/
CABE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEDERAL & STATE POLICY ISSUES CABE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEDERAL & STATE POLICY ISSUES

CABE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEDERAL & STATE POLICY ISSUES - PowerPoint Presentation

onionchevrolet
onionchevrolet . @onionchevrolet
Follow
347 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-26

CABE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEDERAL & STATE POLICY ISSUES - PPT Presentation

FEDERAL LIBI GIL Assistant Deputy Secretary and Director of OELA STATE Martha Zaragoza Diaz CABE Legislative Advocate Jan Corea CABE CEO Key Bills Followed by CABE Key BillsJune 2016 ID: 788291

2016 000 bill board 000 2016 board bill teacher resolution english lobbying education language purpose school june amended expenditures

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "CABE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEDERAL & ST..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

CABE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FEDERAL & STATE POLICY ISSUES

Slide2

FEDERAL LIBI GIL

Assistant Deputy Secretary

and

Director

of

OELA

Slide3

STATEMartha Zaragoza Diaz

CABE Legislative Advocate

Jan Corea

CABE CEO

Slide4

Key

Bills Followed

by

CABE

Slide5

Key Bills-June 2016

AB 2091 (Lopez) Special Education: IEP-Translation Services. Introduced: Feb. 17, 2016.

Amended May 21, 20126. Status: Senate Appropriations. Position: Support

This bill would require a local educational

agency to provide

translation services for a pupil's parent, guardian, or educational rights holder, as specified. As amended, the translated copies would be made available 60 days after the IEP meeting. The translation is to be done by a qualified translator. Also requires the California Department of Education, by January 2018, to post on its internet website standard special education forms commonly used by LEAs into at least 10 most commonly used non-English primary languages of the state’s pupils.

Slide6

Key Bills – June 2016

AB 2350 (O’Donnell) English Learners. Introduced: Feb. 18, 2016

.

Amended May 27, 2016. Status: Senate Appropriations Committee. Position: Support

This bill prohibits EL students from being prevented from enrolling in courses required for graduation or to meet college admission requirements, requires that English Language Development courses designed for LTELs confer graduation credit, and defines SDAIE, Integrated & Designated ELD to align with the newly adopted content standards and ELA/ELD Framework. CDE would develop a video series demonstrating best practices for implementing designated and integrated ELD and would be required to revise its existing research-based guidance document on improving the education of

Els

. A $1.2 million Title III carryover funds is proposed in the 2016-17 State Budget for this purpose.

.

Slide7

Key Bills June 2016AB 2785 (O’Donnell) Special Education: English Learners Amended April 7, 2016 & April 27, 2016. Status: Assembly Suspense File. Position: Support

This bill requires, by July 1, 2018, the CDE to develop a manual for the purpose of providing guidance to LEAs on identifying, assessing and supporting English learners who may qualify for special education services.

SB 915 (Liu) Teacher Recruitment: California Center on Teaching Careers. Introduced: Jan. 26, 2016

.

Amended May 31, 2016. Status: Senate Appropriations.

Position: Support.

This bill reestablishes the California Center on Teaching Careers for the purpose of recruiting qualified individuals into the teaching profession with a focus on chronic teacher shortage areas including

bilingual

and special education teachers.

Slide8

Key Bills – June 2016SB 916 (Allen) Teacher Credentialing. Introduced: Jan. 27, 2016

.

Amended June 14, 2016. Status: Senate Appropriations. Position: Support

Current law authorizes the Commission on Teacher Credentialing to issue single subject teaching credentials only in specific subjects. This bill would add dance and theatre to the list of authorized subjects. This bill contains other related provisions and other current laws.

SB 933 (Allen) Teachers: California Teacher Corps Act of 2016: teacher residency programs. Introduced

:

Feb. 2, 2016.

Amended: June 14, 2016. Status: Senate Appropriations. Position: Support.

This bill would enact the California Teacher Corps Act of 2016 under which grants would be available to applicant LEAs and consortia of LEAs to assist these agencies

Slide9

Key Bills – June 2016

SB 933 (Allen) continued

in establishing, maintaining or expanding a teacher residency program as defined. The teacher residency program is to, among other duties, meet hiring needs of the LEA to fill areas, such as chronic teacher shortage areas, including

bilingual

and special education teachers and hard to staff schools. The teacher residency program is to produce culturally responsive teachers who address specific pupil populations, local district initiatives and priorities and teacher preparation emphasis while maintaining high state established standards for credentials. Sixty million one time General Fund money appropriated for the purpose of awarding competitive grants of $20,000 per resident of the jurisdiction of the LEA as matched by that LEA.

Slide10

Key Bills – June 2016

AB 491 (Gonzalez) English Learners: Proficiency Assessment. Introduced March 26,2016. Amended May 31, 2016. Status: Senate Appropriations Committee. Position: Not yet determined.

As introduced the bill dealt with revising criteria specific to the reclassification of ELs. The original content of this bill has been deleted and was amended May 31, 2016. The bill now deals with parent notices and ability for parents to dispute determinations of home language survey. The bill would require the following additional items for inclusion in the current parent notice of an assessment of a pupil’s English proficiency: 1)Whether a child is an LTEL or at risk of becoming an LTEL, 2) the manner in which the ELD instruction will meet the educational strengths and needs of LTELs or at risk of becoming LTELs, 3) the manner in which the program for ELD instruction will help LTELs or at risk of becoming LTELs develop English proficiency and meet age-appropriate academic standards. CDE would be required to make available to public schools a sample notification letter to be

Slide11

Key Bills – June 2016AB 491 (Gonzalez) continued

provided with the home language survey. The letter is to include purpose of the home language survey with specified statements including the ability for a parent to dispute the school district’s determination of their child’s primary language and ask the school district to re-determine the child’s primary language.

Slide12

EdGE Initiative

Update on Campaign

Board and organization Resolution Process

Endorsement of Campaign

Guidelines

Questions

Slide13

CA Ed.G.E Overview

The

Ed.G.E

Initiative

advances California’s goals

:

Providing

highest quality education for

all children

Preparing

students for college and

careers in the 21st Century economyAccessing high-quality, innovative, research-based educational programs

Empowering

parents, teachers, and

local schools

to meet the needs of all students

Slide14

What does it (really) do?

The

proposed measure, upon voter approval, would

repeal and recast parts of

Proposition 227.

Repeals

the English Only presumptive placement for English Learners.

Removes the English Learner parent waiver requirement

Encourages the development of programs that develop

multiliteracy

skills (such as dual language immersion programs) for our students

.

Changed the trigger re how many students at a school site are needed to advance a request for a multilingual program

to 30 students school wide or 20 students per grade level

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB1174

http://bit.ly/217ko4e

Slide15

Campaign UpdateCampaign Staff

Lisa

Gasperoni

, Campaign Manager

Robyn Swanson, Media

Michelle Henry—Coalition Building

Don Weitzman, Fund Raiser

Steering Committee (Donate $250,000 or more)

CTA

SEIU

Advisory Committee (Being formed--$10,000 donation)

Slide16

PollingContracted for by SEIU

Results will be available by July 4

Voter Information Packet

Ballot Statements and Arguments

Statements due July 12 by different groups

Attorney General is working on the Title, Description and Number

Slide17

Endorsers

CTA

ACSA

PTA

CSBA

CLSBA

CA League of

Women Voters

CFT

CA Democratic Party

SEIULA Chamber of CommerceCABE

Californians Together

Slide18

ACTION STEPSJuly

:

Promoting Board Resolutions and Endorsements

Fund

Raising

Social Media Campaign—start structuring

Print Materials/brochure—to be developed

Contact translators for a variety of languages (Spanish, Vietnamese, Korean, Chinese, Arabic, and

Tagalog

August

Board Resolutions and Endorsement forms presented and adopted

Initiate social media campaign

Fundraiser in San Francisco and San Diego

Launch communications campaign (editorial boards, press releases, speakers training, etc.)

Slide19

RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

For educators and community members the following options are suggestions on how to bring a resolution to a local board of education.

Develop the language for the resolution keeping in mind the members who are going to vote on the resolution. Use the sample resolution in these materials and then look at the talking points to see if adding any other language might be more persuasive for your community.

Once the language of the resolution is finalized you can either take it to a school district cabinet member or a school board member asking them to place it on the agenda for the next school board meeting.

Another option is to work with a group in your community and present the resolution at a school board meeting during public comment, asking the board to put the resolution on the agenda and to take a vote in support.

The goal is to have the resolution passed by the August or September board meeting.

Send copies of adopted resolutions to:

Lisa

Gasperoni

,

lisa@

lgcampaigns.com

,

Shelly

Spiegel-Coleman at

Shelly@californianstogether.org

.

Slide20

DOCUMENT REVIEWENDORSEMENT FORM

SCHOOL BOARD RESOLUTION

ORGANIZATIONAL RESOLUTION

Due by Sept 30, 2016

Slide21

Lobbying Rules

for Nonprofits

CABE Board Meeting

November 15, 2014

Slide22

Federal Tax Laws

California Political Reform Act

Relevant Laws

Slide23

A 501(c)(3) nonprofit will

lose its tax-exempt status and its

ability

to receive deductible charitable contributions if a

substantial

part of its activities are carried on to

influence legislation.

Federal Tax Law

Slide24

Advocacy on State ballot measures is considered grassroots lobbying.

“Insubstantial Part” Test

501(h) Expenditure Test

Federal Tax Law

Slide25

Complete Form 5768

Calculate your “lobbying limit”

Spend up to 25% of the lobbying limit on

grassroots

lobbying

501(h) Expenditure Test

Slide26

501(h) Expenditure Test

 If the amount of exempt purpose expenditures is:

 Lobbying nontaxable amount is:

 ≤ $500,000

 20% of the exempt purpose expenditures

 >$500,00 but ≤ $1,000,000

 $100,000 plus 15% of the excess of exempt purpose expenditures over $500,000

 > $1,000,000 but ≤ $1,500,000

 $175,000 plus 10% of the excess of exempt purpose expenditures over $1,000,000

 >$1,500,000

 $225,000 plus 5% of the exempt purpose expenditures over $1,500,000

- See more at: http://www.councilofnonprofits.org/nonprofit-advocacy/501h-election#sthash.s1kcjcyC.dpuf

Slide27

If an organization has $3 million

in expenditures

5

% times

$1,500,000

=

$75,000

$

75,000 plus $225,000 =

$300,000 (lobbying limit)

$

300,000 times 25% =

$75,000 (grassroots lobbying limit)

501(h) Expenditure Test

Slide28

EXAMPLE:

Nonprofit Budget

= $100,000

Lobbying Limit

= $20,000

Grassroots Limit

= $5,000

501(h) Expenditure Test

Slide29

Only covers

expenditures

and the following expenditures are exempt:

Making available the results of nonpartisan analysis, study or research

Communications with bona fide members

Federal Law

Slide30

Supporting or opposing ballot measures in California is

not

considered lobbying under California lobbying law

Existing nonprofits that solicit/receive contributions of $1000 or more in a calendar year earmarked for the passage or defeat of a ballot measure (or spend more than $50,000 on ballot measures) must register as a committee and

file

campaign reports

IMPORTANT FOR CABE

Slide31

Employees spending less than 10% of their time

Fee for services at fair market value

Bona fide member communications

Newsletters

Public Education Campaigns

IMPORTANT

FOR

CABE

xemptions

Slide32

Garcia

, Hernández, Sawhney & Bermudez,

LLP

www.ghsblaw.com

Slide33

CABE’s RoleJune –September

Advisory Committee--$10,000

Board Resolutions

Endorsements

Fund Raising

Public Awareness