Guo Ru PhD CESE Tongji University ruguotongjieducn Outline Review Ecocentrism Review Describe the meaning of ethics Describe the meaning of environmental ethics Explain the differences between ethics and environmental ethics ID: 791003
Download The PPT/PDF document "Environmental Ethics China’s sustaina..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Environmental Ethics
China’s sustainable development
Guo
Ru
Ph.D
.
CESE,
Tongji
University
ruguo@tongji.edu.cn
Slide2OutlineReviewEcocentrism
Slide3ReviewDescribe the meaning of ethicsDescribe the meaning of environmental ethics
Explain the differences between ethics and environmental ethics
Slide4Ethics vs Environmental EthicsEthics : A major branch of
philosophy that includes a set of principles of right conduct
. Environmental ethics : is concerned with the moral relations that hold between humans and the natural world.
Slide5Differences between Traditional Ethics and Environmental Ethics
Traditional Ethics
Environmental Ethics
Back-
ground
Racial liberation, women liberation, etc.
Environmental crisis & movement
Range of moral standing
Within human being
Out of human being, within Species, ecological system
Ideology
Anthropocentrism
Nonanthropocentrism
Nature
’
s value
Instrumental value
Intrinsic value
Slide6Ecocentric and Anthropocentric worldview
In the field of
environmental ethics, two contrasting worldviews describe the extremes on a continuum (moral line). Ecocentric or “nature-centred
” Nature is more important.Anthropocentric
or “human-centred”.Human is more important.
Slide7The ways of seeing the world greatly influence our decision making and related actions!
Slide8Case
Discussion DDT case
Topic: Who is responsible for harm caused by DDT? How should we do?Requirement: each group (3-4 people) select one stakeholder and give your answer on behalf of this stakeholder(5 minutes)
Summary: 2 minutesQ&A: 1 minute
Slide9DDT
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, commonly known as DDT, is a powerful insecticide that combats the vectors of human disease and crop pests. DDT was first used in World War II to combat infectious disease in humans, but its main use was as a pesticide.
Paul Hermann Müller who discovered insecticidal properties of DDT was awarded Nobel Prize in1948.Problems with DDT arose when it was discovered that the compound is stable and fat soluble, which means that it accumulates in animal fat tissue and becomes more and more concentrated in the offspring of infected species. Thus, It can greatly disturb ecological balance.
Slide10The Effect of DDT on Ecosystems
E.g.,
DDT in Lake Kariba (Zimbabwe, Zambia)
Slide11QuestionsWho is responsible for harm caused by DDT? Why?
Governor?Scientist?
Chemical company?Farmer?consumer who ask for too much?Others?How should we do?
Slide12Case summaryThe root of environmental crisis lies in the behavior of human being.The ideology and related actions can greatly influence the whole world.
Slide13Ecocentrism
Slide14What is Ecocentrism?
Ecocentrism : a philosophy that recognizes that the ecosphere, rather than any individual organism, is the source and support of all life and as such advises a
holistic and ecological approach to government, industry, and individual.
Slide15Aldo Leopold (1887-1948)A forester, conservationist, ecologist
The first one to call for a rethinking of ethics in light of ecology. A Sand County Almanac (1949)
a watershed event in the history of environmental thought
Slide16Leopold’s early research
In his early research, Leopold was to game management.Game Management (1933) :game species such as deer were
“resources” or “crops”.His early opinion regarding predators : varmints
Slide17The change to ecocentric viewLeopold found the problems with the conservationist approach to nature after field experiences and research.
A mere object cannot be manipulated for human ends without repercussions. The overpopulation of deer herds after killing predators
An ecological conscience that reorganizes an intrinsic worth in natural systems was developed and presented by Leopold then.
Slide18Thinking like a mountainOur belief that the earth is dead matter arises in part from our inability to recognize the
“enormously slow, intricate, and interrelated functions” of its life process.Our shortsightedness was more likely to harm than to help the balance of nature.
Slide19Land ethicsThe story of Odysseus
He hanged a dozen of his women slaves for misbehavior because slaves were understood as property at his time.Since that time ethics has evolved to a point where moral standing is extended to all human beings. And the land ethics is Leopold
’s call to continue this extension of ethics to include land, plants and animals.
Slide20Land ethicsMan had an obligation to the land
rather than a dominion over itEthics holism: community (land) outweighs individual
Land as organism
Slide21Leopold’s moral rule
A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise.”
Slide22Leopold’s version of holism
Ethical holism: Right and wrong are a function of the well-being of the community, not of its constituent members.A practical reason: failure of more individualistic thinking.To think only in terms of individual plants and animals often leads to risky land management policies.
Slide23Criticisms on the Land EthicsEthics holism: Environmental fascism
When deer overpopulation threatens the stability of the herd or the integrity of an entire ecosystems within which the deer live, we might have an obligation to selectively kill individual deer.What happens if humans harm the integrity of an ecosystem?
Slide24Deep Ecology
Slide25DescriptionDeep ecology refers primarily to the approach to environmental issues
developed by Naess,Bill Devall,and George Sessions.Deep ecology indicts what is calls the dominant worldview as being responsible for environmental destruction.
Slide26Shallow Ecology and Deep Ecology(1973)Shallow Ecology: fight against pollution and resource depletion
An anthropocentric approach protecting the health and affluence of the people.Focus on the immediate effects of environmental crisisDeep Ecology: a relational, total-field perspective, rejecting the anthropocentric approach
Focus on deep philosophical causesWhat’s the difference?
Slide27QuestionWhat’s the mainstream perspective now? Shallow or deep
?
Slide28A cure for the environmental crisis can come only with a radical change in our philosophical outlook.This change involves both personal and cultural transformations and would affect basic economic and ideological structures.
Slide29How to step outside our personal and cultural worldview or ideology and alternate it to something radically different?
Deep ecologists use a variety of strategies.Poetry, Buddhism, spiritualism, political activism via civil disobedience and ecosabotage.
Slide30Arne Naess (1912-)A Norwegian philosopher
Founder of Deep EcologyDirect action1970, Arne Naess chained himself to rocks in front of a waterfall in a Norwegian fjord and refused to descend until plans to build a dam were dropped.
What’s your comment to
Naess’s action?
Slide31The Deep Ecology PlatformDeep ecologists believe that a radical transformation in our worldview is necessary. Thus they proceed in two directions:
The types of changes neededSeek to develop and articulate an alternative philosophy to replace the dominant worldview.
Slide32The Deep Ecology PlatformUltimate norms
Principles: Deep Ecology Platform8 rules
Slide33Two Ultimate Norms of Deep Ecology
Self-realizationThe role of human life is one part of the ecosphere.
No one is saved until we are all saved.Biocentric equalityAll organisms and entities in the ecosphere, as parts of the interrelated whole, are equal in intrinsic worth.
Slide348 rules of Deep Ecology Platform
(1) The flourishing of human and non-human life on earth has intrinsic value. The value of non-human life forms is
independent of the usefulness these may have for narrow purposes.(2) Richness and diversity of life-forms are values in themselves and contribute to the flourishing of human and non-human life on earth.
(3) Humans have no right to reduce this richness and diversity except to satisfy vital needs;(4) Present human interference with the non-human world is excessive
, and the situation is rapidly worsening
Slide358 rules of Deep Ecology Platform
(5) The flourishing of human life and cultures is compatible with a substantial decrease of the human population. The flourishing of non-human life requires such a decrease.
(6) Significant change of life conditions for the better requires change in policies. These affect basic economic, technological, and ideological structure.(7) The ideological change is mainly that of appreciating life quality (dwelling in situations of intrinsic value) rather than adhering to a high standard of living. There will be a profound awareness of the difference between
big and great.
(8) Those who subscribe to the foregoing points have an obligation directly or indirectly to participate in the attempt to implement the necessary changes.
Slide36Criticisms on Deep EcologyIt has overgeneralized in its critique of anthropocentrism and the dominant worldview. Not all humans and not all human perspectives are equally at fault for environmental problems.
Not very helpful to the environmental concerns of peoples of developing countries
Slide37Any Questions or Comments?
Slide38Thank you!