/
Epistemology Epistemology

Epistemology - PowerPoint Presentation

olivia-moreira
olivia-moreira . @olivia-moreira
Follow
493 views
Uploaded On 2016-06-02

Epistemology - PPT Presentation

Professor Christopher Ullman Christian Life College 2 Everyone has a concept of what is truefalse Each person decides how important truth is to him Each of you know of ways to test a statement to see if it is true ID: 345248

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Epistemology" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Epistemology

Professor Christopher Ullman Christian Life CollegeSlide2

2

Everyone has a concept of what is true/false.

Each person decides how important truth is to him.

Each of you know of ways to test a statement to see if it is true.

These underlying presuppositions govern our thoughts, words, choices, and actions.Slide3

3

 

Consider these questions asked by thinking people

What is truth?

Can we even define truth?

Can we know truth?

Can we know truth with certainty?

Is truth merely opinion controlled by the dominant forces of our society?

How is it that so many people have so many different views of truth?

Is truth relative?

How can we say something is false if we have no way of determining what is true?Slide4

4

Some truth tests

 

Pragmatism

: truth is that which works. If something works, then it must be true.

Coherence

: there is an essential internal harmony of ideas. If something does not harmonize with the ideas that already cohere, it may not be true.

Correspondence

: truth corresponds to reality, identifies things as they actually are.

 Slide5

5

Poststructuralism

is an intellectual movement that

completely rejects “binary oppositions” such as

true/false

right/wrong

good/evil, and

formulates views consistent with that rejection.

These dualistic concepts are believed to be rooted not in reality, but in modernistic philosophy that has “scripted” Western thought and culture. Slide6

6

 

Postmodernism

rejects the belief in universal absolute truth that transcends culture, time, and space by

redefining

it to say that truth is that which is

Created

Defined

Articulated by local (sub) communities.

Young people today are choosing a postmodern worldview over and against all other worldviews. Slide7

7

5 Ways to Know Something

Empirical: through sensed perceptions

Rational: through reason apart from the senses

Mystical: immediately, apart from the senses and reason

Pragmatical: by finding out what works

Authority: through a trusted source Slide8

8

Consider these questions asked by thinking people

Can we trust our senses?

What are the proper roles of reason and sense experience in knowledge?

Are our intuitions more dependable than our perceptions?

What is the relationship between faith and reason?

Is knowledge about God possible? If so, how?

Should we appeal to “mystical downloads” for spiritual knowledge?Slide9

9

Sources of Knowledge

1. Reason alone (excluding faith)

2. Faith alone (excluding reason)

Faith + Reason (God created people to think rationally)

Intuition

Sensed perceptions

AuthoritySlide10

10

A Tale of Two Systems

Continental philosophers taught that human knowledge comes not originally or even primarily from sense experience, but from reason. This is

rationalism

.

Rene Descartes: I think, therefore I am

Baruch Spinoza: the essence of each and every thing is a way that God causes himself to exist

Gottfried Leibniz: we have innate ideas, but all ideas that come from the senses are confused Slide11

11

A Tale of Two Systems

Some problems arose for the rationalists

The Theory of Ideas

“What you

know

when you perceive a brown table is the idea of a brown table.”

The key word here is

know.

The Problem of the External World

How do we know there’s a world

out there

?

The Problem of Other Minds

How do I know that

you

have a mind?Slide12

12

A Tale of Two Systems

The Rise and Fall of

Empiricism

Rejecting rationalism and innate ideas, three British philosophers come rushing into the room:

John Locke

: “The mind is a blank slate”

Sensed experience begins to fill it

Reflection arranges it

George Berkeley

: “The objects of human knowledge are ideas, not things”

You cannot know the carrot, but you can know the idea “carrot”Slide13

13

A Tale of Two Systems

David Hume

: all that is real consists of sensations, and these are unconnected to one another

What about things we do not personally experience? We cannot prove they are causally connected to anything else

So we accept out of custom or habit that one idea is caused by another

Knowledge boils down to non-rational operations of the soul

“We can stop our philosophical researches”Slide14

14

Ontological

The study of the nature of existence, or what it means “to be”:

Is basic reality found in matter or physical energy (the world we can sense), or spirit/spiritual energy?

Is reality lawful and orderly or chaotic?

Is reality fixed and stable or ever-changeable?

Is reality friendly, unfriendly, or neutral in regard to humanity?Slide15

15

Basic Question In Epistemology…

Is there truth independent of human experience?

A Priori knowledge

A Posteriori knowledgeSlide16

16

A Priori Knowledge:

Is independent of human awareness

Is true whether humans know/accept it or not

Exists prior to human experience

Traditional science has upheld the superiority of

a priori

knowledge as it represents the fixed and permanent world that is ‘uncontaminated’ by human knowers Slide17

17

A Posteriori Knowledge:

Requires human experience for verification of truth/knowledge

Modern philosophers claim

a posteriori

knowledge is superior, and that

a priori

knowledge does not even exist!Slide18

18

3 Basic Positions on the Objectivity of Knowledge:

Humans are

recipients

in the knowledge process.

Humans are

participants

in the knowledge process.

Humans exist as ‘pure objects’ who become

manufacturers of truth

rather than recipients or participantsSlide19

19

Sources of Knowledge:

Empirical Knowledge

:

composed of ideas formed from observable data

Sensory Knowledge

:

knowledge obtained through the Senses

Revelatory Knowledge

:

knowledge that is revealed through a transcendent or supernatural reality that breaks into the natural order/realitySlide20

20

Sources of Knowledge:

Authoritative Knowledge

:

accepted as truth because it comes from experts or is sanctioned over time by tradition

Rationalism/Reason:

emphasizes the power of thought & what the mind contributes to knowledge, the senses are not enough

Intuition:

knowledge that is not the result of conscious reasoning Slide21

21

Validity of Knowledge

Corresponding Theory

Coherence Theory

Pragmatic TheorySlide22

22

Validity of Knowledge - Tests of Truths

Correspondence Theory:

theory fits the data collected & analyzed through research

if the judgement corresponds with the facts it is true

method most often used by those working in the sciencesSlide23

23

Validity of Knowledge - Tests of Truths

Coherence Theory:

places its trust in the consistency of harmony of all ones’ judgments

a judgment is true if it is consistent with other judgments that have previously been accepted as true

there is an agreement on the boundaries, logic & phenomenon of the theory Slide24

24

Validity of Knowledge - Tests of Truths

Pragmatic Theory:

there is NO such thing as static or absolute truth

people know only their own experiences

the test of truth is in its utility, workability, or satisfactory consequencesSlide25

25

Epistemology

What is Epistemology?

“The theory or science of the method or grounds of knowledge.”

—Webster’s Dictionary

“The branch of philosophy that is concerned with the theory of knowledge. It is an inquiry into the nature and source of knowledge, the bounds of knowledge, and the justification of claims to knowledge.”

—FeinbergSlide26

26

“Today evangelical Christians stand at a greater distance from those with whom we communicate than we did just 20 years ago. At that time, even those who rejected Christianity were prepared to discuss whether the evidence for Christianity’s truth was adequate. Today, this is much less frequently the case. Before we can broach the question of whether the Christian gospel is true, we have to establish that such a thing as truth exists.” Slide27

27

A Conversation Between Protagoras and Socrates (4

th

Century B.C.)

Protagoras:

Truth is relative. It is only a matter of opinion.

Socrates:

You mean that truth is mere subjective opinion?

Protagoras:

Exactly. What is true for you is true for you, and what is true for me is true for me. Truth is subjective.

Socrates:

Do you really mean that? That my opinion is true by virtue of its being my opinion? Slide28

28

A Conversation Between Protagoras and Socrates (4

th

Century B.C.)

Protagoras:

Indeed I do.

Socrates:

My opinion is: Truth is absolute, not opinion, and that you, Mr. Protagoras, are absolutely in error. Since this is my opinion, then you must grant that it is true according to your philosophy.

Protagoras:

You are quite correct, Socrates. Slide29

29

Epistemology

Self-defeating statements:

“I cannot speak a word in English.”

“My wife has never been married.”

“We cannot know anything about God.”

“There is no such thing as truth.”

“Truth cannot be known.”Slide30

30

Epistemology

A short history of western civilization:

Three periods:

Premodern (400-1600 A.D.)

Modern (1600-1900 A.D.)

Postmodern (1960-present)Slide31

31

Epistemology

Premodern

Modern

Postmodern

400

1600

1960Slide32

PRE-MODERNISM: THE TIME AND WORLDVIEW WHEN

TRUTH INCLUDES

HEAVEN

GOD

EARTH

NATURE

OTHERS

SELF

THE TRUTH IS

UP THERE

AND

OUT THERE

32Slide33

33

PRE-MODERN WORLD

Embraced the objectivity of truth

The preference was for a

Platonist, or

neo-Platonist

notion

of reality

There is an

objective, or external realm

that is transcendent

Reality existed independently

of any individual apprehension of it”

For the Christian pre-moderns, this independently existing realm of transcendence was

the mind of God

. Erickson,

Evangelical Interpretation

, 100.

There was a belief in the referential understanding of language; that is, “language referred to something beyond itself,” Erickson,

EI

, 100. Slide34

34

PRE-MODERN WORLD

There was belief in the

“Correspondence Theory of Truth”

which asserted that “true ideas are those that accurately correspond to the state of affairs as it is

.”

In terms of hermeneutics, the pre-modern period accepted that “the

meaning of a text was . . . within that text

in a rather literal or straightforward fashion. . . . Hermeneutics was in this approach virtually equivalent to exegesis.”

The premodern understanding of

reality was teleological

. There was believed to be a purpose or purposes in the universe.”Slide35

MODERNISM: THE TIME AND WORLDVIEW WHEN

TRUTH INCLUDES

EARTH

INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE

REASON ONLY

THE TRUTH IS

OUT THERE

35Slide36

36

Transition

1900-1960

Epistemology

Modern

PostmodernSlide37

POST-MODERNISM: THE TIME AND WORLDVIEW WHEN

TRUTH INCLUDES

INDIVIDUALS GROUPED IN COMMUNITIES

THE TRUTH IS

ONLY IN HERE

37Slide38

38

POST-MODERNISM: Impact

Ideas have legs! It is impossible to understand postmodernism without noting its impact on our culture

What begins in the ethereal realm of the academy eventually will show up in popular culture

The Arts

Architecture

LiteratureSlide39

39

Truth and Tolerance

“In Postmodernism, there is no objective, universal truth; there is only the perspective of the group. . . . In postmodernism, all viewpoints, all lifestyles, all beliefs and behaviors are regarded as equally valid. . . . Tolerance has become so important that no exception is tolerated.”

Charles Colson, Slide40

40

Modernist Objections to Christianity

What about all the contradictions?

God is just a crutch. Religion was invented by man.

Jesus was just a man.

The Bible we have today is not the same as when it was written two thousand years ago.

I don’t believe in what I can’t see.

Evolution has proven Christianity to be wrong.Slide41

41

Modernist Objections to Christianity

The Bible is a myth full of fairy tales.

How did Noah get all of the animals on the Ark?

There are no such thing as miracles.

Do you really believe in the story of Adam and Eve?

Slide42

42

Postmodernist Objections

to Christianity

If God exists why is there evil?

The inquisition and the Crusades show that Christianity is oppressive.

Christianity is

a

way to God but not the

only

way.

Christianity is arrogant and exclusive.

How do you know that your Bible is better than other religious writings?

Why does God allow bad things to happen to good people? Slide43

43

Postmodernist Objections to Christianity

What about those who have never heard?

The church is full of hypocrites.

Why would God send anyone to Hell?

The God of the OT is cruel, partial, and unjust. Slide44

44

Modernism vs. Postmodernism:

Objections to Christianity

Modernist

Postmodernist

Facts

Rationality

Evidence

Fairness

Relationships

Emotion`Slide45

45

Modern View of Truth

Correspondence view of truth:

(1) Truth is an objective reality that exists whether someone believes it or not, (2) and (to the modernist) that objective reality has no definite basis.Slide46

46

Modern View of Truth

True statements are that which correspond to that objective reality.

False statements are those that do not correspond to that objective reality.Slide47

47

Modern View of Truth

Law of non-contradiction does apply

 

A

-A at the same time and in the same relationship. Slide48

48

Modern View of Truth

What is an example?

Key Motto:

Man can and will know all truth.

Slide49

49

Postmodern View of Truth

Relativism:

what is right/wrong, true/false is determined by some group.

Subjectivism:

what is right/wrong, true/false is determined by each individual.

Pragmatism:

what is right/wrong, true/false is determined by what works.Slide50

50

Postmodern View of Truth

What is an example?

Law of non-contradiction does not apply

A = -A at the same time and in the same relationship.

No objective truth

Key Motto: The truth cannot be known.Slide51

51

Postmodern View of Truth

Religious Spin on Postmodern Epistemology

Universalism: All will make it to Heaven.

Pluralism: Many ways to God that are equally valid.

Syncretism: Assimilation of differing beliefs and practices.

Inclusivism: Salvation is only through Christ, but Christ may be revealed in other religions.Slide52

ENGAGING THOSE WITH POSTMODERN WORLDVIEWS

Acknowledge your culture-encoded version of Christianity

Affirm truth, love and compassion

Magnify the importance of faith perspectives

Show respect

Learn to listen to and tell postmodern stories

52Slide53

53

The Second Vatican Council: Roman

Catholicism slides into universalism

1962-1965

“But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the creator. In the first place among these there are the Moslems, whom professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful god, who on the last day will judge mankind. Those also can attain salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the gospel of Christ or his church, yet sincerely seek god and, moved by grace, strive by their deeds to do his will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience.”

Q. Why support mission evangelism any longer? Slide54

54

Christian View of Truth

What is the Christian view of truth?

Correspondence view of truth:

(1) Truth is an objective reality that exists whether someone believes it or not, (2) and that objective reality has God alone as its objective basis.Slide55

55

Christian View of Truth

The law of non-contradiction is a foundational necessity to all truth.

God cannot even violate this principle since it is a logical impossibility.