) or isoin-T1-weighted images, and at pathologic examination, he-morrhagic foci were found to be present there. At pre-Postcontrast CT demonstrated homogeneous enhance-CT revealed bony destruction in all lesions with no pe-riosteal reaction. In five lesions (71%), ill-defined de-2), and in two there was well-defined punched-out de-ä¨ ä¯ç¥æ ®âæ ¤æ¥¯æ° å¯æ ã°ã±ã¬ãµã¨ãã³â´ã±ã MR and CT Findings of the Temporal Bone LCH CasesLesionsLocationExtentT1WIT2WIGd-enhan.Pre-CTPost-CTBone destruction11Right; mastoid, petrousCavernous sinusIso.Iso.Inhomoâ´â´22Left; mastoid, petrous,Cavernous sinusHypo.Hyper.Inhomoâ´â´squamousOrbit3*3Left; mastoid, squamousHypo.Hyper.Inhomo.HypodenseInhomo.Well-defined4Righ; mastoidSphenoidHypo.Hyper.Inhomo.IsodenseHomo.Well-defined4*5Left; mastoid, petrousEpiduralIso.Hyper.Homo.IsodenseHomo.Ill-defined6Right; mastoid. Iso. Hyper. Inhomo. Isodense Homo. Ill-defined57Right; mastoid, squamous Epiduralâ´â´IsodenseHomo.Ill-defined6*8Left; mastoid, petrous Sphenoid Iso. Hyper. Inhomo. Hypodense Inhomo. Ill-defined9Right; petrous Carvenous sinus Iso. Iso. Homo. Isodense Homo. Ill-defined Absent; *, Bilateral lesions; , Temporal bone CT; T1WI, T1-weighted image; T2WI, T2-weighted image; Gd-enhan., Gd-enhancement; the skull, the calvarium is most frequently involved, fol-and can be suggested only as part of a differential diag-the presence of LCH (2).in our se
ries, and were thus more common than the pre-Findings of bilateral involvement, extension to the adja-9). These findings mimic ag-limited number of cases (10). Although the signal inten-sity was not specific in our study, soft tissue lesionsin the signal intensity seen on such images may be at-LCH is known to be marked by the proliferation of atyp-ical Langerhans cells. During the early phase of LCH, le-included in the differential diagnosis of hypercellular tu-rhabdomyosarcomas or chloromas, especially in the pe- A ) shows a relatively isodense soft tissue mass (H.U., 61.4) involving the petrous ridge, mastoid, and the squa-(H.U., 80.3). Temporal bone CT scan ( at CT (71%) but inhomogeneous at MRI (75%). This dis-crepancy between CT and MRI may be due to the supe-rior soft tissue resolution and higher contrast of the lat-with poorly delineated borders and can mimic a malig-s sarcoma or acute osteomyelitis, and-less fre-The lesion becomes progressively more sharply delin-benign appearance. CT clearly demonstrates osseous in-volvement. In most cases in our series, ill-defined per-calvarial or orbital LCH, where the lesions were de-scribed as having punched-out defect, with sharp mar-studies used conventional CT rather than high-resolu-the latter is an excellent means of determining the na-ture of an osseous lesion. In summary, findings of bilateral involvement, exten-tissue lesions are not specific for LCH. However, famil-iarity with findings of predominant mastoid involve-precontrast CT scan are help
ful in narrowing the diag-1.Mirra JM. In: Mirra JM, Picci P, Gold RH, eds. 2.Cunningham MJ, Curtin HD, Jaffe R, Stool SE. Otologic manifes-3.Hadjigeorgi C, Parpounas C, Zarmakoupis P, Lafoyianni S.Eosinophilic granuloma of the temporal bone: Radiological ap-4.Cunningham MJ, Curtin HD, Butkiewicz BL. Histiocytosis X of5.Hermans L, Foer BD, Smet MH, Leysen J, Feenstra L, Fossion E,6.Stull MA, Kransdorf MJ, Devaney KO. Langerhans cell7.Erly WK, Carmody RF, Dryden RM. Orbital histiocytosis X. 8.Stromberg JS, Wang AM, Huang TE, Vicini FA, Nowak PA.Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis involving the sphenoid sinus and su-9.Yi G, Yoon HK, Han BK, Kim KA, Choo IW. CT findings of orbital10.Monroc M, Pointe DL, Haddad S, Josset P, Montagne JP. Soft tis-11.Rosenfield NS, Abrahams JA, Jomp D. Brain MR in patients with12.McGahan JP, Osborn RA, Dublin AB, French BN. CT ofä¨ ä¯ç¥æ ®âæ ¤æ¥¯æ° å¯æ ã°ã±ã¬ãµã¨ãã³â´ã±ã ë«ì맦믧벱ìì좸ì¶ã°ã±ã¬ãµã¨ãã³â´ã±ã ì¸ëë±ä±¡æ¹§æ²æ¡¡æ¹³ë²¼ì·ì¶ì·ë¸ìµìäµâ¹íäâ¼í°ë¨ë£ìë«ë¿ë¯ªìë¡ë¿¸ì¸ë맦믧벱ëºìë³ë·ë¨ë£ìë«ë¿ë¯ªìë¡ë¿¸ë³ë»ëºìë³ë·ë§¨ì§ìê¤ì죱ì¤ê¤ë¨ì£¯ë·ì¸ëë±ì»ì§ë§¼ì䱡湧æ²æ¡¡æ¹³ë²¼ì·ì¶ì·ë¸ìµìäµâ¹íäâ¼í°ë¬ë»ë»ëª¸ëììë¾´ë⸠ã¸î·ì좯ë»ë¾¡ë²ë§ë¯½ì㦿ë¤ëª´ëª¯ìì¸ëë±ä±¡æ¹§æ²æ¡¡æ¹³ë²¼ì·ì¶ì·ë¸ìµìäµâ¨æ¸½ã ©â¹íäâ¨æ¸½ã©â¼í°ë¬ì£ì¢ì»ì¸ëë«ë²®ìë¾´ë⸠㢿ë§ì몴몯ìºì¶ì·ìì»ë³ëì¸ë좮ì¸ë뻺ëã
¿ë¦´ìì믳ì»ì¸ëì¸ëë뻺ë⸠뾵믳ë³ëìºëª´ëª¯ì뻧ì¸ë²ºâ° ì§ì¡â° ì§ë§¼ë§¼ì§â° 뾬ë«ì¶ì·ëª´ëª¯ìäµë¾¡ë²ìë· ì¢£ëëµë¿ì¶ë¾µìµëì¼ä뾡ë²ìì½ë¾µâ° ì¶ë¾µìµë뻧믳Ⱐäâ¼íë뾡ë²ë±ìë«ì뻧믳Ⱐë®ì»ë«ë²®ìë¾´ë⸠뻧ì¸ë²ºëª´ëª¯ìºã¸î´¨ã°â©ì뻺ë⸠몴몯ìì§ì¡ëì¯ë»§ë¹ë¢ë¡ã¢¿ë¤¨ã ¹â©ëë¡ì¥ë¢¹ë»ëìì¼ë«ã¿ë¤¨ã·â©â° ìë«ì¸ëë±ã¿ë¤¨ã³â©ì본ì뻺ë⸠ã¿ë¤¨ã¶â©ì몴몯ìë¿ì¸ìì룩ë¿â¡®ã´³â¤¬âêï²°ï¨æ¸½ã©â° ë»ë¿â¡®ã´²â¤¬â¹íë¦ë¢·ë¿â 뾬ë³ì»ìì§ë§¼ì»ëª¸ë¾´ë⸠뾬ë«ì¶ì·ëª´ëª¯ìºå±ëì¶ë¾µë¯³ë¾¡ë²ëã¿ë¤¨ã³â©ë¾¡ë²ë¿ë®ë· 좣ëëµë¢¦â° å²ëì¶ë¾µë¯³ë¾¡ë²ëã¿ë¤â ·ã¥â¦°êëë· ì¢£ëëµë¢¦ëª¸ë¾´ë⸠ì¶ë¾µìµëì¼ä뾡ë²ëã¿ë¤¨ã±â©ë¡ë¿ë®ì½ë¾µì»ëªì¸ë»ë»ºë⸠ì¶ë¾µìµëìºäµë¾¡ë²ëã뾹⠷ã¥â¦¿ê¼ê´ë«±ëìì뻧믳ì»â° ä뾡ë²ëã¿ë¤¨ã±â©ë¾¡ë²ëìì뻧믳ì»ëª¸ë¾´ë⸠ë±ìë«ëäâ¼í°ïì¼ëâ ±ã°â©ë¾¡ë²ëª¸ë¾´ì¸ëªë±ë¢·ë§ììºë¼ì»ëì¶ë»ë»ëâ° ã¿ë¤¨ã±â©ë¾¡ë²ë«ìì»ëëë¡ëë«ëì¢ì뻧믳ì»ëª¸ë¾´ëâ¸ëª´ëª¯ììëì¯ë»§ë¹ë¢â ¸ã¤¥â¦¿êì§ì¡ìëⰠ뾬ë«ì¶ì·ëª´ëª¯ìå±ëì¶ë¾µë¯³ë¾¡ë²ë¿ë®ë· 좣ëëµâ ¶ã¥â¦¸ê몸ìë좤ìºì¶ë¾µìµë£ì¼ä뾡ë²ë¿ë®ì½ë¾µâ ·ã¥â§ì²¸î¦¼ê´ë«±ë³ì»ëììì¶ë¾µìµëâ µã¥â§ë¬ëª¸ì룧Ⱐë«ìì»ëëë¡ëë«ëì¢ìë±ìë«â ·ã¥â¤ ë³ëìë¼ì»ë룩ì¸ë뾱䱡湧æ²æ¡¡æ¹³ë²¼ì·ì¶ì·ë¸ìµì»ë·ë¯§ìëëì¸ë믧ë¡ëëâ¸