with the Public and the Media Clarisse Hart Harvard Forest Outreach amp Education Manager Pop quiz Question 1 According to a 2006 survey what percentage of Americans say scientists are people of very great or considerable prestige ID: 301962
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Talking Global Change" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Talking Global Changewith the Public and the Media
Clarisse Hart
Harvard Forest Outreach
& Education ManagerSlide2Slide3
Pop quiz! Question 1According to a 2006 survey, what percentage of Americans say scientists are people of “very great” or “considerable” prestige?
a) 24 %
b) 46 %
c) 63 %
d) 87 %
The highest of any job category
included in the survey.Slide4
Pop quiz! Question 2What percentage of Massachusetts residents are able to name a nearby institution engaged in research?
a) 20 %
b) 40 %
c) 60 %
d) 80 %
And only 26% of them are
able
to name a living scientist.
While 85% of the members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science say
public ignorance of science is a “major problem,”
only 3% of those scientists say they “often” speak to the media.Slide5
Barriers to getting good scientific information to the publicDecline of space and staff for science reportingProliferation of dubiously rigorous blogs and online news sourcesThe problem of objectivity“Fair and balanced” reporting can lead to an overweighting of dissent
Lack of public interest?Slide6
Beliefs and AttitudesSlide7
Beliefs and AttitudesSlide8
Beliefs and AttitudesSlide9
What do we know, and how do we know it?Slide10
What do we know, and how do we know it?Slide11Slide12
What do we know, and how do we know it?Slide13
What do we know, and how do we know it?Slide14
Apples and Oranges?The public may see scientists as
BoringHair-splittingCaveating things to death
Unable to articulate a bottom lineUnintelligibly jargon-y speakers
Scientists may see the public as
Unconcerned with accuracySuperficialSensationalistFocused on controversyIgnorantSlide15
Consider Your AudienceSlide16
Talking to policymakers:What makes voters vote?
“The Language of Conservation”: The Nature Conservancy and The Trust for Public Land, 2004Slide17
Talking to the media:What makes news news?
Extent (broad impact)Intensity (deeply felt)
Consequence (major repercussions)NoveltyEminence or celebrityProximity (local angle)Timeliness (first scoops)
CurrencySlide18
Practice your elevator speechAnswer the 5 W’s & the H.Don’t be too generic in your description -- what makes your project unique?
Avoid jargon, acronyms, and abbreviations (use ‘headline words’ – DNA is a headline word; RNA is not).Tell a story! Bring the 5 senses to your work – what methods or equipment are you using, what environments are you working in?Mention small- and large-scale implications for the general public
.ACTIVITY: Check out the examples below; discuss what works and what doesn’t – then try it out yourself!
Michio
Kaku, theoretical physicistAlan Sage, plant physiologistKatharine Hayhoe, climate scientistCaryn Babaian, high school teacherShaundra Daily
, computer scientist
Allan Adams
, theoretical physicist
Emily Whiting
, architectural engineer
Andre Fenton
, neurobiologist
Dave
Sulzer
, neuroscientistSlide19
“The hardest thing for me to remember when talking to a reporter is to go in with three main points and then not ramble around/go off point. It really dilutes the message and you also get crazy quotes attributed to you!” ~A Harvard Forest researcher
Media MessagingSlide20
New England Maple Trees Under Asian Longhorned Beetle Attack. The Post Chronicle.Threat from Asian beetle expands beyond cities. The Boston Globe.Are New England's Iconic Maples at Risk?
The National Science Foundation. Trees Showing Resilience to Beetles. Worcester Telegram & Gazette
.Editorial - Holding ground: Beetle vs. tree goes to OT. Worcester Telegram and Gazette
.
Media MessagingA cautionary taleSlide21
Break into pairs; one will be a reporter, the other a scientist. The “reporter” will receive a slip of paper (keep it hidden!) noting whether they are supposed to stay “on message” or try to guide the conversation to a different/revised message.Both parties spend ~15 minutes reading a scientific article about global change (focus especially on the abstract and discussion/conclusions).Orwig, D. A., Thompson, J. R., Povak, N. A., Manner, M.,
Niebyl, D., Foster, D. R. 2012. A foundation tree at the precipice
. Ecosphere.Oswald, W. W., Foster, D. R. 2011. Middle-Holocene dynamics of
Tsuga canadensis (eastern hemlock) in northern New England
. The Holocene.Stinson, K. A., Brophy, C., Connolly, J. 2011. Catching up on global change: new ragweed genotypes emerge in elevated CO2 conditions. Ecosphere.The “scientist” identifies 3 key messages they want to get across during a 10-minute interview.After the interview, the “reporter” presents back to the group the key messages s/he worked out. The “scientist” responds about the process.Media Messaging: Activity
HF
examplesSlide22
Discuss types and examples of leads in science writing (see “Leads” handout).Pass around a stack of magazines and newspapers; ask students to identify and share the 1 or 2 leads that most strike them. What type(s) of leads are they?Watch The Island President trailer – a different way to think about packaging a climate change message. It’s like a big “focus on a person” lead!
Ask students to write and share their own lead for a story about the scientific paper they worked with in the Media Messaging exercise.
Writing Good Leads: Activity