Results of Sample Survey for MBA Syllabus Revision 2014 By Prof MK SRIDHAR Director CBSMS Prof BS Vasuki Prof KM Nagendra Respondents Profile Gender Male 70 Female 30 ID: 479830
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Interim Report on" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Interim Report on Results of Sample Survey for MBA Syllabus Revision - 2014
By
:
Prof. M.K. SRIDHAR, Director, CBSMS
Prof. B.S.
Vasuki
Prof. K.M. NagendraSlide2
Respondents' Profile
Gender
Male
70%Female30%
Status & Number (Total
=769)
Student
350
Alumni
65
Teacher/Faculty
192
Employed
98
Freelancer
64Slide3
Age
Group (Yrs.)
<20
121-255126-30
18
31-35
11
36-40
6
41-50
8
51-60
3
>60=13
2
Average Age=29 YearsSlide4
Major Positive Aspects(%age of Respondents)
ASPECT
OverallStudentAlumniFaculty
Employed
Freelancer
Good Subjects
22
16
12
34
14
27
Knowledge oriented
19
27
6
20
5
13
Dual Specialization
14
8
22
15
11
16
Easy Syllabus
12
11
8
8
7
16
Communication skill
9
19
3
6
5
2
Enhanced Knowledge & Skill
8
18
5
1
8
8Slide5
Major Negative Aspects (%age of Respondents)
Overall
StudentAlumniFaculty
Employed
Freelancer
Lack of
Practical
Exposure
21
20
31
13
7
8
More
Theoretical
14
19
11
26
16
33
Not Industry Integrated
14
6
18
26
15
3
Outdated Syllabus
8
7
14
10
7
13
Vast Syllabus
11
12
9
13
5
25Slide6
Major Expectations (%age of Respondents)
Overall
StudentAlumniFaculty
Employed
Freelancer
Case Study Oriented Teaching
9
7
8
12
7
13
Industry Orientation
18
12
31
21
12
13
More Peiod for Internship
8
7
9
13
4
16
Practical Subjects Related To Corporate Practices
26
25
40
33
17
22
Syllabus Must Be As Per Industry Requirements
28
33
29
32
13
16Slide7
Current Perception
Statement
StudentsAlumniFacultyIndl. Working
Entrepreneur
Overall
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
Present MBA graduates are equipped with problem solving skills
4
4
3
4
3
2
3
4
3
4
3
4
Present MBA graduates are not as innovative as expected to be
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
MBA graduates possess good subject knowledge
4
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
3
4
MBA graduates are jack of all, but master of none
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
MBA graduates are value driven and sensitive to ethical issues
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
In future, Management Education must be application oriented
4
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
In future, Management Education must not be skill based
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
1
In future, Management Education must develop profound subject knowledge in few areas
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
In future, Management Education must not necessarily develop knowledge of business organizations
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
2
2
1
In future, Management Education must lay emphasis on values and ethics
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
4
5
5=StronglyAgree; 4=Agree; 3=Can’t say; 2=Disagree; 1=Strongly Disagree
Slide8
Current Perception About MBA
Overall
MeanMode%age
Present MBA graduates are equipped with problem solving skills
3
4
43
Present MBA graduates are not as innovative as expected to be
3
4
46
MBA graduates possess good subject knowledge
3
4
50
MBA graduates are jack of all, but master of none
3
4
37
MBA graduates are value driven and sensitive to ethical issues
3
4
42
In future, Management Education must be application oriented
4
5
85
In future, Management Education must not be skill based
2
1
61
In future, Management Education must develop profound subject knowledge in few areas
4
4
50
In future, Management Education must not necessarily develop knowledge of business organizations
2
1
53
In future, Management Education must lay emphasis on values and ethics
4
5
86
5=
StronglyAgree
; 4=Agree; 3=Can’t say; 2=Disagree; 1=Strongly DisagreeSlide9
Approach For Specialization
Students
AlumniFacultyEmployed
Freelancer
Overall
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
Dual Specialization, Different Weightage
78
22
12
18
35
18
20
20
22
34
166
22
Dual Specialization,
Equal
Weightage
199
57
34
52
73
38
44
45
25
39
376
49
Single specialization
70
20
18
28
81
42
31
32
17
27
217
28Slide10
Basis for Specialization
Students
AlumniFacultyEmployed
Freelancer
Overall
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
Both Function and Sector Based
252
72
42
65
107
56
60
61
45
70
506
66
Function Based
50
14
16
25
60
31
28
29
13
20
168
22
Sector Based
46
13
5
8
23
12
8
8
3
5
85
11Slide11
Weightage To Be Given To Various Types Of Courses In Each Of The Four Semesters
Overall
MeanMode%age of Res
Found_Sem1
45
40
17
Applied_Sem1
34
20
26
Special1_Sem1
18
20
19
Special2_Sem1
15
10
12
Found_Sem2
28
20
20
Applied_Sem2
33
30
21
Special1_Sem2
21
20
14
Special2_Sem2
24
30
24
Found_Sem3
13
0
26
Applied_Sem3
17
0
24
Special1_Sem3
32
30
24
Special2_Sem3
33
40
10
Found_Sem4
13
0
34
Applied_Sem4
16
0
26
Special1_Sem4
27
30
15
Special2_Sem4
31
40
18Slide12
“Yes” for Credit System
Overall
StudentAlumniFacultyEmployed
Freelancer
%age "Yes"
32
27
38
34
38
45Slide13
For Question No. 18, 19 & 20, Semester-wise Clear Subject Titles Can Not be arrived at, as the Responses were mostly repetition of the Existing Subjects Jumbled across different semesters.Hence they require thorough study by a core committeeSlide14
Approach Towards Projects
Count
%ageOnly internship in organization32442
Only dissertation in specific organization and/or freelance
255
33
Both internship in organization and dissertation in specific organization and/or freelance
42
5
Semester end projects
229
30
MBA end projects
198
26
Any other approach, write
35
5Slide15
Student
Alumni
FacultyEmployedFreelancer
Overall
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
Mean
Mode
%age
Weight_Sem1
23
25
22
25
23
25
22
25
2225232550Weight_Sem223252125242522252225232552Weight_Sem324252325252523252425242552Weight_Sem425252225262522252425242551
Weightage To Be Given To
Internal Assessment (%respondents)Slide16
Students
Alumni
FacultyEmployedFreelancer
Overall
Mean
%age
Mean
%age
Mean
%age
Mean
%age
Mean
%age
Mean
%age
Weight_Int_Test
19
95
20
92
21
93
14
95
17
911893Weight_Assignment149413921394119213881392Weight_Mini138015831685158215801582Weight_Ind138411831074117312801179Weight_Social10631162
10
5710589581060Weight_Attendance138812921489108814801387Weight_Quiz10651058963960955960Weight_Foreign1046115193886311331046Weight_Bplan147116711567148115781573Weight_Other141511111519101913271318
General Scheme For
Internal Assessment (%respondents)Slide17
Grading System (CGPA)
Stakeholder
"Yes" %age
Student54Alumni55
Faculty
48
Employed
37
Freelancer
52Slide18
Structure Of University Question Paper (%respondent)
Students
AlumniFacultyEmployed
Freelancer
Overall
Mean
Mode
%age
Mean
Mode
%age
Mean
Mode
%age
Mean
Mode
%age
Mean
Mode
%age
Mean
Mode
%age
Short
Answer
192092161092161089141082172084161088Analytical243093263089283094283084242091263090Essay21208922209424308425
20
82222081232086Case Study202091232092222092202084232088222089M. Choice1607618069140631707319107517071Slide19
About Evening MBA
Recommendation
%age
Good and Useful for Working People32.5To be Application and Industry Oriented12.5Slide20
Thank You All