/
Phylogenetic Interpretation Phylogenetic Interpretation

Phylogenetic Interpretation - PowerPoint Presentation

morgan
morgan . @morgan
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2022-06-18

Phylogenetic Interpretation - PPT Presentation

Dr Laura Emery LauraEmeryebiacuk wwwebiacuk Objectives After this tutorial you should be able to Discuss the impact of a range of biological phenomena upon phylogenetic inference ID: 920046

phylogenetic gene trap jaws gene phylogenetic jaws trap evolution processes divergence tree knowledge recombination time duplication genetic homologous molecular

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Phylogenetic Interpretation" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Phylogenetic Interpretation

Dr Laura Emery

Laura.Emery@ebi.ac.uk

www.ebi.ac.uk

Slide2

Objectives

After this tutorial you should be able to…

Discuss

the impact of a range of biological phenomena upon phylogenetic

inference

Appreciate

some challenges and limitations of phylogenetic approach

Interpret

published phylogenies (and your own)

Slide3

Phylogenetic interpretation

is essential throughout data analysis

Data assessment

- known biology

-

additional data (e.g. geography)

Decide upon and implement

method

Phylogenetic Result(s)

Formulate hypotheses

Answered your question?

Investigate unexpected and unresolved aspects further- consider including more data

Final phylogeny and analysis

Can you validate this?

Yes

No

No

Yes

Slide4

Phylogenetic

interpretation skill setTree-thinking skills

Revise: relatedness,

trait

evolution, confidence, homology

Knowledge

of phylogenetic methods and their limitations Knowledge of biological processes affecting sequence evolutiongene duplication, recombination, horizontal gene transfer, population genetic processes, and many more!

Knowledge of the data you wish to interpretCovered in introduction to phylogenies

Slide5

Recap of tree-thinking skills

Relatedness

Trait evolution

Confidence

Homology

Slide6

1. Relatedness

: taxa that share a more recent common ancestor are more closely related

most

recent common ancestor shared with

first

cousin

most

recent common ancestor shared with

second

cousin

Slide7

2. Trait

evolutionIt can be useful to map traits onto phylogenies as a first step in inferring

their evolutionary

histories

Interpreting trait evolution in its phylogenetic context is rarely

straightforward!

Assumptions must be made regarding the loss and gain of traitsIt is often useful to construct alternative scenariosThen we have to decide upon the most plausible (character state methods e.g. MP and ML can be applied)

Slide8

Example:

The Evolution of Mitochondria

o

rigin

of eukaryotes

Ginger

et al

. 2010

Slide9

Example: The Evolution of Mitochondria

o

rigin

of eukaryotes

Ginger

et al

. 2010

G = gain

L = loss

Scenario

one:

Mitochondria evolved from

mitosomes

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

G

Slide10

Example: The Evolution of Mitochondria

o

rigin

of eukaryotes

Ginger

et al

. 2010

G

G = gain

L = loss

Scenario

two:

Mitochondria occurred at the origin of eukaryotes

L

G

L

G

G

L

L

Slide11

3. Tree

Confidence Question

Does this tree support the grouping of

pelecaniforms

and

ciconiiforms

as a monophyletic group?

Slide12

4. Homology

is similarity due to shared ancestry

Example

: limbs and

wings

Limbs

are

homologous they share a common ancestorWings are not homologous they are an analogous as they have evolved similarity independently

Slide13

Homology Q

uestion: Trap-jaws in ants

Based on this phylogeny, which scenario do you think is more likely

?

trap-jaws are homologous

trap-jaws are analogous and have evolved independently four timesMoreau

et al. 2006

Slide14

Homology Q

uestion: Trap-jaws in ants

Based on this phylogeny, which scenario do you think is more likely

?

trap-jaws are homologous

trap-jaws are analogous and have evolved independently four timesMoreau

et al. 2006

G

L

LL

L

L

L

L

Scenario one: Trap-jaws are homologous

Slide15

Homology Q

uestion: Trap-jaws in ants

Based on this phylogeny, which scenario do you think is more likely

?

trap-jaws are homologous

trap-jaws are analogous and have evolved independently four timesMoreau

et al. 2006

Scenario

two:

Trap-jaws are analogous

G

G

G

G

more

parsimonious

Slide16

Phylogenetic

interpretation skill setTree-thinking skills

Revise: relatedness,

trait

evolution, confidence, homology

Knowledge

of phylogenetic methods and their limitations Knowledge of biological processes affecting sequence evolutiongene duplication, recombination, horizontal gene transfer, population genetic processes, and many more!

Knowledge of the data you wish to interpretCovered in introduction to phylogenies

Slide17

Processes that affect sequence evolution

Gene/genome

duplication and divergence

Recombination

Horizontal gene

transfer

CoevolutionMigrationRate and time of divergence Other

Slide18

1. Gene

duplication

Gene duplication and subsequent divergence can result in novel gene functions (it can also result in

pseudogenes

)

Genes that are homologous due to gene duplication are

paralogous

Genes that are homologous due to speciation are orthologous

Slide19

Gene

duplication question

This is a tree of gene family that has undergone one gene duplication event in its evolutionary past.

Where

on the tree did this occur

?

Is the event

well-supported?Cells Tissues & Organs 2007

Slide20

2. Recombination

Single or small numbers of events:Within genesBetween genes

Where there is extensive recombination - a

phylogenetic approach is

inappropriate (not tree-like)

Slide21

Recombination example: Dengue-2 virus

d

ata from E. Holmes, figure from A.

Rambaut

Slide22

Recombination Question

Can you spot the recombinant strain?

Mauro

et al

2003

Slide23

3. Horizontal

Gene

Transfer (HGT/LGT)

H

orizontal gene

transfer violates the assumption that

sequences have evolved

in a tree-like manner Where sparse, can be detected by comparing with species phylogeny Where extensive, phylogenetic approach is inappropriate

Gogarten & Townsend 2005

Slide24

Phylogenetics

is not appropriate for highly recombinant taxa

Recombination

and horizontal gene transfer produce

networks

Avoid

phylogenetics for:Intraspecific sexual species (recombination at each meiosis)Asexual species with extensive HGT (e.g. some Bacteria)

Phylogenetics

assumes that patterns of relatedness among taxa follow a tree-like structure

Slide25

Horizontal gene transfer question

Can you spot the horizontally transferred gene?

Slide26

4. Coevolution

Where parasites or symbionts

co-evolve with their hosts, both

topologies are expected to be very similar.

Weiss 2009 from Reed et al 2007

Slide27

Coevolution

QuestionDo these phylogenies provide evidence that the lice are inherited vertically?

Hafner

& Nadler 1988

Slide28

6. Migration

Patterns of migration influence phylogenetic topology,

especially in structured populations

Slide29

Phylogeography

example: Chimpanzees

P.

troglodytes

and

P.schweinfurthii

are more dissimilar than you would expect given their proximity> Chimpanzees can't cross rivers!

Gao

et al 1999

Slide30

Migration

Question

What can you infer about patterns of migration

of the Taiwanese stag-beetle based

upon this phylogeny

?

Black

= Taiwan

Slide31

5.

Rate and time of divergence Phylogenies can be used to date divergence times

when some temporal

information is known

e.g

.

carbon dating from fossil evidencee.g. dates of sample isolationGenetic change = Evolutionary rate x Divergence time (substitutions/site) (substitutions/site/year) (years)If all lineages evolve at the same rate (i.e. there is a molecular clock

) then branch lengths should reflect divergences times

C

DEA

B

Slide32

Is there

a molecular clock?

Zuckerland

and Pauling (1962)

No.

substitutions in haemoglobin roughly proportional to time based upon fossil datings

Slide33

Dating divergence with a molecular clock

We know time

T

since a and c diverged

We want to find out time

X since a and b divergedUse T to estimate the evolutionary rate r

r = d(a-c) / 2TUse r to estimate time X X = 1/2

(d(a-b) / r)

X

d =

genetic distance

(

branch length

)

Slide34

Dating Drosophila Divergence around Hawaii

Fleischer, McIntosh &

Tarr

1998

The volcanic activity around Hawaii has produced a chain of islands; the oldest is furthest away from the mainland

Several species including Drosophila have diverged with island formation

Figure Andrew

Rambaut

from

Slide35

Dating Drosophila Divergence in Hawaii

Island formation dates reflecting species’ divergence were

plotted against genetic distance (branch length)

Genetic distance scaled linearly with divergences date, indicating the presence of a molecular clock

Genetic distance

Time

Fleischer, McIntosh &

Tarr

1998

gradient = evolutionary rate

NB

: Not all species exhibit a molecular clock!

Slide36

7. Other

biological processes can complicate molecular analyses

Population genetic processes

Epidemiological

processes

Gene

conversionCodon biasHypermutable sitesConcerted evolutionReassortmentMany more…

Slide37

Summary: Phylogenetic interpretation skill set

Tree-thinking skills

Revise: relatedness,

trait

evolution, confidence, homology

Knowledge

of phylogenetic methods and their limitations Knowledge of biological processes affecting sequence evolutiongene duplication, recombination, horizontal gene transfer, population genetic processes, and many more!

Knowledge of the data you wish to interpretCovered in introduction to phylogenies

Slide38

Further Reading

Molecular Evolution: A Phylogenetic Approach (1998) Roderic D M Page

& Edward

C Holmes, Blackwell Science, Oxford.

The Phylogenetic Handbook

(2003), Marco

Salemi and Anne-Mieke Vandamme Eds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Inferring Phylogenies (2003) Joseph Felsenstein, Sinauer.Molecular Evolution (1997) Wen-Hsiung Li ,

Sinauer

Slide39

Train online

Free online courses

Learn in your own time, at your own pace

Created

for life-science researchers

No previous knowledge of bioinformatics

needed

www.ebi.ac.uk/training/online

Slide40

Acknowledgements

People

Andrew

Rambaut

(University of Edinburgh

) …and the EBI training teamPaul Sharp (University of Edinburgh)Nick Goldman (EMBL-EBI)Benjamin Redelings (Duke University)Brian Moore (University of California, Davis)

Olivier Gascuel (University of Montpelier)Aiden Budd (EMBL-EBI)Funding EMBL member states and…

Slide41

Thank you!

www.ebi.ac.ukTwitter: @emblebi

Facebook:

EMBLEBI

Slide42

Now it's your turn…

Open your tutorial manual and begin Tree-thinking quiz 2 (appendix 2)The manual is available to download from:

http

://

www.ebi.ac.uk/training/course/scuola-di-bioinformatica-2013

When you are finished you can mark your own.Remember to ask for help at any stage!