/
Transforming Implementation & Improvement Into Science: Transforming Implementation & Improvement Into Science:

Transforming Implementation & Improvement Into Science: - PowerPoint Presentation

kittie-lecroy
kittie-lecroy . @kittie-lecroy
Follow
353 views
Uploaded On 2018-11-03

Transforming Implementation & Improvement Into Science: - PPT Presentation

A skills building series January 25 2018 Engage with CIIS Overview Implementation amp Improvement Sciences Implementation Science Focuses on optimal strategies to promote evidence uptake in realworld ID: 712220

amp implementation improvement study implementation amp study improvement strategies research accii staff intervention acc health strategy measures 2017 evidence

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Transforming Implementation & Improv..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Transforming Implementation & Improvement Into Science: A skills building series

January 25, 2018Slide2

Engage with CIISSlide3

Overview: Implementation & Improvement Sciences

Implementation Science

Focuses on optimal strategies to promote evidence uptake

in real-world

settings

Improvement Science

Focuses on rigorously measuring outcomes associated with efforts to improve care delivery

AddressesDid the new endeavor measurably improve desired outcomes?

AddressesDid stakeholders perform the desired endeavor? Why or why not?How well?

Aims

Translate research intro practice

Systematically implement evidence-based practices

Improve the quality of healthcare Slide4

Overall impactSignificance

Innovation

Approach

Investigator team

Research environment

Identifying High-Quality ProjectsB

road, non-specific to IISCriteria could be operationalized to better describe high-quality IISMain NIH Criteria

Issues Applying NIH Criteria to Implementation & Improvement (IIS)Slide5

Proctor’s 10 Key Ingredients for Implementation Research Proposals

Proctor’s 10 Key Ingredients

NIH Criteria

Quality/care gap

Impact; Significance

Evidence-based treatment

Significance;

Innovation

Conceptual model, theoretical justificationApproach; Innovation

Stakeholder priorities, engagement in change

Impact; Approach; Research Environment

Setting’s readiness to adopt new services

Impact; Approach; Environment

Implementation strategy/process

Impact; Significance; Innovation

Team experience with the setting, treatment, processes

Approach; Investigator Team

Feasibility of proposed research design

Approach; Investigator

Team

Measurement & analysis section

Approach; Investigator TeamPolicy/funding environment; support for sustaining changeImpact; Significance

Source:

Writing Implementation Research Grant Proposals: Ten Key Ingredients. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, Baumann AA, Hamilton AM,

Santerns

RL.

Implementation Science.

2012;7:96.Slide6

Tentative Date

Session Title

Proposal

Areas Addressed

10/25/2017

Identifying Your Implementation & Improvement Sciences Research Question

Quality/Care Gap, Evidence-Based Practice

12/6/2017

Using & Discussing Implementation Science Models

Conceptual Model1/25/2018

Implementation Strategies Versus Study Interventions

Implementation Strategy2/28/2018

Designing an Implementation & Improvement Sciences StudyStudy

Design

3/22/2018

Designing Your Implementation & Improvement Sciences Study

Study Design

[PRACTICE-BASED

SESSION]

4/18/2018

Measuring

Implementation & Improvement

OutcomesOutcomes, Quantitative & Qualitative Methods5/10/2018Engaging with Stakeholders to Conduct Feasible & Meaningful ResearchStakeholder Engagement, Feasibility, Team, Policy Environment

Upcoming SessionsSlide7

Series Goal

Proctor’s 10 Key

Ingredients

CIIS Educational Series

High-Quality

Implementation & Improvement Sciences

Significant Contributions to Improve Care, Advance FieldsSlide8

Differentiate between implementation strategies & intervention componentsDiscuss how to link implementation strategies to study aims, setting, process & outcome measures

Provide examples of how to navigate challenges associated with chosen implementation strategies

Implementation Strategies vs. InterventionsSlide9

Megan McCullough, PhD

Implementation Strategies vs. Study Interventions

Research Health Scientist

Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research (CHOIR)

ENRM Veterans HospitalSlide10

The views expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the

Department

of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government.

VA DisclaimerSlide11

Interventions with proven efficacy and effectiveness at improving health behaviors, health outcomes, or health-related environmentsIntervention could include programs, practices, policies

&

guidelines

What is an Evidence-Based Intervention?

Rabin, B. A.,

Brownson

, R. C., Haire-Joshu, D., Kreuter, M. W., & Weaver, N. L. (2008). A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. 

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(2), 117-123.; Brown CH, Curran G,

Palinkas LA, Aarons GA< Wells KB, Jones L., et al. An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annu Rev Public Health,. 2017; 38:1-22Slide12

Implementation research: scientific

study of the use of

strategies

to adopt & integrate evidence-based health interventions into clinical and community settings in order to improve patient/population

outcomes

Implementation Research/Strategies

Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation Strategies: Recommendations for Specifying and Reporting.

Implementation Science. 2013;1(8):139.; Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman

B. Implementation Research in Mental Health Services: An Emerging Science with Conceptual, Methodological, and Training challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2009;36(1):24-34. doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4.“Methods or techniques used to enhance adoption, implementation, & sustainability of a clinical program or practice” (Proctor et al., 2013)

(Proctor et al., 2009)Slide13

Recommendations for Specifying & Reporting

Name the strategy

Define the strategy

Specify the strategy

The actor (who enacts the strategy)

The action (use active verb statement to specify the specific actions, steps, or processes that need to be enacted)

Action target

(specify

targets and identify units of analysis)

Temporality (when the strategy is used)

Dosage

Implementation outcome affected

Justification

Proctor EK, Powell BJ,

McMillen

JC. Implementation Strategies: Recommendations for Specifying and Reporting. Implementation

Sicence

. 2013;1(8):139.Slide14

Thoughts?Discussion?

Questions?Slide15

Hybrid Study Type 2

Operationalizing an Example:

The Anticoagulation Clinic Improvement Initiative (ACCII)Slide16

Use evidence-based dosing algorithmAlgorithm linked to improve percent time in therapeutic range (TTR)Higher TTR = improved patient outcomes

Use a dashboard to measure site-level TTR & related process measures

Utilize improvement approaches to increase standardization across facilities

Appoint an ACC Coordinators (internal facilitators) from each site to facilitate change

ACCII Study: OverviewSlide17

Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) Framework

Facilitation:

Concerned with enabling

&

supporting the implementation of an intervention through deployment of EF

& IF

Evidence:

Stakeholder’s perception of validity of intervention & EBP algorithm

Context:

Environment where ACCII is

introduced:

m

ay

be more or less receptive to change

ImplementationSlide18

Develop a formal implementation blueprint

Assess for readiness

Blended facilitation (focus today)

Stakeholder engagement

Plan Do Study Act

(PDSA) cycles

Educational outreach visitsACCII Study: Bundle of Implementation Strategies Local needs assessment

Ongoing training Create a learning collaborative Inform local opinion leadersOngoing consultation

Tailor strategiesVisit other sitesHow we got the intervention implemented (Powell et al., 2015)

Powell BJ, Walz

TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, Proctor EK, Kircher

JE. A Refined Compilation of Implementation Strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Project. Implementation Science. 2015;10:21.Slide19

ACCII Study

: MethodsSlide20

Year

# Main Study Interviews

# Internal

Facilitator

Interviews

# External

Facilitator

Interviews

16711

2

6312

3

6712

5

4

57

12

Total

254

47

5

ACCII Study

: ParticipantsSlide21

Exploration of intervention & strategy togetherACCII example: blended facilitation

ACCII

Study: Intervention & StrategySlide22

Organize face-to-face meeting quarterly for ACC coordinators Introduced ACC coordinators to:

LEAN

Process mapping

PDSAs & other quality improvement skills

I

mplementation strategies Work 1:1 with ACC coordinatorsAudit & feedback for ACC coordinatorsACCII Study: External Facilitation Strategies

Facilitate bi-monthly calls for ACC coordinatorsFacilitate ACC journal clubAnnual site visits with focused improvement workEnlist stakeholders to support ACCIIDraft policy documents & shepherd policy proposals through committees for approvalSlide23

Organize face-to-face meeting quarterly to learn:Quality improvement approachesProcess mapping & evaluation

Group activities to standardize & centralize

Twice

monthly ACC Coordinator’s calls

ACCII Study

: Internal Facilitation Strategies

Work 1:1 with external facilitation staffSite visit to Portland, OR to visit top performing VA ACCFacilitating implementation of ACCII at home siteServing as resource/support for frontline staff during ACCIISlide24

What are the challenges? How have you measured these in your projects?

ACCII Study

: Implementation OutcomesSlide25

ACCII Study: Uptake of Intervention

Uptake of Intervention

Clinical Intervention

Uptake

Levels

High

Medium

Low

ACC Dosing Algorithm

Algorithm is implemented & used a

high percentage of the time by all staff

Algorithm is inconsistently used among staff

Algorithm is rarely used among all staff

Dashboard

Dashboard is used not only to measure performance, but as a tool for targeting patients needing

more attention

Most or all staff increasing use of dashboard

Dashboard is used to measure performance & only 1-2

features used inconsistently as a tool

Often only select staff use the dashboard with little or no general usage

Dashboard

used rarely to measure performance & rarely or not at all as a tool

Little to no general usage & little or no select staff usageTime in Therapeutic Range (TTR)TTR improvesTTR shows some improvement

TTR shows little improvement

McCullough MB, Gillespie C, Petrakis BA, Jones, EA, Park AM, Lukas CVD, Rose AJ. Forming and Activating an Internal Facilitation Group for Successful Implementation: A Qualitative Study.

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy.

2017:1-14.Slide26

ACCII Study: Uptake of Intervention

Implementation

Outcomes

Participation in Activities:

Uptake

Levels

High

Medium

Low

ACC Coordinators

IF Group

Site regularly sends appropriate IF to participate

Site

inconsistently sends IF to participate

Site rarely or never sends IF to participate

Journal Club (IF,

staff

)

Staff regularly participate & contribute

Staff unevenly

participate & contribute

Staff rarely or never participate &

contributePDSA cycles related to ACC improvement led by IFIF has staff regularly participateIF has staff inconsistently participate

IF has staff rarely participate

IF facilitates feedback from frontline staff to EF on implementation work

IF regularly elicits feedback

IF inconsistently elicit

s feedback

IF rarely participate

Site seeks out &/or accepts assistance by EF ACC Improvement Team

IF & site reach out for assistance & remain in contact with EFs

IF & site unevenly reach out for

assistance from EFs

IF & site do not reach out for assistance, does not respond to EFs offers of assistance

McCullough MB, Gillespie C, Petrakis BA, Jones, EA, Park AM, Lukas CVD, Rose AJ. Forming and Activating an Internal Facilitation Group for Successful Implementation: A Qualitative Study.

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy.

2017:1-14.Slide27

Thoughts?Discussion on importance of outcome measures

ACCII Study

: Outcome MeasuresSlide28

ACCII Study: Outcome Measures

Rose AJ, Park A, Gillespie C, Lukas CVD,

Ozonoff

A et al. Results of a Regional Effort to Improve Warfarin Management. Annals of Pharmacology. 2017.Slide29

ACCII Study: Outcome Measures

Rose AJ, Park A, Gillespie C, Lukas CVD,

Ozonoff

A et al. Results of a Regional Effort to Improve Warfarin Management. Annals of Pharmacology. 2017.Slide30

ACCII Study: Outcome Measures

Abbreviations:

TTR: Time in Therapeutic Range

VISN: Veterans Integrated Service Network

Rose AJ, Park A, Gillespie C, Lukas CVD,

Ozonoff

A et al. Results of a Regional Effort to Improve Warfarin Management. Annals of Pharmacology. 2017.Slide31

Sites with greater improvement were distinguished by 3 factors:

ACCII Study

: Overall Results for Blended FacilitationSlide32

Blended facilitation can serve as an effective implementation strategy

Findings can help guide researchers who seek to incorporate internal facilitator groups as part of their implementation

strategies

Contributes to a growing literature regarding which implementation strategies work best and under what

circumstances

ACCII Study

: ImplicationsSlide33

Key TakeawaysSlide34

What is your evidence-based intervention?

Framework

&

study design?

What strategies would you use to get the intervention into practice?

How do you determine an intervention versus a strategy?

Tell Me About Your ProjectsWhat are the measures?Outcome measures?Implementation measures?Where do you get stuck? What is a puzzle here that is hard to sort out and solve?Slide35
Slide36
Slide37

Tentative Date

Session Title

Proposal

Areas Addressed

10/25/2017

Identifying Your Implementation & Improvement Sciences Research Question

Quality/Care Gap, Evidence-Based Practice

12/6/2017

Using & Discussing Implementation Science Models

Conceptual Model1/25/2018

Implementation Strategies Versus Study Interventions

Implementation Strategy

2/28/2018Designing an Implementation & Improvement Sciences Study

Study Design

3/22/2018

Designing Your Implementation & Improvement Sciences Study

Study Design

[PRACTICE-BASED

SESSION]

4/18/2018

Measuring

Implementation & Improvement

OutcomesOutcomes, Quantitative & Qualitative Methods5/10/2018Engaging with Stakeholders to Conduct Feasible & Meaningful ResearchStakeholder Engagement, Feasibility, Team, Policy Environment

Upcoming SessionsSlide38

Contact

CIIS

Website

:

http://sites.bu.edu/ciis/

Email: ciisinfo@bu.eduThank You!