/
TRAM KIM LAM TRAM KIM LAM

TRAM KIM LAM - PDF document

norah
norah . @norah
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2021-10-01

TRAM KIM LAM - PPT Presentation

RFA CONCEPT PROPOSALMETABOLIC DYSREGULATION AND CANCER RISKA TRANSDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO OBESITYASSOCIATED CANCER RESEARCHTransNCI Collaboration Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesD ID: 891579

metabolic cancer dysregulation risk cancer metabolic risk dysregulation obesity insulin research common resistance related projects measures response clinical identify

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "TRAM KIM LAM" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 TRAM KIM LAM RFA CONCEPT PROPOSAL METABO
TRAM KIM LAM RFA CONCEPT PROPOSAL METABOLIC DYSREGULATION AND CANCER RISK: A TRANSDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO OBESITY - ASSOCIATED CANCER RESEARCH Trans - NCI Collaboration: Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division of Cancer Biology Division of Cancer Prevention Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities DECEMBER 1, 2020 BSA CONCEPT FRAMEWORK OBJECTIVES 1. Investigate the mechanistic role of metabolic dysregulation underpinning the obesity - cancer link. 2. Characterize an altered metabolic profile (e.g., metabolic - related markers) to identify high - risk individuals. 3. Test interventions

2 designed to modify obesity altered - met
designed to modify obesity altered - metabolic pathways to decrease cancer risk. INTENT To support transdisciplinary research that will enhance our knowledge of the dynamics, and underlying mechanisms, that link obesity, metabolic dysregulation, and cancer risk. Research Project Grant 1 OBSERVATIONAL INTERVENTIONAL Complements and extends current knowledge by focusing on m etabolic dysregulation as a key mechanism linking obesity to cancer risk. PRE - CLINICAL BIOLOGIC PROCESSES Inflammation ● Immune Response ● Oxidative Stress ● Sex Hormones ● Lipid Metabolism ● Other THE OBESE STATE

3 → Metabolic - dysregulated “Disease
→ Metabolic - dysregulated “Disease” State OBESITY MODULATING FACTORS Microbiome ● Environmental ● Lifestyle ● Occupational METABOLIC ABNORMALITIES Insulin resistance Hyperinsulinemia IGF - 1, IGFBP, IR Hyperglycemia Dyslipidemia Adipokines CANCER RISK Chronic Positive Energy Balance INTERVENTION 2 UNDERSTUDIED DIVERSE POPULATIONS Race/Ethnicity ● Socioeconomic ● Geography • Lifestyle modification • Metformin • Gastric Bypass IGF - 1: Insulin - like growth factor - 1; IGFBP: Insulin - like Growth Factor Binding Protein; IR=Insulin receptors; PI3K: Phosphatidyl inositol - 3 kinase; MA

4 PK: mitogen - activated protein kinase;
PK: mitogen - activated protein kinase; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin RESEARCH PRIORITIES • What is the relationship between insulin resistance and cancer risk? • How does metabolic dysregulation affect anti - tumor immune and inflammatory response in relation to cancer risk? • Are overweight/obese individuals with a metabolic dysregulation profile at higher risk of cancer compared to those (overweight/obese or nonobese) with a normal metabolic profile? • Can weight loss or other clinical interventions improve abnormal metabolic profiles (i.e., insulin resistance) and modify cancer risk? 3 RESP

5 ONSIVE APPLICATIONS 1. Focus on obesity
ONSIVE APPLICATIONS 1. Focus on obesity - associated metabolic dysregulation • metabolic - related phenotypes 2. Use objective measures of adiposity 3. Address a pressing need or gap in obesity - cancer research 4. Accept the inclusion of common measures and participation in collaborative research 5. Comprehensive Data Sharing Plan 4 OBSERVATIONAL INTERVENTIONAL • Case - control; Cohorts • Molecular Pathological Epi • + Preclinical model • Interventional (INT) • Clinical trial • + Preclinical model POSSIBLE STUDY STRATEGIES MUST INCLUDE POSSIBLE ENDPOINTS • Cancer risk; cancer precursors â€

6 ¢ Markers of carcinogenesis • Metaboli
¢ Markers of carcinogenesis • Metabolic - related markers (INT/Trials) RFA: U01/COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CLINICAL TRIALS OPTIONAL Program Staff Pre - Submission/Submission * Assess responsiveness of applications * Provide programmatic guidance * Identify common themes from applicants Steering Committee Award * Identify common themes across projects * Identify common measures that could be assessed by two or more projects * Identify possible collaborative projects Program Staff with SC Post - Award * Provide programmatic and scientific guidance to address gaps * Provide support to foster investigation o

7 f emerging concepts that will require
f emerging concepts that will require collaborative science 5 STEERING COMMITTEE (SC)* *Steering Committee: NCI staff, funded PIs, and coordinating center BUDGET • Total Costs: $40M for 5 years • $8M per year • Research Project Grants: $7M total cost per year • 6 projects (average $1.15M per grant) • Coordinating Center: $1M total cost per year 6 SHORT - TERM GOALS • Understand the mechanisms of how obesity - related metabolic dysregulation affects cancer risk. • Insulin resistance • Characterize cross - talks between metabolic dysregulation and key biologic processes* in obesity - related can

8 cer risk. • Inflammation; immune respo
cer risk. • Inflammation; immune response • Develop common measures and readouts of obesity - related metabolic dysregulation for different cancer types. • Enable synergy across studies and inform pilot collaborative projects 7 *BIOLOGIC PROCESSES: Inflammation ● Immune Response ● Oxidative Stress ● Sex Hormones ● Epigenetic Changes… REVIEWERS’ COMMENTS and CLARIFICATIONS (Drs. White, Beckerle , and Brawley) • Broad potential for topics, suggest greater clarity of examples that are responsive to FOA • Areas of research priorities to be emphasized in the FOA language: • Insulin resi

9 stance and cancer risk; how does insulin
stance and cancer risk; how does insulin resistance influence cancer risk? • Effects of metabolic dysregulation on immune and inflammatory response and cancer risk • Programmatic guidance at pre - application stage to answer questions in advance of submission deadline • Clarification for the opportunities for synergy within the consortium • Identification of common data/measures • Pilot collaborative projects to investigate emerging concepts guided by the SC • Clarification, pre - clinical models do include animal models • FOA language will clarify the inclusion of animal models to investigate mech