/
Union membership and the union wage Premium in Ireland Union membership and the union wage Premium in Ireland

Union membership and the union wage Premium in Ireland - PowerPoint Presentation

mitsue-stanley
mitsue-stanley . @mitsue-stanley
Follow
442 views
Uploaded On 2017-09-10

Union membership and the union wage Premium in Ireland - PPT Presentation

Frank Walsh School of Economics University College Dublin Frankwalshucdie Are Trade Unions good or bad for employment and efficiency Theory suggests it depends on The objective of unions ID: 586884

decline union workers sector union decline sector workers wage membership premium employees private density public 2003 quarter firms household

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Union membership and the union wage Prem..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Union membership and the union wage Premium in Ireland

Frank Walsh

School of Economics

University College Dublin

Frank.walsh@ucd.ieSlide2

Are Trade Unions good or bad for employment and efficiency

Theory suggests it depends on:The objective of unionsThe level and degree of co-ordination in bargainingThe legal/institutional framework and how competitive labour and product markets are

Empirical literature

Impact of unions on firm performance and productivity is mixed

Across countries evidence that unions increase unemployment unless there is co-ordination across firms and sectorsSlide3

Arguably if

unions are un-representative or if membership is unbalanced co-ordination across sectors is more difficultWalsh 2009 looked at trends in Trade Union membership 2001 2006

No matter how you looked at the data there seemed to be a decline in the percentage of employees who were members

Changes in composition of job and worker type could not explain this decline

The exception is Public Administration

This is consistent with international evidence of decline in membership across a wide range of countries (concentrated in the private sector) Slide4

Quarterly National Household Survey quarter two

2003/11

This does not include

N

on-employed members

N

on-members covered by union contracts but not membersOther agreements: ( JLC’s, REA’s)

Density recovers during recession as a share of employees but continues to decline as a share of labour force

Indicates

decline

in

union number of employees less

than in non-unionSlide5

Quarterly National Household Survey quarter two

2003/11Boom and bust cycle much greater for total number employees than for union employment Slide6

International literature shows a decline in membership across most

countries over timeVery of often the decline greater for private sector workersThis trend is pronounced in the Irish case

Percentage members in Public vs. Private sector Slide7

Proxy for Public Sector is

Public Administration, Education and Defence. Private sector is all other employees

Quarterly National Household Survey quarter two 2003/10

Steady decline in private sector density continues throughout

The density is fairly stable for public sector employees Slide8

Is the pattern in membership reflecting a change in the composition of the workforce/jobs or is there an underlying trend?

We can look at the probability that an employee is a union member in each year and control for worker and job characteristicsControls are for: age, gender, education, nationality, region, urban status, industry, occupation and firm size

Create an index starting at 100 and compare the raw density with the change in probability of membership when control for worker and job characteristics

Changes in the composition of jobs/workersSlide9

Quarterly National Household Survey quarter two 2003/10

When we control for changes in composition there is a steady decline in union density over the periodSlide10

Measuring the union wage premium

Can unionised firms choose more able workers for higher paying union jobs? This would imply the observed wage premium overstates the true premiumBut unionised firms have compressed wage structures and lower returns to skillHighest skill workers might do better in non-union jobs

Empirical literature suggests that there is two sided selection

Union firms can

choose at lower skill levels

to ensure they don’t get the least able workers but will not attract the most able

Empirical evidence internationally supports this two sided selection and suggests ability bias will cancel out on average?Slide11

What if follow the same workers over time and observe those who switch union status. Does their wage rise or fall? Ability is fixed

A problem with this is that a small % of workers randomly miscode in all surveys. These will almost always look like they change union status from one period to the nextA high percentage of the fraction of the sample who appear to be moving may be just miscodes

The union premium will be biased downwards since wages will not change for the workers with miscodes

SILC data for Ireland asks workers if paid a union sub on last wage packet. Separate question asks how much it is. For over 60% of sample the payslip is observed

Arguably for this sub-sample measurement error in the union variable will be very low. You would have to incorrectly report paying a sub or not, then report an incorrect amount that is consistent with this and the interviewer would observe your payslip and fail to resolve this inconsistency Slide12
Slide13

Wage premium declining over time for all specificationsSlide14

Discussion/Conclusion

Union density on a downward trend especially in private sectorUnion wage premium at around 8-10% from 2006-10 but seems to have fallen substantially during recent recession

A

labour market with co-ordinated

sectoral

bargaining does not seem feasible without representative employer groupsA key difference between countries with low and high rates of representation is the degree to which worker representative bodies are involved in the provision of other services (pensions/social security)Slide15