/
Optimal Option Investment Strategy Optimal Option Investment Strategy

Optimal Option Investment Strategy - PowerPoint Presentation

myesha-ticknor
myesha-ticknor . @myesha-ticknor
Follow
429 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-21

Optimal Option Investment Strategy - PPT Presentation

Sponsor Dr KC Chang Tony Chen Ehsan Esmaeilzadeh Ali Jarvandi Ning Lin Ryan ONeil Spring 2010 Outline Background amp Problem Statement Project Scope Requirements Assumptions Approach ID: 561670

price amp strategies optimal amp price optimal strategies loss investment background risk future analysis expiration recommendations return volatility strike project requirements ruin

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Optimal Option Investment Strategy" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Optimal Option Investment Strategy

Sponsor: Dr. K.C. ChangTony ChenEhsan EsmaeilzadehAli JarvandiNing LinRyan O’NeilSpring 2010Slide2

Outline

Background & Problem StatementProject ScopeRequirementsAssumptions

ApproachMethodology

Modeling

Analysis

Evaluation & Recommendations

Conclusion & Future WorkSlide3

Background

Investors can potentially earn huge profits by trading assetsMany investors trade on speculation and attempt to predict the marketOptions allow investors to trade with greater leverageSlide4

Definitions

Option Contract – A conditional futures contract to trade an asset at a given price and date. Option buyer gets right to exercise contract.Positions – Long (buyer) and short (seller) Expiration date –date underlying assets are tradedStrike price – Price the commodities are tradedPremium – Option priceSlide5

Definitions

Two general types: call (right to buy) and put (right to sell)American and EuropeanShort Strangle Strategy:Simultaneously selling a call and a put with the same expiration dateTypically call strike price > commodity price and put strike price is < commodity priceSlide6

Background – Short StrangleSlide7

Background – Strangle Payoffs

Call: Commodity price less than strike pricePut: Commodity price greater than strike priceSlide8

Background – Stop Loss

Stop Loss – Maximum amount seller is willing to lose. Executed by buying back the same optionSlide9

Volatility Smile

Volatility smile results from variation in implied volatility among options that vary only on premium value.Slide10

Previous Team This project is a continuation of Fall 2009 project

Estimated premiums using Black-Scholes modelEstimated return using strike prices, stop-loss, and days before expiration as inputSlide11

Problem StatementPrevious group used fixed implied volatility. Due to volatility smile, this results in inaccurate premiums.

Tradeoffs between profits and risk of ruin need to be balanced using a equity allocation and risk management methods.No easily accessible tools to quickly assess strangle strategy performance.Slide12

Optimal Option Investment Strategy Project Goals

To provide policy recommendations for the option sellers to balance profit and risk of loss using historical dataTo determine the optimal fraction for investment with associated risk of ruinTo develop a graphical user interface to provide useful information investors can act on.Slide13

Business CaseOur model and tools can aid fund managers to quickly assimilate information about the current options market conditions

We provide a software tool to display equity curves over a specified period of time. Our tool also shows payoffs from fractional investment allocations to match returns and risk of ruin to customer demandSlide14

Outline

Background & Problem StatementProject ScopeRequirements

AssumptionsApproach

Methodology

Modeling

Analysis

Evaluation & Recommendations

Conclusion & Future WorkSlide15

Project Scope

Range of data: 2004-2009 Underlying asset is S&P 500 future indexShort strangle strategies onlyCall strike prices +5 to +50 Put strike prices -5 to -50Stop loss from 5 to 45 and without limitMaximum acceptable volatility at 30, 40, 50 and without limitSlide16

Assumptions

Strategies missing more than 50% of data points (months) are ignoredOnly have closing price data so trade after marketOur trades do not affect the marketDo not simulate trading slippage (always a willing trade partner)Do not consider interest rate or inflation (time value of money)Slide17

Requirements [1 of 2]

Provide recommendations on investment strategiesrecommendations are based on expected return on investment and risk of ruinProvide a range of optimal strategies that trade off risk and return according to investors’ risk tolerancesSlide18

Requirements [2 of 2]

Develop a Graphical User Interface (GUI) to display results, statistics, and visual representation of selected strategies Take filtering criteria from users in the model interfacePlot the return (equity curve) for various fractional allocations of capitalSlide19

Approach

Research relevant papers and previous workParse and organize the historical data Develop the trading modelValidate model & analyze results Determine optimal strategiesDevelop graphical user interface Slide20

Outline

Background & Problem StatementProject ScopeRequirements

AssumptionsApproach

Methodology

Modeling

Analysis

Evaluation & Recommendations

Conclusion & Future WorkSlide21

Optimal Fraction AllocationFractional Investment: choosing investment size by fraction of equity Optimal f: fractional investment which brings the highest return

Relevant research: Kelly FormulaVince FormulaSlide22

Fractional Investment AlgorithmSlide23

Risk of RuinDefinition: Ruin is the state of losing a significant portion (often set at 50%) of your original equity

Futures Formula: Wherea = mean rate of return d = standard deviation of the rate z = how we define ruin. Here is 50%. Slide24

Methodology VerificationSlide25

Outline

Background & Problem StatementProject ScopeRequirements

AssumptionsApproach

Methodology

Modeling

Analysis

Evaluation & Recommendations

Conclusion & Future WorkSlide26

ModelingSlide27

Modeling

GUI ApplicationOptimization Model Days before expiration

Put & Call strike prices Stop loss Maximum volatility

Average return

Final TWR

Maximum Draw-Down

Optimal

Fraction

Risk of RuinSlide28

Outline

Background & Problem StatementProject ScopeRequirements

AssumptionsApproach

Methodology

Modeling

Analysis

Evaluation & Recommendations

Conclusion & Future WorkSlide29

Evaluation MetricsTerminal Wealth Relative (TWR) –

Average percent return – mean of monthly returnsMaximum drawdown – greatest negative difference between two dates over a time period Slide30

Days Before Expiration 2007-2009Slide31

Days Before Expiration – Individual YearsSlide32

Stop-Loss 2007-2009Slide33

Strike Prices 2007-2009

Day 44 Before ExpirationDay 42 Before ExpirationBetter strategies lie around call = +5 and put = -15Slide34

Volatility Index

Number of Strategies No Max. VixTotal Number Of Strategies = 34000 Max. Vix = 30Total number of Strategies = 33320Max.

Vix = 50Total number Of Strategies = 34000Slide35

Sensitivity AnalysisOptimal Strategy:

Call Price = +5Put Price = -15Stop-loss = 20Days before expiration = 42Fraction allocation = 100%Strategy Output:Final TWR = 711Risk of ruin = 0%Average monthly return = 16%Percent winning trades = 88%Maximum draw-down = 15%

Methodology:

Vary parameters of the optimal strategy one at a timeSlide36

Sensitivity AnalysisSlide37

Sensitivity AnalysisSlide38

Outline

Background & Problem StatementProject ScopeRequirements

AssumptionsApproach

Methodology

Modeling

Analysis

Evaluation & Recommendations

Conclusion & Future WorkSlide39

EvaluationDays 39-44 provide the highest returnStop-loss amounts of 15-25 were most common in the top strategies

Continuing to trade in high volatility market resulted in higher final returnSlide40

RecommendationsManageable higher stop-loss values should be chosen rather than low stop-loss values which can be difficult to implement in a volatile market.

Fractional investment allocation should also be less than 100% to avoid ruin because the market is constantly moving and therefore the future is still uncertain.Slide41

ConclusionIt would not be necessarily accurate to use our exact optimal strategies in the future since it may only remain optimal for a short period of time

A continuously weighted forecasting model with current data should be used to update optimal strategiesSlide42

Future WorkExpansion of scope to analyze more complex strategies to yield higher profits

Obtaining a more complete and suitable data set especially for earlier years to find better patterns for forecasting the futureAddition of adaptive logic so that optimal strategies are calculated using only a portion of dataSlide43

Questions