ASSISTID PI Workshop - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

ASSISTID PI Workshop

23rd April 2015Clonsilla, Dublinwww.assistid.euSlide2
Slide3

The ASSISTID programme

2014-2019ASSISTID is an international Training and Career Development programme which will fund 40 postdoctoral researchers in the area of ‘Assistive Technologies for Intellectual Disabilities or Autism Spectrum Disorders’ to improve the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities or autism, their carers and families.

Research topics include:Assisted living,

Behaviour Analysis, Social Science, Speech and Language Therapy, Rehabilitation & Counselling, Computer Science, Ethics and Policy, and Education. All projects must involve the assessment, application or development of Assistive Technologies.

The €9M ASSISTID programme is co-funded by the EU Marie Curie action and by the charity RESPECT.

ASSISTID is co-ordinated by the DOCTRID Research

Institute and the management team of Prof. Brian Harvey, Dr. Sheeona Gorman, Ms Gretta FitzGerald & Ms. Alie Kwint.

DOCTRID RI is a distributed research network consisting of all universities on the island of Ireland together with partners in the UK and USA. Slide4

The ASSISTID

programme 2014-201940 Fellows will be funded- 32 Incoming and 8 outgoingIncoming mobility: Applicants not having resided or carried out their main activity (work , studies, etc) in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) for more than 12 months in the 3 years immediately prior to the deadline for submission of proposals.

Outgoing mobility: At the deadline for submission of proposals, applicants must be resident in ROI and must be either ROI nationals or long-term residents (3 yrs) in ROI. Applicants shall not have resided or carried out their main activity (work, studies, etc.) in the country of their host

organisation for more than 12 months in the 3 years immediately prior to the deadline. Slide5

Call 1: 1

st Sep-30th Nov 2014. 8 Fellowships offered. Expected start date July 2015Rolling call (currently open) 1st Jan- 30th June 2015. Staggered start dates (approx. Aug and Oct 2015) Call 2: 1

st Jul-30th Sep 2015. Expected start date Feb 2016Applications are made entirely through the ASSISTID website (www.assisted.eu)

1) A completed online application form2) Project proposal (max 10 pages)3) The Applicant’s CV (max 5 pages)

4) A Letter of Motivation (max 2 pages)5) Optional: A Letter of Support from the scientist(s) in charge of the supervision of the fellows, countersigned by the Dean/Vice-president of Research of the Host Organisation.

6) Written approval letter of the DOCTRID Research Board for fellowships based in institutions outside the DOCTRID network.

Timeline of callsSlide6

Evaluation processSlide7

S&T Quality

Training

Researcher

Implementation

Impact

Sub

Criterion 1

Research/technological

quality, including any

interdisciplinary and

multidisciplinary aspects of the proposal

Sub Criterion 1

Clarity

and quality of the research training objectives for the researcher

Sub Criterion 1

Research

experience

Sub Criterion 1

Feasibility

and credibility of the project, including work plan

Sub Criterion 1

Impact

of competencies acquired during the

fellowship on the future career prospects of

the researcher, in particular through exposure to transferable skills training and if relevant with exposure to the private sector

Sub Criterion 2

Appropriateness

of research methodology and approach

Sub Criterion 2

Relevance

and quality of additional research training as well as of transferable skills offeredSub Criterion 2Research results including patents, publications, teaching etc., taking into account the level of experienceSub Criterion 2Quality of infrastructure /facilities and (inter)nationalcollaborations of host Sub Criterion 2Contribution to career development, or reestablishmentwhere relevant  Sub Criterion 3Originality and innovative nature of the project, andrelationship to the 'state of the art' of research in the fieldSub Criterion 3Host expertise in training experienced researchers in thefield and capacity to provide quantitative and qualitative mentoring/tutoringSub Criterion 3Match between the fellow's profile and project Sub Criterion 3Practical arrangements for the implementation and management of the research project  Sub Criterion 3Development of lasting cooperation and collaborations with other countries Sub Criterion 4Timeliness and relevance of the project  Sub Criterion 4Independent thinking and leadership qualities. Potential for reaching or reinforcing a position of professional maturity. Sub Criterion 4Practical and administrativearrangements, and support for the hosting of the fellow Sub Criterion 4Benefit of the project outcomes to people with intellectual disabilitySub Criterion 5Host research expertise in the field and quality of the group /scientist in charge Sub Criterion 5Potential to acquire new knowledge  

Evaluation CriteriaSlide8

Marking scale

Scoring range

Up

to

0

Very

poor

Criterion

is not addressed at all or unable to be evaluated. A

ll information is missing or not relevant

0 – 0.9

1

Very poor

Inadequate

content,

confusing or condradictory

information, poor

presentation

,

criterion

addressed

in

superficial

manner

.

1 – 1.9

2

Poor

Acceptable

ideas, but serious weaknesses in addressing the criteria. Poor justification of the research. 2 – 2.93FairSome good points and some weaknesses. Criterion is addressed well but some improvements are required. 3 – 3.94GoodCriterion is very well addressed, some improvements are possible. 4 – 4.95Excellent Criterion is perfectly addressed with very minor weaknessesSlide9

27 ASSISTID proposals submitted

1 proposal ineligible due to mobility issuesASSISTID Success Rate50

% success rate at interview33% overall success rateAverage MC success rates 16-18%

26 proposals through to Remote Review stage

18 proposals reached 70% score minimum threshold

8 proposals did not reach the minimum threshold

18 candidates invited for interview

16 candidates attended interview (7 via GoToMeeting)

8 candidates offered ASSISTID Fellowship

ASSISTID Call 1 by numbers

Transparency of ASSISTID Review Process

“Tell

the organisers it was a pleasure to deal with such a transparent process with good feedback. 

All

fellowship applications should run like

yours”Slide10

What are we looking for?

Projects in the area of Intellectual Disability, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability with DementiaProject must involve Assistive Technology: -development of new technology, -application or modification of existing technology-assessment of the adoption/policy/ethics/provision of ATRESPECT encourages:- proposals focused on moderate-severe/profound ID

Proposals enhancing the QoL, Social interaction, Education and Employment.Proposals addressing challenges of Community living

- involvement of the DoC or other ID Services , ASD Schools etc..either through secondment or including service users in study design/AT applications

Junior and senior researchers are accepted equally:-Reviewers advised to take candidate’s experience into consideration and the value of the training appropriate to their stage of career development.

Letter of Support from PI is now required in the application.Slide11

Specific Issues – Relevance

Guide notes to EvaluatorsObjective of ASSISTID fellowships: “to equip researchers with the skills to assume leadership roles within the Services that provide for the education, social inclusion and employment of people with autism or ID. This will ensure societal relevance of the research project and the translation of knowledge to improve care for people with autism and ID”. Project outcomes must include Assistive Technologies either in their development and application, assessment and relevance, or adoption that enhance the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities, ASD, or dementia with ID.Slide12

Specific Issues – Career Development/Training

Objective of ASSISTID fellowships: “the individual research project must allow the fellow to enhance and diversify their scientific skills and to further develop their scientific careers”Development of scientific skills (deepening of skills, widening the skill set, acquiring research experience in industry or in the services)Development of transferable skills (leadership skills, presentation skills, IPR knowledge etc)Improved career perspectives after ASSISTID fellowship Slide13

What makes a successful project?

Scientific Excellence- Relevence to ID/ASD, well developed methodology‘The envisaged output is impressive and will have a substantial impact in the field’‘a good command of existing research and issues and proposes

an appropriate and innovative plan to develop new techniques for measurement and

intervention’Training/Implementation- Clear

measurables, implementation plan stated‘methodology is well described in sufficient detail’

‘Research training objectives are described in a very clear and detailed way’‘The work plan is ambitious but feasible. It is well thought through. It is clear she prepared it with

care’‘The training objectives are concrete’The project plan is excellent: carefully designed, ambitious, broad in scope but sharp in focus’‘Realistic implementation plan’

Researcher-Both junior and senior have equal opportunities

‘Applicant is well suited to the project and has requisite background to carry out project goals’‘highly motivated and displays a clear sense of understanding of the topic and the needs of people with ID’

Impact- Aim of project clearly stated with specific measurable outcomes and relevance to ID/ASD‘Clear impact for

consumers’‘The scholarship will greatly contribute to the career development of the applicant’‘During the planned two years the applicant will get relevant and transferable skills

.‘Assuming the pilot/development work pans out, I think this has a high probability of significant impact for researchers in the area and maybe down the road for

clinicians’Slide14

Unsuccessful proposals

(Did not reach threshold after Remote Review)Most common criticism was lack of information on methodology and objective. A strong topic/researcher will not compensate for unclear and undetailed methodology/aims!‘There are no training objectives explicitly

stated’‘Hard to tell if each phase of the work plan is of sufficient or excessive length due to lack of methodology details’

‘There is a lack of information about the details of the methodology..what

functions will be assessed and how,what techniques will be

used..how progress will be monitored’‘The implementation lacks details, such as a time frame, a more refined idea about the involvement of end

users and their families. It is not clear how they will impact on the design and how they will be selected/recruited’‘Research questions and methods vague. Justification for why people with autism need this

intervention not clearly made’‘Potentially useful intervention, but not clear how efficacy will be demonstrated which reduces estimated impact’

‘I would rather like to see more details on how the applicant sees the difficulties in developing a user interface/intelligence system for autistic patients’

‘The stated research goals lack technical details, which makes it difficult for an expert in the field to evaluate if the project

has merits and sufficient research opportunities’‘Training objectives not specific enough. High quality host.’Slide15

Unsuccessful after interview

Some strong projects, and motivated candidates but ASSISTID was not the most appropriate programme (eg lack of AT, panel found on close questioning that the research was not very relevant to ID or ASD)A lack of understanding about challenges in ID/ASD research, lack of mentor in this areaNot enough focus on, or planned engagement with, people with ID or ASD.

Lack of detail on analysis, research methods . No empirical or evidence-based studies.Resubmission

Candidates with strong proposal but lacking detail in the behavioural psychology aspects, involvement and relevance to people with ID-ASD-Dementia advised to revise and resubmit with suitable co-PI/mentor and empirical studies.Candidates welcome to resubmit basing their revised proposal on reviewers comments and interview panel feedback

.Slide16

Next steps

Principle Investigators* Provide a current overview of your research area and attractive projects for potential candidates to view on the ASSISTID Website www.assistid.eu * Actively source and encourage applications from promising candidates in your area* Write a Strong Letter of Support for inclusion by the Applicant.

* Engage with the Applicant in drafting the Proposal* Review proposal-ensure clear methodology/aims/outcomes and relevance to People with ID/ASD/Dementia+ID

* Impact of proposal addressing the evaluation criteria.DOCTRID TeamEnsure assisted website is up to date, clear and attractive for potential candidates

?FAQs UpdatesAvailable for support throughout the processProvide information to help PI’s disseminate projects

Contact ASSISTID Programmes Manager: Sheeona Gorman sgorman@respect.ie +353 (0)1 685 6004Slide17

How can

we help you?The DOCTRID TeamBrian Harvey

Sheeona GormanAlie Kwint

Gretta FitzgeraldBreda

HawkshawAlejandro Sotomayor

www.assistid.eu