/
FIXED POINTS AND FREEZING SETS IN DIGITAL TOPOLOGY FIXED POINTS AND FREEZING SETS IN DIGITAL TOPOLOGY

FIXED POINTS AND FREEZING SETS IN DIGITAL TOPOLOGY - PowerPoint Presentation

karlyn-bohler
karlyn-bohler . @karlyn-bohler
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2019-11-23

FIXED POINTS AND FREEZING SETS IN DIGITAL TOPOLOGY - PPT Presentation

FIXED POINTS AND FREEZING SETS IN DIGITAL TOPOLOGY L aurence B oxer 1 2 I ntro to digital topology In computer memory a digital image is not a set of continuous bodies Rather a digital image is a set of discrete ID: 767265

set digital topology freezing digital set freezing topology fixed points image boxer adjacency minimal point proposition connected continuous pixels

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "FIXED POINTS AND FREEZING SETS IN DIGITA..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

FIXED POINTS AND FREEZING SETS IN DIGITAL TOPOLOGY Laurence Boxer 1

2 I ntro to digital topology In computer memory, a digital image is not a set of “continuous bodies.” Rather, a digital image is a set of discrete pixels or voxels . Usual approach to digital topology: Pixels as points in ; close pairs as edges of a graph. is a continuous function between digital images if close points have close images – that is, ( adjacent to ) implies either or .Notation: {) | is continuous}, the adjacency of . This approach yields some success in recognizing connectedness, contractibility, fundamental groups. However, fixed point properties of Euclidean objects and of their digital images can be very different.  

3 Intro to digital topology – adjacencies The most commonly used adjacencies are the adjacencies. Given , in , , we have if f or at least 1 and at most distinct indices , , andfor all other indices , .  adjacencies are also known by the number of pixels neighboring a given pixel in the adjacency. For example,  adjacency in is 8–adjacency.   adjacency in is 4–adjacency.  

4 Intro to digital topology - connectedness Digital image is connected if given , there exists a path such that .   -connected and -connected  -connected; not -connected  Theorem [9, 1]: is digitally continuous if and only if preserves digital connectedness.  

5 Motivating tools - 1 If is a continuous map of a subset of a path-connected Euclidean space, with 2 fixed points, the image under of a path between the fixed points can be wildly distorted by .   However, the analogous situation for digital images yields the following. Proposition 2 [7]. Let be a digital image and let ). Suppose such that there is a unique (graphically) shortest -path from to . Then . Sketched proof: Since , the uniqueness of implies . And if is not a subset of , it is easy to see that for some in , and would not be adjacent, contrary to the continuity of .  

6 Motivating tools - 2Let be the projection to the coordinate: .   Lemma 3. [4] Let be a digital image, , , in .If , then . Similarly, if , then .  

7 Freezing sets - definition and basic propertiesDefinition 2 [4]: Let be a digital image. is a freezing set for if for every isomorphism , if is -continuous and , then . Theorem 4 [4]: Let be a digital image. is a freezing set for if and only if given ), implies .   Trivially, is a freezing set for . How do we find proper subsets of that are freezing sets for ? How small can a freezing set be?   Theorem 5 [4]: Let be a digital image. Let be a proper subset of that is a retract of . Then does not contain a freezing set for .  

8 Proposition 7 [4]: Let be finite. Let . Let . Let . If , then .   Sketch proof : Suffice to show Given ,  for each index there is a digital line segment containing with endpoints in such that is one-to-one. By Lemma 3, for all , . Hence .   Boundaries

9 Example: Minimal freezing set for digital rectangle   The 4 corner pixels make up a minimal freezing set . Proof : Let such that . By Proposition 2, the top and bottom rows of pixels must be fixed points. Similarly, Proposition 2 can now be applied to each column of pixels. Thus, , so is a freezing set.Minimality: if we remove a member of , the resulting set yields such that - indeed, .  

10 Example: Minimal freezing set for digital rectangle   In contrast to previous example, adjacency doesn’t lend itself to use of Proposition 2. We know from Proposition 7 that is a freezing set. That is minimal follows from: Proposition 10 [4]: If is a proper subset of then is not a freezing set for .Proof: Let such that . Want to obtain such that . If a corner point is in we can construct as in previous example. Otherwise, consider such that is not a corner. We obtain such that , as shown.  

11 Other simple examples For a digital simple closed curve, a minimal freezing set has 3 points. For a wedge of 2 digital simple closed curves, a minimal freezing set has 4 points. For a tree, the set of leaf vertices is a minimal freezing set.

12 References[1] L. Boxer, A classical construction for the digital fundamental group, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 10 (1999), 51-62.[2] L. Boxer, Remarks on fixed point assertions in digital topology, 2, Applied General Topology 20, (1) (2019), 155-175. [3] L. Boxer, Remarks on fixed point assertions in digital topology, 3, submitted. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.09903 [4] L. Boxer, Fixed point sets in digital topology, 2, submitted. Available at https :// arxiv.org/abs/1904.00534 [5] L. Boxer, O. Ege, I. Karaca, J. Lopez, and J. Louwsma, Digital fixed points, approximate fixed points, and universal functions, Applied General Topology 17(2), 2016, 159-172.[6] L. Boxer and P.C. Staecker, Remarks on fixed point assertions in digital topology, Applied General Topology 20 (1) (2019), 135-153.[7] L. Boxer and P.C. Staecker, Fixed point sets in digital topology, 1, submitted. Available athttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.11093.pdf [8] A. Rosenfeld, Digital topology, The American Mathematical Monthly 86 (8) (1979), 621-630.[9] A. Rosenfeld, ‘Continuous’ functions on digital pictures, Pattern Recognition Letters 4, pp. 177-184, 1986.