/
UAF  Deferred  Maintenance & Renewal UAF  Deferred  Maintenance & Renewal

UAF Deferred Maintenance & Renewal - PowerPoint Presentation

mindeeli
mindeeli . @mindeeli
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-23

UAF Deferred Maintenance & Renewal - PPT Presentation

February 2010 Majority of facilities built between 1958 and 1972 The oldest facility Eielson Building was built early 1930s Average age of facilities Fairbanks campus 35 years Community campus 25 years ID: 784939

age amp building uaf amp age uaf building campus construction gsf state funding renewal facility tvcc projects total renovation

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "UAF Deferred Maintenance & Renewal" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

UAF

Deferred Maintenance & Renewal

February 2010

Slide2

Majority of facilities built between 1958 and 1972.

The oldest facility, Eielson Building, was built early 1930’sAverage age of facilities:Fairbanks campus = 35 years Community campus = 25 yearsWhy is Deferred Maintenance a concern to UAF?2

Slide3

UAF Facts

Buildings:267Campus Sq. Feet:3,470,408 GSF

Roads:

8.28 miles

Walkways:

8.81 miles

Exterior lights:

1,000Exterior stairways: 164Exteriors steps: 1,700Roof: 31 acresParking spaces: 5,137Parking lots: 24 acresUtilidor: 8 miles

Approximately 3 million square feet of campus is heated and powered by UAF's combined heat and power plant

3

Slide4

UAF 1969

4

Slide5

Deferred Renewal:

Correction of deficiencies from the cumulative effect of major repair, renewal and replacement, and renovation projects that have not been carried out; special consideration should be given to identification and completion of deferred renewal projects that will result in further deterioration of a facility if not completed. (Regents’ Policy 05.12.020.D)Maintenance & Repair:Recurrent day-to-day work required to preserve or immediately restore a facility or fixed equipment to such a condition that it can effectively be used for its designated purpose. (Regents’ Policy 05.12.020.F)

Definitions

5

Slide6

Campus Growth

By date facility acquired or construction completion6

Slide7

Construction Age

Renovation Age

Age

GSF**

% of Total GSF

GSF

%

of Total GSF% ChangeLess than 10167,9795%695,11722%314%

10-25528,291

17%

607,006

19%

15%

25-50

2,021,589

64%

1,517,356

48%

-25%

Over 50

437,14614%335,52611%-23%3.1 M100%3.1 M100%

Construction Age vs. Renovation Age*

*Renovation Age: Construction age is reset to newer age when an investment greater than 50% of adjusted value is invested in the facility.Construction age reset due to major renovations on the following buildings:Brooks Building – 2003Duckering Building – 2002Rasmuson Library – 2004Fine Arts Davis Concert Hall – 2004Fine Arts Building – 2008Museum of the North – 2007Tanana Valley Campus Center - 2008

7

** GSF includes UAF main campus, TVC, and Fairbanks Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station

Slide8

Life-cycle of major building systems

Bunnell House

-Fine Arts Building Renovation

-Bioscience Research & Diagnostic Facility

Slide9

TVCC Steam

Costs

Cost savings achieved from exterior replacement at TVCC

-56%

change

-63%

change

-36%changeEstimated Annual Cost Savings FY10: $43,000

Slide10

10

Slide11

11

Slide12

ADA

$1,200,000Campus-Wide Residential$850,000Critical Electrical$5,185,908

Elevators

$1,355,000

Fire Alarms

, Sprinklers

$876,392

Road, Paths & Lights$550,000Sewer$3,507,219Utilities$5,238,000Other R&R AppropriationsState & Non-StateFY97 – FY1012

Slide13

$1.3 M

$6.3 M$4.7 M$14.5 M$4.4 M

Community Campus R&R Appropriations

State & Non-State

FY97 – FY10

13

Slide14

Overview of Total UAF R&R Appropriations

FY1997-FY2010State$133.5 MNon-State

$47.4

M

Non-State Category: Federal Receipts

$13.4

M

Non-State Category: University Receipts$34 M

TOTAL

$180.9

M

Average FY97-FY10

$12.9

M

14

Slide15

Overview of R&R Appropriations

FY1997-FY201015

Slide16

DRAFT

16

Slide17

$1.2M

State GF Funding. Installed code compliant fire sprinkler system throughout building.

Irving I Fire Sprinklers

17

Slide18

$1.0M

State GF. Renewal of 2,500 sf. of space in the Gruening building to serve the new doctoral program in Psychology.

Before

After

Gruening

Revitalization for PhD in Psychology Program

18

Slide19

$

7.7M ($5.7M GF, $2M UA Non-GF) Revitalization, code corrections, and renewal of 19,800 gsf of lab and office space. Funded in 2006, completed in 2008.

Before

After

Arctic Health Laboratory Revitalization Phase 1

19

Slide20

Wood Stave Pipe

50 year old wood stave pipe - shows only the "bands“. The sewer flow was holding the wood staves up, and once the sewer flow was stopped, they fell to the bottom of the line. 20

Slide21

Critical Electrical Distribution Phase 1A

Vault 1 top slab construction. Vault 1 is located at the intersection of the new utilidor and the utilidor that goes to the West Ridge

New utilidor (8' x 8') located on the North side of Alumni Drive near the Atkinson Power Plant.

Interior of Vault 2 - boxes and switches will be located on the left hand wall.

21

Slide22

TVCC Revitalization Phase 3

Exterior EnvelopeBeforeAfter

Before

After

TVCC

Thermography

Photos

TVCC Thermography Photos22

Slide23

Skarland

Hall Shower Repairs

Corrosion at galvanized shower base pans. This results in water leaking to floor below.

Plumbing shower waste line from the use of showers for over 40 years.

23

Slide24

24

UAF Contracts AwardedContractors & Design Consultants2004-2009*Note:Fairbanks contractors were awarded $54.9M and Fairbanks consultants were awarded $4.2M out of the total contracts awarded to Alaska contractors/consultants.

Slide25

Saving & efficiencies from consistent funding

Allows a two stage funding of projects.Small initial allocations allow design to be performed with follow up allocation funding constructionMinimizes large appropriations not being used for construction while design is being completedAllows large projects to be funded over two or three years

Follows the actual cash flow of the projects.

Campus can see the benefits of R&R funding earlier than waiting until a large project can be designated as worthy to receive all of the R&R funding for one or two years.

Potential to minimize volatile construction market pricing. A predictable and consistent volume of work from UAF should contribute to consistent pricing.

25