/
The Great Debate on Tolls & PPPs The Great Debate on Tolls & PPPs

The Great Debate on Tolls & PPPs - PowerPoint Presentation

luanne-stotts
luanne-stotts . @luanne-stotts
Follow
389 views
Uploaded On 2018-01-10

The Great Debate on Tolls & PPPs - PPT Presentation

CON Position By Greg Cohen American Highway Users Alliance ADC Conference Denver September 19 2014 Background The HwyUsers Alliance is proud to be a sponsoring organization of ADC Great issue for this group ID: 622206

toll tolls users amp tolls toll amp users tolling road oppose lanes diversion highway public interstate tax fed projects

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Great Debate on Tolls & PPPs" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

The Great Debate on Tolls & PPPs

“CON” Position

By Greg Cohen

American Highway Users Alliance

ADC Conference – Denver

September 19, 2014Slide2

Background

The HwyUsers Alliance is proud to be a sponsoring organization of ADC

Great issue for this group!

Not a partisan issue

Quick points of philosophical agreement:

We both support more freedom of mobility

We both oppose waste and bureaucratic excessSlide3

Limit Tolling

While some tolling and PPPs can add value to users, there are many temptation to fleece us

By limiting the types of tolling projects there is a better chance of good outcomes:

Building new roads (more quickly too)

Adding tolled express lanes

Converting underutilized HOV lanes to HOT lanes

Even in these cases, road users must be protected!

No non-compete agreements or similar arrangements.Slide4

Differences of Opinion

Oppose the conversion of existing free lanes

Oppose “long-term” leases for lump upfront cash (both public and private)

On diversion:

D

on’t trust toll operators more than tax collectors

Tolls are more regressive than fuel taxes

Safety impacts from diverted truck traffic are a cost

Enviro

. groups like EDF love pricing as a means to do social engineering & oppose physical capacity

Oppose “balkanization” of the StatesSlide5

A little history

98 years ago: Fed. Aid Hwy Act of 1916 creates Fed-State partnership to fund the national connected highway network. Tolls banned if federal funds used.

1927 – Relaxed ban on bridges but tolls had to be lifted once bridge bonds are paid.

1956 – Grandfathered toll roads onto Interstate System routes

1987 – Program to permit tolls on non-Interstate routes

receving

fed-aid. Slide6

Recent history

1998 – Pilot program for up to three Interstate routes to convert to tolls (no diversion / last resort for funding)

2012 – MAP21 permits unlimited tolling of new capacity only.

2014 – Obama Administration proposes allowing tolls anywhere on the Interstates, and

permiting

diversion of the tolls to transitSlide7

Highway Robbery

Yesterday, The HwyUsers entered an Amicus Brief in support of the users of the Dulles Toll Road

Cato & the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association joined the brief

A long-term concession agreement between VDOT & MWAA left toll road users with a 466% increase in tolls since 2005.

The tolls were continually raised to pay for rail to the airport. Road users have no ability outside the courts to effectively fight the toll increases.Slide8

Diversion of tolls is not confined to this

i

solated

c

ase

PANY&NJ divert tolls for PATH trains and the WTC

Since Robert Moses left, the

Triborough

Bridge and Tunnel Authority under MTA diverts its revenue to the New York Subway

A few miles of I-95 in Delaware pays for much of the State government on the backs of motorists.Slide9

Under Obama’s Plan “Bad” toll projects just as likely to be the norm as “Good” toll projects

Examining recent tolling attempts on the I.H.S.

I-80 in Pennsylvania

I-95 in North Carolina & Virginia

I-90 in Washington State

NJ 440 into Staten Island (combined with concession agreement on GS Pkwy & NJ

Tpke

)Slide10

Why it’s so Easy for Good Toll Ideas to Go Bad:

Crony capitalism:

Monopolies, whether public or private, are NOT market based.

Public officials who are weak & afraid

Don’t tax me, tax the guy behind the tree!

Windfall revenues from long-term leases

Less opportunity for taxpayers to question rates, particularly under a concession.

Some toll authorities keep their books closed to the public and their mischief can’t be uncovered.

Tolls can be used for social engineering.

Tolls harm a captive population of road users.Slide11

Conclusions

No system is perfect

Taxes are diverted.

Tolls are diverted too.

The Obama plan to allow tolling of any or all Interstates creates dangers for motorists.

Federal program must be reformed to restore the trust in the Highway Trust Fund and taxes must be adjusted to deal with needs, inflation, and increased fuel economy.

In the limited cases where toll and PPP plans add more value to motorists, Congress must still maintain its constitutional duty to regulate interstate commerce and taxpayers must still have means to address grievances. Slide12

THANK YOU

Contact Greg Cohen @ gregcohen@highways.org