20 April 2015 Company Mission To produce principled leaders across the four developmental pillars of The Citadel experience academic military physical effectiveness and moralethical ID: 759763
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "M Company METL Assessment for School Yea..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
M Company METL Assessment for School Year 2014-2015
20 April 2015
Company Mission
: To produce principled leaders across the four developmental pillars of The Citadel experience: academic,
military, physical
effectiveness,
and moral-ethical.
Slide2Overall Assessment
Last Year (end of year) This Year (as of 4/15/15)Academic T PMilitary N T Moral-Ethical N TPhysical Effectiveness T T
P – Proficient T – Trained N – Needs Improvement U – Unsatisfactory
Slide3Academic Assessment
Current rating: PROFICIENT
Strengths
Average semester and cumulative GPAs above 3.00; 3.038 and 3.001, respectively)
Use of Tutoring Program & Academic Support Center
Maintaining quiet ESP Conditions
Proactive Academic Officer & Academic Advisor
Weaknesses
Checking and attention to removing class absences
Slide4Academic Pillar Metrics
Cum GPA last yearCum GPA this yearTotal Class Absences last semesterUnexcused ClassAbsences this semesterTotal ClassAbsences this semesterNumber Academically Deficient lastYear # (cum GPA)Number Academically Deficient thisYear # (1st sem.)1C DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA 0 12C DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA 2 23C DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA 2 04C DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA 3 4Total 2.9825 3.001* 278 50 ** 295 ** 7 7
# Based on Commandant Dept. definition of academically deficient as < 2.00 GPA
* 4
th
in the Corps among cadet companies as of Fall 2014; Fall 2104 Grades provided by Lisa Pace on 1/8/15
** 9 April 2015 Weekly Report: “Company Totals – Spring 2015
Lates
and Absences”
Slide5Academic Pillar Focus Areas
Continue having duty team, Academic Officer, and chain of command do walk through inspections to monitor ESP.
Maintain focus on maintaining average semester GPA of 3.00 or higher
Be more proactive in
checking, tracking,
and removing valid class absences
Slide6Military Assessment
Current ratings: TRAINED
Strengths
Positive command climate
Strong
military ethos
Parade results
Positive 4/C retention – 94.1% for SY 14-15 (32 of 34)
Weaknesses
Inconsistent accountability processes
Inconsistent MRI process and results
Under-utilization of squad leaders
Slide7Military Pillar Metrics
Total Demerits last yearTotal Demerits this yearClass I Offenses last yearClass I Offenses this yearSuitability Boards last yearSuitability Boards this year 1C DNA 272 0 1 0 0 2C DNA 713 9 1 0 1 3C DNA 316 7 5 0 0 4C DNA 429 1 2 0 0 Total DNA 1,730 17* 9* 0 1
*
Source: Commandant’s Dept. Punishment Orders; current year r
eflects status through PO # 32
Slide8Military Pillar Focus Areas
Continue focus on improving accountability at formations
Continue focus on improving MRIs
Better utilize squad leaders for accountability at formations and for readiness of cadet rooms for MRIs
Continue focus on 4/C retention
Slide9Moral-Ethical Assessment
Current ratings: TRAINED
Strengths
Leadership Training Program (LTP)
Steady focus and emphasis by cadet leaders
Awareness via Cadet Counseling program
Weaknesses
Maturity of our cadet demographic
Slide10Moral-Ethical Pillar Metrics
CADET CLASSNumber of honor accusationslast yearNumber of honor accusationsthis yearNumber ofResignations/“in violation” honor findingslast yearNumber ofResignations/“in violation” honor findingsthis yearNumber of sexual harassment/assault incidentreports last yearNumber of sexual harassment/assault incident reports this year 1C 0 0 0/0 0/0 0 0 2C 0 0 0/0 0/0 0 0 3C 1 4 1/0 3/0 0 0 4C 2 0 0/2 0/1 0 0 Total 3* 4* 1/2* 3/1* 0** 0**
*
Source
:
Informal
company
records; data not available from Honor Committee; 4/C in violation is a transfer
** Source: Informal
company
records; company data not available from Title IX Coordinator or CARE
Slide11Moral-Ethical Focus Areas
Ensure Mike company cadets attend scheduled LTP training
Maintain and emphasize a positive expectation of our cadets
LTP attendance by athletes must be made mandatory
Slide12Physical Effectiveness Assessment
Current ratings: TRAINED
Strengths
Strong physical fitness & testing program
Strong participation in intramural program
Weaknesses
Difficulty influencing un-motivated cadets (
bottom 7%) to
pursue physical fitness & regular exercise
Noticeable “sophomore slump”
Lack of 4C participation in intramurals
Slide13Physical Effectiveness Pillar Metrics
CPFT avg. last yearCPFT avg. this yearNumber of CPFT failures last year *Number of CPFT failures this year *Number of Ht. & Wt. failures last year *Number of Ht. & Wt. failures this year *1C 226.5 249.5 0 0 1 32C 251.5 224.5 1 1 1 13C 225.5 227 5 2 5 24C 242.5 251.5 2 1 0 2Total 236.5 238.1 8 4 7 8
* Source: Commandant’s Dept. CPFT Deficiency Lists; includes consolidated results for Fall and Spring semesters
Slide14Physical Effectiveness Focus Areas
Continue to hold all cadets accountable for their performance and progress
Continue to hold cadets in remedial status accountable
Encourage/challenge sophomore class
Increase recognition of top performers
Continue emphasis on intramurals and encourage participation by all cadets
Submit a formal suggestion to Director of Intramurals that more team intramural events be created for freshmen
Slide15Summary
Overall trend in all pillars is positive.
Primary focus area continues to be related to accountability (military pillar)