/
Field Investigation of the Chemistry and Toxicity Field Investigation of the Chemistry and Toxicity

Field Investigation of the Chemistry and Toxicity - PowerPoint Presentation

molly
molly . @molly
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2022-06-08

Field Investigation of the Chemistry and Toxicity - PPT Presentation

of TPH in Petroleum Vapors Implications for Potential Vapor Intrusion Hazards Roger Brewer amp Lynn Bailey Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response Hawaii Department of Health   April 2012 ID: 915135

benzene tph vapor risk tph benzene risk vapor intrusion soil site gas action 000 vapors aliphatics summa carbon weighted

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Field Investigation of the Chemistry and..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Field Investigation of the Chemistry and Toxicity

of TPH in Petroleum Vapors: Implications for Potential Vapor Intrusion Hazards

Roger Brewer & Lynn BaileyHazard Evaluation and Emergency ResponseHawai‘i Department of Health April 2012

1

Slide2

There are three methods to gain knowledge:

The first, reflection, is the noblest;The second, imitation, is the easiest;And the third, experience, is the bitterest. Confucius

Slide3

Reference:

Field Investigation of the Chemistry and Toxicity of TPH in Petroleum Vapors, Implications for Potential Vapor Intrusion Hazards: Hawai’i Department of Health, Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response, http://www.hawaiidoh.org/3

Note: Significant vapor intrusion problems have not been identified for existing buildings at any of the study sites included in this presentation. The site data are presented for example only.

Slide4

Acknowledgements

Field study funded under a grant from USEPA Region IX;Hickam AFB/NAVFAC Hawai’i past work and field assistance

Field work carried out by HDOH HEER & UST staff with assistance by several local consultants;Numerous consultations with regulators and consultants on the mainland.4

Slide5

HDOH Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Guidance

HEER EHE guidance (2005; last updated Fall, 2011)

HEER Technical Guidance Manual (Section 9);Test for TPH plus BTEXN and methane in soil gas;TPH soil gas action levels:2005: Residential = 26,000 ug/m3 (based on limited, published information);

2011: Residential = 130,000+ ug/m

3

(based on this study).

5

Slide6

Vapor Intrusion

Indoor Air

Action Level

vapor diluted

Slab or crawl space

contaminated soil or groundwater

diffusion to slab base

advective flow into building

Subslab Soil Gas

Action Level

Soil Gas

AL

res

= 1,000 x Indoor Air AL

Soil Gas AL

C/I

= 2,000 x Indoor Air AL

6

Slide7

Do We Really Need to Worry About TPH?

How can something that smells so bad or

can catch on fire pass a “risk assessment”?7

Slide8

Key Questions…

1. Are BTEXN and especially benzene in soil gas adequate to screen for potential vapor intrusion hazards at petroleum-contaminated sites?

2. Could TPH still pose a vapor intrusion risk even though BTEXN meet acceptable risks?a. What is the toxicity of TPH in petroleum vapors?b. What is carbon range makeup of vapor-phase TPH? 8

Slide9

Gasolines

Diesel Fuels

Fuel Oils

Fuels and Carbon Ranges

C2

C4

C6

C8

C12

C16

C20

C24

C28

C32

C36

69'C

126'C

216'C

343'C

402'C

449'C

C0

BTEX

PAHs

Methane

V

olatile

/Semi-Volatile

9

Slide10

Toxicity of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

TPH Working Group (mid/late 1990s)

Subsequent Guidance Massachusetts DEP (1997+) Washington DOE (2006) California EPA (DTSC 2009) USEPA (2009)

10

Slide11

Massachusetts DEP TPH Carbon Ranges

C5-8

C9-12

C11-22

C19-36

C13-18

Potential Vapor Phase

C2

C4

C6

C8

C12

C16

C20

C24

C28

C32

C36

C0

C9 -10

Aliphatics

Aromatics

Gasolines

Diesel Fuels

Fuel Oils

TPH = Sum of Aromatics + Aliphatics (excluding BTEXN, etc.)

11

Slide12

C2

C4

C6

C8

C12

C16

C20

C24

C28

C32

C36

C0

Vapor-Phase Carbon Ranges

C5-8

C9-18

C9-16

Less Toxic

Gasolines

Diesel Fuels

Fuel Oils

More Toxic

TPH = Sum of Aromatics + Aliphatics (excluding BTEXN, etc.)

12

Aliphatics

Aromatics

Slide13

Carbon Ranges - Vapor Sample Collection

Volatile

Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH):C5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C12 Aliphatics

C9-C10

Aromatics

Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH):

C13-C16 Aliphatics

C11-C16 Aromatics

VPH Compounds: Summa canisters OK

EPH Compounds: Sorbent tubes required

13

Slide14

TPH Carbon Range Action Levels

Carbon Range

RfC

(ug/m

3

)

Residential

Indoor Air (ug/m

3

)

Residential

Soil Gas (ug/m

3

)

C5-8 aliphatics

600630630,000C9-18 aliphatics

100

100

100,000

C9-16 aromatics

100

100

100,000

USEPA 2009 Reference Concentrations

Target Hazard Quotient = 1.0

Assumes indoor

air:subslab

soil gas Attenuation Factor of 0.001

Odor Threshold (ug/m

3

) approximately 1,000 ug/m

3

Use same as action levels for BTEXN and other individual VOCs

14

Slide15

TPH Mixtures: Weighted Toxicity & Action Levels

Weighted

TPH RfC

= 216

ug/m

3

TPH Indoor

Air

res

= 250 ug/m

3

TPH Soil

Gas

res

= 250,000 ug/m

3Weighted TPH RfC (ug/m3) =C9-C18 AliphaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C16 Aromatics15

Slide16

Critical

TPH:Target Compound Ratios

Point where relative proportion of “less toxic” vapor-phase TPH will overwhelm “more toxic” individual compoundsCritical TPH Ratio =

Least Stringent TPH Action Level

Most Stringent Target Compound Action Level

Critical

TPH:Benzene

Ratio =

630 ug/m

3

(C5-C8 aliphatics)

0.31 ug/m

3

(10

-6

cancer risk)Critical TPH:Benzene Ratio = 2,032TPH will always drive vapor intrusion risk if the TPH:Benzene ratio exceeds 2,032:1Useful as initial screening tool to evaluate potential vapor intrusion risk drivers16

Slide17

TPH:Benzene

Soil Gas Ratio

Risk Driver

>2,032

TPH will

always

drive

vapor intrusion

risk

(TPH

HQ >1.0 when benzene ECR <10

-6

)

3 to 2,032

TPH could drive vapor intrusion hazards(depends on carbon range makeup and target benzene risk)<3Benzene will always drive vapor intrusion risk.(TPH HQ <1.0 when benzene ECR <10-4)

TPH vs Benzene in Vapor Intrusion Risk

Notes

High: Ratio of least stringent TPH action level to most stringent benzene action level.Low: Ratio of least stringent TPH action level to most stringent benzene action level.

17

Slide18

TPH Will

Always Drive VI Risk if…

VOCIndoor Air Action Level (ug/m

3

)

Critical TPH Ratio

Naphthalene

0.072

8,750

1-Methylnaphthalene

0.29

2,172

Benzene

0.31

2,032

Ethylbenzene

0.97

649

Xylenes

21

30

Toluene

1,000

0.6

Based on least conservative TPH action level (630 ug/m

3

) and most conservative VOC action level (e.g., 10

-6

cancer risk and HQ 1.0).

TPH

could

drive vapor intrusion risk below these ratios depending on carbon range makeup and target risk applied to the individual VOC.

18

Slide19

Off To The Field!

Key sites for collection of soil gas samples identified;Two phases of sampling:

Phase I: Summas, TO-15 & MA-APHPhase II: Summas+Sorbent Tubes, TO-3, TO-15, TO-17 & MA-APH19

Slide20

TO-15

TO-17

Sorbent Tube Range

Summas

or Sorbent Tubes for Soil Gas?

(

Summas

will miss heavier VOCs)

C2

C4

C6

C8

C12

C16

C20

C24

C28

C32

C36

C0

Summa Range

(Hayes 2007)

Larger volume

Familiarity

Limited to C12

Summas

Sorbent Tubes

Up to C24+

Small volume (50ml)

Saturation limitation

Less familiar

20

Slide21

Key Study Sites

Site

DSite

A

Site

B

Site E

Site

C

21

Slide22

Sample Collection

Summa Canisters

(1liter summas)Sorbent Tubes(60 ml syringes)

22

Max Draw = 50ml

Two Tubes to

Evaluate Breakthrough

Slide23

Results of Field Data

Following summaries based on Summa canister dataSorbent tube data very similar to Summa data

Minimal VOCs greater than C12 in soil gasNaphthalene was usually ND and not a significant risk driver in comparison to TPH (or benzene)TEX likewise not significant risk drivers23

Slide24

TPH Dominates BTEXN in Vapors

(BTEXN component decreases in aged releases?)

Site/Fuel TypeAverage Soil Gas Composition(TO-15 Data)

TPH

*BTEXN

TPH:Benzene

Gasoline (Fresh Vapors)

91.6%

8.4%

170

Diesel (Fresh Vapors)

93.7%

6.3%

206

JP-8 (Fresh Vapors)

96.4%

3.6%

301

Site A

(JP-4/AVGAS

?)

99.6%

0.4%

1,513

Site B

(mixed

fuels)

99.5%

0.5%

4,174

Site C

(JP-8

+/- JP-4)

99.7%

0.3%

18,710

Site D

(MOGAS/JP-4/AVGAS)

98.3%

1.7%

9,135

Site E

(

diesel)

99.9%

0.1%

18,611

*Exhaust samples 30-40% BTEXN

24

Slide25

TO-15 Gas Chromatograph

Fresh Gasoline Vapors

C5-C8

Benzene

C5

C9

C9-12

Naphthalene

C13

25

Slide26

Weighted RfC= 565 ug/m

3Indoor

Airres = 590 ug/m3Soil Gasres = 590,000 ug/m3

TPH:Benzene

= 170

Carbon Range Chemistry and Weighted TPH Toxicity

Fresh Gasoline Vapors

Based on TO-15 Summa Data

C9-C12 Aliphatics

C5-C8 Aliphatics

C9-C10 Aromatics

Slide27

Who’s Driving…?

TPH vs Benzene as VI Risk DriverCalculate equivalent TPH concentration for sample/site at target benzene action level based on

TPH:Benzene ratioDivide by weighted site-specific TPH action levelGasoline Vapor Example (using indoor air action levels):Target Benzene Action Level = 0.31 ug/m3

(10

-6

risk)

TPH:Benzene

= 170:1

Equivalent TPH = 53 ug/m

3

Weighted TPH Action Level = 590 ug/m

3

TPH noncancer HQ = 53/590 = 0.1

Benzene

drives vapor intrusion risk (TPH HQ <1.0 when benzene risk = 10

-6)27

Slide28

Benzene

TPH Hazard Quotient

TPH vs Benzene Vapor Intrusion RiskFresh Gasoline Vapors

Benzene Cancer Risk

10

-6

0

Benzene adequate to evaluate vapor intrusion

provided that a target 10

-6

cancer risk is used.

(TPH noncancer HQ still <1 when benzene risk 10

-6

)

TPH

HQ=0.1Based on TO-15 Summa Data28

Slide29

TO-15 Gas Chromatograph

Fresh Diesel Vapors

C5-C8

C9-12

Benzene

Naphthalene

C5

C9

C13

29

Slide30

Weighted RfC= 216

ug/m

3

Indoor

Air

res

= 250 ug/m

3

Soil

Gas

res

= 250,000 ug/m

3

TPH:Benzene

= 206

Carbon Range Chemistry and Weighted TPH ToxicityFresh Diesel VaporsBased on TO-15 Summa DataC9-C12 AliphaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C10 Aromatics30

Slide31

Based on TO-15 Summa Data

31

TPHBenzeneHQ=0.3

TPH vs Benzene Vapor Intrusion Risk

Fresh

Diesel Vapors

TPH Hazard Quotient

Benzene Cancer Risk

10

-6

0

Benzene adequate to evaluate vapor intrusion

provided that a target 10

-6

cancer risk is used.

(TPH noncancer HQ still <1 when benzene risk 10-6)

Slide32

Gas Chromatograph

Fresh JP-8 Vapors

C5-C8Benzene

C5

C9-12

Naphthalene

C13

C9

32

Slide33

Weighted RfC= 225

ug/m

3Indoor Air

res

= 230 ug/m

3

Soil

Gas

res

= 230,000 ug/m

3

TPH:Benzene

= 301

Carbon Range Chemistry and Weighted TPH Toxicity

Fresh JP-8 Vapors

Based on TO-15 Summa DataC9-C12 AliphaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C10 Aromatics33

Slide34

TPH

Benzene

HQ=0.4

TPH vs Benzene Vapor Intrusion Risk

Fresh JP-8 Vapors

TPH Hazard Quotient

Benzene Cancer Risk

10

-6

0

Benzene adequate to evaluate vapor intrusion hazards provided that a target 10

-6

cancer risk is used.

(TPH noncancer HQ<1 when benzene risk 10

-6

)Based on TO-15 Summa Data34

Slide35

Gas Chromatograph

Site A (AVGAS)

C5-C8

Benzene

C5

C9

C9-12

Naphthalene

C13

35

Slide36

Weighted RfC= 510

ug/m

3Indoor

Air

res

= 530 ug/m

3

Soil

Gas

res

= 530,000 ug/m

3

TPH:Benzene

= 1,513!

(reduced benzene in soil gas)

Carbon Range Chemistry and Weighted TPH ToxicitySite A (AVGAS)Average TPH in Soil Gas71,000,000 ug/m3Based on TO-15 Summa DataC9-C12 AliphaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C10 Aromatics36

Slide37

TPH

Benzene

HQ=0.9

TPH vs Benzene Vapor Intrusion Risk

Site A (AVGAS

)

TPH Hazard Quotient

Benzene Cancer Risk

10

-6

0

Benzene adequate to evaluate vapor intrusion hazards provided that a target 10

-6

cancer risk is used.

(TPH noncancer HQ<1 when benzene risk 10

-6)Based on TO-15 Summa Data37

Slide38

Chemical/

Carbon Range

*Henry’s Constant

Benzene

0.23

Ethylbenzene

0.32

Toluene

0.27

Xylenes

0.29

Naphthalene

0.018

C9-C10 Aromatics

0.33

C11-C22 Aromatics

0.03

C5-C8 Aliphatics

54

C9-C12 Aliphatics

65

C9-C18 Aliphatics

69

C19-C36 Aliphatics

110

Where’s the BTEXN? Partitioning of Compounds in Soil

*Theoretical ratio of vapor-phase mass to dissolved-phase mass at equilibrium. Dissolved-phase dominates if H’ <1.0.

Aromatics Prefer to be in the Water

Aliphatics Prefer to be in the Vapors

38

Slide39

Gas Chromatograph

Site B (Mixed Fuels)

C5-C8

Benzene

C5

C9

C9-12

Naphthalene

C13

39

Slide40

Weighted RfC= 443

ug/m

3Indoor Air

res

= 460 ug/m

3

Soil

Gas

res

= 460,000 ug/m

3

TPH:Benzene

= 4,174!

(reduced benzene in soil gas)

Carbon Range Chemistry and Weighted TPH Toxicity

Site B (Mixed fuels)Average TPH in Soil Gas44,000,000 ug/m3Based on TO-15 Summa DataC9-C12 AliphaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C10 Aromatics40

Slide41

TPH

Benzene

HQ=2.8

TPH vs Benzene Vapor Intrusion Risk

Site B (

Mixed

Fuels

)

TPH Hazard Quotient

Benzene Cancer Risk

10

-6

0

TPH

always

drives potential vapor intrusion hazards. (TPH noncancer HQ>1 even when benzene risk 10-6)Based on TO-15 Summa Data41

Slide42

Gas Chromatograph

Site C (JP-8 +/- J-4)

C5-C8

Benzene

C5

C9

C9-12

Naphthalene

C13

42

Slide43

Weighted RfC= 251

ug/m

3Indoor

Air

res

= 260 ug/m

3

Soil

Gas

res

= 260,000 ug/m

3

TPH:Benzene

= 18,710!!

(minimal benzene in soil gas)

Carbon Range Chemistry and Weighted TPH Site C (JP-8 +/- JP-4)Average TPH in Soil Gas17,000,000 ug/m3Based on TO-15 Summa DataC9-C12 AliphaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C10 Aromatics43

Slide44

TPH

Benzene

HQ=22

TPH vs Benzene Vapor Intrusion Risk

Site C

(JP-8

+/- J-4)

TPH Hazard Quotient

Benzene Cancer Risk

10

-6

0

TPH

always

drives potential vapor intrusion hazards.

(TPH noncancer HQ>1 even when benzene risk 10-6)Based on TO-15 Summa Data44

Slide45

TO-15 Gas Chromatograph

Site D (JP-4)

C5-C8

Benzene

C5

C9

C9-12

Naphthalene

C13

45

Slide46

Weighted RfC= 211

ug/m

3Indoor Air

res

= 220 ug/m

3

Soil

Gas

res

= 220,000 ug/m

3

TPH:Benzene

= 9,135!

(minimal benzene in soil gas)

Carbon Range Chemistry and Weighted TPH

Site D (JP-4)Average TPH in Soil Gas630,000 ug/m3Based on TO-15 Summa DataC9-C12 AliphaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C10 Aromatics46

Slide47

TPH

Benzene

HQ=13

TPH vs Benzene Vapor Intrusion Risk

Site D (JP-4

)

TPH Hazard Quotient

Benzene Cancer Risk

10

-6

0

TPH

always

drives potential vapor intrusion hazards.

(TPH noncancer HQ>1 even when benzene risk 10

-6)Based on TO-15 Summa Data47

Slide48

Gas Chromatograph

Site E (Diesel)

C5-C8

Benzene

C5

C9

C9-12

Naphthalene

C13

48

Slide49

Weighted RfC= 127

ug/m

3Indoor

Air

res

= 130 ug/m

3

Soil

Gas

res

= 130,000 ug/m

3

TPH:Benzene

= 18,600!!

(minimal benzene in soil gas)

Carbon Range Chemistry and Weighted TPH Site E (Diesel)Average TPH in Soil Gas2,900,000 ug/m3*Reference site for default TPH RfC in Fall 2011 TPH soil gas action levels.Based on TO-15 Summa DataC9-C12 AliphaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C10 Aromatics49

Slide50

TPH

Benzene

HQ=44

TPH vs Benzene Vapor Intrusion Risk

Site E

(Diesel

)

TPH Hazard Quotient

Benzene Cancer Risk

10

-6

0

TPH

always

drives potential vapor intrusion hazards.

(TPH noncancer HQ>1 even when benzene risk 10-6)Based on TO-15 Summa Data50

Slide51

TPH vs Benzene as Vapor Intrusion Risk

Site/Fuel Type

Vapor Intrusion Risk Driver

TPH

Drives Risk

*Benzene

Drives Risk

Gasoline (Fresh Vapors)

X

Diesel (Fresh Vapors)

X

JP-8 (Fresh Vapors)

X

Site

A

(JP-4/AVGAS?)

X

X

Site

B

(mixed fuels)

X

Site

C

(JP-8 +/- JP-4)

X

Site

D

(MOGAS/JP-4/AVGAS)

X

Site E

(diesel)

X

*Assuming a target, 10

-6

cancer risk is used for benzene.

51

Slide52

Other Sites TPH vs BTEXN

Site/Fuel Type

TPH:BenzeneIn Soil Gas

HAFB SS156-E (gasolines)

244 to 1,296

ConocoPhillips (mixed)

97 to 5,400

Lipoa

Place (mixed)

82

to >6,400

Challenger Loop (JP-4, JP-8)

2,800 to 5,100

Aloha Petroleum

(gasolines)

366 to 13,100

HAFB SS156-J (mixed)

560 to 165,000

HAFB CG110 (diesels)

1,600,000

TPH:Benzene

ratio highly variable

Best to always test for TPH

52

Slide53

Back to the Key Questions…

Q: What is TPH in petroleum vapors made of?

Answers: Mostly C5-C8 aliphatics, with an increased proportion of C9+ aliphatics in middle distillate (diesel, etc.) vapors.Aromatics, including BTEXN, make up a very minor component of vapors, especially at aged release sites.53

Slide54

Key Questions…

Q: What is the toxicity (RfC) of TPH in petroleum vapors?Answer:

Inhalation Reference Concentration for TPH will range from 100 ug/m3 and 600 ug/m3 (based on USEPA 2009 guidance). Vapors from gasolines will be closer to 600 ug/m3. (dominance of C5-C8 aliphatics)

Vapors from middle distillates will be closer to 100 ug/m

3

(presence

of C9-C12

aliphatics)

TPH Indoor air action levels similar to TPH RfC

54

Slide55

Key Questions…

Q: Are BTEXN and especially benzene in soil gas adequate to screen for potential vapor intrusion risks?Answers (more studies needed):

Yes – But only for gasoline-contaminated sites and only if a conservative target risk is used (e.g., 10-6 );Aromatics can be preferentially removed from vapors via partitioning into moisture and degradation (but aliphatics will also be degraded);Reliance on benzene only can miss significant vapor intrusion hazards at diesel/middle distillate sites;TX not present in significant enough amounts to drive vapor intrusion risks at the study sites (ethylbenzene?);

Naphthalene not detected in most soil gas samples and not a reliable indicator of vapor intrusion risk.

55

Slide56

Key Questions…

Q: Can TPH still pose a vapor intrusion risk even though BTEXN meet acceptable risks?Answers:

Yes - TPH drives vapor intrusion risk over BTEXN at four of the five sites tested;TPH data especially important at sites with middle distillates (but vapor emission rates will be lower compared to gasolines);TPH alone would have been adequate to screen all of the study sites for potential vapor intrusion hazards (i.e., take care of the TPH and you will take care of the benzene).56

Slide57

Already Here & Coming Soon

Study data used to update HEER TPH soil gas action levels (based on Fishing Village data);

Draft report to be posted in March;Final report to be posted this spring;Methylnaphthalenes? (not significant in this study);Updated TPH Carbon Range guidance and soil gas sample collection guidance to be posted this summer;Comments and ideas always welcome.

Now we know what the source area looks like…

57

Slide58

RfCs

AFs

Biodegradation

TPH

Carbon

Ranges

Don’t Panic!

BTEXN

Subslab

Vapor

Intrusion

Next Step: Pre-Screening Sites for

Potential Vapor Intrusion Concerns

58

Slide59

Avoid Setting The Site Screening Bar Too Low

When do we need to look more closely (screening levels)? When is remediation really required (high risk sites)?

Risk Pyramid of Investigated Sites

Site Screening Bar

High Risk

Remedial Action Ultimately Required

(don’t miss)

Medium Risk

Flagged in Screening but No Action Ultimately Required

(minimize)

Low Risk

Eliminated During Screening, No Further Action Required

(maximize)

59

Slide60

Avoid Setting The Site Screening Bar Too

High

Risk Pyramid of Investigated Sites

Site Screening Bar

High Risk

Remedial Action Ultimately Required

(don’t miss)

Medium Risk

Flagged in Screening but No Action Ultimately Required

(minimize)

Low Risk

Eliminated During Screening, No Further Action Required

(maximize)

60

Slide61

Screening Sites for Further Investigation

Let’s Be Rational...:Don’t over compound conservative screening assumptions (e.g., “Tomb Model” for IA:SG attenuation and target 10

-6 risk);Biodegradation and attenuation away from source area;Distance from source area;De minimis volumes of contaminated soil and areas of free product (regardless of concentrations);

Other considerations:

-Alternative toxicity factors;

-Target risks vs typical background;

-Tidal pumping &subslab oxygenation

-Explosion, odor concerns (including methane);

-Focus on subslab data.

Avoid testing indoor air (too many indoor & outdoor sources)

Balance uncertainty about benefit to human health with certainty about economic impact on property owners.

61