/
Heather Novak, Ph.D. Statistical Research Analyst Heather Novak, Ph.D. Statistical Research Analyst

Heather Novak, Ph.D. Statistical Research Analyst - PowerPoint Presentation

karlyn-bohler
karlyn-bohler . @karlyn-bohler
Follow
348 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-28

Heather Novak, Ph.D. Statistical Research Analyst - PPT Presentation

Institutional Research Colorado State University Student Engagement for Diverse SubPopulations at CSU 2012 NSSE Results   Student Affairs Assessment Symposium March 29 2013 National Survey of Student Engagement NSSE ID: 700422

nsse assessment 2013 symposium assessment nsse symposium 2013 student scores csu learning csu

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Heather Novak, Ph.D. Statistical Researc..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Heather Novak, Ph.D.Statistical Research Analyst Institutional ResearchColorado State University

Student

Engagement for Diverse Sub-Populations at

CSU:

2012

NSSE

Results

 

Student Affairs Assessment Symposium

March 29, 2013Slide2

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

What is NSSE

Survey administration

The theory of student engagementNSSE ‘Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practices’How NSSE data can be usedVariability within CSU’s NSSE dataLongitudinal change at CSUPeer comparisons

2013 Assessment Symposium

2Slide3

3

2013 Assessment SymposiumSlide4

2013 Assessment Symposium

4Slide5

2013 Assessment Symposium5

CSU Population ParameterSlide6

Variation within CSU’s NSSE Scores

We will focus on variation within CSU’s NSSE data by looking at benchmark scores across first-generation, minority, and low-income statuses.

2013 Assessment Symposium

6Slide7

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. Colleges and universities promote high levels of student achievement by emphasizing the importance of academic effort and setting high expectations for student performance.

2013 Assessment Symposium

7Slide8

Active and Collaborative Learning (ACL)

Students learn more when they are intensely involved in their education and asked to think about what they are learning in different settings. Collaborating with others in solving problems or mastering difficult material prepares students for the messy, unscripted problems they will encounter daily during and after college.

2013 Assessment Symposium

8Slide9

Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI)Students learn firsthand how experts think about and solve practical problems by interacting with faculty members inside and outside the classroom. As a result, their teachers become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, life-long learning

.

2013 Assessment Symposium

9Slide10

Enriching Educational Experiences (EEE)Complementary learning opportunities enhance academic programs. Diversity experiences teach students valuable things about themselves and others. Technology facilitates collaboration between peers and instructors. Internships, community service, and senior capstone courses provide opportunities to integrate and apply knowledge.

2013 Assessment Symposium

10Slide11

Supportive Campus Environment (SCE)Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that are committed to their success and cultivate positive working and social relations among different groups on campus.

2013 Assessment Symposium

11Slide12

Variation within CSU’s NSSE Scores

In summary, there is not much variation in the benchmark averages across first-generation, Pell-recipient, or minority status.

2013 Assessment Symposium

12Slide13

CSU’s NSSE Scores over Time

CSU has participated in the NSSE survey eight

times. The

benefit of having multiple NSSE administrations is that longitudinal trends in NSSE responses at CSU can be explored. 2013 Assessment Symposium13Slide14

Summary of CSU’s NSSE Scores over Time

14

2012 Change from 2007

First-Year

Senior

Level of Academic Challenge

(LAC)

+

+

Active and Collaborative

Learning (ACL)

+

+

Student

Faculty Interaction (SFI)

+

=

Enriching

Educational Experiences (EEE)

+

=

Supportive Campus Environment (SCE)

+

+

2013 Assessment SymposiumSlide15

2013 Assessment Symposium15Slide16

CSU’s NSSE Scores compared to PeersA benefit of participating in NSSE is that CSU can compare our scores to the average score from a group of selected peer institutions.

2012 NSSE Results

Diversity Symposium

16Slide17

Peer Comparisons2013 Assessment Symposium

17

2012 CSU compared to the average 2012

NSSE score for other large public research institutions

First-Year

Senior

Level of Academic Challenge

(LAC)

-

=

Active and Collaborative

Learning (ACL)

=

+

Student

Faculty Interaction (SFI)

=

=

Enriching

Educational Experiences (EEE)

-

-

Supportive Campus Environment (SCE)

+

=Slide18

Conclusions

There is not worrisome variation in engagement scores across socio-economic diversity variables

CSU has considerable improvement in our 2012 NSSE scores compared to 2007

In terms of the peer comparisons CSU has room for improvement, especially for the EEE benchmark2013 Assessment Symposium

18Slide19

19Slide20

Questions, Comments, & Future Research I

deas

Heather Novak

Institutional ResearchHeather.Novak@colostate.edu491-2163

2013 Assessment Symposium

20