Definitions Credibility of a witness means the credibility of any part or all of the evidence of the witness and includes the witnesss ability to observe or remember facts and events about which the witness has given is giving or is to give evidence ID: 723116
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Credibility Rule: When, Why and How" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
The Credibility Rule:
When, Why and HowSlide2
Definitions
Credibility of a witness
means the
credibility
of any part or all
of
the evidence of the witness
, and includes the witness’s
ability
to
observe
or
remember
facts and events about which the witness has given, is giving or is to give evidence.
Plain language translation:
How believable and reliable is (some or all of) the evidence from a witness?
Credibility of a person
is also defined. Essentially the same definition but applied to an out-of-court representation that has been admitted into evidence.Slide3
Evidence can be relevant
for MORE than one purpose
Evidence can be
relevant to
:
Fact in issue (FII)
Excl
rule
does not arise
FII &
Credibility
Excl rule MIGHT apply
Credibility only
Excl rule
WILL applySlide4
Section 101A: definition of credibility
(inserted in reaction to High Court decision in
Adam
)
Credibility evidence, in relation to a witness or other person, is evidence relevant to the credibility of the witness or person that:
is relevant only
because it affects the assessment of the credibility of the witness or person; or
(b) is relevant:
(i) because it affects the assessment of the
credibility of the witness or person; and (ii) for some other purpose for which it is not admissible, or cannot be used, because of a provision of Parts 3.2 to 3.6.Slide5
The effect of s 101A
Where evidence
is relevant to
FII & CRED:
If ADMISSIBLE
for
its FII purpose
↓
Can also be used
for its credibility
purpose
(s 102 does not applyie not caught by the exclusionary rule)OR
If INADMISSIBLE
for its FII purpose
(
eg
due
to hearsay)
↓
The only allowable use
is for credibility
purpose
s 101A means
the
exclusionary rule (s 102)
will
apply
↓
Admissibility will require
an exception to
the credibility ruleSlide6
Exceptions to the exclusionary rule
Evidence that discredits:
a witness during XX:
s 103
an accused during XX: s 104
a witness by adducing evidence to rebut a denial of a credibility impeachment: s 106
by adducing evidence from an expert re credibility: s 108C
Evidence that accredits:a witness/accused in re-ex & prior consistent statements:
s 108by adducing evidence from an expert re credibility: s 108C
Credibility of non-witnesses whose representation has been admitted into evidence:for all people: s 108Afor an accused (in addition to s 108A): s 108BSlide7
s 103 Exception: XX as to credibility
(1) The credibility rule does not apply to evidence adduced in cross-examination of a witness if the evidence
could
substantially
affect the assessment of the credibility of the witness.
(2) Without limiting the matters to which the court may have regard for the purposes of subsection (1), it is to have regard to:
(a) whether the evidence tends to prove that the witness knowingly or recklessly
made a false representation when the witness was under an obligation to tell the truth
; and (b) the period that has elapsed since the acts or events to which the evidence relates were done or occurred.Slide8
s 104 Further protections: XX the accused
(1) Applies in addition to s 103.
(2) Leave is to be sought to XX the defendant on a matter relevant to
cred
(3) Pros
do not need leave if XX goes to whether the defendant:
Is
biased or has a motive for being untruthful, or Is, or was, unable to be aware
of or recall matters to which evid relates, or (c) Has made a prior inconsistent statement.Leave not to be given under (2) unless def presented evidence that:tends to prove that a witness called by the pros has a tendency to be
untruthful; and is relevant solely or mainly to the witness’s credibility. Ref in (4) does not include evidence of conduct in relation to:(a) events relating to the defendant’s prosecution; or(b) the investigation of the matter being prosecuted.(6) Leave not to be given in relation to a co-accused unless: …NB Section 192Slide9
S 106 Exception: rebutting denials with other evidence
(1) The credibility rule
does not apply
to evidence relevant to a witness’s credibility, adduced otherwise than from the witness
if:(a) in XX of the witness:
the
substance of the evidence was put to the witness, & the witness denied
, or did not admit or agree to, the substance of the evidence, &
(b) the court gives leave to adduce the evidence.
(2) Leave under (1)(b) is not required if the evid tends to prove the W: (a) is biased or has a motive for being untruthful, or (b) has been convicted of an offence, (incl foreign country), or (c) has made a prior inconsistent statement, or (d) is, or was,
unable to be aware of matters that his/her evid relates, or has knowingly or recklessly made a false representation while under an obligation, imposed by or under an Australian law or a law of a foreign country, to tell the truth.NB Section 192Slide10
Evidence that Discredits
Evidence relevant (or admissible) only to credibility
↓
The exclusionary rule deems
inadmissible: s 102↓
Admiss if the questions
substantially affect assessment of the W’s cred
: s 103 test
Additional protections (and consequences) for accused: s104
↓Adduce rebuttal evid from another source if W denies etc the content of the assertion: s106Slide11
s 108 Exception: re-establishing credibility
The credibility rule
does not apply
to evidence adduced in re-examination of a witness.
(3) The credibility rule does not apply
to evidence of a prior consistent statement of a witness if:
evidence of a prior inconsistent statement of the witness has been admitted
, or it is or will be suggested (either expressly or by implication) that
evidence given by the witness has been fabricated or re-constructed (whether deliberately or otherwise) or is the result of a suggestion;and the court gives leave to adduce the evidence of the prior consistent statement. NB Section 192Slide12
Evidence that Accredits
Evidence relevant (or admissible) only to credibility
↓
The exclusionary rule deems
inadmissible: s 102↓
During re-examination (RX)
questions relating to credibility permissible: s 108(1)And/or
Prior consistent statements (PCS) (RX or ex-in-chief):
s 108(3)(b)↓PCS admiss
to rebut a PIS or suggestion of lying↓NB Leave required for PCS (s 192)Slide13
In summary
Does the credibility evidence exclusionary rule apply?
Definitions of credibility/credibility evidence:
Dictionary
When the exclusionary rule will apply: ss
101A and 102Does the evidence discredit?
XX a witness: s 103XX of an accused:
s 104Evidence to rebut the denial of a witness during XX: s 106
Evidence from an expert re credibility: s 108CDoes the evidence accredit?
Re-ex & PCS: s 108Evidence from an expert re credibility: s 108CDoes the evidence relate to a rep from a person who has not been called as a witness?All people except the accused: s 108AAdditional protections for an accused: s 108BDoes the adducing of the evidence require an application for leave?Factors for consideration: s 192