/
Amy Susman-Stillman, PhD Amy Susman-Stillman, PhD

Amy Susman-Stillman, PhD - PowerPoint Presentation

natalia-silvester
natalia-silvester . @natalia-silvester
Follow
380 views
Uploaded On 2018-02-26

Amy Susman-Stillman, PhD - PPT Presentation

Amanda L Sullivan PhD LP Elyse M Farnsworth MA Childcare Type and Quality among Subsidy Recipients with and without Special Needs Context CCDBG Reauthorization OPRE interest in special populations ID: 636444

children special center care special children care center quality amp based subsidy subsidies subsidized status accessed years child differ

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Amy Susman-Stillman, PhD" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Amy Susman-Stillman, PhDAmanda L. Sullivan, PhD, LPElyse M. Farnsworth, M.A.

Childcare Type and Quality among Subsidy Recipients with and without Special NeedsSlide2

Context CCDBG ReauthorizationOPRE interest in special populationsDifferences in early care and education experiences? Benefits from subsidies equally experienced?Unique considerations? Slide3

Young Children with Special NeedsSubstantial portion of young children are at-risk (Boyle, et al, 2008; Rosenberg, Zhang, & Robinson, 2005)Developmental DelaysCongenital DisordersDevelopmental DisabilitiesChronic IllnessesSlide4

Why Does Differential Use for Young Children with Special Needs Matter?Educational AttainmentMental HealthHealthRelationshipsEmployment & EarningIndependent LivingCriminal Justice InvolvementSlide5

Consequences of Early Childhood Special NeedsSlide6

Study FrameworkHigh quality ECE beneficialSubsidy use increases use of licensed & publicly-funded programs Subsidy use increases use of quality (usually centers)Subsidy density related to quality careGoal/Assumption:Current LiteratureSlide7

Unique quality considerations Structural Adult:childCaregiver knowledgePhysical environment, equipmentProcessCaregiver-child relationshipIntensity of caregiving needsHow do subsidies affect the type and quality of care that families with children with special needs select? Slide8

Research QuestionsDoes type of care for subsidy users differ by special need status?What types of care are accessed by subsidized children with special needs?What is the quality of care accessed by subsidized children with special needs?

Do subsidized children with special needs spend more time in child care than non-subsidized children with special needs? Slide9

Data Source and Analytic SampleData SourceEarly Childhood Longitudinal Study – Birth Cohort (ECLS-B)Nationally-representative dataset of children born in US in 2001Analytic Sample (9 months, 2 years, 4 years)Children eligible for subsidies ranged from 1,498,800 at 9 mo - 1,404,300 at 4 years (weighted; unweighted 4000 (9 mo) -3100 (4 years)Subsample 1: All children using subsidies (weighted N= 163,000 at 9 mo – 101,700 at 4 yrs; unweighted N = 450 at 9 mo - 300 at 4 yrsSubsample 2 : Subsidy-eligible children with special needs (weighted N= 81,500 at 9 mo - 344,350 at 4 yrs; unweighted = 450 at 9 mo – 1250 at 4 yrs Slide10

Study VariablesSlide11

Study VariablesSlide12

Ecological Predictors of Type & QualitySlide13

Does choice of care differ by special need status?Slide14

Does choice of care differ by special needs statusSlide15

What Types of Care Are Accessed by Children with Special Needs?Slide16

What Predicts Use of Home or Center-Based Care by Subsidy-Eligible Children with Special Needs? 9 months2 years4 years1 or more siblings Home Center Center Home & Center

Unmarried parents

Home &

Center

Home & Center

Maternal work status

Home & Center

Home & Center

Home &

Center

HS or less (v. > HS)

Center

No healthcare subsidies

Center

Region

Center (South)

Gender, race, home language not English,

m

aternal age, use of food subsidies non-significant

Slide17

Caregiver:Child and Hours of CareSubsidy-using children with special needs, compared to their non-subsidy-using peers with special needs:were more likely to experience caregiver:child that did not meet quality standardsused more hours of care than non-subsidy-using children with special needs (all z scores significant at p < .05)Slide18

What is the quality of care accessed by subsidized children with special needs?No consistent improvement in access to quality careSlide19

SummarySlide20

ImplicationsAttention needs to be paid to the quality of care accessed by families with children who have special needs, both on the parent/consumer end and the provider end.Family characteristics not necessarily consistent predictors of care for children with special needs.Parental underutilization of subsidy because quality is harder to access? Slide21

Thank you For more information, please contact:Amanda Sullivan, asulliv@umn.eduAmy Susman-Stillman, asusman@umn.eduVisit www.cehd.umn.edu/ceed/projects/subsidyutilization/default.html Slide22

CCBDG Allows State FlexibilitySlide23

Does choice of care differ by special need status? 9 months2 years4 yearsSubsidized special needsHome-based Center-based Home-basedCenter-basedHome-basedCenter-basedSubsidized no special needsHome-based

Center-based

Home-based

Center-based

Home-based

Center-based