/
Applying dependency parses and SRL: Applying dependency parses and SRL:

Applying dependency parses and SRL: - PowerPoint Presentation

myesha-ticknor
myesha-ticknor . @myesha-ticknor
Follow
382 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-01

Applying dependency parses and SRL: - PPT Presentation

Subject and Generic Attribute Discovery Stephen Wu Mayo Clinic SHARPn Summit 2012 June 11 2012 Outline Motivation and Role Generic Attribute Definition Methods amp Examples Subject Attribute ID: 543619

nmod subject dependency rules subject nmod rules dependency generic family patient pmod father path attribute died member rule semantic root amp methods

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Applying dependency parses and SRL:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Applying dependency parses and SRL: Subject and Generic Attribute Discovery

Stephen Wu, Mayo Clinic

SHARPn Summit 2012

June 11, 2012Slide2

OutlineMotivation and RoleGeneric AttributeDefinitionMethods & ExamplesSubject Attribute

Definition

Methods & Examples

Status & Future WorkSlide3

Attribute DiscoveryClinical Element ModelsExclude genericFamily history

Methods: Dependency Parser and SRLSlide4

Methods summaryTypes of rulesNoun phrase structurePath to rootPath between pairsSemantic arguments

Feature vector

Decision logic/MLSlide5

(a) The patient was referred to the

Lupus

clinic.

(b) We discussed increased risk of

breast cancer

Definition

:

“refers to mentions, which are generic, i.e., not related to the instance of a disorder, sign/symptom, etc…”

“… Mentioned as part of a general statement with no clear subject/experiencer.”

Values

:

in {true, false} default=false

Generic: Attribute DefinitionSlide6

Ex: Noun phrase structure Rule (a) The patient was referred to the Lupus clinic.

Find the headword of the NE

Modifies another noun (nmod)?

Generic: Dependency parse rules

referred

patient

w

as

sbj

adv

nmod

to

the

pmod

vc

nmod

clinic

the

nmod

L

upus

generic=

trueSlide7

Ex: Path to root Rule (“Discussion” context) (b) We discussed increased risk of breast cancer

Find NE headword

Path to top

“Discussion” word?

Generic: Dependency parse rules

increased

discussed

sbj

nmod

nmod

risk

We

pmod

obj

of

breast

nmod

cancer

discuss,

ask, understand, understood, tell, told, mention, talk, speak, spoke, address

generic=

trueSlide8

(c) The patient’s son has

schizophrenia

.

(d) Father died of

MI

in 50’s

Definition

:

The person the observation is on. This modifier refers to the entity experiencing the disorder.”

Values

:

in {Patient, Family_Member, default=Patient Donor_Family_Member,

Donor_Other, and Other}

Subject: Attribute DefinitionSlide9

Ex: Semantic argument Rule (c) The patient’s son has schizophrenia.

Semantic argument

(ARG0, ARG1)

Family term (WordNet)

Subject: Semantic role labeling rules

‘s

patient

has

PRED

the

schizophrenia

ARG1

subject=

family_member

son

ARG0

father, dad, mother, mom, bro, sis, sib, cousin, aunt, uncle, grandm, grandp, grandf, wife, spouse, husband, child, offspring, progeny, son, daughter, nephew, niece, kin, familySlide10

Ex: Path to root Rule (family) (d) … father who died of MI in 50's

Find NE headword

Path to top

Family term?

Subject: Dependency parse rules

MI

father

pmod

died

pmod

adv

in

50s

tmp

subject=family_member

of

who

nmod

nmodSlide11

Ex: Dependency paths Rule (d) Father died of MI in 50's

NE + “Family” pairs

Find dependency path

Once-removed?

Subject: Dependency parse rules

MI

Father

pmod

died

pmod

adv

in

50s

tmp

subject=family_member

of

s

bjSlide12

Methods summaryTypes of rulesNoun phrase structurePath to rootPath between pairsSemantic arguments

Feature vector

Decision logic/MLSlide13

Status and Future WorkcTAKES v2.5“Assertion” moduleDefaultFuture work (with data)

Evaulation & Error analysis

Improved rules

Features in machine learningSlide14

Thank you.https://sites.google.com/site/stephentzeinnwuwu.stephen@mayo.edu

Task 4/6 team:

Stephen Wu

Cheryl Clark

James Masanz

Matt Coarr

Ben Wellner

Special thanks to:

Lee Becker

Guergana Savova

Pei Chen

This work was supported in part by the SHARPn (Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects) Area 4: Secondary Use of EHR Data Cooperative Agreement from the HHS Office of the National Coordinator, Washington, DC. DHHS 90TR000201.