/
New Targets and New Treatments in Melanoma New Targets and New Treatments in Melanoma

New Targets and New Treatments in Melanoma - PowerPoint Presentation

min-jolicoeur
min-jolicoeur . @min-jolicoeur
Follow
461 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-29

New Targets and New Treatments in Melanoma - PPT Presentation

Brendan D Curti MD Director Melanoma Program Director Biotherapy Program Providence Cancer Center Earle A Chiles Research Institute Disclaimers Earle A Chiles Research Institute accepted grants of ID: 340562

year melanoma resistance ipilimumab melanoma year ipilimumab resistance braf patients cell survival patient gp100 metastatic response rate 2010 shows

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "New Targets and New Treatments in Melano..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

New Targets and New Treatments in Melanoma

Brendan D. Curti, MD

Director, Melanoma Program

Director Biotherapy Program

Providence Cancer Center

Earle A. Chiles Research InstituteSlide2

Disclaimers

Earle A. Chiles Research Institute accepted grants of

from BMS,

Medarex

, and Roche to cover costs of clinical trials.

I am neither employed nor do I have equity in any company or entity whose products/drugs will be discussed

today.

Research Support: NIH, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Safeway Foundation,

Kuni

Foundation, Prometheus Pharmaceuticals

Speakers Bureau: Genentech,

Prometheus

Advisory Board: BMS, PrometheusSlide3

Melanoma Statistics

More than

 

70,000

people in the United States will get melanoma

2011

.

About

8,800 patients die

per year

from melanoma.

During the 1970s, the rate of new cases of melanoma each year increased at about 6% per year. Since the 1980s, the rate of increase has slowed to a little less than 3% per year.

Melanoma is more often found in whites who are about 10X more likely to develop melanoma than African Americans.

Men are slightly more likely than women to have melanoma.

Melanoma rates are highest in older people, but occur

in

all ages. In fact, melanoma is one of the most common cancers in people under age 30. Slide4

Balch, C. M. et al. J

Clin

Oncol

; 27:6199-6206 2009

Survival

curves from the

AJCC

Melanoma Staging

DatabaseSlide5

Balch, C. M. et al. J

Clin

Oncol

; 27:6199-6206 2009

Survival of

7,635 patients with metastatic melanomas

(

stage IV)

by

(A) the site of metastatic disease and (B) serum

(

LDH) levelsSlide6

TREATING METASTATIC MELANOMA

The Long Dark Tunnel

No documented improvement in survival over the past 30 years

No new FDA-approved drugs for melanoma from 1992 until 2011.

Until this year, first

-line therapy of questionable

value

over supportive care, no established second-line therapy at all, no proven value of combination regimens

Treatment of choice is a clinical trial

Vern Sondak ASCO 2010Slide7

TREATING METASTATIC MELANOMA

Not Just Bad, Consistently Bad

Korn et al.

J Clin Oncol

2008;26:527-534

DECADE TRIAL PERFORMED

1

st

LINE VS PRETREATED

PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL ON COOPERATIVE GROUP PHASE II TRIALS BY DECADE AND PRETREATMENT ALLOWEDSlide8

MHC-I/II TCR

4-1BBL

B7-DC/PD-L2

OX40

B7-2(CD86)

OX40L

4-1BB

PD-1

Antigen

Presenting Cell

T Cell

CTLA-4

-

+

B7-H1/PD-L1

+

TNFR family

TNF family

B7 family

CD28

family

Adapted from:

Melero

et al.

Nature Rev Cancer

. 2007;7:95.

Targets of novel

immunotherapySlide9

CTLA-4: The Brake on T-Cell Activation

CTLA-4 B7

Vaccine?

CD28 B7

T-cell receptor: antigen/MHC

IL-2Slide10

Original Article

Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

F.

Stephen Hodi, M.D., Steven J. O'Day, M.D., David F. McDermott, M.D., Robert W. Weber, M.D., Jeffrey A. Sosman, M.D., John B.

Haanen

, M.D., Rene Gonzalez, M.D., Caroline Robert, M.D., Ph.D., Dirk Schadendorf, M.D., Jessica C. Hassel, M.D., Wallace

Akerley

, M.D.,

Alfons

J.M. van den

Eertwegh

, M.D., Ph.D., Jose Lutzky, M.D., Paul Lorigan, M.D., Julia M.

Vaubel

, M.D., Gerald P.

Linette

, M.D., Ph.D., David Hogg, M.D., Christian H.

Ottensmeier

, M.D., Ph.D., Celeste

Lebbé

, M.D., Christian

Peschel

, M.D., Ian Quirt, M.D., Joseph I. Clark, M.D., Jedd D. Wolchok, M.D., Ph.D., Jeffrey S. Weber, M.D., Ph.D., Jason

Tian

, Ph.D., Michael J. Yellin, M.D., Geoffrey M. Nichol, M.B., Ch.B., Axel Hoos, M.D., Ph.D., and

Walter J. Urba, M.D., Ph.D.

N

Engl

J Med

Volume 363(8):711-723

August 19, 2010Slide11

MDX-020: Study Design

R

A

N

D

O

M

I

Z

E

Pre-treated

Metastatic

Melanoma

(N=676)

(N=137)

(N=136)

(N=403)

gp100

+ placebo

Ipilimumab

+ placebo

Ipilimumab

+ gp100Slide12

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Survival

Ipi + gp100 (A)

Ipi alone (B)

gp100 alone (C)

1

2

3

4

Years

Survival Rate

Ipi + gp100

N=403

Ipi + pbo

N=137

gp100 + pbo N=136

1 year

44%

46%

25%

2 year

22%

24%

14%Slide13

Ipilimumab Improves Best Objective Response Rate (BORR)

Arm A

Ipi + gp100

N=403

Arm B

Ipi + pbo

N=137

Arm C

gp100 + pbo

N=136

BORR, %

5.7

10.9

1.5

P-value: A vs C

0.0433

P-value: B vs C

0.0012

DCR

, %

20.1

28.5

11.0

P-value: A vs C

0.0179

P-value: B vs C

0.0002

‡: Disease control rate: percentage of patients with CR, PR, or SD Slide14

Ipilimumab

and DTIC

versus DTIC (+ placebo)Slide15
Slide16

CTLA-4 Immunotherapy: Toxicity = Immune Response-related Adverse Event (IRAE)

Most common IRAEs

Rash

Diarrhea (colitis)

Endocrinopathies

Hepatitis

IRAEs are almost always reversible and manageable with steroids

Toxicity does not always equal response, but there does appear to be an association

Weber, 2007.Slide17

Dermatologic IRAEs

Image courtesy of Jeffrey S. Weber, MD, PhD.Slide18

Robinson et al, 2004;

Phan

et al, 2003.

Ipilimumab

-Induced

Colitis and

IritisSlide19

6/30/04 Baseline

(4.5 mm)

12/3/04 Headache/fatigue after 5 doses

(

10.8 mm)

Ipilimumab-Related Pituitary Swelling and Dysfunction

Blansfield

et al, 2005.Slide20

Beck et al, 2006.

IRAE Management

Patient education for early recognition of IRAEs

Aggressive work-up and management for moderate/severe events

Non-specific complaints may reflect endocrine (e.g.:, pituitary) toxicity

Established therapies (e.g.:, corticosteroids) are effective

Dexamethasone

: 4 mg IV q6hrs x 7 days followed by 17 days taper. If ineffective then

infliximab

5 mg IV x 1.

Algorithms established for work-up, treatment, and reporting of

IRAEs

Patient wallet card and/or medical ID braceletSlide21

Conclusions- Ipilimumab

Ipilimumab represents a new class of T-cell

potentiators

and a breakthrough for the field of immunotherapy

Further development of ipilimumab is ongoing

Treatment of a variety of cancer types

Alternative combination regimens

Refinements in dose and schedule

Approved by the FDA on March 25, 2011

Price for 4 doses = ~$120,000Slide22

Targeted TherapySlide23

Hocker

, et al. 2008 The Society for Investigative DermatologySlide24

BRAF mutation location (by amino acid position and substitution)

% of all BRAF mutations

V600E

97.3%

V600K

1.0%

K601E*

0.4%

G469A*

0.4%

D594G*

0.3%

V600R

0.3%

L597V*

0.2%

*Indicates most common amino substitution, but % represents all amino acid changes reported at that position

Relative frequency of BRAF mutationsSlide25

Distribution of BRAF/NRAS/c-kit mutations

by primary site

Curtin J et al. JCO 2006; 24: 4340 Slide26
Slide27

Representative Findings of the Effect of PLX4032

in Patients

with Melanoma That Carried the V600E

BRAF Mutation

Flaherty KT et al. N

Engl

J Med 2010;363:809-819Slide28

Antitumor Response in Each of the 32 Patients in the Extension Cohort

Flaherty KT et al. N

Engl

J Med 2010;363:809-819Slide29
Slide30
Slide31

BRAF and

Vemurafenib

:

Conclusions

Approximately 50% of melanomas contain an activating mutation in BRAF:

glutamic

acid for

valine

at amino acid 600 (the V600E mutation).

Side effects included rash,

arthralgia

, fatigue, and

keratoacanthoma

.

Treatment of patients with V600E BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma with PLX4032 resulted in complete or partial

tumor

regression in the majority of patients.

Remissions do not appear to be durable.

Approved by the FDA on 8/16/2011

Bargain price: $9800 per month ($117,600 per year)Slide32

Patient 1

76 year old grandmother diagnosed in 2002 years with TXN3M0 (stage 3) melanoma of left neck s/p RLND

2004: Left axillary LN recurrence, 24/28 + on axillary dissection

May 2010: New onset dyspnea. Found to large left pleural effusion, bulky chest and abdominal adenopathy. Biopsy confirms melanoma. ECOG 2 (on a good day)

What would you do? Slide33

PLX4032 vs DTIC (BRIM3)

Patient has had 16

squamous

cell cancers

resected

in 6 monthsSlide34

Patient 251 year old salesman with T2bN1M0 melanoma on back in 2005. S/P WLE, SLN and CLND. One year “Kirkwood” IFN.

Surveillance CT shows new mediastinal and hilar adenopathy, new SQ nodule.

What would you do?Slide35

PLX4032 vs DTIC (BRIM3)

Assigned to DTIC,

PR after

after 6

cycles, then PD, now responding to IL-2Slide36

Patient 364 year old dentist, presents with acute abdominal pain. CT shows liver mets and adrenal tumors. Additional staging shows lung, LN, adrenal mets. LDH 8000. Biopsy confirms melanoma, PS 2 (and sliding rapidly).

What would you do?Slide37

Before

After

Pt 11 – Melanoma

CT PR

PET CRSlide38

Patient 456 year old woman presents with cough. Imaging shows mediastinal lymph nodes. Biopsy shows melanoma.

IL-2: Mixed response. RT to progressing lesion. 6 months later, new SQ, lung and LN disease. SQ nodule harvested for autologous vaccine.

What would you do? Slide39

IpilimumabSlide40

Questions for the future:

How excited should we be with PFS of 6 – 8 months with targeted therapies (despite the high initial response rate)?

How do we sequence “targeted” therapies?

We have entered the age of personalized medicine to characterize targets for melanoma treatment. Do we need to enter the age of personalized mechanisms of resistance? (and include physiologic, immunologic and other mechanisms of resistance)

If BRAF resistance can (in part) be overcome with MEK inhibition, and MEK resistance can be overcome with WNT inhibition (at least in vitro), what will we need for WNT resistance?

A melanoma “wiring diagram” was shown at a recent meeting with 35 nodes (connections). If we assume that there are 2 interactions from each node, and each interaction represents a path of resistance (or a path of recovery if you take the perspective of a melanoma cell), then there are 2

35

(= 3.4

x

1010) potential resistance pathways. How easy will it be to address address these several pathways of resistance in an individual? (and even if my estimate is wrong by 99.999999999%, there are 34 resistance pathways to manage).